User talk:Chris G/Archives/2007/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 44 | 29 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot 3. Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 03:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Im back
- Well I reported the email, blocked any emails from him so they'd be deleted as soon as he sent them, then I let MySpace know about this impostor myspace which he made to parody my MySpace. They did nothing so I reported again. Hopefully they'll figure out he's copying me and insulting me. He put the music as the national anthem of canada and put my ethnicity as Asian and it's just a really bad insult. I had to delete my blog after he insulted me, called my fiancee Gem a cow and asked if I fed her pure lard. I was just sick of him. Luckily I'm back and splitting my time between Wikipedia and The Odyssey Online Wiki Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 10:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Your bot request
Hi Chris G I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot 3 has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot 12:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for your block on spammer:Sabbirhs. I was just getting ready to go to bed when I started traking this person, and was glad to see him shut down. LonelyBeacon 08:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Same. He was frustrating! Auroranorth (sign) 09:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Smile
Modla has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Bot 3
Hi Chris G - your bot #3 (the status updater) is running a bit slow. It sometimes doesn't even adjust my status to offline/online. I was on earlier today and it didn't change at all (see the page history). Do you know why? Auroranorth (sign) 05:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. And well done on the successful RfA! Auroranorth (sign) 09:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi!
My name is Gp75motorsports, and I am trying to get a bot past BRFA. Its name is AntiMalBot, and it prevents other bots from malfunctioning. Seeing as I don't know anything about Perlwikipedia, I need you to come up with a source code for it. Please post it on my talk page. Thanks! --Gp75motorsports 22:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- You should post this to WP:BOTREQ. --Coastergeekperson04 02:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
You're a sysop!
Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, block anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on articles for deletion for more than 5 days (provided there's a consensus), protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.
Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»=PS Please add you name to WP:LA!
=Nichalp «Talk»= 05:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations. Now you can check for deleted edits at WP:CHU/U - oh yeah, and all the actually interesting stuff you can use admin tools for ;-) ... WjBscribe 05:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats! --Hdt83 Chat 05:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations,
{{BASEPAGENAME}}
- Congratulations,
- Congrats! --Hdt83 Chat 05:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Question for you on the IP block
First, thanks for blocking him. It was needed. My question is, is 24-hour the standard block for such a persistent (and blatant) vandal? I'm not complaining, just curious, as I would have liked to have seen a bit longer, to perhaps wane his interest in vandalizing that article. K. Scott Bailey 03:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Understood. I'm not certain I understand about the "level 3 warnings" and all that. To me, vandalism is vandalism, and there should be a 2 strikes your out policy. Vandalize once, shame on you. Vandalize twice, you're indef blocked, and banned for life. As an aspiring Wikidragon (only two articles, one major revision, and one stub under my belt to date, with neither of the two I wrote being even close to GA yet), vandals are the bane of my existence. Lately I've been delving a little too deeply into the namespace, and it's been taking time away from what I'm really best at, so I guess I'll leave the "adminning" up to those of you who have the cursed (I don't think I would WANT the damned things!) tools. Thanks again for your help! Regards, K. Scott Bailey 03:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Deletiong Status...
Can you please delete this, I no longer want Statusbot User:StatusBot/Status/Miranda. Thanks. Miranda 10:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| Thank you so much for the block, I have wasted too much time on this guy. I just had to give you a barnstar!!! Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
- Amen, brother. Thank you very much for the block. This user was the hundredth sockpuppet of a banned user, and was making a lot of trouble. Thanks! Snowfire51 07:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- You also may want to block the user that left the message here. He has done the same thing to like 5 accounts.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- You also may want to block the user that left the message here. He has done the same thing to like 5 accounts.
- Keep up the good work bud. Thanks again, you work is very appreciated. Its hard to believe one person spends this much time just to vandalize Wikipedia, it amazes me. Well thanks again.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep up the good work bud. Thanks again, you work is very appreciated. Its hard to believe one person spends this much time just to vandalize Wikipedia, it amazes me. Well thanks again.
- haha our edits conflicted with each other, but thanks for grabbing that one too and the IP. Hopefully this will stop him for a little while. ;-)
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- haha our edits conflicted with each other, but thanks for grabbing that one too and the IP. Hopefully this will stop him for a little while. ;-)
- Thanks again! Snowfire51 07:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Here is an IP address he used where he manually signed as one of his accounts and then the IP address was transcluded there (i think by signbot) 71.129.234.151 I do not know if you want to block it or just watch it. But I cannot say this enough thanks for your help!
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Here is an IP address he used where he manually signed as one of his accounts and then the IP address was transcluded there (i think by signbot) 71.129.234.151 I do not know if you want to block it or just watch it. But I cannot say this enough thanks for your help!
- Thanks again! Snowfire51 07:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
13 year old admin??
Are u the youngest or are there admins even younger than you? Imagine what people will think when they find out you're only 13 years old and u are an admin! Stupid2 07:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Chris G has done a great job on a deadline when we've needed him, 13 or not. He's the man. Snowfire51 07:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I second that.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 07:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I second that.
- Yep, hes really good. Stupid2 07:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, Chris G is doing a great job, as are our other younger admins, like Animum. I am also an admin, and I am 12. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Let's just hope he doesn't get grounded :P (My god, I'm 7 years older than you. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 08:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, hes really good. Stupid2 07:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Another sock
Here is another sock of the user that you blocked yesterday. User:Glenn Aulepp.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 20:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- If you see more socks, pop me off an email. I try and monitor the situation, but I don't always see stuff as it happens. I've been sort of involved with this situation for a while now.--Isotope23 talk 20:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Your Bot
On Hardcore Haks page, your bot says he's "SOMEWHERE". Wth is taht supposed to mean? HIYO 22:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
we might need a stronger block
The 24 hour block on User talk:70.107.157.172 did not help. He/she went right back to vandalizing the page. --Brewcrewer 06:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
User Zhugs546
Refering to: | This warning
Chris, have a good look at the users history and the page history before blocking this user. He added a line that would pass quality requirements, yet was reverted by the reporter of the "Vandalism". After that, there was a short discussion where the origional editor was not involved. The line was removed again, then added, and then removed again. Zhugs546 didn't receive ANY notice that there was a discussion, so he could not have been aware this was discussed.
Im all for blocking vandals quickly, but this is not vandalism. From my point of view Zhugs546 qualified this as "Back stabbing negotiations" to get a line out and made a rather annoyed personal attack at the person who kept reversing it. However, i don't think this warrants handing an NPA4-im since this is certainly not clear and persistent vandalism, especially considering his clean history. I would rather see this go to mediation, or get discussed again, this time with inclusion of Zhugs546, who added the line after all.
--Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 09:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's the personal attack is worrying me, I thought that was quite offensive and there is no situation that I think any user should say such things to another user no matter what the circumstances, I under stand that there is something going on between these two editor, but I think the user made a bad decision going and doing that and if he does that again I am quite happy to administer a block, however I will also investigate the circumstances which cause that outburst and take other necessary action. --Chris 09:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, in all due honesty, i don't think this attack was all that serious. The only offending line i saw was "Fuck this and that and you". Don't get me wrong, i don't think the edit was good, but i have seen much, MUCH worse then that when patrolling for vandalism. Have a look at my own user page for an example. I have been called a "self-righteous twiddle", and have been advised to "go away, play with your scripts, follow your logic with your brain in neutral, and stop wasting my time" by an established editor.
I have no doubt that you can handle this correctly, but please do take into account that this is a clean account, which probably made a bad slip. Clear vandals get four warnings before getting blocked, so please be a little lenient on this one. :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 10:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, in all due honesty, i don't think this attack was all that serious. The only offending line i saw was "Fuck this and that and you". Don't get me wrong, i don't think the edit was good, but i have seen much, MUCH worse then that when patrolling for vandalism. Have a look at my own user page for an example. I have been called a "self-righteous twiddle", and have been advised to "go away, play with your scripts, follow your logic with your brain in neutral, and stop wasting my time" by an established editor.
User:Himhifi
You blocked User:Himhifi indefinitely for spamming. Actually, the user doesn't seem to be spammer. S/he has made several edits apart from adding links. The collection of external links added by the user doesn't comprise of spam sites. The user seems to be a little disruptive, though. You might want to consider changing the duration of the block. utcursch | talk 12:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- My bad, I defaulted to my regular aiv user block, thank for alerting me! --Chris 12:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Dude youre a beast at this whole admin thing, I keep on running into your name everywhere!! :-) Keep up the good work and thanks for the IP block from AIV.
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 08:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Smile
SJP:Happy Verterans Day! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Please block this anonymous user who is vandalising the same page instantly. Thank you very much! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 09:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh already blocked. --Edmund the King of the Woods! 09:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you, I will not disappoint.142.59.210.117 23:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
New Vandalous Email about me
Just got an email from the idiot again. tylerwarrenchugscock@yahoo.com was deleted so he made a new one
- Just saying hi
- From: Tyler Warren (tylerswienersmellslikedonuts@yahoo.com)
- You may not know this sender. Mark as safe | Mark as unsafe
- Sent: November 9, 2007 7:34:30 PM
- To: quotetheraven666@hotmail.com
- Hello phony..Just dropping by to say hello. You claim to be all bad-ass, and tough. You dont back down, but yet you run and hide everytime I try to speak to you. You report me for virtually nothing. I have never threatened you or anyhting. All I want is you to grow up and be a man. Admit that you are nothing but a friendless child, who goes around threatening people all the time. You are nothing but a phony, a tool, and a child. I am alot smarter than you. Stop being a little boy and just go about your buiness, stop bothering everyone else, and get busy pushing buggys.
- A few other quick things
- - The "bed" comment was not intended to be gay, just colourful language
- - You are a child
- - I am alot smarter than you
- - You will be a baby and report this email too I'm sure....be a man and respond...and I promise ( I keep promises), I will tell you who we(i) am/are eventually. If you keep closing my communication, you will never figure me out, and I will never tell you
- Hint 1.
- Canada
This guy's an idiot -.- Vampire Warrior 00:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
About your Chris G Bot 3
Hi! I'm currently using your really cool useful bot, but it lags a lot when it tells my current status (say, I come online for a long time, and then your bot changes my status to online). I would like to know why. Thank you.-- Vintei talk 22:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- That is cuz StatusBot only makes updates every 5 minutes. ^_^ HIYO 00:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Status Bot
I used to use Status Bot and since it stopped working so did my status updates. I tried to get it to work but now it says I am "Somewhere". Can you please help me configure it? Thanks,Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 04:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC).
Congratulations
HELP
- I may be a bit late, but i just noticed your succesfull adminship in the signpost: Congratulations! -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
please help me
Hello this is User:Rafff18I am sorry about using an open account at the school library to post, but I am not trying to sock, this is the only way I can communicate on wikipedia now. I have come to you Chris G because you were the first person to respond to the appeal of the indefinite block. It all started on Thursday when I re-added a small paragraph to the Montreal Screwjob page that had been deleted, all the information in it had ether already been discussed on the talk page or was a quote that I had a direct link to. instead of going through proper Wikipedia:Dispute resolution like I wanted User:Secret blocked me for 24 hours despite the fact that Wikipedia:Blocking policy said not to do this for disputes. the next day a friend of mine who added the information in the first place re added it and asked what was wrong. one of the people I had been in an edit war with User:Bmg916 claimed that "source fails WP:V, can you verify this was an actual interview with this actual person" so my friend posted a direct link to the sight with the interview [[1]] and he was still reverted without reason. After that an editor who I have had problems with in the past User:Scorpion0422 told secret that I was socking and he should block me indefinitely and without contacting me or my friend, or doing any research into it he complied. When I got home I discovered I had been blocked indefinitely and secret had made several false claims about me like that he had given me several warnings despite the fact he never talked to me, I was socking despite the fact that I had not been on wikipedia sense he blocked me the day before, and that I have a history of providing useful edits to pages.
When I originally appealed you responded by taking there side and claimed that I had a "history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia" despite the fact that that is not true. However you did give me a chance to get unblocked by making improvements to an existing article. I complied and added information to Playpen (fictional magazine) about shows, episodes, and, I added sources to the article. However another person that I was in the edit war with User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson deleted my work from my user talk page [[2]] and blocked me from accessing it without giving a reason, something tells me this douse not fall under the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. I did what you asked, so could you please lift the block on both my account and my user page. If you have any more questions for me go ahead and ask and if your answer is no please inform me why. Please unblock me
FYI, the above user has now been indef blocked for vandalism after he resumed his vandalism following my 48 hour block. JodyB Roll, Tide, Roll 12:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
TreebranchesWhy won't you let me keep my page on fishmatoes, it is most relivent to historyTreebranches —Preceding comment was added at 04:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Just Wondering
I saw that you placed a final warning on Treebranches page, and that you were the last one to delete Fishmatoes. Are you going to block the user? Just wondering. Thanks!-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 04:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh wait, now I'm confused, did you put the final warning on Treebranches page when I tagged it?-BlueAmethyst .:*:. 04:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
so what's the verdict
Hello Chris it's User:Rafff18 again and I was wondering what you decision was on User:secret block on my account. I have read secret response to you and have posted a counter on his talk page. It seems the only thing I did wrong was get into an edit war and if that was the case then the other people I was fighting should also have been blocked, especially User:Scorpion0422 who contently reverts and erases information from pages using week arguments like WP:NOT#INFO despite it not falling under any of the the criteria there, WP:Trivia despite it specifically saying not to remove trivia sections, and just labeling something as cruft because he ether douse not like it or find it interesting. Also he seems never to have read [[WP:ACM], check out the page Husbands and Knives this Sunday to see him in action.
I am not sure if you are a wrestling fan, and if you are you are probably to young to remember the Montreal Screwjob. it has been a very polarizing issue for wrestling fans and Hart's fans tend to hate anything that paints him less then a saint, notice how there main source of information comes from Bret's personal site (they felt the same way with Chris Benoit before the incident). I will admit that I took Shawn's side after the screwjob and have had similar arguments with hart fans over the last decade, one of them from about two years ago can be seen on the articles talk page when the content I added was originality discussed. However this is the first time I have been blocked indefinitely for merely disputing that Harts actions might have something to do with the WWF letting him out of his contract early.
Finally how do you report that an administrator is abusing there powers, specifically User:secret blocking me for a dispute while refusing to go through WP:DR and User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson for deleting and blocking my talk page. Also do you think my post are to long, because it took me over an hour to write this and i am not sure anyone even readies it if it's that long. thank you and please unblock me.
Page legality with Wikipedia guidelines.
Hello Chris,
Im having a few difficulties with this user sub page:
This page links to a web page where a man stuffs a rubber ball up, O well, guess you know where. Previously the page contained a tabled image, but after complaints the user created this link. I do not know what i should file here, or if anything shpuld be filed at all. It kind of looks like a UW-Link violation, but then again, its on a user sub page, so I do not know if it applies here. Could you have a look at this one please? Thanks in advance. :)
--Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 11:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Your bot request
Hi Chris G I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot (task 3) is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBotTalk 12:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Is this your user? Did you change your username? I did too. Where is the username archive? Mine is here. —Coastergeekperson04's talk@11.21.2007 00:42
Your RC cleanup
Hey Excirial, I see you a lot at RC patrol. You're definitely one of the finest vandal fighters I've come across. I'd give you a barnstar but it's too clichéd. So I'm just letting you know that every revert and report is really appreciated. I'm sure you will be a great asset with the tools one day. Cheers! Spellcast (talk) 09:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- And all your aiv reports have been great, I see an admin in the making! --Chris 09:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- (Becomes tomato red) Not so fast people, i didn't even recover from blushing from the previous compliment! Well, what can i say? I think: "Thanks a lot for the compliments, and glad to help!" Will fit in here just fine! I love doing this vandalism patrol, and perhaps i will issue an RFA someday. Not yet, since my account has been only 1 month old (Even though i have been around since March 2006 on IP level, but not exactly active). Perhaps some time in the future, when i have encountered more of the wikipedia guidelines. Im still quite green on those, and i want to make sure i know them more thoroughly before i request adminship :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 09:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
FYI. I'd take it as a compliment in a sad and repulsive way. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Cache
Hi, please refresh your cache. ;) The function was added and uses cookies so that you should allow them for en.wikipedia. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure how my edits to the Lolita Fashion page constituted vandalism. They were constructive and well-thought-out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.94.158 (talk) 09:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Editor Review
Hi buddy. As you're now an admin I'd suggest you remove the editor review. It's backlogged and clearly the community not only considers you a great editor but a bit more too!! Pedro : Chat 21:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, kind forgot about that, Thanks for the remider. --Chris 02:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Chris,
I have provided some links to support my arguments in the talk page of Riktam Technologies. And in a few days, I can provide you with more insights regarding this.
Thanks a lot, Aditya2you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya2you (talk • contribs) 10:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
you changed my edit for Click-N-ship. I work for tech support for the system. if you dont want my help in making wiki better the look up the information your self www.usps.com/onlinepostage/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.126.163.20 (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Sock Puppet is back
That sockpuppet is back. User:Unitscurve ZacBowling (user|talk) 09:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thanks for killing the sock puppet! ZacBowling (user|talk) 09:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
- Another editor found user User:Innerroads. ZacBowling (user|talk) 17:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
yo --Jack Cannery (talk) 05:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Chris G Bot 3
Hey. I noticed that your bot hadn't been updating mine (or anybody else's) status since the 27th. Checking the enabled page, it appears that someone enclosed the enabled bit in font tags. I don't know if this stopped it running, or something far more sinister. Just thought I'd bring it to your attention in case you hadn't noticed. ~~ [Jam][talk] 01:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Pope Mcdonald HermanXIX
Block him. He's a sock of User:PWeeHurman. -Goodshoped 06:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Status Bot
Does this really work--Hardcore Hak 15:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Hardcore Hak