User talk:CartoonDiablo/Archive 1

Bedn.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Bedn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bradcis 16:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, CartoonDiablo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome!
Runcorn 21:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newgrounds BBS[edit]

You re-created the entry on the NG BBS, not withstanding that it was previously deleted with a strong concensus. Don't break Wikipedia rules again or you might get banned. Mackan 08:56, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The recreated article has now been speedy deleted. Please understand that the Wikipedia community has agreed that the Newsgrounds BBS is not notable enough to warrant an article. Please do not continue to recreate this article. Thanks, Gwernol 10:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newgrounds[edit]

I too, am a fan of Newgrounds [1], and I understand your enthusaism about the site. However, it is important for articles to be concise and focused--articles should describe the subject and major components of the subject as concisely as possible. Moreover, adding terms and important users is considered orginal research, even more so without external documentation. View Adam Fulton or Jeff Weise for an example of how important users should be documented.

It is important, just as it is at Newgrounds, to read the rules and regulations here at Wikipedia.--HowardSF 06:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop adding information about the NG BBS. It's of no value to the article. 217.209.197.17 15:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newgrounds[edit]

I've been monitering Newgrounds for some time, and there seems to be some controversy regarding the inclusion of the BBS in the article. Now I know that you personally think that information in the BBS belongs in the article and that many editors agree with you, I also know though that many editors believe that there should be no mention of the BBS as is evident by their requests to delete all mention of it in the AFD for the article on the Newgrounds BBS.

Now I'm not saying that either side is right or wrong, but I feel the back and forth editing on the article needs to come to an end. I'd wonder if you and some of the editors who want it left out of the article would be willing to discuss a solution that at least gives everyone a little bit of what they want. I've left a similar message on the talk page of one of them and would appreciate if we could all sort this out before it possibly gets edit-warry. Cheers Canadian-Bacon ^(contribs) 03:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Josh_Bend_interview.ogg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Josh_Bend_interview.ogg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newgrounds BBS Recreation[edit]

You have recently created the article Newgrounds BBS. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Hagerman^(talk) 02:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons in Halo[edit]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Weapons in Halo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Weapons in Halo. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Antidrugue 04:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Deleted.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Deleted.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Encyclopedia Dramatica[edit]

Do what I told you to, take it to deletion review, we do not handle those requests at WP:RFPP or alone. Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 01:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletions[edit]

I have listed all of your "satirical photoshops" at images and media for deletion. If you do not want them deleted please post any counter arguments at the linked IFD subpage, thanks. --Sherool (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

inappropriate images[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. --Адам12901 ^T/_C 16:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plank[edit]

If you had taken the time to read the discussion pages, you would have seen that the community has decided that Plank is not notable to be included as a character. I see that you have had problems with this in the past. Always edit within the parameters of the community, else you will find your edits being deleted. -- Elaich ^talk 22:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:New_level_icons.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:New_level_icons.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Runnig_from_schoolbus.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Runnig_from_schoolbus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TheScaryDoor.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheScaryDoor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ingpuddle.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ingpuddle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fakepopup.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fakepopup.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ED Screenshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ED Screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol Creme[edit]

On Lol Creme, what is your source for changing the year Lol Creme joined Art of Noise from 1998 to 1997? -kotra (talk) 23:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Welfare Benefits Payments Graph.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Welfare Benefits Payments Graph.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Union Elections Threatened With NAFTA Closing (1993-1995).gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading this media, (it's appreciated.)

However, it would be nice if you could give some kind of indication as to what license the media is under. That way other people can be confident in making use of it for many varied purposes :)

Adding license information also helps prevent media you've put effort into creating from being deleted :)

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators which will assist you :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page B'Tselem has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Traxs 7 03:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Single Payer Public Opinion.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Single Payer Public Opinion.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 04:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Wage Productivity.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wage Productivity.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Welfare's effect on poverty[edit]

I have nominated Welfare's effect on poverty, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welfare's effect on poverty. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. elektrik SHOOS 03:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Welfare's effect on poverty. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. elektrik SHOOS 03:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gore-Bush chart in Media Bias article[edit]

Hi. When I took a look at your recent edit to Media bias in the United States, I noticed that the chart and its caption in the article did not quite match what I saw at http://www.journalism.org/node/1049. So I did 2 quick fixes: (1) make File:Media_Coverage_Bush_and_Gore.svg match the page at journalism.org more closely and (2) give more detail about the chart in the media bias article. I'm hoping that you can and will check and correct my work. In particular, the caption in the article is too long, because I don't have time to make it short.

I'm too busy to do it now, but at some point I could construct a SVG image from the data at journalism.org, instead of using their image. BTW, the original chart has wrong labels on the vertical axis: 0.65 should be 65% and so on.

Cheers, CWC 15:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tea Party Demographics.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tea Party Demographics.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Total compensation graphs[edit]

I have replaced the total graphs showing total compensation that you removed from a large number of pages (neoliberalism, monetarism, etc.). Since there are a large number of pages with essentially the same reasoning, I decided to discuss the matter here rather than on every article talk page.

Declining real wages with increasing total compensation does tell us something interesting about the US economy: that a greater % of salary is being paid as benefits in kind (mostly healthcare) rather than in cash. Primarily, it is a symptom of rising spending on healthcare faster than the increase in GDP per capita. There's nothing wrong with using the graphs to show this.

But the impression given by your use of the graph was rather the opposite: that everyone has started to earn less in total since the 70s, which is untrue (and patently ridiculous if you simply compare living standards then with now). It is misleading (I won't say deliberately, but I do suspect that from the originator it was, given that the total compensation graph comes from exactly the same source, so they must have seen it).

Please do not reinstate your graphs without discussing the matter here. 78.147.13.3 (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"real compensation" is beyond misleading because not every job gets compensation (small businesses etc.) also you seem to have it backwards, the "compensation" is just increasing employer health care spending on employees (healthcare benefits as compensation) which doesn't in any way show that healthcare quality is increasing.

Wages are before spending, their the payment you get, there's no way to intentionally decrease wages unless you ask for a wage reduction. What you seem to be getting confused are wages with income, which can change depending on how someone spends their money.

I'll give you some examples of why compensation is pointless:

Nobody tries to justify things like Neoliberalism, Monetarism etc. with "real compensation" but many people do criticize those policies by pointing to declining real wages (in fact I cited people's criticism and you replaced it).
Private healthcare spending (healthcare benefits) has grown considerably since 1990 so by definition compensation will always increase (source)
Families are spending less on basic needs such as food, clothing etc. then they did in 1970 Figure 5 page 16 (note this is in real median income which has gone up since the 70s)
No one uses the Fed's definition of "real compensation". CartoonDiablo (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, first, please don't edit war. This is against WP policy. I say to discuss first, instead you just replace all the graphs.

Second, I think you may need to take a step back from this. Your user page seems to be entirely about your support for left wing causes - I think this may be clouding your judgement.

I am sorry to be harsh, and I hope I have not offended you, but there is really no argument here. Total compensation is what people get paid. Real wages is just one way out of many different ways of taking the payment. It is like if your employer gave you $10 on Day 1, and on Day 2, gave you $5 and $10 worth of services that you were going to buy anyway. In the second scenario, the total amount of value you receive for your work is $15, which is more than you got on Day 1. But if we plot a graph that only shows wages, it makes it look as though you are receiving less, when the opposite is the case. This is misleading, and the only reason to do this is the push a PoV, by tricking people who will assume that 'real wages' means the total amount paid by employers. 78.145.241.12 (talk) 18:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well to be frank, if there was an "edit war" then you seemed to of started it. I pointed to people who use real wage to criticize a lot of policies (irrespective of my opinions) so the edits fit. As far as I know, nobody uses "real compensation" to promote those policies so you seem to be conjecturing and promoting "right-wing causes" more then I am promoting "left-wing causes". I'm honestly not trying to be combative but I don't see the point of even having the charts in most of the places you put them unless somebody actually tried to justify them with real compensation.

With regards to the payment, a lot of jobs don't get the services you described. And the "benefits" (as far as the fed elaborated) are just healthcare spending, which will increase regardless. Also services in general don't make up for money, it's kind of like how workers used to be payed with vouchers.

Anyways I think the consensus should be this:

If we want to use our charts, we need to cite people who use Real wage/Total compensation for that article
It should be fitting, (ie not have a chart in something like History of Corporations or History of Unions)

CartoonDiablo (talk) 01:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RedDawnTeaserPoster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RedDawnTeaserPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tea Party Demographics.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Tea Party Demographics.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to High-fructose corn syrup. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. T. Canens (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what your opinion is on this proposal? Xenophrenic (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I had to I'd say Keep it, it adds to the discussion and is only cited as fair use whenever anyone else uses it (mediaite etc.) CartoonDiablo (talk) 03:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Investment Theory Business Orientation Outline.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Investment Theory Business Orientation Outline.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Richard Perle.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Perle.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Investment Theory Business Orientation Outline.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Investment Theory Business Orientation Outline.svg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Illegal Union Firing 1952 - 2007.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Illegal Union Firing 1952 - 2007.svg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Single Payer Public Opinion.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Single Payer Public Opinion.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]