User talk:Cashannam

Nomination of Emily Lam Ho for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Lam Ho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Lam Ho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citobun (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chiu Yeng Ho[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chiu Yeng Ho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Citobun (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yen Kuok[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yen Kuok requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Citobun (talk) 02:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move warring[edit]

I have moved the article back into article space and protected it from further moves. I could just as easily have blocked you as well as you were clearly move-warring with other users. This is the same as if you had been edit warring, which is one of the most common reasons users are blocked, so please, in the future discuss your concerns instead of warring with other users. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eleanor Lam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanor Lam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Lam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citobun (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Eleanor Lam) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Eleanor Lam, Cashannam!

Wikipedia editor GeoffreyT2000 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please stop moving this article to the draft namespace. I'm going to ask for this article with an AfD to be move-protected.

To reply, leave a comment on GeoffreyT2000's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chiu Yeng Ho for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiu Yeng Ho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiu Yeng Ho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citobun (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new user subpage[edit]

User:Cashannam/ Emily Lam Ho per the AfD discussion. Best regards... Ad Orientem (talk) 04:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which I have moved to User:Cashannam/Emily Lam Ho to remove the unnecessary space. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor895. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 13:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cashannam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Matthew hk has accused me of being a sock which is simply not true. I have been editing Wikipedia since November 29th. I have created four articles and made numerous edits on other pages too. It appears that an individual who I created an article on (under her Chinese name) previously had an article (under her American name) which was subject to much dispute... hence the incorrect allegation. Cashannam (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU evidence has shown you're definitely linked to the other account(s). Sorry. Primefac (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.