User talk:Bsadowski1/Archives/2009/August

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — Aitias // discussion 10:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Dangit, you beat me to reporting Obritom69. :p Thanks, though. Alessandriana (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Autorollback

You might want to be a bit more careful with it, you just reverted the iphone to the i-rape :) Googolplexed (talk) 07:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC) wait never mmind my browser was acting screwy, it was show the previous rev Googolplexed (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPhone&diff=274077823&oldid=274077774 ;) Bsadowski1 (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

My Talk Page

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my talk page. Because of that, I'll forgive you for getting to all the other reverts before me. :-) Gnowor (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks twice for this and this :) Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diva Zappa

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Diva Zappa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I suggested over a fortnight ago that I didn't feel that Zappa was notable enough to have her own Wiki page and used the notability tag. No-one has made any effort in establishing notability and when I have searched for her on Google, I found little that suggested anything other than very minor claims for notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fol de rol troll (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the attack on my talk page. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Look at the revision history and see for yourself :)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

A.E. Wilder-Smith

i am very sorry i didnt mean to delete that it said on my laptop the writing i entered was in --Godlover32795 (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry :p --Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Timeline of science and engineering in the Islamic world

Your revert of the anonymous edit on this page seems to be a misuse of the rollback feature. The edit was not blatantly unproductive or nonsense, it was reverting a very thoughtful and careful cleanup of the article that I performed in the last week. The current article is highly un-encyclopedic and the version that was reverted to was much closer to featured timeline articles such as Timeline of chemistry. I'm not sure if it's uncontroversial or correct but it doesn't deserve use of the rollback feature, thank you --kittyKAY4 (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

It was another accident. I clicked stop on Firefox when I clicked it. I didn't know it would actually complete it. I didn't read what the IP edited. I thought it was a vandal edit because ClueBot had reverted it before. ---Bsadowski1 (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for un-vandalizing my talk page :) -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


Biff Burger

Good lord. you guys are crazy with how quick you react. I'm reading the instructions now on how to request a page. I know I messed up. I'm working on it. -FSUNolez06 (talk) 23:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for catching the vandalism on the DustBot page. I was trying to correct such myself, you must have finished just I was clicking the save button. I appreciate your being a good Wikipedian! Lonesome Crow (talk) 05:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for taking care of User talk:Fluffy prince jr while I was handling other matters. :)--The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


D'OH!!

I FORGOT! I'm supposed to put "User:" In front of my link! I'll try and keep it in my userspace from now on. SORRY!!! *Awkwardly goes back to user page.* —Preceding unsigned comment added by Math321 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Wrong CSD

In such a case, it is best to leave both tags. It is not rare to see articles that meet more than one CSD criterion. Usually, the ones that meet G10 also meet A7 as well.

Regards. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok. I will remember not to do that :) --Bsadowski1 (talk) 03:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Please stop beating User:Abce2 to reverting vandalism. If you continue to do so, you will be immedetly blocked.

CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents 01:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bsadowski1/Archives/2009/August&oldid=1166515302"