User talk:CP\M/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitrane tion/Israel-Lebanon/Workshop]].

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 19:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


August Esperanza Newsletter[edit]

Program Feature: To-Do List
The Esperanza To-Do List is a place where you may list any request, big or small, for assistance. If you need help with archiving your usertalk, for example, all you need to do is list it here and somebody will help you out. Likewise, if you need help with some area of editing on Wikipedia, list it here! Again, any matter, trivial or not, can be placed on this page. However, all matters listed on this page must not be of an argumentative nature. You do not need to be a member of Esperanza (or this program) to place or fulfill requests on this page. If you don't have any requests, consider coming by and fulfilling a few! This program has not been very active, but has lots of potential!
What's New?
In order to help proposed programs become specific enough to make into full-fledged programs, the In development section of the proposals page has been created. Proposals that are promising, but need to be organized in more detail are listed here. Please take a look at what is there, and help the proposals turn into programs.
To improve both the layout and text of the front page, in an attempt to clarify the image of Esperanza, the front page is going to have some redesigning take place. Please take your creative minds to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Front page redesign to brainstorm good ideas.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  1. In order to make sure all users who join Esperanza are welcomed, a list of volunteers who are willing to welcome new Esperanzians is at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Members#Esperanza_welcomers. Please add yourself if you are interested; we want to make sure all new Esperanza members are welcomed!
  2. The In development section of the proposals page has been created.
  3. Proposals page: Some proposals have been moved to the aforementioned "In development" section, some have been left as a proposal, and others have been archived. For those proposals that were a good idea but didn't necessarily constitute a program, General Esperanzial Actions has been created.
  4. Two small pieces of charter reform will be decided on in a straw poll at Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Governance. One involves filling the position of any councillors who may leave, the other involves reforming the charter.
  5. Until cooperation with the Kindness Campaign is better defined, it remains as a proposed program.
  6. There is a page for discussing the front page redesign.
Signed...
Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, Freakofnurture, and Titoxd
05:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Off-wiki communication[edit]

In terms of the off-wiki communication with my mediator, while I can certainly appreciate Cerejota's reaction to finding out that something existed that he wasn't aware of, communication with the principals is an important part of mediation, and moreover, that communication should remain confidential. I don't understand what problem may exist, but let me know if you think there is one. Cheers, TewfikTalk 08:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider it inacceptable, and in one case I held some conversation in email, don't keeping the fact confidential. However, that was because a participant asked for this channel. It can sometimes be used, if, for instance, one has suspicions he is unsure about, and doesn't want to share yet, or if there's a suggestion author doesn't want to be associated with him. However, I think it should be done very carefully and only with compelling reasons. The problem is uniformity. It's fine if all parties communicate privately, but, when some write in the open, and some via email, it creates a certain degree of mistrust. In some cases a high degree, so the mediator, IMO, must be either sure that other parties don't feel uncomfortable about private communication, or have really compelling reasons. Most people just don't like to be discussed behind their backs. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 09:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly appreciate your points, but I do believe that the communication does fall into the instances that you describe, and shouldn't be grounds for the mediator's recusal, especially being that (admittedly, I'm biased) we've made some real progress, and show signs of resolving the issue. Cheers, TewfikTalk 15:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly it does. I just don't understand all of this. Well, one is free to refuse the mediation, and probably almost anyone from MedCab would leave if asked with reasoning, and if there were just two parties. But I don't get why would he ask for that - after all, it isn't that big deal. But, anyway, I start to think that something about private communication should be stated in our guidelines. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 16:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject US Governors (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 07:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment - Impressive speed. I didn't even see the blanked page - the bot reverted it so quickly it got replaced between page saving and loading.
P.S. There was an old not-even-started wikiproject with only a template which I cleaned to make space for a new one. The bot wasn't mistaken, I really deleted most of the page; of course it couldn't distinguish an article from an unfilled and useless template.

CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 07:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continued[edit]

Doesn't this article fall into the deletion requirements? By the way, here are User:Aleverde's contributions. ~ clearthought 17:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Into speedy deletion, as CSD A7, or Unremarkable people or groups. With all my inclusionism, writing an article about each victim of a war isn't appropriate. Just being a victim implies an order of magnitude less notability than being in any garage band. My condolescences, but Wikipedia is not a memorial (it could be, I have nothing against), so I'll mark it as CSD. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A note - I wrote the above after tagging as {{db-bio}}, and the article was speedied in meantime. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 18:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CP/M[edit]

I was one of the last users of CP/M on the internet, using Lynx on an Amstrad PCW. How are you using CP/M? Fred Bauder 22:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, most of the time I just use my workstation or laptop with Linux or Windows to edit pages, but I still sometimes work in Internet using the PC at work or an old Toughbook, with CP/M-86 (and Lynx as well). The actual reason I use CP/M is using equipment with old controllers, with required utils only written for CP/M, and sometimes ISA cards needed as well, so that no upgrade is feasible. But I still list myself as CP/M user because it doesn't mean I use nothing else (I'm not -that- old-fashioned). And CP/M is today rare enough to be noteworthy, though not as exotic as it may seem - it was very popular in its times... though, well, I really don't need to tell that to you, I guess  ;-). CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 23:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006[edit]

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab[edit]

"Maybe it would be better to bring the issue on the talk page, and allow user group to decide for themselves what do they want to write on their page?"

This is a public forum and it deserves comment. If they want to "decide from themselves," countless ISPs will sell them server space! I don't expect my changes to last, but I do expect these people to take notice.Yakuman 01:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's just like I don't decide what to write on your user page (not talk page) - despite it isn't private property, it's just commonly accepted way for someone to tell about himself. User groups have pages which serve a similar purpose. Also, mixing up first and third person is somewhat inconsistent. While it might be changed, the talk page is better for the discussion of major changes rather than edit summaries, and it isn't usually necessaty to implement changes for people to notice a suggestion. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some Advice[edit]

Hey, you seem to know what you're doing, so do you think you could take a look at Camonna Tong and Kwama and give me some advice for them? As my "pet articles" I'd like to develop them some more but I've got a case of editor's block. I would put them up for review or something except I'm not entirely sure what kind of review they merit yet. Thanks your time. :) --Niroht 02:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For Kwama, I'd suggest to put a screenshot for each section, and possibly expand the economic part, merge Mines section inside it. Also it would need a comprehensive lead, mentioning the hierarchy and importance of kwama mines as one of the main food sources.
I can't think of something for Camonna Tong - the material is quite limited, there isn't much to say, and not many concentrated sources. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 06:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input, I'll see what I can do when I get time. --Niroht 17:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation[edit]

Request for mediation; I would likes some third party insight. [1] and [2]. ~ clearthought 22:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll jump in now and try to suggest something. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 23:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your needed insight on the matter. ~ clearthought 00:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pie chart updated[edit]

I have updated

File:Casualties-of-the-2006-Israel-Lebanon-conflict.png
Pie Chart

. There seems to be a temporary cease fire on Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict as discussed in Talk:Casualties of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. I am holding off reporting the 3RR violation of a dynamic IP address for now. Can you please comment. Carbonate 14:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another update, info on the talk page. Carbonate 14:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Morrowind[edit]

I changed it because I felt that Morrowind wasn't of medium importance (ie notability), but rather was of "high low" importance. Additionally, it didn't get all that great of reviews. Despite that, it won't bother me, if you change it back (assuming you haven't already). - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, being quite a popular game even today, I don't think it is to be set to low. The Low rating is mostly either for in-game details (all other 100 articles about MW setting), or for games mostly not played and not remembered. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on the RFD location. We should probably keep this in one location, so if you have any furthur questions regarding this, respond on the RFD and I will moniter the page for recent changes. Thanks for asking for my opinion. Cheers! :) — Moe Epsilon 19:53 September 12 '06

House Made of Dawn[edit]

I think it might be too soon to call this one a success. See the page's history and User:HQCentral's talk page for details... Vizjim 19:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we have found a consensus, it's only left to implement it, which for some reason wasn't done. I just closed the case so it doesn't hang around. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 21:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
More fun and games. Vizjim 09:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September Esperanza Newsletter[edit]

Program Feature: Barnstar Brigade
Here in Wikipedia there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go unappreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go unnoticed. As Esperanzians we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. This is where the Barnstar Brigade comes in. The object of this program is to seek out the people which deserve a Barnstar, and help them feel appreciated. With your help, we can recognize more dedicated editors!
What's New?
September elections are upon us! Anyone wishing to be a part of the Advisory Council may list themselves as a candidate from 18 September until 24 September, with the voting taking place from 25 September to 30 September. Those who wish to help with the election staff should also list themselves!
Appreciation Week, a program currently in development, now has its own subpage! Share your good ideas on how to make it awesome there!
The Esperanza front page has been redesigned! Many thanks to all who worked hard on it.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  1. The proposals page has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  2. Since the program in development Appretiaion week is getting lots of good ideas, it now has its own subpage.
  3. The September 2006 Council elections will open for nominations on 18 September 2006. The voting will run from 25 September 2006 until 30 September 2006. If you wish to be a candidate or a member of the elections staff, please list yourself!
  4. The new Esperanza front page design has but put up - many thanks to all who worked on it!
  5. TangoTango has written a script for a bot that will list new members of Esperanza, which will help those who welcome new Esperanzains greatly!
Signed...
Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, Freakofnurture, and Titoxd
04:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Unspecified source for Image:Typhoon3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Typhoon3.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rama 16:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help With Javascript[edit]

I'm trying to put the tool that gives me a strikeout button into my javascript page and having no success. Now I understand little to nothing about programming, so could you give me a hand or direct me to someone who could please? --Niroht 20:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly familiar with browser javascript work, but it might be helpful to ask Tra. He knows javascript enough to write some tools, so I guess it won't be hard for him. Also you might ask Cerejota, he is a java programmer.
Or, maybe better, just check the categories - Category:User_js, Category:User_js-4, Category:User_js-3. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006[edit]

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Editors are cautioned that there may be exceptions to Wikipedia Guidelines and Style Guides due to unusual circumstances such as an important current event. Decisions need to be based on utility of the article to readers, not to literal compliance with Wikipedia rules. A diverse mix of blogs is recommended, but the extent and selection of specific blogs is a matter of content to be determined by the editors of the article. Any user, particularly Tasc, who engages in edit warring with respect to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict may be banned from the article for an appropriate period. All bans are to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 03:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LH2 is NOT more famous among every-one[edit]

("more famous among everyone" - I have NO IDEA who or what LH2 is (and Wik on the Net is too slow for me to run it down), but prada is, on the other hand, some-what known to me, though I am not at all into fashion. - sorry, this is beside the point, but Your statement did bug me. 10:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC) )

Actually I too have no idea and don't remember mentioning any LH2... What exactly are you refering to? CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 11:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
: Sorry, I mis-typed.  It should have been HL2, for Half Life 2. Kdammers 12:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding so quickly.

Do you reckon it's a Coke or Pepsi can?

--A. B. 18:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No vandalising the Reichstag![edit]

Lol, good call! I gotta admit I fricken love that page! Glen 15:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A comment on your vote[edit]

Hi CP\M - I made a comment on one of RFD votes here regarding the 'Redirect pages to South African farm attacks'. Would you please read my comment and consider my request. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Cheers, Jason Lionchow - Talk 20:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we decided that since Keitei has kindly offered us pizza, we won't roast you and eat you instead. Yep, you get to live, and even better, you get to keep mediating cases. Congrats! ~Kylu (u|t) 22:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on WT:ATT[edit]

Please make your comment about naming on Wikipedia talk:Attribution. The proposal seems to be going forward at a goodly pace. Robert A.West (Talk) 23:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue VIII - October 2006
Project news
Current proposals and discussions

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Operation Flashpoint 2
Vympel R-27
SS-N-16
The Omar
Serj Tankian
Lead ship
S8G reactor
Soviet submarine S-350
Klaus Eichstadt
Battle of Red Mountain
SSGN
Amram Mitzna
James Madison class submarine
Summerset Isles
Sachsen class frigate
Skipjack class submarine
Alex Skolnick
Ambrosia (Deus Ex)
De Zeven Provinciën class frigate
Cleanup
Russian Shipyard Number 10
USS Virginia (SSN-774)
AIM-54 Phoenix
Merge
Isolation tank
Armoured warfare
Tron 2.0
Add Sources
HMS Thermopylae (P355)
M16 rifle
Ikara (missile)
Wikify
Celso Amorim
PoPoLoCrois
USS Sea Panther (SS-528)
Expand
Mary Rose
Military history of China
USS Long Beach (CGN-9)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 13:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November Esperanza Newsletter[edit]

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!)
Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach.

Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.

What's New?
The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one!
A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  • The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  • There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia.
  • The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested!
  • In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
  • A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
  • Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello.
Signed...
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

user:HQCentral[edit]

I notice your comments on User talk:HQCentral. We have just discovered that that user was a sock puppet of notorious plagiarist Primetime, who was banned by Jimbo. Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Primetime, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime As a banned user all of his edits may be removed, and as a serial plagiarist all of his edits should be scrutinized. If you have a chance to review his article and talk page contributions on articles where you've worked with him it'd be a help. -Will Beback 02:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about him being a sockpuppet, though lack of attention to some things may suggest that; however, the user was editing quite actively, and at times constructively. Seems to have at least some real good intents (edited his analysis of House Made of Dawn), but often fails to listen to others. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Primetime has a love/hate relationship with Wikipedia. He adores the Encyclopedia Britannica and other printed encyclopedias. He thinks WP is horrible, yet has decided to improve it by copying in large chunks of text from other reference books while claiming they're his own work. Edits like this [3], [4], [5] are classic cases or plagiarism. Furthermore, it's been proven by the Checkuser tool. His combativeness, such as HQC showed the House Made of Dawn analysis, is also typical of Primetime. There's no question that he and HQC are the same person. -Will Beback 09:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Convinced now. He just acts not in a vandalistic way. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 10:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We were all slow in recognizing his vandalism. He seems (more or less) reasonable, if sometimes bullying. FYI, I've posted a notice about his latest appearances here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Primetime = plagiarism. Thanks for improving theproject despite these distractions. Cheers, -Will Beback 10:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's it. It is generally very uncommon for a vandal or troll to participate in mediation and even agree with compromises, but still I had a suspicion that he isn't the one who wrote the material (as he couldn't summarize it). Probably that's just so. I don't think he's a vandal, just completely locked on what he wants with little regard to others or to rules. However, some major edits would better be checked, as they might be copies, but not violations. Also, many could be rewritten, so it would likely be better to move them in the talk pages, unless evidence is present. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 12:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your extending good faith to Primetime. That's an excellent habit. However there are some occasions when it's misplaced. I and others have spent a considerable amount of time reviewing his contributions and finding the sources. Based on that experience I can say that he hasn't made a single substantive contribution of text that wasn't copied. When confronted he lies and counterattacks. Due to his infecting the encyclopedia with plagiarized material and bullying other editors this person has proven a lack of good faith and is no longer allowed to participate. It's sad, but true. -Will Beback 12:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(late, but) - Well, I'm not really arguing. You've just asked for my review of his edits, so I stated my impression - it happens that I hadn't really faced the dark side. I trust people who have more in-depth knowledge of his actions. By saying I think he isn't a vandal I mean his intent seemed to me to be not to deface/destroy Wikipedia, but to shape it to his vision, which is incompatible with real limitations, accepted concepts and requirements; well, to the extent I've seen his actions with that specific sockpuppet. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 20:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue IX - November 2006
Project news
Current proposals and discussions

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Grafikbot 23:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Editor review[edit]

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/CP\M/Archive2, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - December 2006
Project news
Current proposals and discussions

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Serial Experiments Lain FAC (again)[edit]

Hi CP/M. I remember you helping out when I started working on Serial Experiments Lain, so I thought you might want to know it is undergoing FAC at the moment. I wish you a happy new year, a happy Eid el Kabir, and lots of great stuff. --SidiLemine 14:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It really changed a lot! Yes, now it really looks and reads fine, though might use some expansion. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 14:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll continue working on it anyway as I still have lots of unused material, but I wanted to know if it passed before the new year, as a kind of omen. ;) Cheers!

"Final solution" to Deus Ex related articles reply[edit]

That might be a good idea. Which article do you suggest? -- Grandpafootsoldier 03:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably UNATCO, as it has some references already, and can have a clear real-world reference (the UNATCO website which was removed because it looked too real after 9/11). Didn't find it right now, but it was somewhere amond DX articles. It still needs some more external refs, but I've unfortunately lost the touch with DX community in last couple years. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 03:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XI - January 2007
Project news

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XII - February 2007
Project news
  • The new consolidated review department—combining the existing project peer review and A-Class review with a listing of project articles undergoing various external featured content candidacies and reviews—is now operational.
  • Two new templates have been introduced:
  • An effort is being made to have task forces maintain annotated bibliographies for their topic areas; several task forces have already begun to construct them.
  • The project reached two important milestones this month: 500 active members and 30,000 articles in the assessment system.
  • A military version of Wikipe-tan has been created; a new userbox featuring one of the images is available for interested project members.
From the coordinators

The third project coordinator elections have now concluded. Seven coordinators have been selected to serve for the next six months:

Carom (talk · contribs)
FayssalF (talk · contribs)
Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs)
Kyriakos (talk · contribs)
LordAmeth (talk · contribs)
Petercorless (talk · contribs)
Wandalstouring (talk · contribs)

Congratulations to the winners, and thanks to all of the candidates who put themselves forward for this responsibility, and to the retiring coordinators for all of their efforts to improve the project!

Kirill Lokshin, Lead Coordinator

Current proposals and discussions
  • {{Infobox National Military}} is being developed to replace the old {{Military}} template; comments on the draft version are welcome.
  • A proposal to introduce a category tree for military campaigns, as well as a number of associated classification guidelines, is being discussed; comments would be very appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by grafikbot 17:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XIII - March 2007
Project news
Current proposals and discussions

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XIV (April 2007)
Project news
Current proposals and discussions
  • A fresh discussion about the by-nation category system for military personnel has begun; suggestions are very welcome!
  • The use of flag icons in templates is currently being discussed.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Shiloh
  2. Battleship
  3. British anti-invasion preparations of World War II
  4. Domenico Selvo
  5. Knights Templar
  6. Lochry's Defeat
  7. Puerto Ricans in World War II
  8. Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell
  9. Thomas Crisp

New A-Class articles:

  1. Benjamin Franklin Tilley
  2. Cambodian Campaign
  3. List of United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons
  4. Operation Igloo White
  5. Royal Wiltshire Yeomanry
  6. Russian-Circassian War
  7. Tupolev TB-3
Awards and honors
  • Cla68 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his many valuable contributions to military history articles, and, in particular, his leading role in the creation of numerous featured articles on the topic of the Pacific Theater of World War II.
  • RM Gillespie has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his massive efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Vietnam War, and, in particular, his development of a substantial portion of the project's A-Class articles.
  • Wilsbadkarma has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his work on lists (included two featured lists) and portals (including one featured portal). Lists especially are an undermanned area of work, and his excellent efforts deserve commendation.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, CP\M. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:GuntherHermann.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CP\M, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PaulDenton.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CP\M, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:UNATCOTrooper.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CP\M/UNATCO. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morrowind FA push[edit]

Thanks for your help with the Morrowind article, and your substantial help with the Black Marsh article in the past. I'm just about to enter the article for FAC. Wish me luck! Geuiwogbil 22:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CP/M[edit]

I got a kick out of your user page... "This user contributes using CP/M." Is that even possible? I still pull out my old Kaypro 2X from time to time to play games. Man, trying to hook up that old 300 baud modem to the internet would be a hoot. --Lendorien 22:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not practical, of course... But CP/M-86, with drivers et cetera, isn't all that obsolete. I've got a laptop running it, which I have to use to work with some quite modern industrial equipment. It doesn't age in 10 years like computers, and sometimes you only have the programs for old good CP/M. It's superior to DOS in some aspects, and Lynx isn't too unfamiliar to people used to *nix. Of course, actually I mostly use a modern system to edit, but it's not like CP/M should be lost in ages. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 09:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One of CP/M's main strengths, and a great attraction, is that it lies near the level of complexity where both the hardware and software can be fully mastered by a single human. If necessary, one might build a CP/M-like OS and hardware to run it in one's garage from scratch within a reasonable timeframe -- similar to World War I era aircraft or some other great projects of invention. MS-DOS is too closed for that, and Linux' complexity is far too great for any single person to wholly comprehend. Digwuren 19:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XV (May 2007)
Project news
Current proposals and discussions
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 3rd Battalion 3rd Marines
  2. B-52 aircraft crash at Fairchild Air Force Base
  3. Pontiac's Rebellion
  4. Russian-Circassian War
  5. Shen Kuo
  6. Webley Revolver

New A-Class articles:

  1. AHS Centaur
  2. Operation Lam Son 719
  3. Ronald Niel Stuart
  4. Zveno project
Awards and honors
  • Kevin Myers has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on early modern warfare in North America, and, in particular, the creation of four featured articles on the topic.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XVI (June 2007)
Project news
Current proposals and discussions
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. AHS Centaur
  2. Battle of Cape Esperance
  3. USS New Jersey (BB-62)

New A-Class articles:

  1. Andrew Cunningham, 1st Viscount Cunningham of Hyndhope
  2. Battle of Arras (1917)
  3. Battle of Red Cliffs
  4. Ironclad warship
  5. Michael Brown Okinawa assault incident
  6. Victoria Cross
Awards and honors
  • Noclador has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on structural graphics for land-based forces worldwide, his contributions to the Alpini and other regiments, and all his other military graphics.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Userbox[edit]

A>_ This user uses CP/M.

I have shamelessly stolen your userbox, resized it to standard proportions, and converted it into this template.
Digwuren 19:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 00:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XVIII (August 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Attack on Sydney Harbour
  2. Augustus
  3. Cædwalla of Wessex
  4. Confederate government of Kentucky
  5. Ine of Wessex
  6. Harry S. Truman
  7. Hispanic Americans in World War II
  8. Ironclad warship
  9. Pham Ngoc Thao
  10. Victoria Cross for New Zealand

New featured lists

  1. Surviving veterans of World War I

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of the Plains of Abraham
  2. Enfield revolver
  3. Fort Stanton (Washington, D.C.)
  4. Ho Chi Minh Campaign
  5. Jacques Le Gris
  6. Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Wandalstouring was awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and dedicated service as a project coordinator and his many contributions to the structure and operations of the project.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

hhey[edit]

it has been way too long shadin —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 18:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yeah, sure. I have less time for editing lately, but greetz nonetheless. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 01:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sounds like you've been busy Shadin2 16:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XIX (September 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Andrew Cunningham, 1st Viscount Cunningham of Hyndhope
  2. Battle for Henderson Field
  3. Battle of Greece
  4. Battle of Ramillies
  5. Egbert of Wessex
  6. Frederick Russell Burnham
  7. Freedom Monument (Riga)
  8. Issy Smith
  9. Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
  10. Omaha Beach
  11. Victoria Cross (Canada)
  12. Winfield Scott Hancock

New A-Class articles:

  1. Barton S. Alexander
  2. Battle of Barrosa
  3. Byzantine-Arab Wars
  4. Cleomenean War
  5. Fort Bayard (Washington, D.C.)
  6. Fort Corcoran
  7. Fort Runyon
  8. George Jones (RAAF officer)
  9. Jean de Carrouges
  10. Operation Passage to Freedom
  11. Smolensk War

New Featured lists:

  1. Army Groups of the National Revolutionary Army
  2. Puerto Ricans Missing in Action in the Korean War

New Featured topics:

  1. Victoria Cross
Current proposals and discussions
  • A proposal to formalize the project's style guide as part of Wikipedia's Manual of Style has been made and is being discussed; comments and suggestions would be very appreciated!
Awards and honors
  • SandyGeorgia was awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of the instrumental role she plays in the featured article process, both by checking the project's featured article candidates to ensure that citations are formatted correctly, and by helping clear out the backlog of featured articles that no longer meet the criteria. Sandy is the first non-member of the project to receive this award.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XX (October 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Arrest and assassination of Ngô Đình Diệm
  2. BAE Systems
  3. Battle of Barrosa
  4. Prince Louis of Battenberg
  5. Second Ostend Raid
  6. Thomas C. Hindman

New A-Class articles:

  1. Alexandru Averescu
  2. Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
  3. Fort Jackson (Virginia)
  4. Richard Williams (RAAF officer)
  5. Tet Offensive
  6. Wallachian Revolution of 1848
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • JKBrooks85 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his diligent efforts to improve our coverage of fortifications in the American Civil War, and, in particular, his creation of a substantial number of A-Class articles.
  • Tony the Marine has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his considerable efforts in raising Puerto Rican- and Hispanic-related military history articles to featured status.
File:Romans MMVII.JPG

What is Tag & Assess MMVII? We'd better explain. A month or so back, we ran a script to list all the articles in categories related to military history. This gave us about 165,000 articles. Some of these are already tagged and assessed as military history; some are military history but not yet tagged and assessed; some are not military history articles at all. This huge project — working thorough 165,000 articles — is called Tag & Assess 2007. To make it manageable, the list has been broken down into 330 ranges each of 500 articles. This is where you can help.

Just... adopt-a-range from the available worklists then keep track of your tally on participants' list. The tagging is easy, just follow the simple instructions. Afterwards, as our way of thanking you, you'll be presented with service awards and barnstars based on the number of articles you process. Remember... the ranges are broken down into sub-sections of ten articles, so you work through them at twenty or thirty articles a day if you wish. To make Tag & Assess 2007 a success, we need your help. Please sign up now. Thanks.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]


Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mages' Guild[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mages' Guild, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mages' Guild. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Thieves' Guild (Elder Scrolls) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls)[edit]

Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lorkhan (Elder Scrolls) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fighters' Guild[edit]

Fighters' Guild, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Fighters' Guild satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighters' Guild and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Fighters' Guild during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mages' Guild[edit]

Mages' Guild, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Mages' Guild satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mages' Guild and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Mages' Guild during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXI (November 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Red Cliffs
  2. James II of England
  3. Lawrence Sullivan Ross
  4. Pre-dreadnought battleship
  5. Thomas C. Hindman
  6. USS Kentucky (BB-66)

New featured lists:

  1. List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients
  2. List of Canadian Victoria Cross recipients

New featured portals:

  1. Military of Greece

New A-Class articles:

  1. 2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident
  2. Battle of the Gebora
  3. Battle of Vaslui
  4. Le Quang Tung
  5. Morotai Mutiny
  6. Phan Dinh Phung
  7. Truong Dinh
  8. USS Illinois (BB-65)
  9. Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang
  10. Yen Bai mutiny
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Albuera
  2. Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
  3. Battle of the Gebora
  4. Constantine II of Scotland
  5. Francis Harvey
  6. Vasa (ship)
  7. Wulfhere of Mercia

New A-Class articles:

  1. 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing
  2. Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
  • Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
  • For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007

Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:

1. Bedford — 7,600
2. TomStar81 — 5,500
3. Parsival74 — 5,200
4. FayssalF — 3,500
5. Roger Davies — 3,000
6. Ouro — 2600
7. Kateshortforbob — 2250
8. Cromdog — 2,200
9. BrokenSphere — 2000
9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000
9. Maralia — 2,000
12. MBK004 — 1,340
13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250
14. Sniperz11 — 1100
15. Burzmali — 1000
15. Cplakidas — 1000
15. Gimme danger — 1000
15. Raoulduke471000
15. TicketMan — 1000
15. Welsh — 1000
15. Blnguyen — 1000

Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.

We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mk 48 Torpedo[edit]

While the data about the real speed and range of the Mk 48 are not official, I think that a Jane's estimate is more than enough a citation to include them in the article. So, I will do that, if you are not against it. KostasG (talk) 15:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I wrote a couple of more things with a reference. I don't particularly like the site where I found the data, but I couldn't find the official USN thing. If you can spare a few moments take a look @ the article and tell me your opinion. Thanks a lot :) KostasG (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIII (January 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 1994 Black Hawk shootdown incident
  2. Battle of Musa Qala
  3. George Jones (RAAF officer)
  4. Italian War of 1542–1546
  5. Jim Bowie
  6. Józef Piłsudski
  7. Matanikau Offensive
  8. Offa of Mercia
  9. Suleiman the Magnificent
  10. USS Illinois (BB-65)

New featured lists:

  1. List of Knight's Cross recipients
  2. Order of battle at the Glorious First of June

New A-Class articles:

  1. 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt
  2. Cold War
  3. Hans-Joachim Marseille
  4. Krulak Mendenhall mission
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors
  • Bwmoll3 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his superior contributions to a variety of articles about the United States Air Force, including a great number of those dealing with wings and installations.
  • Bedford has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of the outstanding contribution he has made to the project's organization by going above and beyond the call of duty in tagging, assessing, and classifying a massive number of articles during the 2007 assessment drive.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.


This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIV (February 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident
  2. Carlson's patrol
  3. Coenwulf of Mercia
  4. Glorious First of June
  5. Koli Point action
  6. Operation Camargue

New featured lists:

  1. List of Victoria Cross recipients by nationality

New A-Class articles:

  1. 51st Army (Soviet Union)
  2. Indonesian occupation of East Timor (1975-1999)
  3. Le Paradis massacre
  4. Military of East Timor
  5. USS Bridgeport (AD-10)
Breaking news
  • A new B-Class Assessment Drive ("BCAD") will go operational no later than 11 March. Of great interest to experienced wiki-gnomes, it is small in scope, about 4,500 articles, and will be supported by the usual awards, including a golden wiki. To keep up to date with developments, and to get off to a flying start when it opens, add WP:MHA-BCAD now to your watchlist.
Awards and honors
  • Kirill Lokshin has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding organizational work, his painstaking maintenance work, and his unstinting advice, throughout his two years of project leadership.
  • MBK004 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding effort to improve our compliment of naval ships by updating infoboxes, replacing deprecated infoboxes, and locating sources for ships in the employment of their respective countries' navies.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXV (March 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Æthelred of Mercia
  2. Cannon
  3. HMAS Melbourne (R21)
  4. Huldrych Zwingli
  5. Timor Leste Defence Force
  6. USS Bridgeport (AD-10)

New featured lists:

  1. List of countries without armed forces
  2. List of foreign recipients of the Knight's Cross
  3. List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Battle of Iwo Jima
  4. List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Royal Navy

New featured topics:

  1. Atlantic campaign of May 1794

New A-Class articles:

  1. Armia Krajowa
  2. Heuschrecke 10
  3. USS Siboney (ID-2999)
  4. William Stacy
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVI (April 2008)
Project news
  • Tag & Assess 2008 launched on 24 April and will run until 4 July. We have around 60,000 articles to check, so all assistance is very welcome. As usual, there are barnstars galore and service awards for contributing editors.
  • The project scope has been amended to include specific reference to historically accurate video games. Songs and music with long military associations are also now included.
  • The Contest department has completed its thirteenth month of competition, which saw 27 entries. The top scorer this month is Ed! with 37 points, followed by Cam with 22 points. Woody, Howard C. Berkowitz, Redmarkviolinist, Nousernamesleft and Outdawg also fielded entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 188 points in total. You are encouraged to submit articles you're working on as entries.
  • The coordinators have "adopted" task forces to act as prime point of contact. A list of which coordinators have adopted which task forces is here.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt
  2. 1962 South Vietnamese Independence Palace bombing
  3. Lazare Ponticelli
  4. Maximian
  5. Peterloo Massacre
  6. The Third of May 1808
  7. USS Orizaba (ID-1536)
  8. USS Siboney (ID-2999)

New featured lists:

  1. List of Irish Victoria Cross recipients
  2. Order of battle at the Battle of Tory Island

New featured portals:

  1. Portal:American Civil War

New A-Class articles:

  1. 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team (United States)
  2. Battle of Bonchurch
  3. Battle of Tassafaronga
  4. Early thermal weapons
  5. HMS Cardiff (D108)
  6. USS Comfort (AH-3)
  7. USS Orizaba (ID-1536)
Current proposals and discussions
  • An interesting proposal to set up teams to deal with specific tasks, like taking the Top Ten most frequently read military history articles to featured articles status is here.
  • The coordinators are exploring ways of developing and improving our fifty or so task forces. More information is here.
  • All editors are invited to contribute to a discussion about the naming of military operations in an endeavor to reach consensus.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVII (May 2008)
Project news
  • Editors needed for Tag & Assess 2008. To coincide with the summer holidays, it will be gearing up from 15 June. As usual, barnstars galore!
  • Partner peer reviews: for a thirty-day trial period, we'll be running joint peer reviews with Wikiproject Video Games. The idea is simple: we help with their reviews; they help with ours. This way both wikiprojects benefit from new reviewers and new ideas!
  • We're notable: A new book, Simon Fowler's 2007 Guide to Military History on the Internet (UK:Pen & Sword, ISBN 9781844156061) rates Wikipedia as "the best general resource" for military research (p. 7). Of the military pages, he says: "The results are largely accurate and generally free of bias" (he also suggests people join the wikiproject). When rating WP as the No. 1 military site (p. 201) he says "Wikipedia is often criticised for its inaccuracy and bias, but in my experience the military history articles are spot on."
  • A-Class reviews: the usual four-day review period may now be extended by up to three days (ie seven days in total) in the following circumstances:
  1. the article has no opposes but has insufficient support for promotion or
  2. the article's nominator requests more time to resolve matters arising during the review.
The full text is here.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Tassafaronga
  2. Funerary Monument to Sir John Hawkwood
  3. HMS Cardiff (D108)
  4. Krulak Mendenhall mission
  5. Le Quang Tung
  6. Operation Passage to Freedom
  7. Paul Nobuo Tatsuguchi

New featured lists:

  1. List of Texan survivors of the Battle of the Alamo
  2. List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Royal Navy
  3. List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Indian Army

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of the Kalka River
  2. Battle of Verrières Ridge
  3. Brian Horrocks
  4. Byzantine navy
  5. Erich Hartmann
  6. Montana class battleship
Current proposals and discussions
  • A discussion has been opened into the structuring of top level operational categories, starting with Category:World War II. All interested editors are invited to help establish a consensus.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
Project news
  • With the holiday season upon us, we're very short of reviewers at A-Class Reviews and are likely to remain so for the next month or so. If just five new reviewers each reviewed one article a week, the problem would be solved! To keep track of Milhist articles for peer and A-Class reviews, simply paste the code – {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} – onto your talk page.
  • Similarly, copy-editors are currently in short supply. If you can help out at the Copy-editing section of the Logistics Dept, it would be much appreciated. If you can help with A-Class Reviews and Featured Article Candidates so much the better! To keep up to date with Milhist articles needing copy input, just paste – {{WPMILHIST Copy-editing alerts}} onto your talk page.
  • The debate on whether Milhist should adopt the new C-Class has been closed, with a strong and clear consensus against adopting. The archived discussion is here.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Lissa (1811)
  2. Battle of Verrières Ridge
  3. Benjamin Franklin Tilley
  4. Brian Horrocks
  5. Lince (tank)
  6. Montana class battleship
  7. Saint-Sylvestre coup d’état
  8. Verdeja (tank)
  9. Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang

New featured lists:

  1. List of Crimean War Victoria Cross recipients‎
  2. List of German World War II jet aces (promoted in May)

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of Mount Austen, the Galloping Horse, and the Sea Horse
  2. Battle of Strasbourg
  3. Operation Brevity
  4. Operation Tractable
  5. Operation Varsity
  6. Roman-Persian Wars
  7. SS Kroonland
Current proposals and discussions
  • The Milhist review structure is itself being reviewed. The idea is to see how it can be improved, or whether it needs changing or updating.
  • The month-long trial of partner peer reviews with Video games is being discussed. All feedback welcome!
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIX (July 2008)
Project news
  • The criteria for Military history A-Class reviews have been overhauled. The new standard is deliberately set higher than before, and is much closer to featured article quality. The new criteria are:
  • A1. The article is consistently referenced with an appropriate citation style, and all claims are verifiable against reputable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations as appropriate.
  • A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused on the main topic; it neglects no major facts or details, presents views fairly and without bias, and does not go into unnecessary detail.
  • A3. The article has an appropriate structure of hierarchical headings, including a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections, and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.
  • A4. The article is written in concise and articulate English; its prose is clear, is in line with style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant.
  • A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as images or diagrams with succinct captions, and other media, where appropriate.
  • The timescale for A-Class articles has also been changed to give more editors an opportunity to participate.
  • The six-monthly Coordinators' election has been moved back a month to avoid clashes with the holiday period. The sign-up period will run from 1–15 September and the elections themselves from 16–30 September.
  • The military land vehicles task force has been created.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Concepción
  2. Battle of Mount Austen, the Galloping Horse, and the Sea Horse
  3. Battle of Tory Island
  4. Early life and military career of John McCain
  5. Grass Fight
  6. Leopard 2E
  7. Operation Varsity
  8. Roman–Persian Wars
  9. Uriel Sebree
  10. USS Princess Matoika (ID-2290)

New featured portals:

  1. Portal:World War II

New A-Class articles:

  1. 11th Airborne Division (United States)
  2. 2007–2008 Ethiopian crackdown in Ogaden
  3. 2008 invasion of Anjouan
  4. Auxiliaries (Roman military)
  5. Citadel of Saigon
  6. HMS Ark Royal (91)
Current proposals and discussions
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXX (August 2008)
Project news
  • The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is underway, to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 14 September! Voting starts at 00:01 (UTC) on 15 September and runs until 23:59 (UTC) on 30 September.
  • A new barnstar specifically encouraging and recognizing excellence in Milhist article creation and development has been introduced. Any editor who has made a significant contribution to three or more Milhist A-Class articles promoted since 1 August 2008 under the new A-Class criteria is eligible. Nominations for the medal should be made here; should list the three A-Class articles for which the medal is sought; and must be subsequently supported by three or more project coordinators, who will be responsible for making the award. Editors may nominate themselves or any other qualifying editor.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Domitian
  2. HMS Ark Royal (91)
  3. John McCain
  4. Operation Ke
  5. Panzer I
  6. Warwick Castle

New featured lists:

  1. List of Korean War Medal of Honor recipients
  2. List of USAF Test Pilot School alumni

New A-Class articles:

  1. Harry Murray
  2. Horses in warfare
  3. Kaunas Fortress
  4. Kiev Expedition (1018)
  5. Napoleon I of France
  6. Operation Ke
  7. Panzer IV
  8. SS Dakotan
  9. SS Pennsylvanian
  10. TAM (tank)
  11. United States Naval Gunfire Support Debate‎
  12. USS Mercy (AH-4)
Current proposals and discussions
  • A new discussion about whether Milhist should adopt C-Class is underway. All comments are welcome.
  • The 2008 Tag & Assess Workshop is still open, seeking input on ways to improve the efficiency, user-friendliness and organization of future Milhist drives. All comment is welcome, especially from people who didn't participate in the drive!
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXXI (September 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. AMX-30E
  2. Battle of Goliad
  3. Guadalcanal Campaign
  4. Harry Murray
  5. Morotai Mutiny
  6. Phan Xich Long

New featured lists:

  1. List of Indian Mutiny Victoria Cross recipients
  2. List of Zulu War Victoria Cross recipients‎

New featured topics:

  1. Guadalcanal Campaign

New A-Class articles:

  1. 2nd Canadian Infantry Division
  2. Air Combat Group RAAF
  3. Battle of Berlin
  4. Blair Anderson Wark
  5. Late Roman army
  6. Operation Lüttich
  7. SMS Von der Tann
  8. SS Minnesotan
  9. SS Montanan
  10. SS Ohioan (1914)
  11. SS Panaman
  12. SS Washingtonian
  13. USS Iowa (BB-61)
  14. USS West Bridge (ID-2888)
Current proposals and discussions
  • The W1.0 Editorial Team have selected 1133 Military history articles for inclusion in the W0.7 test release. For convenience, these are broken by task force and you'll find a list on each task force headed "Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for [task force name]" on the task force talk page. You may nominate extra articles for inclusion or existing ones for removal. If you can improve any of the articles on the list, by adding references, or copy-editing, or cleaning up generally, please do so.
  • A new discussion has started about naming articles on Soviet WWII operations. All contributions are welcome as we hope to resolve this longstanding issue once and for all.
  • The debate over whether Milhist should adopt C-Class is continuing. All comments and suggestions are welcome.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXXII (October 2008)
Project news
  • Following a lengthy discussion, three new coordinators – EyeSerene, Maralia and the_ed17 - have been coopted. The purpose of the appointments is partly to fill the place left by the retirement of TomStar81 and partly to provide increased/improved coordinator capacity to cover existing coordinator absences and to help with upcoming major projects. As a reminder, coordinators are merely editors who have committed to go the extra mile for the project and that there are very few processes that require coordinator input. Specifically these are closing A-Class reviews, and endorsing two project award nominations. Any editors who wish to help with the nitty-gritty of this busy project (cross-posting A-Class review, peer review and featured article candidate alerts; responding to member questions and queries, helping with drives) are positively encouraged to do so.
  • A workshop has been set up to redesign and improve the newsletter. In our recent competition, a new name was chosen – The Bugle. All editors are welcome to participate, especially those with graphic and design skills!
  • Administrator and Milhist coordinator, Nick Dowling, has changed his user name to Nick-D.
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Albert Speer
  2. Anglo-Zanzibar War
  3. Operation Epsom
  4. Operation Tractable
  5. SMS Von der Tann
  6. TAM
  7. USS Nevada (BB-36)

New featured lists:

  1. List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service
  2. List of New Zealand Land Wars Victoria Cross recipients
  3. List of Second Afghan War Victoria Cross recipients

New A-Class articles:

  1. Admiralty Islands campaign
  2. Battle of Fort Donelson
  3. Battle of Fort Henry
  4. Battle of Vigo Bay
  5. Clarence Smith Jeffries
  6. Frederick III, German Emperor
  7. Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette
  8. MS West Honaker
  9. Percy Herbert Cherry
  10. Joseph Maxwell
  11. SS Iowan
  12. Third Battle of Kharkov
  13. USS Constitution
Current proposals and discussions
  • Adoption of C-class remains firmly on the Milhist agenda with discussions approaching their fourth month of debate. More views are sought on this.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: The Bugle
Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Battle of Lipantitlán
  2. Battle of Khafji
  3. Richard Williams (RAAF officer)
  4. Tom Crean
  5. Third Battle of Kharkov
  6. SS Mauna Loa
  7. SS Montanan
  8. SS Ohioan (1914)
  9. USS Constitution

New featured lists:

  1. List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Schnellboot service

New A-Class articles:

  1. 13th Airborne Division (United States)
  2. Alaska class battlecruiser
  3. Edmund Herring
  4. Revolt of the Comuneros
  5. Rheinmetall 120 mm gun
  6. SS Black Osprey
  7. Stanley Goble
  8. Tanks in the Spanish Army
Current proposals and discussions
  • Adoption of C-class remains firmly on the Milhist agenda with discussions approaching their fifth month of debate. More views are sought on this.
  • What is a Pyrrhic victory? There's an interesting and lively discussion on this here. (And the short answer is: follow what the sources say.)
  • Can you design logos? We're looking for a snappy new logo to go with the new title of the newsletter. See the ideas so far at the newsletter workshop.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: The Bugle
Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 13th Airborne Division (United States)
  2. 2nd Canadian Infantry Division
  3. Action of 13 January 1797
  4. Akutan Zero
  5. AMX-30
  6. Arena Active Protection System
  7. Blair Anderson Wark
  8. British Empire
  9. Frederick III, German Emperor
  10. Phan Dinh Phung
  11. Rheinmetall 120 mm gun
  12. SS Dakotan
  13. SS Washingtonian
  14. Tanks in the Spanish Army

New featured lists:

  1. Timeline of the Adriatic campaign, 1807–1814

New featured topics:

  1. Spanish Tanks

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of Salamis
  2. Bruce Kingsbury
  3. Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)
  4. George Ingram
  5. Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)
  6. John Whittle
  7. Lexington class battlecruiser
  8. Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
  9. SM U-5 (Austria-Hungary)
  10. Tetrarch (tank)
  11. USS Iowa turret explosion
  12. Zanzibar Revolution
Current proposals and discussions
  • Design competition Editors with design skills urgently needed to design an eyecatching logo for this newsletter. The logo needs to incorporate a bugle motif as well as the newsletter's title, "The Bugle". Fame and honour (a barnstar) guaranteed for the successful design. Submit entries here please.
  • Who will be the three "2008 Military historians of the Year"? There are 13 candidates so far and the number is rising rapidly. The winning editors will receive the Gold, Silver and Bronze Wikis; and all other nominees the WikiProject barnstar. To nominate editors you admire, or to cast your votes, please visit here!
  • A new drive has been started to identify the core topics of World War I with the aim of improving their quality before the centenary of the start of World War I in 2014.
  • A discussion is underway regarding flag icons and whether to rewrite the current guidelines to reflect the Manual of Style.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]