User talk:Cath 220

Hi Cath_220, I am reviewing your article "Silent no more" and am about to decline it. You will get an automated message about that shortly. However, I am not declining your article because it cannot be accepted. Just for the moment, it does not meet Wikipedia's standards in terms of

a neutral tone (suitable for an encyclopedia),
it does not have enough independent, reliable, widely published sources, and
it probably needs tighter editing.

However, I have added four suitable sources in support of your article (you will find them under the References heading). I do realise that topics like this carry an inherent emotional load. I am personally satisfied that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, which means that the article is, in principle, acceptable - once the other issues are brought up to standard.
So: please find a way to work in the references I have given you;
go over the article and do your best to take the emotion out of it, and
see if you can tighten up the editing. Keep thinking to yourself: "What point am I wanting to make here? Does this line, sentence, phrase help me to make that point in a constructive, logical manner?" If it doesn't, cut it.
I hope you will accept this as intended to be helpful! Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 11:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Silent No More.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 11:01, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David, thanks for all of your help! I tried to make this a neutral as I could sorry - I'll try again and try to take out the emotion. Thanks so much for the references! I'll try to work them in then! Thanks so much for your feedback!

Hello, Cath 220. You have new messages at Cath 220's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Cath 220 (talk) 03:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

If the above Talkback was meant for me, I didn't get it! Visit my personal Talk page to see a clear explanation (I believe!) on how Talkbacks are supposed to work. As you can see, your article has been accepted. You did a good job, I had to make very few, and only minor, changes before putting it online. Well done! David_FLXD (Talk) ^{Review me} 09:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Silent No More, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

David_FLXD (Talk) ^{Review me} 08:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Your addition to Silent No More has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicans for Life[edit]

Hello! Good work in the new article about the Silent No More campaign. Do you think you could help to improve the article about Anglicans for Life, specially concerning their activity around the world and their recognition by the Church of England? The Church of England is pro-life but I don't have the information if Anglicans for Life is active in the United Kingdom. For the improvement of the article is needed someone with a better knowledge of the subject than myself.Mistico (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Father Frank Pavone.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Father Frank Pavone.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Saw your work on Priests for Life with regards to the HSS mandate - great job! I'm going to do a bit of work on that article myself, it seems that Wikipedia covers pro-life organisations quite poorly. I've just created Secular Pro-Life - what do you think? Acather96 (click here to contact me) 16:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]