User talk:Bordwall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Talk Ctrb Todo Done Learn Help
Archive

Welcome!

Hello, Bordwall! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

ok i done[edit]

i reviewed the PL,man blue links - so you can revert it if they bothers you too. I wont be allowed thy to my house either 99.90.196.227 (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Content[edit]

yeah you reverted on of my changes and my edit was correct because of my personal research — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonhenly (talkcontribs) 04:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonhenly: If you're referring to this edit on the Lil Jon wiki page, changing Lil Jon's birthplace to Vatican City without providing sources seemed incorrect. Remember content guidelines on no original research. Bordwall(talkctrb) 04:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand but it is common knowledge and understanding that Lil Jon was born in Vatican City
That statement clearly contradicts the sources currently cited on the page. If you have some alternative source that should be considered please cite it, or offer it for discussion on the article's talk page. If you don't, this doesn't seem very productive. Bordwall(talkctrb) 04:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article[edit]

Javad Ramezani shorab article I link him.--Mohafzanwikipedia (talk) 06:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate[edit]

birthday 1st of may —Preceding unsigned comment added by FarahB13 (talkcontribs) 19:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC) --Mohafzanwikipedia (talk) 06:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good article[edit]

Article Javad Ramezani shorab on YouTube and there are reputable sites.--Mohafzanwikipedia (talk) 06:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohafzanwikipedia: None of the links provided have convinced me that the subject of the article fulfills general notability guidelines. Please do not remove speedy delete tags on articles you have created. You can respond in the article's talk page, and a site admin will remove the tags if needed.. Bordwall(talkctrb) 06:43, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello We Are approved.--Mohafzanwikipedia (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohafzanwikipedia: As noted on your talk page, as the article's creator, you cannot remove the 'speedy deletion' template. You have now been warned numerous times. This has caused an incidents report for your account. Bordwall(talkctrb) 07:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello Bordwall. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages moments after they are created, as you did at The Safavids. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Please note that a 10 minute period is generally considered acceptable before tagging a page for deletion, especially for newcomers who may be overwhelmed or otherwise frustrated when their article is tagged within a couple minutes. --Non-Dropframe talk 21:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information iconHi Bordwall, I seem to have overlooked the notice I received of the page deletion nomination for High Sabbath Adventists last week. I was a bit surprised at the deletion notice I received yesterday. At this point, although we are an international body of believers, we are not in any press articles that I have come across, which I understand is a criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. We are growing, though, and when we meet this criteria, I would like to be able to replace the article. Would it be possible to have a copy of the deleted article transferred to my user space, so I can reference it for improvement when that time comes? I looked through the deletion documentation, but I was confused about how to request this. Could you direct me? Thank you. Ray Dickinson (talk) 14:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@-ray-: You can find help regarding user pages on this page. You could simply copy the content from the page as it exists into a new userspace page. Notability can be a difficult bar to meet, even for somewhat large organizations. In the future, if you believe the organization has reached the appropriate level of significant, independent coverage, you should perhaps consider beginning as a draft, so that other editors can respond to potential problems before the article goes live. This way the deletion process can be avoided, by assuring the article meets notability before its formal creation. Cheers! Bordwall(talkctrb) 20:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Bordwall: Thank you for the info. I will definitely go the draft route next time. I have created a userspace page at user:-ray-/High_Sabbath_Adventists, but I cannot access the deleted article because I am not an administrator (as per this info page). How can I request that move? Thanks. Ray Dickinson (talk) 01:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@-ray-: I didn't realize the page had already been deleted. As it has, my understanding is that it isn't possible to recover the page as a standard user unless you can find a mirror somewhere else online. Alternatively, you could read this wikipage on viewing deleted content. Best of luck! Bordwall(talkctrb) 03:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump[edit]

Apologies, I thought Donald Trump and Human Faeces were sufficiently similar to allow for integration, Clearly I was mistaken. Perhaps Toupees may be a more fruitful line of inquiry.

Surely I was acting in good faith though? :p

--2.29.52.80 (talk) 00:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bordwall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bordwall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bordwall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reply All (Podcast) Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reply All (Podcast) Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]