User talk:Bronznazaret

January 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yorkshire Dales has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yorkshire Dales was changed by Bronznazaret (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918883 on 2016-01-16T13:26:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Junior Reid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at RZA, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: RZA was changed by Bronznazaret (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85809 on 2016-01-16T13:32:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ol' Dirty Bastard. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wallington County Grammar School. Eagleash (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Keith D (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bronznazaret (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock the Wu/M!g coalition or suffer with 36 shurikens to your chamber

Decline reason:

All we needed to know. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.