User talk:CURL3FRI3Z

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to St. Mary's High School (Phoenix, Arizona) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at BattleBots. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: BattleBots was changed by CURL3FRI3Z (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88586 on 2021-02-05T04:24:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to St. Mary's High School (Phoenix, Arizona) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to St. Mary's High School (Phoenix, Arizona). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message on my talk page, the warning message above does not block your account or current editing but is a warning not to make edits contrary to Wikipedia and guidelines. Continuing to do so will lead to a block after preliminary warnings. Also note, your personal knowledge is not a reliable source. It cannot be verified. False information could be added based on such assertions and there is no way to check it. This is tried with some regularity. Also, there is no way to know whether this is an insult to the person to which the nickname who may not even know about it. This is not the first message you have received. I suggest you read Help:Getting started; Wikipedia:Introduction; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not before you continue editing.
Also please note:
From Wikipedia:No original research: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources". From Wikipedia:Verifiability: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution" and "Articles must be based on reliable, third party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."
Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources. "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form". Unpublished materials are not considered reliable."
Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations. "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."
Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth#Editors are not truth finders. Essay. "Wikipedia editors are not indifferent to truth, but as a collaborative project, its editors are not making judgments as to what is true and what is false, but what can be verified in a reliable source and otherwise belongs in Wikipedia."
Wikipedia:Verifiability. "In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. When reliable sources disagree, maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight." Donner60 (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CURL3FRI3Z&oldid=1015381149"