User talk:CallAng222

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CallAng222, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Valfontis (talk) 15:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Linking dates[edit]

Hi, we no longer link individual years in articles. Thanks! Valfontis (talk) 15:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Islam[edit]

Please do not revert again. If you do, you'll join Slooppouts34 here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CallAng222 reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you have broken WP:3RR at Islam. There may still be time for you to respond to this complaint and promise to stop warring. Otherwise a block is possible. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted twice to your position, and am myself barred from doing it again because of WP:3RR. So I have reverted your last edit even though I agree with it. In the meantime, I've posted a request for comment on Talk:Islam, in the hope that we can get some other editors to weigh in and develop a true consensus. In the meantime, please don't revert to your version again, or I'll have to block you. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV deletion[edit]

Please do not delete reliably sourced content from articles, as you did with the article on Islam. Do you have access to reliable sources that show a different point of view? Blogs, self-published websites, etc. do not count as reliable sources - see WP:RS. The aim of Wikipedia is to build up an encyclopaedia - so if you are are able to use reliable sources to show other views on the subject, then you are welcome to contribute.

I suggest you read Wikipedia:I just don't like it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although I know for sure that you are a sockpuppet, and the SPI you filed secretly will only get you boomeranged. I enjoy your opposing views, and will not file a SPI to get you blocked. If you want to avoid getting blocked, revoke your SPI.--Slooppouts34 (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The SPI[edit]

That has taken a lot of load off my head. I never fathomed that they were socks, just thought them as SPAs. --Fauzan ^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 09:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for getting the SPI regarding (what should I put in brackets the guy has so many names) underway. I presume that he is somehow linked to mangoeater but cant prove that for sure so bleh there. Anyway, I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for getting theat sort of vandalizm off wikipedia. tyvvm.FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]