User talk:C. Cyvette M. Gibson

Your submission at Articles for creation: C-Unit (U of Colorado) (December 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C-Unit (U of Colorado) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! C. Cyvette M. Gibson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you need help, ask[edit]

Hi. There are numerous resources on Wikipedia to teach you how to edit. Moving articles around and creating articles that violate WP:NPOV while you appear to have a conflict of interest make your editing problematic. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to C. Cyvette M. Gibson‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]