User talk:Catlemur/Archive E
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Battle of the Eurymedon (190 BC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Eurymedon (190 BC) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
NOTED. I AM CHECKING TO SEE IF THOSE ARTICLES I EDITED THAT YOU RE-EDITED ARE COMPLIANT WITH WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. SO ANYTHING NOT CITED ON THERE WILL BE REMOVED.Pikespeak361 (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC) ABOVE IS FOR CATLEMURPikespeak361 (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of the Eurymedon (190 BC)
The article Battle of the Eurymedon (190 BC) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Battle of the Eurymedon (190 BC) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Good article backlog drive in March
 | March 2021 Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the March 2021 GAN Backlog Drive starts on March 1, and will continue until the end of the month. |
(t · c) buidhe 04:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Franc affair
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Franc affair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for helping out with the Paona Brajabasi page,sorry for asking this but can you help with this page too Wangkhei Meiraba - 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Luwanglinux: Gave it a look. My advice would be that you read through the Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria, maybe take a look at a couple of articles that have been ranked as B class and try and emulate their structure. Try to create more detailed articles with different sections for early life, military career, legacy. Look for sources at Google Scholar, libraries and local university academic repositories. This helped me a lot when I was starting out.--Catlemur (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Franc affair
The article Franc affair you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Franc affair for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Franc affair
The article Franc affair you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Franc affair for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
You generously reviewed Lancaster's Normandy chevauchée of 1356 for GAN. It is now at FAC - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lancaster's Normandy chevauchée of 1356/archive1 - and if you felt like repeating the favour I would be most grateful. Regards. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild: I am quite busy right now IRL but I don't mind helping out. Thing is I don't really know how exactly am I going contribute to a FAC especially when I have worked on the GAN (I would have pointed out if something was off right away instead of waiting for FAC). Would the first step be to study the Manual of Style in detail?--Catlemur (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Momentarily donning my FAC Coordinator hat, there are many ways of contributing to an FAC review. Reviewers are positively encouraged to submit partial reviews, but to indicate which parts they reviewed. So one sees for example "Support on prose", or "Support on prose and those parts of the MoS I am familiar with". Or I personally have made comments such as "I reviewed this at GAN and gave it a harder time than GAN really warrants. So apart from the additional minor issues below I believe that it is up to FAC." For this nomination the first nominator, Hog Farm, has specified just which FAC criteria they have reviewed against, but there is no requirement nor expectation that a reviewer does this. Nominators (eg myself wearing my nominator hat) would like reviewers to cover as much as possible, but I urge you to "just" review what you are comfortable with. This is more likely to make you a repeat reviewer, and your comfort zone will grow with time.
- MoS: (almost) no one knows all of the MoS, so don't worry about it too much. Flag up thinks which you know, or are reasonably sure, are against the MoS; maybe look up the odd thing you are not sure about; and feel free to ignore anything you can't be bothered to check.
- I hope this helps. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Vardar offensive
I did not delete the Ivanov source or any reference to it. I changed them to SFNs like 96.77% of the other references. I would of changed the last 2 refs but sources with no author, no publication date and no pages make poor SFNs.
Are you talking about the following change?
-to-
- ... machine gun positions and artillery pieces. ...[3]
Closer examination will show I simply combined the 2 page ranges into a single ref. (A good article review should have caught this.)
- ^ Ivaylo S. Ivanov (2000). "The Significance of the Bulgarian Senior Military Leadership in World War I: A Comparative Study of the Bulgarian Army Operations at Dobro Pole and Doiran in 1918". Master of Military Art and Science Thesis. pp. 59–64. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
- ^ Ivaylo S. Ivanov (2000). "The Significance of the Bulgarian Senior Military Leadership in World War I: A Comparative Study of the Bulgarian Army Operations at Dobro Pole and Doiran in 1918". Master of Military Art and Science Thesis. pp. 68–72. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
- ^ Ivanov 2000, pp. 59–64, 68–72.
- Ivanov, Ivaylo S. (2000). The Significance of the Bulgarian Senior Military Leadership in World War I: A Comparative Study of the Bulgarian Army Operations at Dobro Pole and Doiran in 1918 (Master of Military Art and Science Thesis). Retrieved 13 November 2015.
I certainly could have made a mistake and I would appreciate knowing about any.
PS: Since when does a cosmetic change add a source (or two)?
PPS: 99% means only 1 edit added content. You could check.
User-duck (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- @User-duck: I was clearly in the wrong about this, I am sorry.--Catlemur (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Catlemur: Sorry if I was harsh. I get my feathers ruffled easily and text can be so terse. I am careful about my edits but I could have easily made a mistake.
- Honestly, I am tired of the GA argument. An article is assigned a GA status at a point in time. After that edits can easily degrade it. Work needs to be done to maintain the status, link rot, etc. After 20,000+ edits, I cannot tell you how many awful articles I have encountered. I am working on an article now that has the "good article" template. There is nothing on the talk page about when or why it was added. What I know is that a majority of the SFNs do not have a year when the source cite clearly has one. I am adding years (I consider it an article improvement) and fully expect someone to revert. User-duck (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
MILHIST and Class on Talk Pages
Kindly give a link to the policy that Milhist overides all other classes on talk pages. Thank you. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Whiteguru: The burden of proof that it doesn't lies 100% on you. Can you prove that an article requires separate A class assessments in all the other WikiProjects it is subject to? You realize that in articles like the British Empire, that would require dozens upon dozens of separate reviews, involving numerous experienced editors working simultaneously? I don't know if you are being a pedant or you are advocating for some kind of Kafkaesque bureaucratic nightmare, either way I will fight tooth and nail against it.--Catlemur (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Rollback
Please don't misuse rollback, as you seem to have done on Vladimir Vakhmistrov; it's for intentionally-problematic edits, particularly vandalism. All the best, Miniapolis 01:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Miniapolis: At no point did I use rollback on Vladimir Vakhmistrov, my edit was completely manual. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.--Catlemur (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; when I first checked the history I thought I saw "Rollback 1 edit", but when I checked again it wasn't there. You added a {{Copy edit}} tag dated May 2014, though, which I presume was a mistake. Please leave edit summaries. Miniapolis 17:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Tsadkan Gebretensae
On 25 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tsadkan Gebretensae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tsadkan Gebretensae, one of the top commanders of Tigray forces in the conflict against the Ethiopian government, previously served as chief of staff of the Ethiopian National Defense Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tsadkan Gebretensae. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tsadkan Gebretensae), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
2021 European Union migrant crisis
Hi, my page move reverted you ref fills, would you be able to do it again? Kingsif (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Trobriand
My apologies. Change reverted.Roundtheworld (talk) 06:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Macedonian Mule Corps
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Macedonian Mule Corps you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 04:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Macedonian Mule Corps
The article Macedonian Mule Corps you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Macedonian Mule Corps for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 02:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
|
Military history reviewers' award | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2021. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Hello catlemur, I see that you have made certain edits to the belligerents of the Syrian civil war page. I am starting my dissertation on The welfare effects of price level changes on Syrian/Turkish border during the 2010s. (because of refugee crisis) Any help would be massively appreciated. Any sources you could point me to with general context pieces on the civil war or refugee problems. Many thanks,
Please contact me on georgerobson1207@gmail.com GeorgeRobson12 (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Kalavryta
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Kalavryta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Kalavryta
The article Battle of Kalavryta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kalavryta for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 02:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 14:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |