This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Please assist me in this so that the issue is settled peacefully since I had drafted the page in question after looking at several featured articles and I intended to do the same to it. Please look at it and its history. I only realized the other page was created almost at the time I started editing on mine so I added the extension "telenovela" so that the move could be successful. Please consider my plea because I'm frustrated. Cheers-- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 20:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Lets hope he gives a valid reason for that because he knew perfectly that had a userfied version which he himself edited not long ago.- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 22:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Nyanchoka are frustrated because?, if virtually all the information that was in your sub user page, was false. I went yesterday to investigate and write the article on my own account, I have not taken anything of yours. Is it not my fault that the same information appears in Google?. Case Daniel Arenas participate in this telenovela?, or Andrés Palacios?. That is completely false, neither of them were for this telenovela. I believe "Como tres gotas de agua" first, and as he saw that you could not then decided to create "Como tres gotas de agua (telenovela)". Because I'm very sorry, but the article and my information is going to be.--Philip J Frytalk 06:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Philip J Fry you had a right to edit and remove the so called "false information" from the subuser page or at least inform me that you are to create the page so that I wouldn't waste much precious time. But that doesn't mean all the contents in the article were false. Creating a new page just as someone else is doing so yet you perfectly knew well may be deemed unethical but I believe you created it with good faith but sometimes actions done at a wrong way may be misinterpreted. The actors Daniel Arenas and Andrés Palacios were to be cast but they weren't in the long run. CambridgeBayWeather, to avoid potentially wastage of time, please redirect the page Como tres gotas de agua to Como tres gotas de agua so Philip J Fry and I work on the page together and probably remove and add the information that is relevant to the article. My apologies CambridgeBayWeather for us turning your talk page into a debate hall.-- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 07:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
I in no time you copy me, myself investigate in Google. I already had thought about creating this article, I was just hoping that the protagonists are confirmed. Which is a fact. I do not understand you want to create a disambiguation, it is just to impose your edition and show that you created this article ?. If that article was deleted. In case there is another article with the name "Como tres gotas de agua" to create a disambiguation ?.Not so much padding were doing with your subpage user, all in the section of "Production" is on the introduction of the article. Ah unclear, just you saw that I thought Como tres gotas de agua was it also decided to create it, I will not. I'm sorry but my information is going to be. the current version that I believe is correct, if you want to add the information of what Alex Sirvent is fine, but the rest just seems irrelevant information and only this unnecessary to fill empty spaces.--Philip J Frytalk 09:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Philip J Fry, read this and say which part of "Introduction" is repeated at the "Production". Let CambridgeBayWeather decide. Before I go there is a reason why the issue was tabled on your talk page. I only reported it here. -- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 10:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
"(telenovela)" in the title is unnecessary , needless , no other article of the same name.--Philip J Frytalk 19:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Skiddle deletion
Hi, just dropping you a line as it seems you've deleted an article I worked on for quite some time last night. It's was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skiddle - I think I did a pretty good job of tidying, cutting a lot of the garbage out and making it notable (while they are a smaller agent they're still fairly well known, I think I've probably used them at least 3 times this year so far and I maybe only go to 10 gigs a year maximum). The vote on the deletion page seemed tied at 3 for keep and 3 for delete and I don't think anyone had time to review my edits before you deleted it. Could you please take a look at my edits compared the version live yesterday and let me know if you could restore the article? Many thanks Lancshero (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. I've done that now. ==Deletion review for Skiddle==
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Skiddle. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Lancshero (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I didn't really expect the deletion request to be executed after I put so much effort into the article. Can you send me the wiki text of the last revision so my work isn't wasted? I might post it at a gaming or software related wiki instead. Matthias M. (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, but no. I respect the community decision. It is clearly not wanted here. Maybe it was written in a too technical way. I moved http://content.gpwiki.org/OpenRA instead. Matthias M. (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Emaze page deleted
Hi,
I'm trying to understand why the Emaze page was deleted and would like you to explain.
What was missed here and should be improved.
I see a lot of pages with much less importance still going strong.My goal is not to have everybody removed, but rather try to build something useful.
Thank you for your cooperation.
--Gingimaster (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the answer.
Nevertheless, i beg to differ with them.
There are several notorious sources talking about Emaze and there are online proofs to back it. Websites such as Techcrunch, various French academies, Business oriented press. The fact that the company raised twice nearly $3M is information that many people might find interesting.
Deleting The page on the grounds mentioned earlier simply means that thousands of similar and and of less value also have to be removed (Viber, Powtoons, Airpush...).
If you're willing to restore it, i'll be sure to add more authoritative sources to back these claims.
Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingimaster (talk • contribs) 19:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
editors sensoring me preventing discussion from movin forward
Hello. I have a bully troubling me. I am not editing articles with factual cited information. I am discussing the information on my talk page. 2 ssholes repeatedly come and redact the information! How can the information to be added to the articles be discussed when the information is repeatedly being sensored ? I feel I am being targeted because the information that is on my talk page is in acutal articles in wikipedia. So why is the same information sensored on my talk page? 173.66.63.102 (talk) 03:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Protected page letting anon IPs through
Hi, CambridgeBayWeather. On 07:58, 30 November 2015, you protected Alki David because of persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The expiry date was set for 30 May 2016. But today an anon IP made an edit [1], so I'm wondering if the page protection might have glitched and not gone through. Thank you for any help.--Tenebrae (talk) 16:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. I was actually a little confused to see that the article no longer exist. And thanks for all the information to spend my sub-page.--Philip J Fry / talk 13:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for closing the discussion. The address-hopping IP who submitted the draft is well-known to the F1 project as disruptive and usually starts his unreferenced, poor quality drafts in talk-pages. Project members often spend time sorting out his work and took a step back from this debate in view of the history. As for the Lola LC88 page, it has in-line citations which admittedly need improving but it is not ripe for deletion and I hope the editor who nominated it will not continue to do so. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
The information in that sock investigation was fabricated and used to make me nervous. Those edit were constructive and they weren't made by this user. Bitmapped needs to be blocked. He even fabricated the story that cause the article Mountain Parkway Byway to be move protected. Please stop him. Wv26228 (talk) 08:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Uqaqtuq (talk), I'm afraid that's our conversation is being used to fuel my sock dilemsa, suggest closing the investigation before anymore instances of such evesdroping occurs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wv26228 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Can you simply lock this article from this IP? This person performs so many edits making it impossible for anyone else to inspect and handle and the IP keeps changing therefore impossible to converse. And of course this person does not understand the basics of Wikipedia. HkCaGu (talk) 07:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! HkCaGu (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of defunct airlines of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carolina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
PIAA Football Records
PIAA Football Records. You deleted this page on November 7th. This page took thousands of hours of many people's time to accumulate and we had 1000's of sources for most of our data. Their could have been a few stats in there that were not cited but why would you delete the whole page? Why not just remove the couple that didn't have the stats. Can you please reinstate the page. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeDog77 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Please do not participate in this edit war on Religious conversion. State your arguments on the topic talk page and reach a consensus with the other editors. Grammar'sLittleHelper (talk) 20:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Sfarney. Not much of an edit war there. The last edit before the IP was 21 November. You might try WP:RFPP but there does not seem to be enough activity in the article to justify it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
This is the edit war I see:
(cur | prev) 20:10, 14 December 2015 CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) m . . (56,133 bytes) (+575) . . (Reverted edits by 96.246.99.90 (talk) to last version by Trotting cove) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 19:09, 13 December 2015 96.246.99.90 (talk) . . (55,558 bytes) (-575) . . (→Islam: By removing useless information that is irrelevant to the "Main category".) (undo) (Tags: Mobile edit, Mobile web edit)
(cur | prev) 07:45, 21 November 2015 Trotting cove (talk | contribs) m . . (56,133 bytes) (+522) . . (Undid revision 691562055 by CounterTime (talk)) (undo | thank)
It is the same information added and deleted, added and deleted, and your edit is the 5th in the series. Grammar'sLittleHelper (talk) 20:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I do not consider that objection relevant. The same material has been edited and reverted multiple times in the last month. Please participate in a consensus discussion on the talk page. That is the Wiki way, not this competing edit struggle. Grammar'sLittleHelper (talk) 20:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi CambridgeBayWeather (nice username!) - I seem to have egg on my face after ... ah I see it was the wrong page you were looking at! I thought my understanding of the policy was very wrong for a second there D: -- samtarwhisper 10:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Samtar. When I went to put the template on the RFPP page I edit conflicted with you. Good thing or I probably would have missed the whole thing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Notice of request for deletion of YPG dab
Notice of deletion request, that YPG (disambiguation) be deleted per G6 (a redirect holding up a consensual move). --Dervorguilla (talk) 04:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
What's wrong with the thanks button
Why would you want to block somebody for thanking you. it's just a token of appreciation for cleaning up the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brocooli (talk • contribs) 21:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Make sure to click on both pictures to see them full size CambridgeBayWeather as they will give you a chuckle. May your 2016 be full of joy and special times. MarnetteD|Talk 03:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi CBW, wishing you the happiest of holidays, and hoping all is well in your part of the world. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross
Thank you, but someone already sent me a copy and I also preserved the text as a Word document. Is there any way to legally save this article as a user page? Several wikipedians would still like to use this as a reference they could edit. Czolgolz (talk) 17:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Czolgolz. I don't think so. Some of the images are fair use and can't be used out side of article space. Keeping material around that isn't go to ever be an article, and in this case will shrink ass time goes by, is not usually done. You could keep a list somewhere but I suspect that would be deleted eventually. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
On a more general note, how come you closed a whole load of MfD's before the 7 day discussion period had ended? Brustopher (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Brustopher. Because it was Sunday morning, because the voices in my head told me too, because it was -37C here yesterday and my brain hasn't thawed out yet. Ah yes, because I'm psychic and knew they would be deleted in the future!
I really have no idea why I did that. I always start at the bottom of the page and work up through the old business. I don't know why I ended up working in the middle. I've restored all the deleted pages and reverted the closings. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting! Best wishes for the holidays. Brustopher (talk) 21:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
I put it down to the apathy inspiring nature of MfD. Even TfD has a few people who are super passionate about it, even if they're in the single digits. Brustopher (talk) 22:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Santa's regular sleigh is in for a 'D' check, so he's bringing his presents via SantaSleigh2 (hmmm..... what if you're Buddist?)
The Reason For This Season Is Happiness And Sharing—hope you'll be enjoying some good groundtime/downtime. Best : HarryZilber (talk) 14:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC) (formerly of CYULZF)
A relatively new editor has been adding a great deal of information based on what some other editors consider a questionable source: Template:Find a Grave; more importantly is a tendentious history WP:TE in constantly reverting back to a preferred version, thereby hitting the 3R rule. Can you help; I have already set up a talk page discussion on the topic of Robert Taylor's death. I do not want to go any further, for the time being, on dealing with the numerous other articles that have been revised to have a great reliance on the Find-a-Grave website as a reference source. Sorry to involve you in a sticky issue, especially during the season of good will. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
CambridgeBayWeather, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 10:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Howdy, there's been a lot of persistent vandalism from different IPs on the Flin Flon page. Perhaps you'd be willing to protect it for awhile? Air.light (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Anon user 71.235.154.73 is back and once again trying to deface the ResellerRatings after your 6 month protected edit. Can you please protect the page?
From the talk page, "Note: For clarity in the somewhat confusing discussion below, "NotTechimo" was blocked from Wikipedia indefinitely by Mr Stradivarius at 04:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC) for impersonating another user (me) and for registering his/her account in bad faith. Later, IP 71.235.154.73 was also blocked by MusikAnimal at 11:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC). Disruptive edits of this talk page continued from another IP, so the page was protected by CambridgeBayWeather at 02:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)."
166.170.37.25 (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Any factual, well sourced, encyclopedic content added by any user which casts any type of unfavorable light on this business is consistently removed, then protection requests are filed to keep the information out of the article for 6 months. The same user, Techimo, who has an affiliation with the organization as the only other article he's ever contributed is the one he started about the company's founder (Scott Wainner), is responsible for this manipulation.
The latest revisions were quite neutral, well sourced from peer review sites such as the Better Business Bureau, SiteJabber, and Truspilot, as well as industry news magazine, Internet Retailer Magazine, a former division of Thomson Reuters. These are neutral sources with no axe to grind. Criticisms were listed as well as the steps ResellerRatings took to address them. That is about as neutral as it gets. All of ResellerRatings' peers such as TrustPilot, Angie's List, and the Better Business Bureau have similar "Criticism" sections. Why is ResellerRatings' article allowed to be any different?
The consistent citing of "non neutral point of view" by user Techimo and his various IP's is false, disruptive, and misleading. I request a revert to the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ResellerRatings&oldid=701384529 revision and for the protection to remain in place to prevent Techimo from removing factual content and abusing the Wikipedia article protection measure.
Counter Argument to Above:ZeroShadows is defending content contributed to the ResellerRatings page by 71.235.154.73, an edit warring IP who posted the same (or versions of) critical attacks (citing every negative, and not reliable, hearsay, blog, and user generated forum posting source he could locate) no less than 103 times in December 2014 in an eager effort to attack the ResellerRatings page with a non-NPOV agenda, which also included sources which were not reliable. This user then began another tirade of posts under the the username NotTechimo, for which he was blocked from Wikipedia for impersonating (me) by Mr._Stradivarius. The edit war continued from 32.211.179.232, so the ResellerRatings page was protected for 6 months until August 2015 by yourself.
Now, after a round of critical, non-NPOV, and biased edits to the ResellerRatings page by the same edit warring IP 71.235.154.73 which began on January 21, 2016, within hours, ZeroShadows also contributed several edits to the ResellerRatings and Better Business Bureau pages, and he is now here asking you to allow his (or his friend's) biased agenda and attack against this page to be allowed to persist. There is documentation on the web that exists proving that 71.235.154.73 has a continuing financial interest in damaging the ResellerRatings page and an axe to grind, but in the interest of upholding Wikipedia's outing policy, that won't be posted here. However, ignoring that, and on the sole basis that 71.235.154.73 engaged in a 100+ edit warring attack, impersonated me by creating the NotTechimo account, and got blocked by two admins, I would respectfully request that you deny this user the ability to continue his pattern of abuse. Techimo (talk) 08:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Response: You've made my point in your response, citing the same "non-NPOV" argument you make for every single edit to the article made by anyone, but yourself. The history of the article speaks for itself as you've been at this since the inception of the article. Calling the Better Business Bureau, Angie's List, Trustpilot, Sitejabber, and Thomson Reuters "negative, and not reliable, hearsay, blog, and user generated forum posting source(s)" is laughable. You obviously have a vested interest in ResellerRatings, are not an impartial user, and most definitely have a conflict of interest. These sources are impartial and have no axe to grind. The data that was included, regardless of who included it, was neutral, encyclopedic, and in the spirit of Wikipedia. Your manipulation of the protection system and prevention of factual information from appearing in the article needs to end. ZeroShadows (talk) 09:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
@CambridgeBayWeather I'm unclear as to why you responded to the protection request by protecting the article, but now wish to bow out for an unprotection request. Nonetheless, thank you for the response. I've submitted an Edit Protected Request in the article's talk page. ZeroShadows (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
CambridgeBayWeather, I respectfully request that you fully protect ResellerRatings while the discussion unfolds and while other editors weigh in. Techimo (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@Techimo and CambridgeBayWeather FWIW,I have no intention of starting an edit war, and I've stated such on the talk page. I am not the 71.235.154.73 anon user who was involved with Techimo in the edit war a year ago. I do, however, agree with his recent contributions and after reviewing this article's history, it's become apparent to me that consistent removal of anything Techimo considers unflattering has made the article less well rounded. Regardless, I'm not opposed to this protection request should you wish to prevent 71.235.154.73 from further editing, but it isn't necessary to prevent me from performing any edits. ZeroShadows (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
it says..
10:13, 25 September 2015 CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) deleted page You Broadband (Expired PROD, concern was: No indication of notability, no significant coverage in reliable sources, tagged for over a year without improvement. Unduly promotional tone.)
Please let me know
dushyant 09:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
dushyant
YOU Broadband India Limited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dushmis (talk • contribs) 09:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— dushyant 05:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello I would be glad if you could reopen a conversation for the A and C Mall it is a notable shopping center in Accra and I belive it should be on Wikipedia.--Rberchie (talk) 13:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot--Rberchie (talk) 14:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Phoebe Ryan Page Deletion
Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I emailed you about your deletion of Phoebe Ryan's page in March 2015 and my proposed restoration of it. Hope all is well.
Thanks for letting me know about the legal threats, CambridgeBayWeather. I skimmed Exa~enwiki's comments pretty loosely the first time around and didn't actually notice! -Silence (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok thanks. I only want to have the website represent facts. Last night i was drinking a bit and i might have not carried myself properly. Im glad we are in agreement. Do you live in Cambridge Bay? How are things up there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.155.219 (talk) 15:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes I do live in Cambridge Bay. And it's cold here. Yesterday was −37 °C (−35 °F) with 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph) wind and a will chill of -55. Today it's only −29 °C (−20 °F) with 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph) winds and -45 wind chill. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Buffalo Airways
Sir, the rationale you have exercised in not correct. The page you directed me to clearly indintifies that if the aircrafy is seriously damaged, the it is allowable to be included.
The webpage says:
The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport.
As, all of these incidents resulted in serious damage to the aircraft, i do not understand why you are messing with the inclusion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.155.219 (talk) 04:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Airport articles
Accidents or incidents at the airport should only be included in airport articles if:
The accident caused human fatalities.
The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport.
The accident or incident invoked a change in procedures, regulations or process that had a wide effect on other airports or airlines or the aircraft industry
Airline articles
Accidents or incidents should only be included in airline articles if:
The accident was fatal to humans;
The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport;
The accident or incident resulted in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry
You need to educate yourself to the rules of inclusion. Stop trying to be a poice officer and screwing around. I only want the article to read factual. TEHSE ARE INCIDENTS THAT CAUSED SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT. I WILL REPORT YOU TO WIKIPEDIA IF YOU CONTINUE TO UNDO FACTUAL ITEMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.155.219 (talk) 04:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
And if you want to report it to Wikipedia then go ahead. It's a content dispute and you have made no attempt to take this to the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Cambridgebay and OhanaUnited will you be ammenable to including the accident? Please see talk page on Buffalo SiteNorsemanmick (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Cambridgebay - Please send me a PM. I need to talk to you.
Norsemanmick (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Wondering if you can semi Nashville International Airport for a while. An IPv6 has been removing a few valid airlines, reverted by multiple editors, but never come back to the same IP, never reads edit history/summaries and perform the same edits again and is therefore un-warn-able. HkCaGu (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Only one good IP edit; the rest were reverted. Nevertheless, the editing has been infrequent. Renew PC? --George Ho (talk) 03:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cambridgebayweather. Thanks for the tip. I'll do my best to add links and citations in the future. I have been updating Air Spray Aviation lately. Boy I sure wish the title wasn't "Air Spray Aviation", it should be either "Air Spray (1967) Ltd", Or simply "Air Spray". Is there a way to change this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norsemanmick (talk • contribs) 03:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey CambridgeBayWeather, I accidentally created these three Categories. I had February spelled wrong as Febuary. Could you please delete them for me right now i have just made them re-direct to the correct place.
Can you help me get this copywrite citation figured out. File:Air Spray.jpg I need to call it "fair use", but I cant figure out to tag it as such. I am new to this, can you assist?
Norsemanmick (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir Cambridgebayweather. I would like to re-name the webpage "Evergreen 747 Supertanker" to become "747 Supertanker"
The reason is because Evergreen filed for Bankruptcy in 2013 and a newer company has salvaged the air spray equipment and is resurrecting this fire bomber into newer 747-400 aircraft. The article should be representative of the 747 as an airtanker, not a specific Evergreen platform. I have modified a few things to show the quantity build is now 3 (2+1) and I was hoping to have the website to be more generic. Are you amenable to these changes, kind Sir.
If you are, would you please be so kind as to help me in renaming.
Sir Cambridgebayweather. Thank you, I have initiated this and will wait to see the outcome. I might need your help after its conclusion to assist in converting. On the colour scheme, is the green colour a mandatory rule of Wikipedia? It generally presents much better and flows more in line when the colour compliments the company's logo or general colour scheme. What are your thoughts?
Your friend
Norsemanmick (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
You recently deleted the page I created for Astute Payroll (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astute_Payroll)
I was hoping to get some information as to how we can still have a page for the company without it being 'unambiguous advertising or promotion' - I thought I'd written it in such a way, with references etc, that made it factual but I guess I still wasn't quite right.
If you could provide any information here, I'd be very grateful.
Thank you
Caitlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitlinbwilliams (talk • contribs) 08:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Canbridgebayweather. Just like you helped me with Air Spray logo, can you please tag the Conair Logo as fair use. I am really struggling with this. It is for Conair Group page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norsemanmick (talk • contribs) 18:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Conair Group
Hi, I have started updating Conair Group. I added infobox and fleet chart. I put the color to red, but if it needs to go to green, then I guess I have no choice. Can you please review the article and make any changes you see fit. Thanks, I enjoy collaborating with you on these articles. The previous picture was replaced with a newer one as the old picture was for a DC6 Conair tanker which is no longer in their fleet.
Your friend,
Norsemanmick (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No worries, whenever you get time. You will see I have done some research and added a significant section on their history as well.
Norsemanmick (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Cambridgebayweather. I know you changed the color back to green as you want consistency, but it makes no sense. I have changed colour back to represent the Air Spray logo. Air Canada and Westjet have colors to reflect the logo on thier pages on the smae fleet chart.Lightgreen is not in keeping with the article and Wikipedia does not have any rules set in place. Please let me know if you are ammenable to this. I do not want to create a warring situation. I want to come to an agreedment please. I want to keep it civl and professional. I have put this on the talk page on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norsemanmick (talk • contribs) 03:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you kind Sir. Did you get a chance to review the Conair article yet? Looking forward to your feedback.
Your friend,
Norsemanmick (talk) 04:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Good morning Kind Sir. Thank you for the edits on the Conair page. I added some information on the Q400-MR aircraft. I hope you are okay with it. I am not sure if it is too much infomation, but it does describe the reason for them appearing on the website. How was the birthday party last weekend?
Your freind,
Norsemanmick (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir. They are not registered in Canada, the aircraft are not owned by Conair,→ I belive they are registered in France. I would guess the reason they are on the Conair website is they are probably contracted to operate and maintain the Q400 when configured as waterbombers in the fire season.
Norsemanmick (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Ah thanks. That explains why I kept finding pictures of the French Sécurité Civile while looking for information. I see they also use the Conair Firecat. Please you really don't have to call me sir. Wikipedia is pretty informal. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir, oh sorry.
Hello, You know what I would like your help to do next is Everts Air, but they have two pages (Everts Air Cargo & Everts Air) which should probably be combined. As well, there is a sister company called Everts Air Fuel, which handles the bulk fuel side of the business, but it does not have a page at all. As far as I am aware, Tatonduk Outfitters Limited is the parent company. Perhaps we should make a new page for Totonduk and link all of the others? If not, we shoud do somthing to clarify to the Evert pages and possibly add the Everts Air Fuel sister company as well. What are your thoughts?
Norsemanmick (talk) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
It's a bit confusing. Are Everts Air Cargo and Everts Air different companies or just different divisions? The link to their website leads to the same place from the articles. At the same time Everts Air says "With the introduction of larger aircraft like the Douglas DC-6B and Curtiss-Wright C-46 Commando the company split between Everts Air Alaska and Everts Air Cargo." The Everts Air Fuel should probably be a redirect to the air cargo article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
As far as I understand, there are 3 divisions under Tatonduk Outfitters, "Everts Air Alaska" for passengers, "Everts Air Cargo" owned by his son for cargo and "Everts Air Fuel" which is owned by The Father Cliff, but they are sister companies and utilize/share some of the same facilities etc...Both Everts Air Fuel and Everts Air Cargo run 2 C46 Commandos each for total of 4. The Wiki pages are a complete mess and need to be re-structured and re-organized. For example, both logos and slogans are the same. One of these pages should become Everts Air Fuel and the other Everts Air.
Norsemanmick (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
So I can copy and paste an article in there and do all the changes, then copy and paste it into the main article later on?
Norsemanmick (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I wouldn't paste it back. Copy the stuff over and fix it up. Then on the Everts pages you would add a merge proposal and a move proposal. One or both depending on what is necessary. Then when you start the discussion on the talk page you can point to your sandbox to indicate what the finished articles would look like. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir. How are things going up there? How is the weather kind Sir? Sorry about the Sir's !
Norsemanmick (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Norsemanmick. The weather is great. Lots of sunshine and the temperatures have gone from −35 °C (−31 °F) to −36 °C (−33 °F). How's things with you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Mildest winter I can ever recall in Edmonton. Sounds like you are still in the thick of it.
Norsemanmick (talk) 03:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I need some help protecting the Lockheed L188 Electra page from a fellow who is deleting information which is true and accurate. I have spent a lot of time researching the Electra to ensure the information is correct on survivors and have multiple citations.
Norsemanmick (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
You should open a section, if you haven't already, on the article talk page. You can also approach YSSYguy and try to work it out with them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir, I have approached Yssy on his page. We will see where the resolution brings us.
Norsemanmick (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
You know Sir, I sure do wish the Everts pages were only one. I think it is an error that there is two.
Norsemanmick (talk) 01:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Sir Cambridgebayweather. It is a balmy 13 degrees today in Edmonton. Are you out of the worst of the weather yet - Sir? I hope for your sake it gets a little warmer. I have spring fever myself. Best regards
Norsemanmick (talk) 01:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
It's warmer. Yesterday was -15 but today it's a bit colder with -27 but it should go up. Windy though 34 km/h, and a wind chill of -42, and supposed to get stronger. Snow blowing around. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
VANDALS
Looking for an admin on duty: if you could stop by here and hand out some indefinite blocks, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Quis separabit? 17:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I think, however, a 24 hour block is too short for Driplivia, who is almost certainly Monica Samille Lewinsky. Check out edit histories. Yours, Quis separabit? 17:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Kyle1278 (talk·contribs)
Hey, on March 8, 2015 I changed my password on User:Kyle1278. When I tried logging on today with the same password it today it would not recognize it, I tried both the new and old password with no such luck. I tried to use the email reset but I get this There is no email address recorded for user "Kyle1278". so I must have removed the email account at some point. For the User committed identity I remember reading about it, but i'm not sure if I created one in the past.
I have read Help:Logging_in#What_if_I_forget_the_password., and understand that its unlike for me to gain access to the account, its hard losing it after 8 years of editing, I can leave other info about Kyle1278 if need be. If I can't gain access to the old account, could a you redirect the talk and user page to User:Kyle1278-2, and delete the sub-pages under Kyle1278, and add the semi-protection to this accounts User Page? Last, User Rights can I have them added to this account, or do I have to request them again after? Thank you for any help you can provide.
Cheers Kyle1278-2 (talk) 23:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Kyle1278-2 I see you have rhe WP:AWB right so you might be able to use that to get your password back. If you need to I can move both the Kyle1278 user page and talk page over. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
No such luck, I only had it remember my user name. Might as well merge them, will user rights be restored? Cheers Kyle1278-2 (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Kyle1278-2. OK I moved Kyle1278 talk and user page over to Kyle1278-2. It seems to have taken a lot of the subpages with it. See
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2009 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2009 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2010 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2010 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2011 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2011 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2012 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2012 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2013-2015 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2013-2015 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/2016 Archive has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/2016 Archive.
The page User talk:Kyle1278/Sandbox has been moved to User talk:Kyle1278-2/Sandbox.
The page User:Kyle1278/2009 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2009 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/2010 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2010 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/2011 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2011 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/2012 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2012 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/2013-2015 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2013-2015 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/2016 Archive has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/2016 Archive.
The page User:Kyle1278/Sandbox has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/Sandbox.
The page User:Kyle1278/Sandbox2 has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/Sandbox2.
The page User:Kyle1278/WikiCleanerConfiguration has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/WikiCleanerConfiguration.
The page User:Kyle1278/Workshop has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/Workshop.
The page User:Kyle1278/huggle.css has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/huggle.css.
The page User:Kyle1278/monobook.css has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/monobook.css.
The page User:Kyle1278/monobook.js has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/monobook.js.
The page User:Kyle1278/sandbox has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/sandbox.
The page User:Kyle1278/twinkleoptions.js has been moved to User:Kyle1278-2/twinkleoptions.js.
If you have an up-to-date CFS on hand, can you look up this airport's runway length? CBC news said the new runway is "a little more than a kilometre long" but the article says it's only 802m long. OhanaUnitedTalk page 08:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
OhanaUnited. I do have one but it's at work an I won't be there until the 15th. I'll check it then. I suspect that multiple airports need updating. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Re: the ANI you just closed. It's unfortunate that the user that initially filed it has subsequently been blocked for socking, but I fail to see how that gives QuackGuru a free pass for his behaviour. There were several items to consider, including (but not limited to); his still-continuing conduct on the Talk:Peyton Manning page, his conduct at a related 3RR report, the number of complaints filed against him, the number of blocks he has, (no doubt largely stemming from those complaints), his stubborn refusal to accept consensus or acknowledge wrong-doing, and finally, but certainly of importance, the no less than twelve (12) editors who called for some type of sanction against him at the very ANI you just closed as 'no action'. Was this really the best way to go? - theWOLFchild 15:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The whole process was tainted by the sockpuppet. Given that there are several sections wanting sanctions makes the whole thing impossible, and how many people were calling for sanctions based on the original filing. I see that one editor who did start a section also asked that the whole mess closed. There is nothing stopping anybody from starting a new topic with a clearly laid out goal and not multiple goals. The 3RR is stale and blocking now would be punitive. Also the number of reports about Quackguru needs to be viewed in light of the number of sockpuppets that have a grudge against him. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Regardless of who filed the ANI, QG still made all those edits, those comments, those reverts, the endless arguments. Even if he has an army of socks after him, that doesn't excuse his behaviour. At least a dozen editors, familiar with this situation, spoke up and called for some kind of action to be taken. The community had spoken... how do you ignore that? - theWOLFchild 16:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
But anybody can ask for anything, isn't it up the admin to take action? The ANI stemmed from QG's behaviour on the Peyton Manning talk page, and carried on to the related 3RR and the ANI itself. Surely you could review those pages, along with his history (previous complaints and blocks) and decide if action is warranted? There were a few different sanctions proposed, why not just pick the one(s) you feel were most appropriate and enact them? If the subject of an ANI can just bloat the hell out of it the point of incoherence and then get a free pass because of that, what's to stop every disruptive editor brought to ANI from doing that? And what is going to stop QG from continuing to engage in the very behaviour that the community just voiced it's concerns about? - theWOLFchild 17:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
User: Thewolfchild, CambridgeBayWeather has been around the block a few times and they know what they're doing. I just closed a discussion or two on that talk page. My suggestion to you, and this follows hard on "There were too many sections asking for different things. It needs one report with a clear goal", is to write up one report with one goal if disruption continues. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you to both of you. This has been very... informative. - theWOLFchild 23:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
We meet again...
Well, here we are mate, it's been a while since I was blocked for 3 months.
And yes, I knew you were the one that semi-protected my user page. And I was just too crazy, and it was over 127 minutes of non-stop disruptive editing. (July 17, 2015)
And that was it. It was over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.14.181 (talk) 02:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
A redirect
Hello, I really need your help. I created a page Além do Tempo (telenovela), I later discovered that a page of the same name but without the dab (Além do Tempo) existed. I t initially redirected to Rede Globo but changed the redirect to Além do Tempo (telenovela). Could you please delete it so that I can rename the page without necessarily having the dab. Cheers- Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 12:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Sir, I just wanted to talk about the changes you reverted in the "Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion" section of the article titled "Sharia". I had made changes regarding apostasy which you reverted. Might I know why the reverts were done? Not an angry complaint, just a humble request. Regards, Cataleya Cataleya B (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Cataleya B. Because the paragraph was sourced and your addition was in the middle which changes the meaning. Find a source that agrees with what you say and add it in a separate section. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
_(14586469407).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
-2.jpg)
Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.
