Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.
Cheers, Riley Huntley (talk) No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 05:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]
Hello! Bradford,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 04:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Ross Lynch has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Uploading someone else's photo to your flickr account then using that as a source for the image on commons does not give you ownership of the photo. It is still copyrighted by the original photographer.Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Corazón Valiente, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automatedcomputer program called ClueBot NG.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corazón Valiente. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. EdinburghWanderer 21:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, please remove the administrator category and topicon from your user page as impersonating an administrator is highly frowned upon and blockable. Thank you for the kitty though, I will take good care of it. Cheers, Riley HuntleytalkNo talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 04:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to my talk page was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I don't have an account on the es wiki... TheopolismeTALK 20:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, nonfree images aren't permitted to be displayed in userspace, but a link to the image is fine. Nyttend (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The unfree image placed in my post by DJMalik has been removed. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the compliment & greetings. I do whatever I can to maintain them in a professional level by adding useful content with valid sources. You'll see me around articles remotely related to Univision, Telemundo, Televisa, and a little bit of Venevision and TV Azteca. Platinum Star (talk) 00:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Malik, I suggest you really do take time to read the pages I linked you to. It may save you from awkward situations in the future. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Consider adding other sources aside from IMDb to verify the biographical information such as birth place and birth date. SwisterTwistertalk 22:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dulce Amargo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance, Chilean and Roxana Díaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. According to thesewebsites, no official titles exist for episodes 19 and onwards, which is why "Capítulo ##" was used as an alternative. I don't think that episode descriptions, such as in the last episode (Aurelio Casillas muere al intentar cambiarse el rostro) would make a good substitution for Capítulo ##, unless that's allowed. Platinum Star (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking about removing that section since episode titles are unused, unless Telemundo chooses to use them again, which will force me to restore the episode title section. Platinum Star (talk) 04:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For Marido en alquiler and Santa Diabla, they don't need consideration. As for the other ones (Pasion prohibida, Dama y Obrero, El se~nor de los cielos, etc with no episode titles), I'll think about it.
Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriel Coronel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elizabeth Gutiérrez may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
como Analía en el Rostro de Analía"]</ref> || Ana Lucía Moncada / Mariana Andrade de Montiel[ || <center>— </center>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kimberly Dos Ramos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
'''Kimberly Dos Ramos De Sousa''' <ref name="IMDb"/> (born April 15, 1992 is an [[actress]], [[entertainer]], [[Model (profession)|model]] and [[singer]]
2011|author=Varios|fecha=|work=Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre|language=Español}}</ref>''[[Grachi]'' achieved in its opening day in the country of Mexico a total of 10.7 points in audience
Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for September 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for September 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kimberly Dos Ramos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camaleones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pee Wee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PITBULL MR 305 (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Argentina does not use pm/am. Venezuela too. The one and only country in the world that use pm/am is the United States. So why in the case of Argentina, Panama, Mexico and Dominican Republic you didn't write pm, and you write it only for Venezuela? What's the point?[reply]
PITBULL MR 305 (talk) 23:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Is it a lie that Dama y Obrero finished? If not, then why you reverted my edit on it? For every other telenovela of Telemundo here on Wikipedia the last episode is written not with № or name, but with Gran final, like Relaciones peligrosas, for example - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relaciones_Peligrosas . So why you reverted my edit on it?[reply]
You can confirm it by going to official twitter pages of those actors. I don't think they would lie about being in this telenovela. You will also find pictures from the set there. I tried to put references, but they don't work. I guess I don't know how to do it properly. [1][2] By the way, telenovela premieres in december. If you don't believe me now, in december you will see that they are a part of the cast yourself :) Mickie777 (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Although the English translation is extremely difficult to read, I'll leave alone the very badly translated, redundant article that has too much unnecessary information. (No translation is better than a bad translation.) Unfortunately the English article reflects badly on Srta Dos Ramos.Rose1909 (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian de la Campa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC) And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriel Coronel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Format, Release and Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian de la Campa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. And Adoil Descended (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 30[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Marido en Alquiler cast members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Lopez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm FairyTailRocks. DJMalik, thanks for creating Suelta La Sopa!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add reliable sources to make the subject notable also user-generated sites like YouTube is not counted as reliable sources per WP:NEWSBLOG. At first glance it fails WP:GNG.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. FairyTailRocks (talk) 14:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paola Núñez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It looks that you're the only one who can make edits on telenovelas pages, because you revert everything other users puts. And those users usually puts confirmed information, the same information you put yourself after some time. You always ask for references, but even if you get them, you still delete everything. If you're the person who knows everything and other people are always wrong, I feel like I'm wasting my time putting anything on Wikipedia. So I'm done. And if you're some type of the God on here, you should take a look at Los miserables page, because this poor english with tones of mistakes is really killing me everytime I read it.
p.s. I don't care if you gonna get offended and I'm gonna be blocked from edits on Wikipedia for speaking my mind, but at least I feel better now. Have a nice day :) Mickie777 (talk) 02:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ana Brenda Contreras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mujeres Asesinas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I would like to ask you cordially to stop reversing the correct edit on the 'Avenida Brasil (telenovela)' article, since your edit have a few mistakes:
1. In the 'Telenovela overview' section, Bernado Simões' character 'Batata' is incorrectly written as 'Patata'. I know that when the telenovela is dubbed some names may be changed BUT we need to stick with the ORIGINAL names in the article (in this case, Batata).
2. In the 'International release' section you removed at least SEVEN countries where the telenovela was officially launched like: Israel, Hungary, Georgia, Mongolia, Bulgaria, Thaiti and Bosnia (also the territories of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, Guadeloupe and Martinique). Plus, they are not listed in order of premiere like EVERY OTHER telenovela article in the wikipedia universe. The Russia broadcast date is also wrong (It didn't premiere on March 26, 2012. That was the original brazilian premiere date).
It's nothing personal, we just can't remove or hide correct information from the article. Hope you understand. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afr12run (talk • contribs) 16:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I'm trying to be nice with you! I don't wanna make an 'edit war' of this, but you need to understand that you can't change somenthing that is right on the article. This section in your edit have wrong information and hide countries and this cannot be accepted. Otherwise, we gonna have problems. I'm asking you to understand. Hope we can agree on something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afr12run (talk • contribs) 16:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why you keep putting Venezuela in second place on the table when Portugal was the second country to premiere? Your are not putting the countries in the correct order by premiere! They are all out of order! I'm not gonna give up! Im not gonna let you mess up with this article! I put references to a lot of countries and you still remove them (like Mauritius and Bulgaria)! What's wrong with you?
Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avenida Brasil (telenovela), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Avenida Brasil (telenovela) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I ask my release, because it's my first block and took months in editing is wikipedia, the truth promise not continue creating edit wars. good morning is that eventually, all thanks for reading my request. PichuHow can I help? 01:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but is not coherent enough for me to understand that you understand what the issue at hand. only (talk) 03:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why does your signature contain links to two other accounts? "Pichu" links to User:Bradford and "How can I help" links to User talk:DjMalik. Please change it so it links to you and not other users or your former names. only (talk) 03:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marido en Alquiler may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Please stop your disruptive editing. The articles have a standart. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Mahone, you may be blocked from editing. stop just copying and pasting incorrect information into this article. you are removing correct formatting, reliable sources and other info. Louis Erisson (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will say this once. Please do NOT update the episode count DURING the episode broadcast. It has to be done AFTER the episode ends. That's Wiki's policy and not mine. Also, i've noticed that you randomly revert edits that you deem unconstructive (including my edits that are not vandalism) and you reinsert what I had added on said article. Last night's edit in LQLVMR is your example. Please start following Wikipedia policy unless you really want to face the consequences, which I think it's not the best idea. Thank you. Ricardo80 (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nora, La Emprendedora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Cruz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Victoria San Marino.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Victoria San Marino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fut.Perf.☼ 08:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for the additions and revisions you've made to the cosita Linda article. I would like to return the episode list box and the Venezuela broadcast section, though its always being removed and the episodes are already being uploaded. Can I still return it without it having to be removed again? Thanks MarVit3 (talk) 07:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have included at least one reference, so the issue shouldn't be "This section does not cite any references or sources.......". Thanks. --→Enock4seth(talk) 00:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Diabla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PLEASE do not make changes to data relating to the telenovela.
should not interfere as at information notified. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but I know you better for the information displayed on us persons responsible pages? do not think so. information will reenter the pages. for any changes need to ask. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Τheories vandalism to doing it yourself. access is published information on the telenovela. Much of the information on it by the producers. specifically Mr. Jose Alberto Castro producer of telenovela La Malquerida has said that the telenovela will premiere in May and Actors who will be cast in the series. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alka21 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but after you know you better than me that I live in Mexico I read, hear and constantly learning everything for the telenovela ... once again sorry, I'm so sorry ... Alka21 (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madre Sustituta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Once a proposed deletion has been contested an article can not be deleted through that method. If you feel the article should still be deleted use WP:AFD. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on File:Amaya_in_2013.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —howcheng {chat} 02:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Tempestad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Levy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I've edited your userpage since our rules regarding non-free content such as the posters you've uploaded do not allow their use on userpages. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Would you explain the radical changes made in this article ??? --Helptottt (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely nothing was wrong with the awards and nominations article, 50+ awards are not "few prizes." Besides, the article was reviewed and patrolled. Your redirection was unjustified, but fine, I won't report this. As for the color of the wins/nom is concerned, it's perfectly acceptable to change the colors, I don't see any problem there. Please, do not alter anything else in that section. Thank you. --Helptottt (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There was a Wiki notice before the Santa Diabla information stating that the article needed editing for grammar, spelling, etc. I edited the translation to correct all of the English, and I clarified the debut of Diaz on Telemundo (as requested), as well as the the composition of the theme song. I did not do anything incorrectly. Please leave my revisions as they totally correct the English, and please just add the remaining information as needed. It is my pleasure to help with English translations of telenovelas. Rose1909 (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to welcome you to the WikiProject Latin music! :) Erick (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 11-11:En Mi Cuadra Nada Cuadra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Just wanted to request you to kindly edit the template for Venevision 2014-2015 telenovelas that you created so that it can read the current telenovelas that are airing eg corazon Esmeralda at 9 pm instead of Cosita Linda. Thanks.MarVit3 (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Secretos del Paraíso, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages RCN and Iván López (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Accidentally rv'd you, have rv'd myself back to your edit. Apologies! --S.G.(GH)ping! 20:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Ronca de Oro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rating and Buga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per your edit summary here, why not discuss this on the talk page first before reverting, excuse me to say for fun? OR a limited time provided for references to be provided. I strongly recommend talk page discussions before reverting or removing stuffs articles. Regards. →Enock4seth(talk) 02:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I study about telenovelas. From pages where you are the the owner, there's so little information about cast and plot! In the old days you got all information about cast,! But now only actors and their roles! Give wikipedia's user more information! Look at page En nombre del amor there's perfect cast and when someone corrects you you just remove adds.Please fill out cast section in Santa diabla start from it and don't remove other's job
I saw you move some articles about Spanish-language albums and songs to its native capitalization. However, WP:NCCAPS says to use capitalization found on English-language sources. I once did the same thing and got into trouble for it. Just giving you a heads up. Erick (talk) 23:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See that's what happened. Someone told me about RAE and the enforcement of lower-case Spanish capitalization. This is where I got in trouble (I still feel bad about it). If you wish move to foreign-language titles based on its native capitalization, you should seek consensus first on the capitalization guideline talk page. It's been debated several times before and I don't want to get involved. The only exception are classical musical pieces though, where they have to follow the native capitalization rules. Erick (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that other wikis respect the rules, but you still need consensus to move articles based on foreign-language. I'm going to revert the moves back, but if you want to change it, request the moves here. Erick (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Show me a policy or guideline in Wikipedia that says I have to follow the Spanish language rules for titles of works. I showed you the above link because that was done by a guidelines. And yes you do have to reach consensus. Wikipedia is a community-based project. If you disagree, start a discussion here. Erick (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2014 Premios Juventud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dudel250 (talk) 00:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I saw your page while Patrolling and i was wondering what you meant for it to be about. I couldn't find enough context to work out what the page was about. It did seem like a pretty good page but i just couldn't see what the page was about. Please Reply Thanks! Dudel250 (talk) 00:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content
from Canal de las Estrellas without explaining why. In the future, it
would be helpful to others if you described your changes
to Wikipedia with an accurate edit
summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored
the removed content. If you would like to experiment,
please use the sandbox. If you think I
made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can
leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheQ Editor (Talk) 19:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
GeorgeMilan, per your admission here, I have indefinitely blocked your alternate account because it is being used to edit the same material in violation of policy. —DoRD (talk) 16:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Accusing me of sockpuppetry? Go ahead and report me for that, but you will have wasted your time because I only use MY account (this one you see here) for editing wikipedia. Unlike you, I don't have another identity here, so please keep your hypocritical opinions to yourself. Ricardo80 (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't need anyone to defend me because I can stand up for myself. I do not knpw who is that editor and I don't care because it's none of my business. Again, feel free to report me and that IP address, but don't come crying to me if you get blocked for accusing me for sockpuppetry. Ricardo80 (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hello there i just wanted to know if you deleted the mexican Broadcast of the telenovela lo que la vida me robo?
Hola que tal solo queria saber si tu borraste el transmitir Mexicano de la telenovela Lo Que La Vida Me Robo?
Hello, I've actually removed that section as irrelevant and not have references. see WP:NOT.--GeorgeMilanTALK2ME 01:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All that has to be done to get it back is to add the site where the ratings come from to references Joeloliv8 (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Did you delete the mexico broadcast section from the article lo que la vida ne robo..it was indeed relevant to everyone who looked at the list of episodes to stay up to date on the series i dont think it was the right thing to do i hope you can recover it because it was very helpful
Orphaned non-free image File:El Señor de los Cielos poster 1.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:El Señor de los Cielos poster 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've wikilinked that with the corresponding Spanish and Portugese articles, but I have to ask why you've moved it from the original title, which seemed fine, to the current title which seems grammatically suspect? Valenciano (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Muchacha Italiana Viene a Casarse (2014 telenovela)[edit]
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're asking but you requested the article be deleted be it was clearly written by the inventor/maker of the show and it showed no significance. I don't see any evidence of the former and a TV show that airs on TV with blue-linked actors is probably a bit of significance. If you think the article should be deleted, consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD. WilyD 09:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you delete the list of episodes for De que te quiero, te quiero they were very well needed especially by me, now i dont know which episode i am and you just dete it.
Also about the cast, what's wrong with the cast I put. First of all it's better than yours because yours is messy, missing stuff, and out of order, mines is clear, tidy, and had all the information available. It's not fair that any edits on that page are a erased by you. You dont own the page sooooo why are you doing it?
You look like you are in a bit of an edit war. You need to take it to the talk page and invite the other editor. Yes, he has been a bit of a jerk, but you've been here a while and he hasn't. At least make an effort to get him to discuss on the article talk page, and come to an understanding or compromise. Part of the problem is that your edit summaries have been non-existent or less than helpful, and maybe some discussion and summaries might help. To be clear, I've warned him clearly and loudly on his talk page, I'm just asking you help out a bit to give him a chance to turn around. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and he brought you up at WP:ANI, but participation isn't required and in fact, probably not a good idea. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The synopsis is meant to be a short, general overview of the basic plot in a few sentences. It is not necessary to include every single detail, because the show's full summary contains many spoilers. I know that the summary you included in from the show's official site, but this version is poorly translated and not in grammatically correct English. I included a 2 to 3 sentence translated version of the telenovela's plot based on articles written about the show. Thanks for helping out.
Musicfan877 (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877Musicfan877 (talk) 02:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, let's compromise. I edited your translation, but took out most of the spoilers because there were too many and none of it made much sense. I understand that some telenovela articles have longer plot summaries, but I think a paragraph gives plenty of information. The complete summary is too long and readers only need basic information about the story. The longer summaries have too much important information. I am just paraphrasing, so the information is easier and clearer. Thanks. Musicfan877 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877[reply]
Hello, Please explain what you want. I translated what you had, but in less words. The information you had is not written correctly, which is why I kept changing it. None of what you have in this section is in correct English. Your translation of the summary has a lot of errors with verbs and subjects. I think we can both agree that the article should be written in correct English. If you want to use this long summary, maybe you can update the Spanish page with it. Musicfan877 (talk) 06:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Musicfan877[reply]
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Mi corazón es tuyo". The discussion is about the article Mi corazón es tuyo.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! a DRN volunteer. --Bejnar (talk) 05:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hi Damián. I periodically check Jaime Camil's English page to keep it updated and fix any vandalism, etc. I see that you changed the format of his filmography and that makes sense. But you deleted more than half of his television shows because they do not fit the category, "Telenovelas." Could you please restore them? He has done TV work inside and outside of the category Telenovelas (and a few shows such as Devious Maids and Jane the Virgin which are pseudo-telenovelas), so I would think it appropriate to change the category from Telenovelas back to Television, but you may wish to format it differently.
Thank you for restoring his picture to the page. I'm glad it's back. In my opinion it's an awful photo, but that's not your fault - it was there years before you ever edited the page. What is the process for replacing it with a better picture? Must the change come from Jaime Camil's office? I know nothing about the technical side of Wikipedia edits.
FYI I am a native English speaker and I use telenovelas to improve my Spanish.
Paulah88 (talk) 01:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're doing a great job with the telenovelas, very welcome. Don't be put off by a nav template nom for deletion. All you have to do is hide the red links until you can get to them, no rush, it'll take time to start them all properly.See Template:Televisa telenovelas 1960sView here, I've hidden the fully red linked years for the time being, all you have to do is move the dotted line markers I've added. I've left the remainder of 1969 as it seems you're working through that year.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing, can you please add the year and the correct imdb links [1]?♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
De nada. Estoy aprendiendo a hablar español con fluidez. Puedo tratar de hablar en español, me perdone si me equivoco! Si usted necesita ayuda con la plantilla al enlace rojo más, voy a editarlo.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. No me importa tratar de comunicarse en español, ya que es una buena práctica! Hazme saber cuando se inicia un año más.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Damián, si no le molesta, prefiero inglés porque su inglés es mucho mejor que mi español. I found the following references. All of these are television shows, but none are telenovelas. Also you listed "Una familia de diez" as a telenovela, but it is an episode-based comedy instead. Maybe you want to add Jaime Camil's new show to the list - it's a US show in English. Jane the Virgin. Network: CW. Start date: October 2014. Role: Rogelio. Site: http://www.cwtv.com/shows/jane-the-virgin/about (scroll down to see him in the credits).
I prefer to wait for you to do it. I already posted the information long ago. Si el que removió infomación legitimo es usted, a quién se toca, recolocarlo?
You don't decide what's necessary and what's not. Me neither but I wanna see rules, which says that that information is forbidden .I hope you let me change Wikipedia better. Zaca4 (talk)
I can't understand why do you remove the information about "Corazon Indomable in Bulgaria"? There are all sources you need. Please explain to me, what is wrong? --46.229.193.141 (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, have any other source a little clearer, I had no reference exists.--Damián(talk) 16:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There was a reference - the official site of the television. Look again the history and you will see it.--46.229.193.141 (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you helped me but thank you. I don't know, what administrators will decide, but I want to make a deal with you. If you let me do cast and deceased characters in novela pages(and other people too, who really may help to upgrade) and I won't bother you in other sections. Do you agree? I wait for your answer. Zaca4 (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I won't touch telenovelas again, because I do not need more problems. I know you harm Wikipedia a lot, but fortunately , we have more places where to get information.Also I hope that administrators make right decision. Best wishes. Zaca4 (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Deborah (telenovela)[edit]
Hello Damián80,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Deborah (telenovela) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Detrás del muro[edit]
Hello Damián80,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Detrás del muro for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. AlanS (talk) 10:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the terrific work with the telenovelas and template creation. Very productive!! (Sigan con el excelente trabajo con las telenovelas y la creación de plantillas. Muy productiva!) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
English translation follows each paragraph.
Tema: la pagina de ingles de Jaime Camil
Subject: the English page for Jaime Camil
Primero, sacaste los shows de filmography que tú encontraste en la pagina imbd de Jaime Camil. (Buscaste paginas imbd de cada uno show? No.) Sacaste infomacion, por falta de reference, sin ni una gota de esfuerza para asegurarte si sería apropiada.
(English: First, you removed the shows from the filmography, if you could not find them in Jaime Camil's imbd page. Did you look for any of the shows themselves in imbd? No. You removed information, supposedly for lack of reference, without lifting a finger to make sure the removal was appropriate.)
Luego, despues que yo te dado la informacion que me pediste, tú me dijiste que no tengas tiempo para recolocar las cosas que sacaste. Dijiste que yo debo recolocar los que sacaste tú. (Quiere decir, yo debo corregir lo que destrozas tú.)
(English: Then, after I gave you the information you requested, you told me you were too busy to put back the information you removed. You told me that I should do it (in other words I should fix what you destroyed).)
Entonces, despues de 2 días, para evitar conflictos, yo recoloqué los shows, hasta la forma que pusiste. CON todos los referencias y enlaces. Admito, algunos enlaces fueran en forma equivocada; acabo de pedir ayuda de corregirlos, de otro wikipedia editor.
(English: So, after two days, to avoid conflict, I put back the shows, and I even put them in the format you created. WITH all the references and links. I admit that some links were in the wrong format. Right away I requested help to fix them from another Wikipedia editor.)
Y que? Aunque no tienes tiempo para reponer lo que sacaste indebidamente, SI! tienes tiempo (en pocas horas!) para destruir el trabajo de otros! Tus combios inapropiados:
(English: And what happened? Even though you had no time to fix what you removed inappropriately, AMAZINGLY you had time to destroy the work of others - in just a few hours! Your inappropriate changes:)
1. Qué nochecita con Jaime Camil. You removed the reference. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. There is no Wikipedia page.
2. Diseñador de ambos sexos. You removed the link to the Spanish wiki page. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. I know mine was a red link; I was researching how to link to a Spanish Wikipedia page.
3. Operación Triunfo. You removed the link to the Spanish wiki page. Now there is no link and no reference for the show.
4. La familia P. Luche. You removed the link to "Season 1, Episode 14." Note that the link that you kept in, to the show itself, does not list Jaime Camil. For that, you need the link I put in the notes column. Since you remove shows if they do not have sufficient reference, why would you remove the only reference to Jaime Camil being in the show?
5. Aventura por Mexico. You removed the reference. Now there is no link and no reference for the show. There is no Wikipedia page.
6. El Gran Show. You left in the Wikipedia link, but it points to a show from Peru. You removed the reference to the Univision show, which is the show Jaime Camil was in.
7. Devious Maids. You left in the Wikipedia link, which points to a page that does not list Jaime Camil. You removed the reference to the imbd full cast list, which includes Jaime Camil.
Por favor, hacer las correciones a tus errores, o revolver la pagina a la forma anterior. Si puedes corregir mis enlaces a paginas de wikipedia-español, te agradezco.
(English: Please correct the errors you put on the page, or return the page to its former version. If you can correct my links to the Spanish wikipedia pages, I would appreciate it.)
Paulah88 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I understand that my mistake was falling in wars. But take some time editing wikipedia, after two days is blocking me, when the edit war had stopped. I promise not to fall back into edit wars, it was my fault not taken into account.Damián(talk) 14:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
This is your second block for this offence. Please give us your understanding of what edit warring is. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
It seems unfair that my block me 48 hours and the other user around 24 hours, it is clear that he did nothing wrong, right?. Besides, I just created another account to impose its puppet editions. Here you can see these links: [2], [3], [4], Your new account is Dedo34, this seems totally unfair, since the wars of issues with this user comes from multiple items from telenovelas. And just to help you be a more encyclopedic wikipedia I make this place. But okay I get it here to help anyone cares and clear the other user does what you want when you want! and no one can say anything. Zaca4 user has multiple accounts using puppets to impose their issues and of course no one does anything right?. I understand that I must not fall into edit wars that user but so did block it alone for a day and me for two days, that does not seem right.--Damián(talk) 13:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You're no longer blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zaca4 got 24 hours and you got 48 hrs because it was a first offense for Zaca4 and a second for you. After the first one you should have known better than to edit war. Also, did you admit to having created a Dedo34 as sock puppet account? If so, that account is going to be blocked and you may end up with a 1 week block for socking. Blackmane (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is serious?, The Dedo34 account is a puppet Zaca4, seriously going to tell me that I believe account?. This account is not mine, and also Zaca4 was blocked before. I leave this link here [5]. Also, my first lock was months ago, and the user has been blocked Zaca4 twice already and he only block it for a day, this seems unfair.--Damián(talk) 15:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mi corazón es tuyo cast.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mi corazón es tuyo cast.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question is in that you cooperate with me or no[edit]
Question is same: you let me do cast and I won't bother you or no. You said no. I do not want edit-war with you but you do not let me do anything. And now you wonder, why I am still here. If you do not like what I am doing here, then do not start a war. I do not want to pay more consequences and please if you said no for peace and cooperating with me then no. You can always say yes. No wars any more. I hope you understand that what I am doing in Wikipedia is better for everyone. Zeta54 (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Telemetro shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — MusikAnimaltalk 04:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:REDNOT, personal names should not be linked to articles that do not exist, as you did with this edit to Marido en alquiler. I had fixed this only hours before, citing WP:REDNOT in the edit summary,[6] so I do not understand why you restored the redlinks. Please note that the cast section should include character descriptions, not just names, which is why I tagged the section for such cleanup.[7] I have re-tagged the section as it is still excessively long. Please do not remove thetemplate until the identified problems are resolved. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you have read them as I suggested,[8] based on this change you appear to misunderstand the instructions for {{Infobox television}}. The parameters |preceded_by= and |followed_by= are NOT for the series that aired immediately before and after a series on a particular night, they are for series for which the subject series is the successor or predecessor. For example, Star Trek: The Original Series aired from 1966-69. It was the predecessor to Star Trek: The Animated Series, which aired from 1973-74. Those series were succeeded by Star Trek: The Next Generation, which aired from 1987-94. The infobox for Star Trek: The Animated Series would look as it does to the right
If these series were to air on a Monday night in the order:
Star Trek: The Next Generation 8-9pm
Star Trek: The Animated Series 9-10pm
Star Trek: The Original Series 10-11pm
the infobox would still look as it does to the right. Similarly, |related= is for series that are "remakes, spin-offs, adaptations for different audiences, etc." Simply replacing a series does not make that series "related". Please also note that, as I indicated in this edit summary, "px" is not required. I do not understand why you restored it in this edit. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please help. Likewise kick (2014) film there is vandalism happening on the article Anjaan movie. Its done by an IP who seems to be a socket pup. Need protection for this page. Kindly help. Redards.
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Corona de lágrimas a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You've made more edits to Marido en alquiler that have restored problems that have previously been discussed. These include, but are not limited to:
restoration of "px" in the infobox.[9] - As Ihave explained previously,[10][11] px is not required. The instructions for {{Infobox television}} specifically say that "px" should be excluded.
restoration of cast tables - As we have discussed, cast should be listed per MOS:TV and should be in prose form, rather than tables. MOS:TV actually suggests the "ACTOR as CHARACTER" format. Since the section in the article is titled "Main characters", I used "CHARACTER portrayed by ACTOR" when fixing all the poor English used in the section. "CHARACTER portrayed by ACTOR" fits much better when character descriptions are included. There is simply no reason to use tables in this section; it is not a conventional format in TV series articles. Could you please explain why you keep ignoring advice instead of collaborating on the article as we are required to do? I note you have also edited the recurring characters section. That's great but please note that people are not referred to as "it", as you did in this edit. Individual actors should be referred to as "he" or "she". --AussieLegend (✉) 11:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You know what ?. you got me tired, I'm doing what you gives laziness to do, because it's so easy to place a template for others to do the work for you, articles from soap operas have always edited that way, you get your out of nowhere saying and you demand that a soap opera, is a TV series. It is good that you know a lot. Yours ignorance is very good. I'm editing the way it has always done, and you get from nothing to enforce rules; believing that "Marido en alquiler" is a series of TV, things are rules, telenovela articles are edited in different ways, to articles from TV series. So do what you feel like it is because you have so much effort into that descriptions are placed and do nothing, wait for others to do the job for you.--Damián(talk) 16:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is an old English saying, "Two wrongs don't make a right". Here we have a specific essay that elaborates on that. It's called WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because something has been done a certain way doesn't mean that's the way to do it. In the case of the telenovela articles, most seem to need significant cleanup to acceptable standards. These articles are expected to comply with MOS:TV, the MOS in general and our policies and guidelines. The edits you are making do not comply with our requirements and if you persist, especially in edit-warring as you have been doing, you may find yourself unable to edit. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marido en alquiler. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.AussieLegend (✉) 17:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I only did 2 reversal of any other single I reversed myself. Also since the problem had been solved, and leave everything as they wanted. So why the blockade, but it seems unfair one week block, and do not tell me it's because I have blocked 2 times above, clear is the way to undo a user, and of course at least make the attempt to order the release , but equally I will deny it. Yes I know it was my fault; but there is leave things as they wanted.Damián(talk) 02:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Nothing in what you say suggests that you are unlikely to do the same again. As for reducing the block length, you have already had two short blocks for edit warring, and it woudl not be helpful to encourage you to think that you are free to keep on edit warring over and over again, provided you are willing to accept a short block every now and then. If you continue to edit war after several blocks for doing so, a much longer block is the one thing that has some chance of conveying the message to you that edit warring is unacceptable. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok, at least if I will not unlock, I can reduce blocking to two days, or a day, please. I know I made a mistake, but these new changes in the articles of soap operas are a little difficult to accept, because it always is edited differently. Without adding descriptions to the characters.--Damián(talk) 04:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, of course if I block my right ?. And others do what they want and nobody says anything ?, right ?. Like this: [12].A nd of course true; only pay me. But it's okay, I do not bother them more for a week, I hope you can be happy and content.--Damián(talk) 17:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about what other users do. However, please note that I have warned ElNiñoMonstruo about edit warring and pointed out that he has breached 3RR on that article. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously you do not know this person; also generated in the past edit wars. And of course never have locked on these grounds; but clearly not?, pay out of the first you see, and want others to do it ?. And I have several tests of several acts of vandalism ElNiñoMonstruo, and evidence that is always in edit wars. But no matter, I can wait for my lock. Anyway this is what you wanted.--Damián(talk) 18:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Again, this is not about what other editors do. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Hi, I'm asking you to reduce blocking me until Monday, that is a tall order; is all I'm asking. I know I made a mistake, but it can be done. I have already done is done, and you can not change. But as it is evident that I say no, at least make the attempt. I am sorry please.Damián(talk) 21:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
I'm not going to unblock you, because I'm unconvinced that you understand what you did did wrong. In your next unblock request, I suggest you clearly explain how you will handle similar situations in future. PhilKnight (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PhilKnight, It's okay; the next time this happens, I try to talk to the user who is or just going to: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, and I try not to violate this. If I reverse 2 times, and one reverts me, I will help any administrator, but I try not to fall into more edit wars, and if something happens, an administrator will ask for help. But I have made several good editions in wikipedia, and I'm not user making vandalism. My only mistake is to fall into edit wars.--Damián(talk) 23:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Well it is my last request will not know how many times you can order the release; because this is a little different to other wikipedia. But if I understand it is to fall edit wars, I know that before I talk to the user that I have conflicts to reach a consensus, or ask for help from a manager wikipedia, I know that violates one of the important rules of wikipedia and is three-revert rule, for next time, which I hope does not happen again ever again; or at least ask for help any administrator or try to reach a consensus, or try not reverse over 3 times. Come please I do not want to keep locked. If I want to put this well accepted conditions :/.--Damián(talk) 07:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Accept reason:
You at least seem to understand the reason for the block. Considering that you have served over half of the block, I have accepted this request and unblocked before the expiration, because I believe that not unblocking now and letting the block expire in three days doesn't change much. However, this is not the first time you are blocked for edit warring; hopefully this time you will have understood how to behave in a dispute. If you are blocked again for edit-warring you are unlikely to be able to successfully request an unblock again. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Salvidrim:, Thank you very much; if it gives again a case of edit wars, I try to follow the rules of wikipedia and ask help an administrator. I will do everything so that this does not happen again.--Damián(talk) 03:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Damián, En los dos días antes que lo bloquearon, usted quitó más que 1,000 letras de trabajo de otros, 16 veces distintos. 16 veces in solo dos días, caray! Y siete veces más, quitó más que 500 letras. (Y su historia de antes está igual.) No le parece, que algo pasa mal? Sí señor, contribuye mucho a Wikipedia. Pero tambien, usted roba mucho. Tal vez todo el mundo está contra de usted, pero puede ser que está usted contra todo el mundo? Ya tiene 19 años. Que comportese como adulto, no como niño de berrinches. Si quiere evitar los bloqueos, aprenda como trabajar CON otros. Quita de trabajar CONTRA otros.
English translation:
Damián, in the two days before you were blocked, you removed more than 1,000 characters from the work of others, 16 different times. 16 times in only two days, for goodness sake! And seven more times you removed more than 500 characters. (Your prior history is the same.) There's something wrong here, don't you think? Yes you do contribute much to Wikipedia. But you also remove/rob much. Maybe the whole world IS against you. But could it be that you are against the whole world? You're already 19 years old. Behave like an adult, not like a child throwing tantrums. If you want to avoid being blocked, learn how to work WITH others instead of working AGAINST others.
@Paulah88:, First I do not know who you mean, second who told you that I am 19 years ?; I recommend that you not jump to conclusions, without proof or something to prove it. Now if you mean the article Jaime Camil, I have not taken anything away, so I left you placed. Now if you mean; to this edition. Well that issue is correct, you can not use IMDb and Wikipedia references in Spanish, that goes external links, now if you can not understand that, I can not do anything for you.
Spanish
Primero no sé a que te refieres, segundo quien te ha dicho que tengo 19 años?; te recomiendo que no saques conclusiones, sin tener pruebas o algo que lo demuestre. Ahora si te refieres al artículo de Jaime Camil, no he quitado nada, he dejado lo que usted colocó. Ahora si te refieres; a está edición. Pues esa edición es correcta, no puedes usar IMDb y wikipedia en español como referencias, eso va en los enlaces externos, ahora si no puedes entender eso, yo no puedo hacer nada por usted.--Damián(talk) 20:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
English translation follows.
Perdón. Tu propio user page dice que naciste en junio de 1996, entonces acabas de alcanzar a 18 años. En lo segundo, no hablo sobre mi trabajo, sino sobre otras paginas. Las paginas en que tú quitaste el trabajo de tantos otros. Ellos te resistan, y tú echas la culpa a ellos por ser bloqueado. La culpa pertenece a todos otros, y no a ti? Mira a tu propia "contributions" pagina. No veas cuantas veces quitaste partes grandes de otros? Quita de pelear contra los administators - los que te bloquean. Escucha a sus correciones, aceptalo, y aprender ser buen editor si mismo.
Aug 14, 16:19. A vida da gente. -3,948 letras
Aug 14, 00:35. Quererte así. -1,059 letras.
Aug 14, 00:01, Libre para amarte. -10,061 letras.
Aug 13, 23:56, La impostora. -1,531 letras.
Aug 12, 23:21, Los rey. -15,955 letras.
Aug 12, 22:51. Vivir a destiempo. -20,955 letras.
Aug 12, 18:52. La que no podía amar. -3,875 letras.
Aug 12, 14:00. Lo que la vida me robó. -7,223 letras.
Aug 12, 01:07. Santa diabla. -3,672 letras.
y mucho más.
English translation:
Pardon me. Your user page says you were born in June 1996, so you just turned 18. Secondly, I'm not talking about my work, but other pages. The pages where you removed the work of so many others. They resist your changes, and you blame them for being blocked. Is the blame entirely upon others, and not on you? Look at your contributions page. Don't you see how many times you removed huge parts of others' work? (list) Stop fighting with the adminsitrators - those who blocked you. Listen to their corrections, accept it, and learn to be a good editor yourself.
@Paulah88:, Creo que si hubieses sido más especifica, hubiera entendido, ahora prefería hablarte en español, si no te molesta, lo que sucede en esos artículos, no es por que me gusta hacerlo sencillamente hay reglas, y lo que he eliminado de esos artículos,imcumplen las políticas de wikipedia, si quieres puedeas mirar este historial, para que te des cuentas que no son inventos míos. Según lo que dice acá en el manueal de estilo de wikipedia, dice claramente que no "somos una guía de progrmación", entonce todo lo que he quitado es claramente basandome en estás normas de esa página; la lista larga de episodios por día, lo he eliminado igualmente; esa información imcumple la polítca de Lo que Wikipedia no es, es información sin referencias e innecesaria y una larga lista de títulos y ya. Muchos usuarios como ElNiñoMonstruo no quieren entender eso, ElNiñoMonstruo solo cree que yo estoy en contra de él, y que solo hay complot e incluso; acá puedes ver como otro usuario le ha explicado, y él mismo se comporta como si todos estuvieramos en contra de él, y que yo me creo dueño de wikipedia. Pues las políticas de wikipedia son muy claras y éste tipo de información no son aceptables, pero si usted no está de acuerdo, puede dirigirse a los links que le he dado y en la misma discusión de cada uno, exponer argumentos de el porque estás ediciones deberian ser aceptadas. No son cosas mías, son las políticas y reglas de wikipedia. Disculpa que no te escriba en inglés, pero es un poco dificil traducir textos largos.--Damián(talk) 21:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Damian, I included the Spanish so you would understand me clearly. But this is not our private conversation; it is part of wikipedia's English public discussion. Please put what you wrote into English so the public discussion is available to everyone. In our culture, that is the polite thing to do. If you do not have time to translate, please be polite by removing your untranslated comments. Paulah88 (talk) 01:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Paulah88:, Well first, it's my talk page; and I think as you asked me to explain, but anyway:
I think if you had been more specific, I would have understood, now preferred to speak in Spanish, if you please, what happens in these articles, it's not that I like doing simply are no rules, and I deleted those items, breach wikipedia policies, if you want a deal-breaker you look this history, you know for accounts that are not mine inventions. As it says here in the Manueal style wikipedia, clearly states that no "are a program guide ", then all you have removed is clearly basing on that page are standards; the long list of episodes per day, I've also removed; that information imcumple policy consideration of What Wikipedia is not, is referrals and information without unnecessary and a long list of titles and now. Many users like ElNiñoMonstruo not want to understand that, ElNiñoMonstruo just think I'm against it, and there's only plot and even; here can see another user as explained to him, and he acts as if we were all against him, and I think business wikipedia. For policies wikipedia are very clear and this type of information are not acceptable, but if you disagree, you can go to the links I gave you and in the same discussion of each, to make a case for why you are editions should be accepted. They are not my things, are the policies and rules of wikipedia. Sorry I do not write in English, but is a bit difficult to translate long texts.
There I've left this translated, I hope you can understand.--Damián(talk) 01:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for translating. Tan amable (very kind of you). Paulah88 (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Syar756:, The crosses are only used; when actors have died in real life, not a soap opera. I will not revert again, as this is something you do not want to understand.--Damián(talk) 08:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Precise to your message about User:Krispelle, he/she completely disregarded your question of why they duplicated references on 1989 (Taylor Swift album). I also explained to them that ther edit was plain disruptive (i.e. the numerous vandalism on that page), and could warrant administrator attention and a block. Would you mind try asking the user again to set this straight? IPadPerson (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So you're reverting all my edits again? Could it be that you really hate me so much and you hate all my edits? Grow up you Mr. Corrupt!! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation of US-created television series[edit]
Hi Damián80 - please stop moving television series to lower-cased titles. US-created series - irrespective of the language in which they are made - are usually named with full capitals. Grutness...wha? 13:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, do not simply copy and paste entire pages, as you did when you moved Dame Chocolate to Dame hocolate. This breaks the page history. Grutness...wha? 13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There was nothing on the Ips talk page or the article talk page. Also it is a content dispute so it gets protected in the version it was at. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 08:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just wanted to let you know (and would have done so sooner had I noticed your edits) that I undid your move of the page in question. Per WP:UE, we should anglicize page titles where possible - this is the English Wikipedia, after all. I hope that helps. Cheers. LazyBastardGuy 20:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We can note that in the article, in fact we probably should if we haven't already. LazyBastardGuy 00:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In that case we should probably upload the English version of the poster to this wiki. LazyBastardGuy 00:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain, why you undo my edit in El color de la pasión? I will not undo more, if you give me a good explanation.
Xaxi32 (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Les Misérables (Mexican telenovela) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.alma-latina.net/MiserablesLos/MiserablesLos.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BMIComp 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Secretaria o mujer) has been reviewed![edit]
If you will accept my offer then, I won't bother you any more. That's so easy. Don't think that I will just leave you alone. You must do something alwaysDews34 (talk)
These rules are your fantasy. It is your only chance to accept the request. No then no. Then I must continue making your life more interesting. Dews34 (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You chose it. Accept my offer and I won't bother you again. You don't leave me another chance Dews34 (talk)
File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yo no creo en los hombres logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Manuel Balbi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 10:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but this doesn't come under A11. It's either a hoax, or needs prodding for lack of notability. A11 is for good faith articles about things like drinking games, new words, or sports that are played in the school corridor. They're at least possibly real, but are as notable as a blank CD. Hoaxes are intended to deceive (which this might be - I wouldn't know, not even knowing what a telenovela is), A11 just stuff that even the inventors will forget about come exam time. Safe treatment here is prod, or a bit of Googling for a hoax. It's not yet out, so promo comes into play too... (Sneaky, that.) Peridon (talk) 22:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
HEY DISRUPTER! YOU ARE FROM VENEZUELA RIGHT? YOU DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THE PHILIPPINES AND YOU NEVER WATCHED ANY OF PHILIPPINE DRAMAS.
I ALREADY STOPPED EDITING ON ALL OF YOUR SPANISH TELENOVELAS ARTICLES A LONG TIME AGO BY USING ALL OF YOUR "REVERTING/UNDO" POWERS. AND NOW YOU ARE BOTHERING ME AGAIN WITH THIS?!? HOW DARE YOU!!? I'M SURE YOU WILL USE YOUR SO-CALLED RULES AGAIN IN THE FUTURE, CAUSE YOU HAVE NO CONSCIENCE AND YOU ARE VERY UNHELPFUL!! PLEASE STOP CREATING ARTICLES ABOUT THE PHILIPPINES OR I WILL CALL THE POLICE!!! (And for the Admins, very sorry for the caps lock.) -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 14:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, if you're mad or not is not my problem. I have every right to edit any article. Items have no owner and if you do not like it is not my problem either. I have not done anything.--ElSeñordelosCielos(Talk) 15:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are just joking! You have no right to edit or create any article without knowing everything! Tell me, what is the reason why did you created this article?? To use all of your "The Power of Reverting/Undo" so you can make Wikipedia NOT FREE to everyone?? -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All the Spanish is all yours, so please stop using the Philippines or any countries to your evil plans! You should not destroy Wikipedia! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again with your "evil undo". The Hawak Kamay (TV series) article already has a template, and there is no need for another one. And the article is NOT YOURS so stop bothering me with your disruptive reverts again. -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Items not have owners. And I have every right to edit what you want, not because you let me say what I do. I'm not doing anything will you. And I'm really getting tired of the way you talk to me. I have put a complaint here.--ElSeñordelosCielos(Talk) 15:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No!! Items DO have owners! You are no right! And I'm really getting tired of your reverts for a long long time! Did you know that EVERYONE CAN'T EDIT ANYMORE IN WIKIPEDIA ALL BECAUSE OF YOU? So please stop using me to your ambitious plans! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 15:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As you wish, I have not done anything to you. If you want to follow this plan, either.--ElSeñordelosCielos(Talk) 16:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I remember your username is "ElNiñoMonstruo" not "ElSeñordelosCielos". So I have every right to use that name, because it is not yours nor yours. You rid my edits without giving any reason, I threaten to call the police, tell me you think I own wikipedia. And you're pissed.--McVeigh (talk) 12:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are a manipulative Copy-Paster. You are the one McVeigh who is using the username "ElSeñordelosCielos", and not me. So give up now! You lost! -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 14:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly suggest that you also be careful - your actions at Hawak Kamay (TV series) are pretty close to if not edit warring. 3RR isn't an entitlement. Dougweller (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I want to know that you removed the broadcast table on Violetta (telenovela), which it appears last time it was removed. So, I re-added it back but why you remove it again? --Allen(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me) 21:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@AllenHAcNguyen: Hello. I'm just saying what it says here. Where it says clearly that the sections of this type should not be drawn.--McVeigh(talk) 21:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sheryl Rubio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 22:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
McVeigh, I see that you are constantly reverting several edits from Luis Coronel which appears to be over-time vandalism coming from different IP-addresses I recommend that you request the article to be semi-protected. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Thank You, GavinoComments & ComplaintsContributions 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Fundude99: Hello. I think it is not necessary for now, anyway if they continue to vandalism. Protection'll ask for the article.--McVeigh / talk 06:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello McVeigh: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween! – –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages of people you'd like to send this to with a friendly message.
@Davey2010: Thank you. I hope you also have a happy Halloween!.--McVeigh (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome and thanks :) -Davey2010 • (talk) 23:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You harass me again, you are very unhelpful. -_-[edit]
Hey, yu stap sending messejes to me, yu ar bulliying me agen. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. Du yu si it mister evil? ay wil sey it agen. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. Lets sey it agen! AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. AY EM NAT YUR PREND END AY DU NAT WANT TU BI ASOSIYEYTED WIT YU END AY DONT NID YUR HELP. -ElNiñoMonstruo (talk) 09:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Facepalm Well, I don't really understand what he/she is saying. Sorry PinasCentral (talk) 07:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I also, but not necessary understand, things that might contain insults.--McVeigh / talk 11:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's no reason to create placeholder articles for television episodes in which haven't even aired, unless there's significant coverage beforehand, such as production, casting and filming information. The standalone articles contains nothing not already in the The Walking Dead (season 5) article–episode title, writer, director, air date, episode numbers, etc. You added references, but they'll just be deleted anyway once the episode has aired, because they'll be unnecessary then. You added an image, but more than likely it will get deleted because it doesn't meet the non-free image guidelines; images shouldn't be uploaded just for cosmetic purposes. You added a summary, but it's just a "teaser" summary and is copied and pasted directly from the AMC website (which is a copyright violation), and the summary will just replaced with an actual summary when he episode airs. All concrete reasons why placeholder articles like this should not be created prematurely. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Drovethrughosts: I've never seen an article need to have as much information to be created. But over time, you can add more information. But anyway I am not going to discuss that, it is the first time I try to create an article on The Walking Dead. On the image. I have added the correct license. Just as they did here. But finally they will just delete. Because it is not used in the article for now. What will have to be uploaded again next week.--McVeigh / talk 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've used this signature style for 3+ years (with some minor tweaks along the way). Can you explain why your username has changed since last spring? Levdr1lp / talk 05:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Levdr1lostpassword: Oh ok, but if what concerns you is that if your signature copy, you are wrong. It is signing the take of a user of wikipedia in Spanish. And to be honest, this is the first time that I see your username here on wikipedia. And as you change my user name because it already did not like me.--McVeigh / talk 05:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem with your signature style, and I wouldn't have a problem if someone else adopted my signature style as their own. I'm just curious where it came from. You have to admit, it is awfully similar to mine, right down to the hex code. And you still didn't answer my question about changing your username-- have you been using more than one account? Levdr1lp / talk 05:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, I've only used account is. I have only changed name. But I have not used more accounts, or do not know what you mean.--McVeigh / talk 05:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The wiki markup you are using in your signature is very similar to mine, including the "hex code" (those six-character inputs, like "#000000" and "#FFFFFF"). I find it odd that you happened to stumble upon the exact same style as mine. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I just find it odd. Levdr1lp / talk 05:51, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea, I've taken this signing of a user of wikipedia in Spanish..--McVeigh / talk 05:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please link to the Spanish Wikipedia user? Levdr1lp / talk 06:01, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It would give it you, if I agreed. What if I am sure is that this type of signature it got in the wikipedia in Spanish. Since I speak Spanish, always done out there.--McVeigh / talk 06:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. Please explain differently. Where did you find this signature style? Was it from a user on the Spanish Wikipedia site? Levdr1lp / talk 06:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you fluent in Spanish? Levdr1lp / talk 07:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) - @Levdr1lostpassword: - McVeigh doesn't have to tell you where he got the sig from nor does it matter even if he copied yours, You don't own the colours/signature so if I were you I would do something better than harassing everyone who has nearly the same sig as you!. –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:09, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: Apologies. No "harassment" intended. Thought there might be something more serious going on here, but I'm just as willing to drop the issue. (BTW, I've never commented on another editor's signature, nor have I ever come across a signature similar to mine.) Levdr1lp / talk 07:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Personally it does come across as harassing but ofcourse if you're not then I apologize :), If there is a serious issue you should probably report it at the appropriate venue, Me needs sleep me thinks! –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010:Firstly, I will always turn down a suggestion to "grow the fuck up". :) Secondly, I really do think there may (may!) be something more serious going on, and I fully intend to take this to an admin and/or board if/when that becomes necessary-- it has nothing to do with my signature, which is simply how I found my way here. Now that I'm here, well, I may have found something. Or not. We'll see. Regardless, I'm still curious where McVeigh's signature style came from. (I'm flattered when another user adopts something I've made/done, like my HD Radio template, and I thought that might be the case here as well.) Levdr1lp / talk 07:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: Please disregard whatever concerns I raised. Way too much history to sift through, and I'm not nearly familiar enough w/ this editor. Levdr1lp / talk 09:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Levdr1lostpassword: - I apologize for that edit summary, I have a habit of being rather blunt at times, But I admit it was uncivil and completely uncalled for so I apologize for that, I've struck out the entire comments :), Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Levdr1lostpassword: Hi, sorry for not answering before, but in my country was the 2 am. By the way, I do not see because you have to have both roll by a signature style. I just take this signature style because I really liked. But in any case, if it is annoying, I could change my signature :).--McVeigh / talk 19:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:Lisette Morelos.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lisette Morelos.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bradford. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page. Message added 15:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
you could add links to the articles you are creating. Nearly all those with parenthetical titles can have links placed on the titles without the parentheses to disambiguate and link your new articles. See Estafa de amor and Vidas cruzadas as examples. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Carlossuarez46: Hi, but I have no idea of that, I just see red links and I don't notice if there are other articles. That is why I believe them under different titles, as you will understand not find out how many articles there are on wikipedia. But I will take it into account. Thanks for the warning.--McVeigh / talk 05:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When your article title has a "( )", then do a quick search for the title without that and if it exists, please add a link to your article. The more linkage, the better the encyclopedia is and the more likely someone will find your articles. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, I will try to do that.--McVeigh / talk 06:02, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (María Isabel (1966 telenovela)) has been reviewed![edit]
Wikipedia editor Redlock just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
These telenovela articles are very appreciated, but IMHO, it would probably be better for you to make a smaller number of more in-depth articles. Just a suggestion!
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If you would check if the links to the cast, etc., are really the actors in the telenovela articles you are creating. I had to cleanup a lot of wrong links - I think I've done with the 1960s ones. Please make sure you cleanup after yourself. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:31, 12 December 2014
As you notice that you're a fan or follow this actress. You really need references to know what year was born ?.--McVeigh / talk 22:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you are also using unsourced content as of the telenovelas amores de barrio, so you should also correct that one too.
@Jessmrj: The information that you are adding has no reliable references. So therefore it will be reversed, if you have reliable sources, please add them.--McVeigh / talk 04:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yours does have a reliable source on amores de barrio either.
@Jessmrj: The problem is that I do not'm adding any information, in fact this articles was marked as a proposal of deletion. I get rid their editions since they are not constructive and they are only speculations, information that will surely get out of "MásQuéTelenovelas".--McVeigh / talk 04:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello McVeigh. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Terminales, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a hoax - a simple Google search would have evidenced that. Not sure about notability. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Let me tell you that my acts on your Talk Page are not vandalism, the same thing was correctly done on the Spanish Wikipedia (see, for example this edit and this other one), and it seems you're currently blocked there.
@RomanLier:, ya te dije que no importa lo que suceda en esa wikipedia, ¿ok?, esta es mi página de usuario de la wikipedia en inglés y yo quiero dejar el mensaje, así que se acabo esta discusión.--McVeigh / talk 02:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@McVeigh: Of course not, if it shouldn't be there, then it shouldn't be here too.
And please respect if an user wants to delete his/her own message, don't undo the changes.
@RomanLier:, Esto no es "Wikipedia en español", ¿ok?, acá si yo quiero dejo el mensaje o lo borro es decisión mía, ya te deje bien claro que acá no son las mismas reglas que allá. Así que suficiente.--McVeigh / talk 03:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@McVeigh: I see, I understand that we don't have the same rules. I talked in #wikipedia-en and got it solved.
And please don't be as agressive the next time we communicate.
My reason to change your edit is because it is wrong. Danna started her carrer in 80s, when she was a child, and selected filmography is because that is not complete list of her projects.
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.
You emphasized the importance of sources when discussing the additions of actors by Unitele12. That goes both ways: If "Les Misérables" is the official English title, the one the telenovela is most commonly referred to, present a source. I haven't seen one. What I have seen, however, is you edit-warring on that article for months, including multiple cut-and-paste moves which broke the page history (and which I repaired to some degree). I'll also have to note that IMDb generally justifies the additions of actors by Unitele12 and is often even already linked from the relevant articles. You are extremely lucky to not have been blocked for edit-warring this time. If this conduct of yours recurs, you won't be that lucky next time. Huon (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Huon:, Los miserables is also known as "Les Misérables" in some countries. On the changes of titles and copy and paste, that speak with an administrator some time, but they never did anything.--José(talk) 00:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have cited a few sources while updating/adding some information in Así en el Barrio como en el Cielo page. Do you have any difficulty in identifying <ref>...</ref> syntax tags?
By the way, other additional information on the info box and cast were based on the opening credits. The opening credit IS an acceptable source in Wikipedia. Please refer to Wikipedia:Published where a television broadcast; a streaming video or audio source on the Internet is listed as one of the example of published source. The opening credits and episodes are broadcasted on tv. They are also accessible on the Internet, more specifically, the official website. Therefore, they do fall into published and accessible source.Y
Curiously, after reverting my edits, you have "updated" the page with some, but not all, of the "unsourced" content which you have reverted a few minutes earlier (obviously, with few errors and different arrangement). You could have removed only the "unsourced" contents, instead of reverting the whole thing (and retype and rearrange them again). I'm not sure what you are trying to do. Take a look here: Así en el barrio, como en el cielo: Difference between revisions
Make use of the Talk pages before making any full revert. Clarify and ask first.
There should not be any default page format for any Wikipedia articles. Any additional and relevant information with proper citations should be welcomed. Wikipedia is not merely for listing down the cast members of a certain series. Are you trying to make all articles on telenovelas with the same format/content range? Maybe you should just change the title to Snakes and Ladders, the official English title, as you did with other pages.
See also: What Wikipedia is not
It is also not a place to discard other's contribution and then reuse it as your own.[3] See also: Rubí La Descarada
Hey just thought I would help you out as admins tend to respect those with better English more than others. I would word it like this: I would like to get the rollback flag, I've been doing counter-vandalism here and this tool would be useful to assist me. Just a suggestion, I'm sure you'll get it anyway with your experience and edit count. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you reverted my edit with absolutely no reason (see WP:EDITWAR). 2012–2015 is objectively better because it's unambiguous. Sure, there's no month 15, but there's no reason not to follow WP:MOSNUM here. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyuszika7H:, Hello, had seen your edit. But I don't want to start a war of editions create. It was simply the habit of putting it as well. I've seen many articles that always put it as well.--Philip J FryTalk 16:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! This is to let you know that I have blanked List of Young & Hungry episodes and listed it at WP:Copyright problems for processing, partly because an episode summary in your initial version of the page was apparently identical to content already published elsewhere a week earlier. I thought you might have copied it over in good faith from Young & Hungry, but that doesn't seem to have been the case. Can you cast any light? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that you feel happy, since last you had so keen to block me. That reality did you your dream. And you just say one thing, after your warning, I not revert anything, just I added information with reliable sources. And then I do not come to say that I go to any administrator, clear that I did, but for are administrators. If you never do anything!, they are only to block and ready.--Philip J FryTalk 00:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I demand my unlock. Since user Duduty96 edits were obvious vandalism, the user started using different ips to remove information from articles, Here I leave some of the tests [13], [14], Was then created an account to continue vandalizing. Leave you several notices to stop and all of my warnings ignored them. Later appeared Bbb23, leaving me a message. After that I didn't turn, just search online reliable sources and put them in the article, as seen here. After that, I went to the discussion of the article and leave this message, thing simply ignored. Then I try to prevent vandalism in wikipedia and that ends up being blocked I am? Does not seem fair, I am which end locked and the user Duduty96 who go vandalize wikipedia articles to remain unlocked. I already have 2 years contributing to this wikipedia, and I am surprised that a vandal is more supported.--Philip J FryTalk 03:23, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Could you correct the table in the section "Awards and nominations", please ? Have a table is not mandatory.
--Gilles2014 (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And where it says that it is not obligatory?, I can show some link where it says that?. To different things in the French wikipedia does not mean that it should also be in this wikipedia.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 00:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
answer to Philipp J Fry: Could you correct the table in the section "Awards and nominations" on the page Hasta el fin del mundo, please ? Because I observe that there is no frame under the mention "New York Latin ACE Awards".--Gilles2014 (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gilles2014: I don't really know that it is what you want. The name "New York Latin ACE Awards" is correct, as this is how called the Association's Awards in English..--Philip J Fry•(talk) 01:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
answer to Philipp J Fry: I don't speak of the content of the table. There is a lack of frame in this table when I see the table on the visitor's interface. Can you correct that, please?--Gilles2014 (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gilles2014: not see any errors in the table of article, in any case, you can not fix it your? :) , because really I do not see any problem in the table.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 21:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
answer to hilipp J Fry : I watch the table on a computer. I confirm you that there is a lack of frame for the cell (the line under ) the mention "New York Latin ACE Awards". Ask another people to observe this table, pleaseand cease to undo my correction.--Gilles2014 (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gilles2014: Like this are now well. Here take a screenshot:
How you can see, to my table I looks good. Then I do not understand what is the problem?. Will be your browser that this bad.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 01:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: asked me to redlink all the films. He said he was going to do a blitz to create Mexican film. SusunW (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But I tell you better create all those articles before you binding them to the Filmography of the actress. To the extent I understand used so many links red is not allowed.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 16:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, that would make it more difficult to create them if you can't click a red link. If content is missing it should be red linked. Hiding red links is unproductive to growth on wikipedia. Far better to root out what is missing and stub it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be damned if I'm going to make 50 odd separate edits to that article everytime I want an article red linked. As it is the 1926 film has been started which you've shut off. Why not take a trip on the Caracas cable car and leave this alone eh?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When somebody is telling you that they intend to clear the red links, when you start reverting them and hampering their efforts then it becomes disruptive. Don't do this again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just realised you're the guy who started all of the telenovelas which I encouraged you on a while back and helped save some from AFD. I also remember defending the massive number of red links in your telenovela templates, arguing that they were constructive for what you were doing. I'm guessing that somebody kept on at you to the point that you now think it's policy to hide red links?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: Yes, but another user for a time also told me that could not be used red links in articles, I will not say name. But not had set me well, that they were working to create those articles.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 21:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The only editor I know who obsesses about red links and templates is Rob Sinden. You've let that person who most of us disagree with at the actors/film projects get to you. You'd find it annoying if you created a template of red links for Venezuelan telenovelas and I came along and delinked them all, stopping you from starting them wouldn't you? Anyway, there's a massive amount of films missing for Latin America, particularly Mexico. I will be create a lot of director templates with red links for films in them. You're welcome to help start them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: No, definitely was not him. But anyway I have restored the red links. But I think that perhaps I will help you, I really like Mexico and his movies also.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 22:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to create some director navigation templates. I'll create a page of templates for Mexico and one for Argentina. It is best done by director than filmography but I will finish the others.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you improve the english article you created on the actor Marco de Paula, please? There is a lack of biography, career, reliable references, redondancy on links, etc. There are red links. --Gilles2014 (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Camaleona) has been reviewed![edit]
You reverted the changes I made, stating that 'your source' says AMOR DE BARRIO is a remake of LA PALOMA (1995). Well, let me say that your source knows nothing of telenovelas. There are plenty of lazy 'journalists' out there.
AMOR DE BARRIO is a partial remake of PALOMA, produced in 1975 and later remade as MI QUERIDA ISABEL (1996). Have you even watched AMOR DE BARRIO? Have you seen the opening credits?
Read the synopsis for all three, AMOR DE BARRIO, PALOMA, AND LA PALOMA. They are available here, on Wikipedia.
There you go:
http://www.tvynovelas.com/mx/tus-novelas/lo-destacado/15/04/2/Amor-de-barrio-contara-dos-historias-en-una.html
Please add it, I don't know how. TVyNovelas is an official Televisa publication.
Please reinstate my changes.
Ahí también detalló pormenores del proyecto en el que, además de la trama de la telenovela Muchacha de barrio, rescató a Paloma, la heroína de la telenovela del mismo nombre que en 1975 interpretaron Ofelia Medina y Andrés García.
Perhaps you should use more reliable sources rather than no-name gossip websites.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Telenovelas broadcast by Venevisión in 2010s[edit]
You need to stop vandalizing the information that I am correcting. As I said before, "X: THC is the correct copyright holder of the music as per US LAW. An editor of this page, Philip J Fry is in violation of US law for repeatedly and purposely falsyfing information." The correct band, X: THC does not yet have a wikipedia page. I have entered in the links ([4][5]) for proof that X: THC wrote this song, NOT "THC" or whatever other band you falsely choose to credit. WHY DONT YOU GO TO THOSE PAGES AND SEE FOR YOURSELF? Yet you persist in illegally falsifying information and breaking United States copyright law. CEASE AND DESIST! -Mrjordanss
Thank you for shouting at me and his message of good faith. Already search Google the name of the band and his information was correct, but remove references since they are not reliable sources. I also ask that you read this.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 23:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Philip J Fry. You reverted an edit that removed euphemistic language — "passed away" — which Wikipedia explicitly warns editors not to use because it's ambiguous and not neutral. Please let me know your thoughts on the subject. fdsTalk 02:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fdssdf: Really did not want to revert your edit, what happens is that another user had added information without references.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 02:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the quick reply and explanation. Cheers. fdsTalk 03:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have declined your G6 speedy delete request for Las Tontas No Van al Cielo as you asked for a redirect to be moved over the article. Perhaps you got your request around the wrong way. I would suggest that the page is moved to Las Tontas no van al Cielo as that looks to be the title on the poster. Anyway please clarify what you really want to happen. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Issue about the word "Co-lead role","Lead role","recurring role"[edit]
I Prefer the word Protagonist,Antagonist and Supporting role because they give the Character the specificity it needs.Its not a matter of editing.As for "Co-lead role" it cannot be used in place of Main Antagonist.Simply because Antagonist's often play a vital role in the story.
I do alot of research before I do any changes.I therefore ask you to do changes in all the pages that you have done the latter changes.I have the list.
Adriana Louvier
Daniela Castro
Luis Roberto Guzmán
I contact you on other issues.Adios Nyanchoka (talk) 08:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I stated earlier,Lead role sounds rather ambiguous.If one may break it for the reader it can be simpler because Protagonist and Antagonist makes one understand without clicking on the explained page to find out.
Lead role may represent the "Main protagonist" and even "The Main antagonist".Therefore the reader will understand the specific role one played in the show. Good day.
This is a Telenovela,The word protagonist plays a vital role as well as antagonist.I again ask you to redo the revisions you did because they are ambiguous. Nyanchoka (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This words sound rather too AMBIGUOUS which I have stated in more than one occasion.It's not a matter of how Hollywood pages state but on what is right Nyanchoka (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I do understand a little Spanish and that's why am strongly against the latter words.In a Telenovela We have;
PROTAGONISTS
-Main Protagonist that may vary in number depending on the plot.
-Co-protagonist that may also vary in number.
ANTAGONISTS
-Main Antagonist that are also in the category on the Lead Role depending on the plot of the story eg.Teresa(telenovela)Angelique Boyer's role
SUPPORTING ROLE
Depends on the weight of the role played by the actor
SPECIAL PARTICIPATION
Roles played to bring special themes and normally come as a signature in the story.
I therefore ask you to consider the word "Lead Antagonist" on antagonistic roles indicated as Co-lead role eg.In Daniela Castro Nyanchoka (talk) 13:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What?Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
When?June 2015
How can you help?
1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
Telenovela "La Vecina"/"Yo no creo en los Hombres"[edit]
Telenovela "La Vecina"/"Yo no creo en los Hombres"
Hello Philip J Fry,
I live in the United States, in Virginia, and I just want to let you know that "La Vecina" starts this coming Monday June 22, 2015 at 3pm/2c. Also after "Que Te Perdone Dios" ends on Friday July 10, 2015 "Yo no creo en los Hombres" starts on Monday july 13, 2015. So if you can please add that information on the Univision Wiki page. I added it, but you took it off. I would never add false information on Univision Wiki or Unimas Wiki. Max mouse82 (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Max mouse82: The fact that you live in the United States, does not show anything. This is Wikipedia and you should use reliable sources confirming the information you are trying to add.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 15:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: If Im telling you this is because I watch "Que te perdone Dios" and I see the commercials, also my TV guide says that this coming Monday at 3pm/2 "La Vecina" will take one hour of "La Rosa de Guadalupe". You are not doing your homework correct, and I am. You need to visit this webpage www.telenovela-world.com and find out what is going on. Or at least visit the officila page of Univision.
@Max mouse82: See, I have an obligation to be looking for information to come to here to add it, because no one pays me for editing on Wikipedia. Now, that information who wants to add it is you, not me. So therefore you should use references when adding information, which does not. I don't live in the United States, so I can not be aware of everything that happens in American television. As said before, this is wikipedia, and if you wish to add information, it must be with reliable sources.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 15:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: You got it all wrong dude, if you dont get paid, you are not obligated. Im not really familiar with Wikipedia page, that's why I add and edit what I can. As for reliable sources, I dont know where to add that on the reference section. But either way, you or someone else will update Univision wiki and you'll see I was correct. Talk to some of your wiki friends, see if any of them live here in the United States, by asking and comminicating we find answers. Have a nice day!
@Max mouse82: Hmm. Sorry, but until you show reliable references, your edits will remain reversed, because you or thousands of people living in the United States, proves nothing. To add information in Wikipedia should use reliable sources demonstrating such information. That way no one will reverse.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 16:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: I noticed you updated the Univision wiki page on Programing, I told you ahead of time, and I already had done it. And I know you told me that I needed reliable sources, well again I live in the United States and I cant see why Unision would air a false commercial about there programing. I dont know if you have herard, but Univision has gotten very strict, and the same time there programing is lame. Dont you guys get Univision over there in Venezuela?
@Max mouse82:Univision is not available for Venezuela. Anyway I started researching a little and I have added the information with reliable sources. I have no problem when other editors add information, provided it is by adding reliable references.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 17:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: Alrigth alright, cool man. Are you able to visit this page from Venezuela? [[15]] you can also get reliable references there. Anyways, Im glad you have uodated the Univision wiki page.
@Max mouse82: That seems a forum website, and forums are not reliable sources. And I would recommend you fail to use the "Ping" template, any message is able to see without using that template. You must also learn to sign your comments.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 18:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: You are not very clear to me with the "ping" page, and I dont know how to sign. I told you before that I am just learning how to use the Wiki page.
@Max mouse82: Above these messages you've left a few links to other pages where you explain how to sign your comments.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 18:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I edited Daniela Castro's page.It was just a necessary change that I believe is true and am positive that you will agree with me. Nyanchoka (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I never understood the last message you sent please review it because I was confused since your words did not synchronize properly.I think I wasn't the recipient.
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. Use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! —Godsy(TALKCONT) 01:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can tell pretty much how these 3 novelas will play out here in Univision USA once they are rready to air here. Take notes man,. and I dont need no guide or resourses that you speak of, get me? I dont care if you belive me or not, but this is how is going to go down....
I don't really know that it is what you want. And I don't know that you want to tell me this to me, in all cases when these soap operas will premiere because they will be placed on page of Univision programming.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 17:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The reference I laid in the respective pages linked to Telemundo Africa which is a subsidiary channel for Telemundo and airs English versions of Telemundo's telenovelas.So the names I used are acceptable by the production company itself.You can also google and find out for your self. Nyanchoka (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for re-applying just about everything. For reference (no pun intended), it's generally okay to remove references from aired premieres/seasons/episodes/finales unless the title's contentious or something. For everything else where references don't really apply anymore, we should deem them at their own merit and leave them in if in doubt. See a discussion with Geraldo Perez and Cyphoidbomb (you guys want to add another article to your watch list?) here. Hope that explains my edits. I've already cleaned up some articles, which hasn't generally been a problem. Amaury (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I generally disagree with the notion that it's okay to remove references once something's aired. A title is likely not going to be an issue, but we should not be removing airdate references and things of that nature. The strength of this encyclopedia is in its references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with that is that that the source links can eventually potentially become dead or change and therefore reflect incorrect information, and other sources can't always be found. For example, Kirby Buckets' episode guide is a bit off over on Zap2 if you compare it to the Kirby Buckets page even though the episodes already aired. It seems to be okay for upcoming episodes, but after that it seems the guides for some shows get messed up sometimes. Amaury (talk) 14:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We should have a link to a scheduling guide of some sort either as a column reference or a general reference in the references section. Using RTitle for each cite to the same source for all aired episodes is generally not necessary if other references for the same info are in the article and obvious. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be down for that. Having it as a column reference might be better as it's right there when editing the episode guide and you don't have to scroll down to the references section to make sure there are sources. Amaury (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand all that, but references Amaury remove had nothing to do with "Zap2", were references confirming that series would be released, I say to demonstrate the notability of the article, the article cannot be based only in references to the episodes, or Yes?. And they should those sources be damaged or cease to exist the links, there is a bot that is responsible for notification. But I doubt that the sources that I added when you create the item expires. I've been editing here for quite some time and I've never seen the sources used as references to expire. Anyway the only thing I did was to restore information to Amaury I remove and leave all as is as the update article.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 18:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, that also counts. Since the series premiered yesterday evening, sources confirming its (or any show's) release are no longer needed. Amaury (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No need to rush stuff, wait for episode to have finished airing. I generally like to wait a few days to make sure it shows up on iTunes and Amazon (if they carry it) to show wide-spread support for air date and title. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that an article while you have more references, will be better, (of course that they are reliable sources). For example in the article "Mi corazón es tuyo", there are 50 references and all talk about the premiere of the telenovela and other things, and already spent a year since it was created the article and the references are still intact.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 19:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question, Why would you revert my edit? That was the correct English translation of Tierra de reyes. Reyes means kings in the Spanish language.
About adding a plot to Vidas Robadas(Stolen lives)/Infamia(torn apart)[edit]
Hi Philip
I saw your editting and I found out that it is missing a plot or synopsis. So I edited it in a way that it has a good plot. If you think it is disruptive, add a new plot which is different from mine.
Let me remind you I haven't added Paola Núñez as 1985.Infact I undid the revision.I insist that the actress was born on 1978.I wonder who undid that before and now that I try to add it you seem to differ.I'll ask you for one last time to do more research on the latter page before you vent on what I did not do.
In terms of Sources I'll add one to Paola's page to support she was born in 1978 or you can add one since you are in support of it.
I bet you have minimal intersection with the word series.I've told you time and again that Latin actors/actresses have a unique way of describing there characters.Your edits are well referred to but you filmography sections lack or have clarification.Therefore you should seize from turning Wikipedia articles into a soccer match that we do and undo.Whatever I did was correct as you do the same without reason. nyanchy 08:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is no mans territory nor anyone's literature exposure skills so am going to ask you to refrain from your base less and personalizing Wikipedia articles you can help by contributing more than executing your self.Good day! nyanchy 21:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh My God. You don't have communication with the world of telenovelas. I don't put reference because any page of telenovelas published that. The name of her in the telenovela es Fernanda. And she plays the secondary protagonist role. Thanks! Jorgee928 (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just a head's up: when requesting a page move you need to put the move request on the target. For example, when asking a page to be moved to a lowercase title that's a redirect, you'd put the move request at the redirect page instead of the original page. I noticed that you did this with some telenovela articles and I meant to mention it earlier, but forgot until just now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You often do things that you yourself condemn.You wrote that IMDb is not a reliable source yet to you use it.So don't lecture me about 3RR.I know it exists and can't stand your repetitive complains to me.Am already tired with your edits. nyanchy 07:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,I moved the Corazón indomable page because I know its correct.I don't dis agree with you on the issue that it was produced in UK dubbed in English.I live in an English-Speaking country and we used the English title only but it was never attached to the novels.Everything remained in Spanish from the theme song,to opening credits,closing and even the commercials.So I don't understand why you disagree with all my edits but when others do it you agree.Its not that the page did not use the "Corazón indomable" name before it was redirected because of the title card.Therefore I will not explain my self to you severally and you keep on belittling my edits.And please stop telling administrators what I haven't done when reporting,remain true
Hi, lots of missing telenovelas. Can you do a run for Argentina?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: I'm sorry, but doesn't much interest me telenovela from Argentina. Looks that only Raúl has done telenovelas for this country. If there are Argentine actors who I like, but almost all have appeared in telenovelas, Mexican or American, for example Julián Gil and David Chocarro. I'm not very good with respect to telenovelas from Argentina. In any case, also I am interested in telenovelas from Colombia, but up there.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 09:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh OK, I thought seems as you also edited Venezuelan and Colombian ones you were into them all!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: Well, it is logical that you edit articles related to Venezuela, because I am of Venezuela, so everything about this country is of interest to me. You would help with that article, but I have no idea who is that actor, nor much less than many telenovelas has done.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 09:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Restifo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia especially the telenovela. but can i ask a favor? i'm a huge fan of telenovela and the cast especially Angelique Boyer so i get really disappointed when i visit her wiki page and there is not a photo of her. Do you think you can add one to her Wikipedia? thanks in advance and if it's out of your position and you cant do it, its okay. Shelloh (talk) 05:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have come to ask you to please move the fiur pages back to their original names.This is because they often mislead the reader as some of them may not use the name used in the particular country.The telenovelas often get to foreign countries only when dubbed in English but the title remains the same.Others often chang their names during yranslation,may be because a similar title exists in that particular ciuntry.So am reqeusting you to move them back for the sake of people like us.Who often rely on original title in our country and WestvAfrica.
nyanchy 21:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
My browser has a problem can you please skip the first one and read the second.User:Nyanchokanyanchy 22:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
El dia es hoy is television series produced by Cenpro. In Cafe con aroma de mujer she didnt play lead role, she was secondary cast, and Al noerte del corazon she was main villan.
Also she dide a voice role in The story 3 as Barbie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbTkukqjExw and played lead role in movie Carrusel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKZbn3DOFSQ. Where is a series La otra raya del tigre in filmography list https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_OVZP2nYYU
Your edits are totally wrong. Why you dont admit it or just investigate better...
Forbidden Passions/Forbidden Love aka Pasión prohibida[edit]
Hey,I read a note from you in my talk page.Let me continue from where you stopped:Because you said so?Or are you Mr.Perfect?YOU CAN HAVE IT.Its just a poster dude.I don't need a fruitless world war debate or an edit war that you always use as a shield with you.Have it deleted too. I never knew better posters were suggested by you.I'll ask you to stop leaving baseless topics on my talk page.Also stop giving unconstructive warnings.I did not leave a messege on your talk page when I changed the poster or non the less undermine your dear poster.I am losing my cool.Next time I will not be this kind.
zzzzNyanchokanyanchy 16:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC) nyanchy 16:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Respect is mutual.Ok.I did not get you but I fixed the pieces together.You reverted to your image,period! You seem,to comment about an edit war,I haven't seen it.I am simply pissed of with your messages on my talk page that make me seem not to understand you.As per your explanation you said Mónica Spear,may her soul rest in peace and Jencarlos Canela were the only stars what of Rebecca Jones?Regarding the issue of main characters on posters consider removing a speck in your eye first by checking if any of the main stars are present in the El color de la pasión poster.The last time I checked,Michelle Renaud and René Strickler were there.Consider looking for Esmeralda Pimentel and Erik Elias that means I dont foeget easily.Forgive me but that's all I had to say.Nyanchokanyanchy 20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC) nyanchy 20:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
On the matter of the image,I found it more appropriate because it had the logo of the novela.So I don't change images to please myself or provoke anyone.Therefore I will change it next year .Am sorry if I was offensive.Salam nyanchy 21:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Therefore as I said you can keep the latter poster. Or are you not reading the messages I leave you?That's not an answer.I asked about El color de la pasión.As per Rebecca Jones let her be,God knows what her role was. I didn't start a discussion about her.But since this is not a discussion lets close it.Good day nyanchy 21:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I recently revised that article regarding the article.I don't see why you are blanking the Notes section.I myself revised that page and its under my watch list.Can you please consider looking at the page contents before disrupting my edits or at least give an explanation for the blanking.Its barely a week when I revised it.I hope this won't result to an edit war.
One more revert and I will ask foe an administrator for help .I'll not teach you to to respect my edits just leave it be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyanchoka (talk • contribs)
Nyanchoka, please see this discussion for some context about the inclusion of "Antagonist, protagonist, lead, supporting" and other terminologies. The discussion is not over, so if you'd like to participate in it, you are welcome to. Also one good way to avoid an edit war is to stop edit warring. Note that both of you can wind up blocked for this, and Nyanchoka, you appear to have just breezed through a 3RR violation by a scant 8 minutes. If I were you, I'd revert your last edit and start the discussion yourself. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already I will not further discuss anything with Nyanchoka, with this user always there are problems with everything, not only with these issues, if not many more. So preferably go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Because I do not think just that my edit could not be accepted, when the only thing I did was to update the filmography, since the previous version was a disaster. And even edit what the user was editing.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 22:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be going nuts what's up with you.As far as I need no fear you can investigate and you can check if I have any other accounts.Am off to bed I hope I wont find your usual baseless messages on my talk page. nyanchy 23:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Phily J Fry I didn't know about Wikipedia then much... I'm sorry if it look like that but i was editing from a phone. her comes the favor I wanted to ask of you when the wikipedia is unprotected. I'll like you to help me develop her award section using the following sources I'll send to you through your talk page.
you could save a soul by doing the edit for me. I'm going to do things in a professional
way. if I send you the edit here. please you'll help me do things the right way.. once again I'm sorry.. And if you're going to help me for a better communications if you are a twitter user ..tweet me @Ezolanski please and thanks if you are going to reply
@Ejezie Swanky: I could add the awards of Marlene Favela, the only thing need me are references and are from reliable sources. If you want to collaborate, you can take an example of a page of other actors or singers. For example, here are two examples. Where can you see that there is a table for the awards and other awards and nominations. In any case if what you want is to add nothing more awards and nominations, the Rankings table will not be necessary.--Philip J Fry • Talk 17:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK I know @Phily J Fry . But please you can help me. All I want is for you to edit the awards & nomination. you can put the ranking table. I want to collaborate as you said, but since I'm typing from a mobile phone instead of a laptop, The sources link didn't upload cause I got a message from wikipedia saying its copyright.. so what is remaining is the sources and I don't know how to give it to you except if I give you the heading of the article so that you can extract the links yourself or you contact me on twitter... or do you have a better idea? but all I want is for you to help me please .. please cause it'll mean a whole lot to someone
Hi Alex Visekruna, could you use your main account instead of be using ips?. Or is very difficult to do that?.--Philip J Fry(talk) 14:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip J Fry! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
You moved "Por estas calles" to "Por estás calles" and that is the wrong title.[edit]
It should be "estas" and not "estás". I'm not sure about your level of Spanish, but those are two different words meaning different things.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesario12345 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please move it back. It is disgusting to see orthographic errors on Wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesario12345 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Cesario12345: I speak Spanish, what happens is that in the Wikipedia, there are many articles with titles in Spanish that have no accent. When did the movement of the article I thought it was a mistake. But if, indeed, the title does not have an accent.--Philip J Fry(talk) 19:44, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
hi! Philly about the Marlene favela Wikipedia please be kind not to remove the information on marlene favela award section: i put so much work on it by excessive searching and marlene confirmed it herself when in asked her. but if you're so kind, please expand it. besides i love how you shaped up the Wikipedia page for "pasion y Poder" thanks for your audience.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs)
@Banky da silver: Let's see. I need you clarify if Ejezie Swanky are you ?. I do not I'm going to start to look for references to these awards, are adding information without reliable sources, so I reverted.--Philip J Fry(talk) 14:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
but the irony is that you're the one that loves editing Wikipedia so why dontyou google the information and then copy the link. besides in that pasion y poder page where you wrote the synopsis of the novela without a "reliable" source/link. and most of the wikipedias for latino has no "reliable source".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs)
For starters, I'm going to ask you to stop creating new sections to be all the time, and created one, follow the same thread. What happens in "Pasión y poder", it has nothing to do with what Marlene Favela. You do not pay me, so I're giving orders. I do not want and do not have the obligation of looking for sources for everything that you think add wikipedia. "A synopsis" is very different from "Awards and nominations." And as I see you are "Ejezie Swanky (talk·contribs)" I will not keep explaining to nothing, and before me explain.--Philip J Fry(talk) 14:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Phily j fry: cool thats all im asking for to be very honest, you gotta help. no im not Ejezie Swanky. it got on my nerves thou ... think i was a lil bit rude for the last message.. my apologies.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs)
ayo phily if you do that for the marlene favela wikipidia page i'll be so grateful. ill be checking from everyday. a happy tuesday to you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs)
I told you to stop be creating new sections to discuss the same issue. That hinders me after previous discussions files.--Philip J Fry(talk) 14:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to the Taylor Swift WikiProject! We are very pleased to have your help with the project. If you have not done so yet, it is strongly recommended that you add all the Taylor Swift pages to your watchlist. If you have any inquiries regarding the project, or any articles relating to Taylor Swift, please direct them to the project's talk page. Alternately, you could also bring up a discussion on the article's own talk page, or message a fellow participant, but we would prefer all participants engaging on the project's own talk page. If you find yourself inactive with the project for an extended period of time, feel free to remove yourself, or just add yourself to the inactive participants section. Thank you and happy editing!
pls phily are you still on the marlene favela award stuff? please check be sure to remember. im making an effort here please on your spare time check it. please be sure to do it. im gonna add that just put the information of the ones you find in net. type " marlene favela and the award body(palmas de oro or premios falmas, califa de oro, microphone de oro, , trilogia de oro......) individually. plus its all over the net that she was among the 21 divinas y humanas for tvynovelas 2014 issue.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs)
Again we return to the same?. Even before I explain about this and seem to understand nothing. It is it so hard for you to add references to that information?. And another thing, what language you speak?. Because I do not understand anything you say.--Philip J Fry(talk) 15:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
yes it is hard for me, but you said you were gonna search for the information. it hard for me to know how to add the reference information, I'm not a regular editor like you or rather i don't know how to do it. That's why i asked you to help me browse the award information with the name "marlene favela". she is Latin, so the sources where those information are written are in Spanish. its clear now? i wasn't right with my punctuation before
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lady, la vendedora de rosas.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Lady, la vendedora de rosas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip, regarding this edit, I'm a little surprised that you're not aware of how to look up template instructions. You type Template:<NAME OF TEMPLATE> in the search box. For this matter, you'd type Template:Reflist, which says:
Using {{Reflist|30em}} will create columns with a minimum width of 30 em, allowing the browser to automatically choose the number of columns based on the width of the web browser.
Using {{Reflist|2}} will force creation of a two-column reference list, and {{Reflist|3}} will force creation of a three-column list, and so on. This feature is now deprecated in favor of the option described above, which is better suited to flexible formatting for a variety of display screen sizes, ranging from mobile phones and tablets to wide-screen "cinema" displays. Forcing a fixed number of columns has been disabled in mobile view.
@Cyphoidbomb: Hi, thanks for the clarification, actually I have not read that, is that in this Wikipedia there are always changes all the time, for example in the infobox of television and then one is lost. But thanks for clarifying it.--Philip J Frytalk 16:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it was clarified as deprecated in March 2014. Take care, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Corey Fogelmanis, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam SailorTalk! 09:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you moved this page back to its Spanish title. WP:UE and WP:EN dictate that we should go by whatever version of the name is most widely used in English-language sources. In accordance with that, I went searching on Google for the name in quotes retaining its accent. Google ignored the accent and in every major English-language source I found it rendered the title without an acute accent (if you would like: Rolling Stone, Hollywood Reporter, IGN, New York Post, Village Voice, I could go on). I don't mean to pester anyone about this (I was the one who moved the page to its English title originally), but for Wikipedia's purposes we must go by policy (and that's what the linked pages are). Zeke, the Mad Horrorist(Speak quickly)(Follow my trail) 05:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the United States and other places where English is spoken ignore accents because I can not do anything about it, "Génesis" is a name and therefore should lead accent because the movie comes from Spain, but there are absurd rules They ignore that and push aside the rules for the use of the Spanish language. But this is something I will not argue or I have wanted to do, in this Wikipedia many users do what they want, so do not really want to discuss this topic. If you want to regain the title without an accent, either. Regards.--Philip J Fry / talk 14:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! A jultomte for you!. Credits to Hafspajen :) The real Hafspajen (talk) 23:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jordan Fisher, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mr Fry.....please do your research and homework so when YOU edit pages .....You have the correct information. The actor Pedro Moreno will be Iñaki in FRENTE AL MISMO ROSTRO. He is one of 3 male protagonist of this series...... There triplets right?????? Right. Therefore there are 3 men in the story. Check out the info below.
Thank you
First it was said that he would be the third protagonist of the story, then they said no. So that is still very doubtful. Besides all your edits are slightly destructive and add information without reliable sources. I do not need you to come to my talk page to give me references, add them in the article.--Philip J Fry / talk 22:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So then do your research. You will see that he is. Lolasmirh4545 (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have no reason to look for anything, the person interested in adding such information is you.--Philip J Fry / talk 22:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip! So long no say!
First sorry for the unintended vandalism. Due to my browser. I appreciate your edits on Wikipedia. I might be long so I will list for you so that you can get me better. O support you on the issue about the ratings table is unnecessary.
Runtime: The previous hidden "reliable sources required" is now depreciated. Wikipedia allows us to use approximation. According to Template:Infobox television it states that, Episode duration. Should not include commercials and should be approximated, e.g. "22–26 minutes" for most half-hour shows.
Broadcast: Apart from the channel of origin for the series, editors are encouraged to instead detail noteworthy foreign broadcasts, from English-speaking countries, through prose form. This section is best named simply "Broadcast" and should also address broadcasting in the country of origin.
I discourage the use of series in telenovelas. It looks rather conflicting since telenovelas seldom have series/seasons. I suggest we use the working title or rather "telenovela"
With regard to duration, that I think needs to be placed in articles telenovelas. Well, that can always change, an example may be "Que te perdone Dios" and "Marido en alquiler" for a while each chapter lasted 42-43 minutes, but then began to take over, as is currently the case with "Ruta 35" which is supposed to last 42-43 minutes but lasts longer than that. And in the section "Broadcast" I think the term "series" sounds better in English and those who speak the language to understand the time to read. Obviously it is already explained in the introduction of the article is a telenovela. I see that both problems.--Philip J Fry / talk 21:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you are very sure of what you say .. I put that information and of course it is true not pulled out of my mind to the information got from the Spanish Wikipedia, which is information the telenovela. A tip if you want when you open pages telenovela putting the correct information and not that be so because I have seen it in other pages. and finally I corrected incorrectly and Open Page with appetite contribute Wikipedia and do it with love for my country of origin of my favorite Mexico I hope the next time not to redo it ... thanks Alk@ 06:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia in Spanish is not a reliable source, because nobody knows where they got all that information, the article in Spanish of Sueño de amor, has no references. On the other hand, you need to read these two things: Manual of Style/Television and Infobox television.--Philip J Fry / talk 12:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pues, no me distes tiempo, estaba esperando que primero lo ocultaran, ya le mi aviso a ver si hace caso.... y no, no es lo que el quiera, entonces pregunto. si el puede hacer lo que quiera ¿puede crear un bulo? ¿puede crear crear cosas sin sentido? ¿artículos sin relevancia alguna? ¿o fuente primaria?. a ver, dime compañero. Por eso me meto, para protegerlo, y muy posiblemente si no fuera yo, otro lo haría. Saludos y espero tu amable respuesta. --Elreysintrono (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Entiendo, fue un malentendido. no hay problema. Saludos! --Elreysintrono (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You stop saying bullshit then and changed without any reason and cause of changes made to pages by me or someone else. with you have reached my limits. stops because you can not do that you want Wikipedia, write, change, etc. such as the thou shalt. Wikipedia is free portal for world wide, and you know I write with love for Wikipedia and my country.. you not can reduce our. Alk@21 08:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
@Alka21: All editions has reversed yours, have been a good reason, which does not want to understand..--Philip J FryTalk 14:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You have your own view. 15:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Las amazonas es nueva versión de novela del mismo nombre. http://iconosquare.com/viewer.php#/detail/1197104490205456065_539863624 Esa foto del libreto lo confirma, por el autor de la historia, ademas mismo nombre de historia. Derechos de La 2 Dianas las tiene Azteca. Hubo una confusion de que era remake de LDD, por el parecido nombre.
@Alex Visekruna: La fuente que muestras no me funciona, me sale un error al entrar a ella, y pues si hay una confusión o no, deberías aportar una fuente más confiable que diga lo que estas afirmando. Todos los sitios web afirman que es un remake de Las dos Dianas. Aunque por otro lado es algo raro, ya que viendo la cantidad de protagonistas, parece ser un remake de Las amazonas. Pero eso se tendrían que confirmar más a fondo.--Philip J FryTalk 20:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Esta fuente que es del 22 de marzo, afirma que es un remake de La dos Dianas, y fue la más reciente que encontré de este mes.--Philip J FryTalk 20:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Doña Bárbara 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Doña Bárbara 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip, you are the user of Bradford? I'm Nobita in vikidia, please check the message of your discussion and answer please. --Corejose (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, you are a sysop in this wikipedia? Exist a list of the members of sysop in this wikipedia? And you can answer this message? Thanks. --Corejose (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answer message in the es.vikidia. --Corejose (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Philip – have you thought about applying for Autopatrolled at WP:PERM? My quick look at your article creation count leads me to think you probably qualify for it... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@IJBall: Thank you, I'll have it in mind. While trying not understand that, then I'll read it more calmly.--Philip J FryTalk 12:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seria bueno que mejoraras un poquito más tu ortografía y aprendieras a firmar tus mensajes. Creo que ya antes te he lo pedido pero veo que no deseas hacerlo. Solo entras a esta Wikipedia para estar pendiente de rumores y veo que te tomas esto como un sitio de chismes y redes sociales. Pero en fin, viniendo al caso, de acuerdo a esta nota, veo que ahí dicen que se trata de un nueva versión de "Las amazonas". Aunque por otro lado varias de las fuentes que encuentro afirman que es un remake de "Las dos Dianas", y tampoco veo que el productor haya aclarado algo al respecto de qué sucede, si tienes una fuente más confiable, te lo agradecería.--Philip J FryTalk 12:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Espanol no es mi idioma, vivo en Serbia, ademas en mi teclado no tengo las letras con virgulilla porque en mi idioma no se usan, tenemos diferente estilo de escribir. Si te hubieras informado mejor, podrias ver que la histora no tiene nada que ver con LDD, y que hay una confusion. El mismo titulo de novela, las fotos y video que puse lo confirman. Lo hize con muy buena intencion, porque soy fan de Danna Garcia y me gustaria que todas las paginas que tienen que ver con ella sean con informaciones realistas. Nombres de personajes, tres hermanas protagonistas, tantas cosas que es mas que claro que la historia esta basada en LA. Pero quedate con tus "fuentes confiables" que no son de chisme .
A ver, yo no soy adivino para saber de que país eres y con mejorar tu ortografía no necesariamente debes usar acentos y tener una escritura perfecta, pero veo que dominas un poco el idioma y creo que con practicar un poco puedes lograrlo, pero en fin, es un tema que prefiero dejar. Con respecto a "Las amazonas", no veo ninguna fuente que diga que se trate de un error, pero no se puede comprobar, pero tu lo ves desde el punto de vista de ser fan de una actriz, porque si vamos al caso, yo también soy fan de muchos actores y no por eso voy a afirmar cosas, sin que "x" persona lo haya confirmado así, tal vez más adelante se aclaren las dudas, lo mejor será esperar, tal vez tenga razón, pero es mejor esperar a ver que sucede. La única versión de "Las amazonas" que yo vi fue "Las Bandidas" y con respecto a este nuevo remake, me parece muy precipitado que lancen otra versión, cuando apenas han pasado dos años desde "Las Bandidas", tal vez pueda que solo se basen en la telenovela de Venevisión tal y como sucedió en "Un camino hacia el destino" o en la nueva versión de "Doña Bárbara".--Philip J FryTalk 20:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have more poster pictures for Tres veces Ana?
Orphaned non-free image File:Tres veces Ana.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Tres veces Ana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 05:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I needed to revert your edit in that article because you included episode counts for the cast members in the table. The WP:TVCAST guideline states the following: The cast listing should not contain an episode count, e.g. (# episodes), to indicate the number of episodes in which the actor/character appeared. If an actor misses an episode due to a real world occurrence, such as an injury that prevents them from appearing, this info can be noted in the character's description or "Production" section with a reliable source. This applies to all articles about TV series, and for more about why this was added to the guideline, see this discussion in the talk page archive of the Television project: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television/Archive 5#Addendum to the Cast section. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When you upload a non-free image, please don't upload such high-resolution versions. Usually they should be around 300x300 maximum, but that's not a hard rule. I tend to leave posters a bit bigger (around 360 pixels tall) to make sure the width is at least 220px (the default infobox image width). If you're not able to resize them, please at least tag them with {{Non-free reduce}} so that a bot can fix it automatically within 24 hours without having to wait for a patroller to tag or resize it. Thanks. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, here are a few useful templates for getting a more complete non-free use rationale with little input:
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Wikipedia:Future article, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Future article and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Future article during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for your message about my edit to the wiki page, "Tres Veces Ana."
I have readded my edition and added a reliable reference/resource. The telenovela's title was changed three times. At first, during the casting process and pre production, the title was Como Tres Gotas de Agua. Angelique later confirmed that it had been changed to "frente al mismo rostro" and it ultimately ended up being "Tres Veces Ana." Here is the source that Como Tres Gotas de Agua was the working title: [1]
Dado que ya llevas mucho tiempo por aqui, quisiera que me dijeras que cosas puedo mejorar. QUisiera crear articulos y me gustaria saber si hay una lista o algo de los articulos por crear o algo. Saludos y ¿la foto de tu perfil es tuya? --Nobita931 (talk) 16:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nobita931: Ahorita no puedo ayudarte amigo, no tengo computadora, y una hora en un ciber acá en Venezuela está muy cara. Me conecto de vez en cuando y cuando puedo. Pero edita lo que más que te guste, o sólo revierte vandalismo.--Philip J FryTalk 16:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
¿Por qué estás reportandome si el que está correcto aquí soy yo? No sé si es que estás celoso porque yo estoy correcto y tú no pero ya yo te había proveído con 1, 2, 3 sources y aún así me reportaste por envidia. Gracias de verdad, personas como tú cada vez me llevan a la opción de dejar Wikipedia de una vez por todas. Borikén(talk ·ctb) 23:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You changed my entry for La Voz Kids. Temporada 3 is 2015 and Temporada (season) 4 was 2016. It is only a 3 month long show. I am putting back what I had. Thank you. I have been updating it extensively as a birthday gift to Pedro. SusanneSC (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Attempting to escriba en espanol para ti. pardon if errores. I am also updating the page for his American audience as he already has a page on wiki Mexico. MIra, LaVozKids completó 4 temporadas. Pedro estaba en 3 y 4. La nota que tengo pertenece a la temporada 3 solamente. Nadie se ha molestado en actualizar o agregar contenido durante más de dos años. Por favor dejar mi trabajo solo como no es incorrecto y está siguiendo el wiki de directrices. Lo que estaba aquí fue mal hecho y estoy mejorando mucho. SusanneSusanneSC (talk) 23:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
soy Rolodata el de IRC con el que tuviste el problema de canaima. Te pido disculpas UN Y MIL VECES por el problema, soy un experto en la informatica, pero en esto no estaba seguro asi que busque. Si me tienes ignore, por favor quitamelo. EN serio, disculpas. La proxima vez usaré mi gran talento informatico y no lo que pongan tontos en google. Saludos. --37.15.172.194 (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SI pudiera viajar en el tiempo NO LO HARIA JAMAS, pero perdoname y olvidalo. ¿que he de hacer para que me perdones??
PD: Perdonar significa ser amable y olvidarte de lo que paso al 100%. En serio, disculpas. --37.15.172.194 (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 350 articles in just six days. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Your work on telenovelas would really compliment the list and hopefully motivate you to improve existing stubs or create more articles. Thankyou.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:La Doña Telemundo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Philip J Fry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:Sin senos sí hay paraíso.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Sin senos sí hay paraíso.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fatmagül'ün Suçu Ne?, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mona778 (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Juan Ríos Cantú) has been reviewed![edit]
Ya basta, me estas cansando, termina de verme como un enemigo, somos seres umanos, todos queremos lo mismo, el bien de Wikipedia, termina de insultarme y no canceles mi modificas, deja asi la pagina de Sabrina Seara. Saludos y que tengas un buen ano nuevo!.User:Philip J Fry— Preceding unsigned comment added by GORI 40 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Philip J Fry: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant can be 50-100 episodes above however now episode 90 ended and I'll makes sure that is your ownership now will be article become all these episodes, so it may provide all the episodes season 1 are here I will make it all these telenovelas episodes here. Oripaypaykim(talk) 12:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oripaypaykim: Can you explain me better? I do not understand your point, it really seems unnecessary to create list of episodes for telenovelas that only have 50-70 or 90 episodes- That information can go in the main article without any problem, as far as i understand only list of episodes are created if the series Has had more seasons or the list of epiosods is too long.--Philip J FryTalkTag me! 12:14, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My grammar so worthless, I create list of episodes for telenovelas, well it reach entire article for mean time ago since to your adding sourced then then its not bit far as episodes was still is long enough. Oripaypaykim(talk) 12:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oripaypaykim: I'm not against your point of view, but I think it's a little unnecessary to create lists of episodes for telenovelas that never really get so popular or have extensive articles of information; Such as "El Señor de los Cielos". Anyway I asked for help here, I hope to see what the community says about this.--Philip J FryTalkTag me! 12:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think everything's alright, you'll see this article sure is list of episodes are too short could. well it should be redirect article here. Oripaypaykim(talk) 13:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
La doble vida de Estela Carrillo is scheduled[edit]
Premieres on February 13, 2017 replacing La candidata scheduled 21:00hrs.
--Francjñg (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Francjñg: As I continue to expect sources confirming this information, and I think it is very soon to place a release date, because until now who has shown advances and promos of the series has been Univision, not Las Estrellas.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 22:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:SPLIT and WP:CWW and provide the proper attributions to both those articles as required by Wikipedia licensing requirements. Minimally an edit summary saying what you did would have been sufficient. WP:Dummy edits would be fine to both articles now but adding the split tags to both articles talk pages should still be done. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Soy Luna cast members until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No le veo la gracia llenar una mano de artículos de novelas cuya tabla de episodios son solo los diez primeros, creo que un visitante ocasional a estas paginas empaña la imagen de una Wikipedia que la que se supone a la que debería estar actualizada en todos sus aspectos y no solo tablas desactualizadas
que no brindan la información original, sumándole que en este caso la serie se emitió hace casi un año, y del tiempo que lleva creado este articulo ninguno se ha esmerado en actualizar eso. Es lo que sugiero, por si lo toma en cuenta --190.157.184.98 (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pero es muy correcto añadir una tabla de premios sin fuentes y mal organizada? (quién sabe de dónde salieron dichos premios). ¿A caso eso es muy correcto?. La tabla de episodios con poner que está desactualizada es suficiente, pero no veo motivos para eliminar los ratings y los pocos episodios incluidos.--Philip J FryTalk to me 19:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
American Horror Story Cast Page:
Sorry, we are butting heads again. Lourd and Billy Eichner have been confirmed as main and recurring, respectively. Why would we not want to have the cast colors (green and red)? We have always labeled like this in the past. Changeisgame (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Paulson and Peters are clear that will be part of the main cast, were the first confirmed.--Philip J FryTalk to me 00:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Did you not take the time to read the references that I provided? Billie Lourd is set to star in season seven so that means she is a main cast member. Also Billy Eichner is set to appear as well. It's all you have to do is type in American horror story on Google and you'll see all the articles that multiple sources have wrote. It is not speculation I gave you articles and even on the main American horror story page the two actors are referenced in the season seven section .Changeisgame (talk) 00:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is speculative, it is not known if then both actors will only have a special participation. So they said season 7 would be about Donal Trump, which they demoted. I just hope this IP is not about you.--Philip J FryTalk to me 01:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Did you find where there's a problem with File:PoloMG.jpg? With the uploader's prior history, I'm skeptical, but I don't have evidence of a problem with that image. —C.Fred (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@C.Fred: The user has been uploading non-free images for some time, I thought this would be another one. Anyway I looked, but I do not find that image anywhere else than here on Wikipedia. But I still hesitate a bit that the image is free.--Philip J FryTalk to me 20:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This us a user page, it is not important if there are other official pages like that. So I don't see a reason for deletion. Please matter your own business. Thank you. --Zzz369 (talk) 15:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Again, i'm so sorry for the mistake! Because this is image is an copyright violation for the Commercial. Please delete this image.
--FrancoLeymas (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip J Fry. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm♠ 05:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Los «Espacios» después de una referencia (para separar de la siguiente palabra) siempre van incluidos posteriormente de ésta. Tomemos de ejemplo de articulo de novela o serie el articulo Premiere (uno de los artículos destacados de ésta categoría la de "novelas o series"), si se fijan después de todas las referencias tienen su debido espacio. Añadiendo que, sin el espacio adecuado parece que la redacción estuviera toda unida [ej:...directed by Jessy Terrero,based on the singer,Nicky Jam...], sin pautas como lo debería tener un texto enciclopédico normal. No veo, por que los artículos que ud esta creando sean la excepción. --190.147.132.116 (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply] PD:Sin Mencionar que casi en 99% de éstos artículos (de novelas y los de toda Wikipedia) están con el dicho espacio.
@190.147.132.116: Puede que sea cierto, como puedo que también no lo sea. Las referencias claramente dejan un gran espacios al separar textos, ya que se muestra un cuadrado pequeño con un número; pero en fin. Lo que no entiendo su interés en estar al tanto de todos los artículos que he creado.--Philip J FryTalk 22:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Todos no, aquellos con el dicho espacio u otras falencias. --190.147.132.116 (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, Estoy esporádicamente colaborando en artículos (latinos) de Wikiproyectos & Portales de Telenovelas y Televisión; Otra cosa que una cantidad considerable de éstos los crea ud. --190.147.132.116 (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@190.147.132.116: Es tan extraño que habiendo tantos wikipedistas acá, de los 20mil que puedan haber, solo usted note la gran cantidad de artículos que he creado. Eso resulta un poco extraño, y no me venga con qué es "colaborar", o que lo ve a través de una lista o de hecho que ve la gran cantidad de artículos a través de Special:NewPagesFeed.--Philip J FryTalk 23:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before you start reporting people, lets talk about the cast list
In the third season of Senora Acero.
Look at the intro of the show and this was how it was noted
Alejandro Alonso, Alejandro Oliva, and Eduardo Amer were guest actors in season two before they were promoted in season three. The intro of season three had a special recurring cast name list first with those returning from season two and Alonso, Oliva, Amer were noted towards the end including Roberto Wohulmuth who was also promoted followed by Oka Giner, Alejandro Speitzer, etc.
@76.187.251.61: Your current version, according to you, is incorrect, because I myself looked at all the opening themes of the series on Youtube, nobody is talking about the modifications you made to certain information. Clearly I am referring to the order that the cast of recurrent, is organized according to the credits in the opening topics and as stated here.--Philip J FryTalk 01:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes there were three version to the season three intro, ok then its agreed add Oliva and Amer to the end
@76.187.251.61: I have restored everything to how it was previously, if there is some small error, I can modify it.--Philip J FryTalk 01:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bradford! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)
For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.
Quisiera hacer de tu conocimiento diversos artículos que serán de interest en el tema de las telenovelas. Tenemos artículos sobre Imagen Televisión y Dirección General de Radio, Televisión y Cinematografía. No me enteré sobre tus aportaciones en cuanto a las novelas de Imagen hasta el día de hoy, pero esos artículos seguramente te ayudarán. Raymie (t • c) 18:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Raymie: Hola, realmente no entiendo muy bien lo que es "Dirección General de Radio, Televisión y Cinematografía", no conozco esa empresa ó de que va. Lo mío más que todo es colaborar con artículos de telenovelas o series de Imagen Televisión, más, no toco muchos los artículos relacionados con la empresa ya que no veo dicho canal porque no lo tengo.--Philiptalk 18:54, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lo que hace la RTC es que clasifica a todos los programas de televisión y a todas las películas que se exhiben en México. Raymie (t • c) 18:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, Philip. Veo que hablas castellano así que es mas fácil para mi utilizar esa lengua. Respecto a la serie "El hotel de los secretos", el caso es que si la fuente dice eso está equivocada (a mi me sale la página web principal de "Las estrellas" y no exactamente la noticia, con lo que no la he podido leer). Esa telenovela es un remake mexicano de la serie española "Gran Hotel".
Es una cadena fácil de seguir, "Gran Hotel" y "Velvet", serie esta última de la que también habla el artículo, han sido producidas directamente por la empresa española Bambú Producciones y Ramón Campos y Gema R. Neira son dos de los principales guionistas y creadores de la misma. Su participación en "El hotel de los secretos" es muy tangencial. Se podría resumir con un silogismo, esto es, ya que Ramón Campos y Gema R. Neira crearon "Gran Hotel" y "El hotel de los secretos" es un remake de "Gran Hotel" entonces "El hotel de los secretos" ha sido creado por ellos. Es demasiado sencillo para ser correcto. La idea original sería suya, pero el desarrollo y el guion (lo puedes ver en la wiki en castellano de "El hotel de los secretos") no ha sido desarrollado por ellos, siendo el número de capítulos, por ejemplo, muy superior al del original español (80 frente a 39 del original).
En la wiki inglesa pone claramente que son los guionistas, y no lo que son en realidad, esto es, los creadores de la idea original ("Gran Hotel") pero no los guionistas del remake ("El hotel de los secretos"). A no ser que no esté en lo cierto, "writers" en inglés hace referencia a los "guionistas", y eso solo lo son, de eso no hay duda, de la serie española original pero no del remake mexicano.
Resulta mucho mas fácil y menos arriesgado poner ahí sus creaciones originales ("Gran Hotel" y "Velvet") que un derivado de una de ellas en el que no han tenido una intervención directa. Si te das cuenta, puedes ver que en el listado de creaciones de Bambú Producciones, empresa de la que Ramón Campos es uno de los dos dueños (el otro es su mujer, Teresa Fernández-Valdés), no aparece "El hotel de los secretos" como una de sus obras. Saludos--Zumalabe (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
He añadido un nuevo enlace (manteniendo el anterior) en el que vienen correctamente las dos series principales creadas por Ramón Campos y Gema R. Neira. Un saludo--Zumalabe (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zumalabe: Hola, he procedido a retirar dicha información ya que es un poco irrelevante, la verdad, y, de acuerdo a esta fuente, la serie es creada por Ramón Campos y Gema R. Neira. La fuente anterior existía pero es visto que Televisa elimina ciertos artículos después de un periodo de tiempo.--Philiptalk 23:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
De acuerdo, yo matizaba que lo que había era incorrecto. Un saludo--Zumalabe (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your article about Gonzalo Peña has a mistake. He was born in 1989. He is twenty eight years old. I just want to help. Regards. TtPalacios (talk) 04:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
por favor no revertes otra vez el articulo de Zedd por favor si lo haces otra vez te voy a reportar.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodrigo1198 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Queria ver si era posible que pudieras traducir a español el perfil de Antonio Muñoz (actor)
Muchas gracias espero la situación en Venezuela mejore Antoniomnz (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Antoniomnz: Hola, gracias. Con respecto al artículo, no sé exactamente quién es ese actor. Y de paso no encuentro fuentes en Google. Saludos.--Philiptalk 02:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Philip, I noticed you edited the English version of my page, La Hermandad Serie.
I created the page because I'm part of the producers, so I got all the information.
I already update the information of the new season at the spanish version. But I notice every change I made in the english version you cancel it, How can we arrange this?.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BeatrizMaldonado (talk • contribs) 14:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Rosario Tijeras) has been reviewed![edit]
Hi Phillip i am an intern for NBC Universo where the show is produced so this information is coming straight from production can you please stop deleting it.If you'd like to verify please email me to my official NBC email. thank you keiana.granda@nbcuni.com.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniouniverso (talk • contribs) 14:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
hi philip is there anyway you van give a call to the office becaquse my job at nbcuniverso is requiring me to update the wikipedia page and the amrketing department wants it a certain way and you keep changing it please call me so we can resolve this please call 3052979789 please and thank you[reply]
Hi Philip, I am regarding about the article titled Angelique Boyer. So you know about Celebrities Spanish custom names and I have a problem. There is a user by the name of User:Nika de Hitch removing the sourced Spanish custom name to Nika de Hitch's version of Angelique Boyer's article. And I don't like Nika de Hitch's edit. Just so you know Angelique Boyer's Spanish custom name is "Angelique Monique-Paulette Boyer Rousseau". Monique-Paulette is her middle name, Boyer is her first paternal name from her father and Rousseau is her second paternal name from her mother, because the actress lives in Mexico. In order to avoid an edit war, could you keep an eye on the article titled "Angelique Boyer". If you see User:Nika de Hitch reverted to the Nika de Hitch's version revert it back to my version and warn User:Nika de Hitch to never remove a sourced Spanish custom name. And if I see Nika de Hitch's revert to the user's version, I will sent an urgent message. I am worried about a User:Nika de Hitch's warning message will be sent to me. If you can help me this is to make Wikipedia editing safe. I will look forward to your reply. Thanks for your understanding and talk to you soon. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D: Hi. I really do not want to get into that editing conflict. I think the correct thing is that you talk about this subject yourself with the user in question. I am a fan of the actress and I know what his full name is, because there are also reliable sources that affirm it; But I do not want to participate in that problem. Do what I told you. Talk to the user.--Philip J Fry : Talk 22:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hi philip is there anyway you van give a call to the office becaquse my job at nbcuniverso is requiring me to update the wikipedia page and the amrketing department wants it a certain way and you keep changing it please call me so we can resolve this please call 3052979789 please and thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniouniverso (talk • contribs) 21:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@Antoniouniverso: I will not call anywhere. There are two official posters it is unnecessary to place so many images; With the logo of the series is enough. According to the image, it does not have the correct permissions to use it in Wikipedia.--Philip J Fry : Talk 21:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Buenos dias Philip quisiera ver si es posible agregar alguna opcion para poder agregar o modificar Film o Television en la pagina de Antonio Muñoz (actor)
Muchas gracias y feliz domingo. Antoniomnz (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, would you agree that Billy Eichner, Danny Huston, Gabourey Sidibe and Mare Winningham belong in the recurring section? Another user states they belong in the special guest section since it's a "higher" rank than recurring, however, the information is wrong since a character becomes recurring after appearing in 3+ episodes. I just wanted to get other editors opinions on this. Regardless of being credited as special guest, they were/are recurring based on their episode counts. Cheers MSMRHurricane (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MSMRHurricane: To avoid problems, because they are not left in the "Unspecified cast" section, for now, not yet released the rest of the episodes, perhaps these actors appear more, but for now is a bit confusing.--Philip J Fry : Talk 23:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With Billy Eichner, I understand, seeing as he has only appeared in one episode so far. But the other three are definitely recurring (in their appearances on the show, not the current season), as they have appeared in 3+ episodes. Therefore, they belong in the recurring section. MSMRHurricane (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This media is apparently sourced to Photo-Bucket, a site which has seemingly become incompatible with certain browsers, making it harder to verify the status of media nominally sourced to it. Please resource this media to a site where the copyright status, and authorship of this media are more clearly indicated.
I have seen that you have deleted FrancoLeymas's user page several times.Not to be mean but,you should block him again,and the time of block longer.Just suggesting because i found him on the history of editing 2017 Atlantic hurricane season.You also made a recent deletion too.Just suggesting.Have a nice day!QuitenBases (talk) 00:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, why do you revert my editions ?, these are the titles of episodes 79 and 80 of Soy Luna (Season 2) Aziel014 (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Aziel1014: I thought the titles were correct, but no, and if they are going to start modifying one by one, it is better not to put anything, starting because I do not know where they get those supposed titles.--Philip J Fry : Talk 02:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
HI there, there are a couple of errors on the Pambele page for instance. How developed the series, the co-production company, and the proper spelling of the co-producing company. What elements do you need to be able to approve these changes?
I think this is more than enough proof that I am speaking the truth and that my request to change the copy on the page you manage is based on facts supported by the RCN.
Greetings Phillip, I'm providing sources to support the changes of the genere and clarify the reasons why I'm editing the description on the Pambelé project. From a storytelling persepective, character development and production values telenovela and series are completely different. Based on verifiable impartial facts the project should be categorized as a tv series and not as a telenovela.
Please look at the website of the television network that created the series and is currently broadcasting Pambelé in Colombia, the project is listed under the "series" category -not novela- (link bellow). Also if you examine the information provided by the production companies, the authors and other reliable sources they always define the project as a TV series.
Page text.[2]
Direct quote from Wikipedia:
"Over time telenovelas evolved in the structure of their plots and in the themes that they address. Couples who kiss each other in the first minutes of the first episode sometimes stay together for many episodes before the scriptwriter splits them up."
This is definitively not part of the story that has been broadcasted in Colombia over the past months, this project is written and produced as a series, and based on real events.
I'll be happy to exchange opinions and discuss more if needed. I would love to hear your thoughts.
Univision aired an abridged version. Do you know what that means? They combined some epsiodes. Episodes 16 and 17 were combined for the US broadcast. Univision considers those two epsiodes as 16 which was aired October 4. Episodes 19 and 20 were combined for the US broadcast. Univision considers those two epsiodes as 18 and which was aired October 9. That is why Univision calls Episode 21 as Episode 19. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Telenovelafan215: And where is the source that says that?, because what I see are affirmations of it, and since both Univision Now and Univision.com claim that they are a total of 19 episodes and I do not see any source that says the episodes were combined, not However as two episodes are going to have the same amount of spectators?, if not made any special. Sorry but the sources say the correct and if they are a total of 19 episodes for the US version, why are we going to come here to say the opposite and many more without contributing references ?.--Philip J Fry : Talk 22:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You recently corrected me in the article of "El Cesar". I deleted Marcela Guirado's entry in the cast list, because, she is mentioned twice. She is the fourth name in the list, and then the tenth, so I thought that the guy that wrote the article in the first place made a mistake putting her name twice in the list. You could see it by yourself if you want. This thing said, thanks for the correction, but I recomend you read the whole thing first next time you want to change something.
Yes, I can explain. The English title should be bold, just like the Spanish title. Why are you reverting? — Film Fan 20:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Philip J Fry! Can you make article about 1971 Mexican movie Yesenia and find poster? If you make this article, i will be grateful! Grasias! --178.71.222.15 (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Spanish: Hola Philip J Fry, entiendo el mal momento que estas pasando por el bloqueo en Wikipedia en español (DJMalik), te doy animo para que tengas paciencia y esperes a que en el futuro puedas ser desbloqueado, como yo fui readmitido después de 7 años bloqueado. Saludos cordiales --Globalphilosophy (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stephen,
How do you suggest we add all the characters I added and you reverted? They are credited characters and I'm not understanding the process. Very few characters have a reference and yet they are listed. Also, wikipedia lists a guest characters as appearing in just a few episodes, yet you reverted Abril Schreiber who was in it for a week or so.
Thanks! Gitlink (talk) 22:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gitlink: Well, the actors you mentioned, are not remarkable, they do not have an extensive career, as has Abril Schreiber, who is a little more recognized. However, they should only include actors who have appeared in at least 11 episodes. But there are special guests that have great weight in history and therefore are mentioned.--Philip J Frytalk 22:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: So more weight-based, whether story-wise or in actor caliber (the case for Abril Schreiber; I'd be surprised if she made it to 11). Fair enough, in that case, are you counting Actuaciones Especiales as Guest appearances and the rest as recurring? As I mentioned, Abril Schreiber was in it very briefly, fitting the criteria for Guest, but I do not recall where her name was listed. Also, how can I prove Calvo's first name was revealed to be Esteban, other than pointing readers to his social media posts about it, or directing readers to season 2? Finally, why does the page have characters such as Celia, Perez, Calvo and Chucky below season-two-only characters such as Mariana, Sebastian, and Zoraya, if new characters are supposed to be added to the end as they appear? Thanks! Gitlink (talk) 23:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gitlink: When I refer to them as notable actors, I talk about the fact that they had previously had important characters in other productions, such as Abril Schreiber, who became known for many Venezuelan and Colombian telenovelas. However with respect to Calvo, it is better to leave it as it is, because that name is that his character was known throughout the series, it would be confusing for someone who has only seen few episodes of the series, then enter Wikipedia and see that it has a different name. And with respect to the other, I do not understand what you're talking about.--Philip J Frytalk 23:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: Thanks, I understand what you mean about notable actors. I'm just not completely clear on the criteria used to credit them with either a Guest or recurring appearance, and want to clear that up before any further editing. I wanted to know if "Actuaciones Especiales," as shown during the credits, is being listed as Guest. This makes sense, except that Mayra, for example, has a prevalent role more akin to that of a recurring character, vs Abril's but if Actuaciones Especiales = Guest, thats fine.
Regarding the cast list, I mean that on editing it, wikipedia states "Organized by broadcast credit order, with new main cast added to the end of the list".
I am wondering why some characters that appear only in season two, (Mariana, Sebastián) are listed before characters that are in both season one and two (Chucky, Celia). Shouldn't they have been listed after the characters that previously also appeared in season one, as specified on that line by wikipedia? Thanks again. Gitlink (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gitlink: This hidden text is only for the main actors, not for the recurring actors. It is specified here.--Philip J Frytalk 00:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: Looks like that's only about the infobox, which doesn't list supporting cast. Either way, there should be some sort of order to that section as well don't you think? Gitlink (talk) 00:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Gitlink:The problem with the recurring cast, is that we would have to see the series again from the beginning to see in what order the names of each one were appearing, since these actors do not appear accredited in the opening theme, they appear at the beginning of each chapter and it's kind of absurd to take control of that.--Philip J Frytalk 00:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Philip J Fry: It is, just thinking that season one characters should be displayed first, but beyond that we'd have to check the series again. Thanks again and sorry for spamming your talk page! Gitlink (talk) 00:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Zzz369/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zzz369/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes. You are free to edit the content of User:Zzz369/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Philip J Frytalk 20:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can write on my sandbox whatever I want. This is my sandbox, for god's sake. Please leave me in piece. --Zzz369 (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzz369: Well of power, you can. But I really do not understand how important that is here? You do not make significant contributions to this Wikipedia, and this is not a place for you to entertain yourself..--Philip J Frytalk 21:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Improperly Nominating Articles for Speedy Deletion[edit]
You have nominated at least two pages for speedy deletion citing obviously inapplicable rationals. I am not sure if you understand what CSD is. Please refrain from nominating articles for deletion until you have familiarized yourself with the applicable guidelines. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: I thought that I had created the list of episodes of El Chema, however if i created the article of the first season, and I think it is unnecessary for now; I updated the information and it is now in the main article.--Philip J Fry / talk 16:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page was created by user:Oripaypaykim here. It has also been heavily edited by other users which would invalidate a CSD G7 request even if you had created it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Where was the discussion to mass move the List of DZ episode articles to a different name? Additionally, what is your reasoning for doing so? Nihlus 03:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but those are episode lists and not season pages. If that's the only reason you did, I will ask you to move them back and gain consensus before doing it again. Thanks. Nihlus 03:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nihlus: Neither is there a consensus to keep the articles of each season as a list of episodes. In addition there is already a list of episodes.--Philip J Fry / talk 03:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:TITLECHANGES: If an article title has been stable for a long time, and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title. So your comment Neither is there a consensus to keep the articles of each season as a list of episodes is irrelevant as the page titles have been stable since 2010 (I don't need to show consensus in order to make this argument). So again, if you don't want to undo the edits and initiate a discussion to possibly change consensus, then I will undo it myself and not initiate a discussion. Thanks. Nihlus 03:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I’m Mauricio Novoa, and I was able to read your message. And yes, was trying to make an edit to the page of Al Otro Lado Del Muro! The reason is because I play one of the important characters in that series and I was trying to add my name onto the cast! Unfortunately I don’t really know how to add citations and stuff... :/ is there a way I can receive help to add my name on the cast? Mauricionovoaofficial (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Philip J Fry. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rosario (2013 telenovela), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not clear if there is consensus on the title. also, not clear if this is the best target: Rosario (telenovela) is clearly better. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 09:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(television)#telenovelas, the current policy regarding page names for telenovelas stands and there is no special disambiguator for them, and so they default to using (TV series). I am willing to do the work of moving these and fixing links, but your reverts are disruptive to that process. If you wish to establish an exception to the current policy, you need to put the work in and do it. I do realize that you may not have known about this guideline, but now that you do, you need to abide it unless you can demonstrate project-wide consensus that an exception is warranted. I would welcome your aid in fixing these page names, but if you're not willing, then I ask that you at least allow the process to complete. -- Netoholic@ 12:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Netoholic: I'm sorry for you, but you ignore WP:TITLECHANGES. And as I see in that conversation, there is no consensus even for what you want.--Philip J Fry / talk 12:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TITLECHANGES doesn't apply (it mostly refers to controversial topics, like politics). It is not controversial to change a page's disambiguator to comply with an established guideline like WP:NCTV - in fact is is "a good reason to change it". You might find it controversial, but the project doesn't. There is no consensus at WP:NCTV that (telenovela) is an accepted usage. -- Netoholic@ 12:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Netoholic: I do not intend to discuss with you, since there was previously a discussion on this topic and an administrator asked him to stop making massive movements.--Philip J Fry / talk 12:16, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Nacho (singer)) has been reviewed![edit]
Hello Philip J Fry. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Oka Giner, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: In light of WP:NAMECHANGES, I do not find the desired move to be completely non-controversial.Please gain consensus at t/p. Thank you. Winged Blades Godric 15:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Philip J Fry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Are you forgetting this or do you think I'm not here anymore? — Film Fan 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Film Fan: I will not give in to your whims, if you want to start an editing war, well, then. I will have to request help from an administrator. Clearly I said that it is not necessary to place the text in bold, when it is already in italics.--Philip J Fry / talk 00:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So you're going back on what you said, and threatening me? — Film Fan 00:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Film Fan: Take it as you wish, you are a conflicting user. If you have a problem with my edition then go to the discussion of the article or ask for help from another user, but I will not undo my edition for you.--Philip J Fry / talk 00:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, you saw that I had received a short block and decided that meant you suddenly had the upper hand? — Film Fan 00:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference, don't concede an argument if you're later going to backtrack and say "oh, actually, forget what I said, I want to start this argument again." Cheers. — Film Fan 19:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Film Fan: Seeing the conflict that you were generating, I decided to move away, but now no. In the infobox are not used bold. I already told you clearly that it is already in italics.--Philip J Fry / talk 20:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Who says it shouldn't be bold? The Spanish title is bold. That's also in the infobox. Are you saying that because the show is Spanish-language and because you are Spanish that you think the Spanish title should be seen to be more important than the English title? — Film Fan 20:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I do not intend to continue discussing something so absurd with you, I do not know what your obsession is for putting a title in bold in the infobox, it is clearly not aesthetic to use bold in the infobox, for something when placing a text in that parameter , the text is automatically italicized.--Philip J Fry / talk 20:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]
"clearly not aesthetic"? That's an opinion, with which I disagree. And I repeat, the Spanish title is in bold, so why shouldn't the English title be? — Film Fan 21:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Film Fan: You don't use bold-italics in the infobox, only in the lede. It's clear that this is meant to be the case, as {{Infobox television}} automatically converts 'show_name_2' entries to italics, not to bold-italics. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Philip, if you do a little research, you can actually check that this series was first aired on Blim and later on both broadcasters Argentina's El Trece and Mexico's Canal 5. The show was part of a 4 productions deal between Televisa and Pol-Ka.
We all contribute on Wikipedia to make as accurate according to sources, I highly recommend you to read the articles I quote before deleting my comments. If that's the case, then Érase Una Vez, which you included, should not be on the list, since it was also aired on Canal 5.
In January, Blim will bow a new teen live-action series starring Laura Esquivel, “Love, Divina,” a co-production between Argentina’s Pol-ka, Televisa, and Paris-based Federation Kids & Family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoDMarchi (talk • contribs) 11:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bradford, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
–Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not report on the edit warring discussion. I am very sorry. I almost edit warring so I immediately stop it. Please do not block me just give me a warning so I will not edit war again. Please accept my apology. 2001:569:74EF:BD00:6461:8DAB:C394:9B7E (talk) 01:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday, you reverted the MOVE I created for the page Sarah Mintz. Your stated reason was that her legal name did not change, which is not true. Her name has changed and so has the name she has used on social media. I look forward to hearing from you. Oriole7 (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well clearly she said that is the name she adopted because of her religion, but in her birth certificate she is still Maritza Rodríguez.--Philip J Fry / talk 19:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Oriole7: Okay, but that's in the social networks, is there any official record that says she changed her name? It would be better to keep her current name until Maritza says about her name change.--Philip J Fry / talk 01:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even in the same reference that is in the article, she clearly says that the change of name was because of her religion, she did not mention that it is a change of official or artistic name.--Philip J Fry / talk 01:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't a change of her social media account signify that her artistic name has changed? Oriole7 (talk) 01:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as I see it, it does not seem relevant to me, because anyone can change their name there.--Philip J Fry / talk 02:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see that he took his work very seriously with regard to telenovelas articles, so i hope he begins to disambiguate all the possible articles, because I will not help him in that, especially when there was no consensus here to make these changes. And even so, together with a group of specific users who voted against in the first RfC, another RfC was created where there was no greater participation of the community, and they decided what you think is best, something that seems out of place.--Philip J Fry / talk 13:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am a reliable source to edit my own page Priscila Perales which had a lot of mistakes and lacking current information.
Please re-add all the editions I made to it and let me know if you need further proof of my reliability.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Priscilaperales (talk • contribs) 13:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:La Piloto official poster.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:La Piloto official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Phillip fry, I don't have a complaint about the editing you corrected but I have a disagreement with how you handled it. I may be 15 years old but I have more than a few bones to pick with you. Firstly I edited it seeing there is no plot and including it using my knowledge from repeatedly watching the series over and over. I'm repeating it for the fifth time now as I'm in S1/E4
Secondly there is no plot. People who love telenovelas need to know what the story is about even though the plot is short and complex. The more people read the more they get drawn. Reading has information, sometimes detailed, sometimes summurised. However films have locomotive visual qualities called videos which can rival written work such as reading because it cannot describe how the person was feeling however can express them using action. So basically my conclusion is you better write the plot cause if I'm one of the people bothered about this, then you sure are gonna get a lot than what you bargained for. Siphokazi dlomo (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Mi familia perfecta title card.jpg[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Mi familia perfecta title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I'm shocked. You are not a new editor, but your removal of a sourced content in this edit, clearly shows that you have a lot to learn. Can you at least explain to me why you removed sourced content and a useful template?--Biografer (talk) 02:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Biografer: Is that template linked to the article?. What I did was to unite all her filmography in a single table, since I do not see it necessary to expand so much, when her career as an actress is short.--Philip J Fry / talk 02:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am really sorry. You see, the reason why I did it, is because you didn't provide edit summary at the time of my revert. However, even if you did have, it would be hard for me to assume good faith after 3 editors had vandalized 3 articles this morning! First editor: Removed almost the whole personal life section but said in his edit summary that he is updating bio (clearly the opposite of what he was doing). Second editor, removed dead external link (but archiving it could have revived it). And third was doing unsourced fandom editing! :(--Biografer (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mi familia perfecta.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mi familia perfecta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
[reply]
Hi, I'm Reehdelrey. I noticed that you re-edited my edits on Matt Bomer's page. I apologize for not explaining why I was removing some content from the page. I've been working on this article for some time and I just wanted to make an improvement on that article. I deleted the table "In the Media", because I would do it again in a better way. If you think I've done something else that you do not approve, leave me another message on on my talk page. Thanks Reehdelrey (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Reehdelrey: Sorry, but you should have explained in the editing summary what I was doing, I only saw that you eliminated content and did not explain anything; Anyway you can revert my edition, but I think for the next one it would be good, that you use the summary of edition if you think about deleting content or making massive changes.--Philip J Frytalk 02:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
as I understood the edition history, it was you, who lately deleted all the titles, commenting with: "On the official page of Antena 3 there are no such titles"
Oh, i see, thanks for clearyfying that... but why would Netflix be a reliable source then? and what about this source:
https://next-episode.net/la-casa-de-papel/season-1 does it qualify as reliable?
also, when you would like to make the article better - i don't think, that the reference number 7 is placed properly after the number of viewers in the table - i cannot find any such information in the link... thanks in advance 92.200.56.171 (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well when there are no sources for the titles of the episodes is usually used "episode 1, 2 and so". But I see that you have contributed a source, why do not you use it?.--Philip J FryTalk 14:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]
File:Luis Miguel Soundtrack.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
True Zac Efron doesn't have a solid career as a singer because he is mainly and actor. However he has still got songs credit to his name therefore this should be displayed on his page as it is true information which should be included on an encyclopedia. In addition, if anything, the songs should be left on and not the soundtrack albums as the songs are credited to him and the albums are not. Also, seen as Zac Efron has done mostly musicals the discography will only strengthen his career as an actor. Mn1548 (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mn1548: That can be mentioned, but the numbers in the positions seems totally irrelevant, because that is for the soundtrack and already each album has its respective article. And as I can see, the songs that you want to mention are already in the articles of the soundtrack. He is not a singer, is only part of his performance, nowadays anyone can sing, for example, like Cameron Boyce.--Philip J FryTalk 17:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Adding the chart positions and certifications show how well the songs did comercially and is present in most other discographies on Wikipedia so I think should be on this one as well, and given the fact that most of these songs don't have their own pages gives reason to keep it on due to the fact that pages for albums only display charts positions and certifications for the album and not the songs in them. Also saying that the songs are only part of his performance is not true as each song had its own studio recording like professional singers do (You can tell this by listening to the song in the film and on the soundtrack; most of the time they are different even if the difference is only slight). Finally, saying anyone can sing is an irrelevant point. I can sing, doesn't mean I'm any good at it unlike Zac Efron who's must be as he's had studio recorded top 20 Platinum certified songs. Mn1548 (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mn1548: In fact, anyone can sing or how would you explain this?, And as I said before, those songs were not written by Efron. And as I said earlier, those songs were not written by Efron. There is no need to expand a discography section. Taking into account that the recognitions of the albums go to the film, and the soundtrack and the cast in general. Is there a song by Zac, where I sang as a soloist and got many recognitions? What I sang in a movie does not deserve that the section expands. The songs he sang are in the respective article of the soundtrack, which already exists.--Philip J FryTalk 20:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there are songs by Zac Efron, if you had a look at the table before it was deleted you would have seen this - for example "Rewrite the Stars" by Zac Efron and Zendaya. In regards to writing the songs himself, quite a lot of artists have songs wrote for them. If you don't write your own songs, it doesn't mean you don't get credit for performing them. Regardless the fact that the information is on the main page doesn't justify the fact that it can't apper on Zac Efron's page with the information with respect to Zac Efron because that's what a discography is! If your points were valid then you wouldn't see discographies on artists' pages. It doesn't matter whether his singing is his primary method of performance or secondary, it's still valid information and should be on the page. Saying he is an actor by trade and not a singer is a reason to disregard his discography is rubbish because all your saying there is that people can only be famous for one thing which is wrong. David Beckham for example has a filmography, small no less, but is still there. You can't ignore this because his primary career is in football. It's the same with Zac Efron, you can't ignore is singing performances because he's primarily an actor! Mn1548 (talk) 16:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mn1548: Well "Rewrite the Stars" is in The Greatest Showman: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack. So why do you want to add it again? In fact in that same article shown are your Peak chart positions. So why do you want to expand Zac Efron's discography more? With mentioning the soundtracks in which he appears accredited is enough.--Philip J FryTalk 17:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I want to add those songs on his discography because they are credited to him. You don't see other discographies only showing albums or missing songs of which that artist has been credited with. Every artists page I've seen has all charted and certified songs on their discography so why should Zac Efron be any different. Any true and valid information should be on Wikipedia because it is an encyclopedia, that is the whole underling message I am trying to put across. Mn1548 (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He is an actor, not a singer, so that section can not be expanded with unnecessary data.--Philip J FryTalk 18:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But the fact is he has sung with at least 15 songs to his name, and how is this data unnecessary? It is valid information which strengthens his career as a performer. It is not up to you to decide whether this information is necessary or not! And if it is the fact that it should be on the page, please show me the page on Wikipedia Policy which says I can't add a discography section to the page of an actor! Mn1548 (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But the albums he has collaborated on are already in the discography section. I do not know what else you want to add.--Philip J FryTalk 20:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have already said, the stuff that was already there. Chart Positions and Certifications for the soundtrack albums and his songs that he sung on them. There is no reason why this information can't be displayed. Mn1548 (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mn1548: He is not a singer, and all that you want to add are credits that go through the albums not for him.--Philip J FryTalk 12:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As I've already said, the fact that he's not a singer doesn't justify not included a discography of his work on his page. And regards to the credits [3] the respective songs are credited to Zac Efron and not the cast. I could show this for all the soundtracks but I think this makes my point. Mn1548 (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mn1548:Here I have left this, so that other users can also decide what is best for the article.--Philip J FryTalk 16:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou, I think that's probably best seen as we can't agree. Mn1548 (talk) 16:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm an user from it:wiki. I have read the plot of this page and it isn't correct. You can read in many sources that: the telenovela isn't in Switzerland, but in Argentina and Clara can walk, but she suffers Agoraphobia. So this plot is not correct. Sources: Italian or this source in English. So my contribute is true! Bye and sorry for my bad English. --Sax123 (talk) 13:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mi nombre es Luis Miguel Romero. Recientemente he intentado corregir y pulir algunos aspectos del artículo de la actriz mexicana Silvia Pinal en su versión en lengua inglesa. Quise comenzar por la foto, ya que la que ilustraba el artículo era poco nítida y de calidad inferior. También quise agregar algunas referencias completamente verídicas y confiables al artículo, el cual carecía de ellas. Sin embargo, me he encontrado que usted ha revertido algunos de mis cambios. Me interesaría saber las razones. Si le parece juntos podriamos colaborar con el fin de enriquecer la información existente en el artículo. Muchas gracias y saludos desde México!!!.
MasqueIV(talk) 20:57 27 jun 2018 (UTC)
@MasqueIV: La fotografía que estás añadiendo, está pasando por un proceso de borrado rápido en Wikimedia Commons, y es algo que usted debería saber, siendo que usted mismo la subió. La razón dada en Commons es que la fotografía es un plagio. Si usted tiene los derechos de la imagen, debe ir al sitio donde la subió y explicar eso. De lo contrario seguiré revirtiendo su edición con respecto a la foto.--Philip J FryTalk 02:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Falsa identidad) has been reviewed![edit]
i know there are issues of national pride in your editing[edit]
Nevertheless, all views deserve to be presented and proper attribution as well as licensing information should not be erased. Please revert to version giving credit to the original writer and the licensing rights of RTI and TELEMUNDO. Lordtree2 (talk) 22:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That segment was an extension on the qualities of the work which does more need reference.
On the other hand, the opinionated section could have been highlighted as needing reference but not bluntly erased.
I believe national pride is interfering with your editing. I understand you could have taken issue with the reference to Venezuelan soap operas as based on the Cinderella archetype I can provide wirh a source and link.
I understand you are located in Venezuela. Lordtree2 (talk) 23:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Philip J Fry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I had one issue with the replacement photo you placed in the infobox of that article ([16]) ... it is a side profile pic with only one of her eyes clearly showing ... compared to the pic you replaced, with showed her two eyes. Otherwise, the pic's features looked OK. Not sure how other editors would feel about the pic; you might want to gain WP:CONSENSUS on the article's talk page to see if others are alright with the pic. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have put another one where your full face can be seen.--— Philip J Frytalk 17:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely a better one than the side profile. Thanks. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in El hotel de los secretos#Music. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Your addition to Ross Lynch has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Uploading someone else's photo to your flickr account then using that as a source for the image on commons does not give you ownership of the photo. It is still copyrighted by the original photographer. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Bradford • 21:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. The articles have a standart. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Mahone, you may be blocked from editing. stop just copying and pasting incorrect information into this article. you are removing correct formatting, reliable sources and other info. Louis Erisson (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madre Sustituta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Hello, and welcome to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content
from Canal de las Estrellas without explaining why. In the future, it
would be helpful to others if you described your changes
to Wikipedia with an accurate edit
summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored
the removed content. If you would like to experiment,
please use the sandbox. If you think I
made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can
leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheQ Editor (Talk) 19:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Template:Televisa telenovelas 1960s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Facepalm Well, I don't really understand what he/she is saying. Sorry PinasCentral (talk) 07:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
ElGatoSaez | Contáctame 02:27 8 ene 2015 (UTC)
Take a look here: Así en el barrio, como en el cielo: Difference between revisions
Wikipedia:Future article, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Future article and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Future article during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)
,
.jpg){kind=link}
