User talk:Bold12

Katie Logan and Bill Spencer, Jr.[edit]

Their divorced is not finalized, when the show says that their divorced is finalized we can add the 2013, but now they are still legally married. So now stop adding the 2013! They are not divorced! Dont remember Steffy and Liam's marriage, they add to wait 6 months (4 months in the show). So I kindly ask you to stop change it. Plus, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have a blast editing. SoapFan12 11:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bold and the Beautiful secondary characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wyatt Fuller[edit]

You're not understanding; his name stays FULLER because per the guidelines of WP:COMMONNAME, he's more commonly known as Wyatt Fuller. Has zero to do with him being a Spencer. Being a Spencer and WP:COMMONNAME have nothing to do with each other. He's been published at Fuller. That's his commonname. 71.233.227.127 (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please stop spamming pages pertaining to The Bold and the Beautiful. Your edits are too excessive and not sourced, while removing clearly sourced material. Please stop. You're just making pages far too fan-dictated and not third-party dictated. This isn't a fansite, it's a website of encyclopedia-like material. And your edits are not helping that at all. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 15:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 14:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GraemeL ^(talk) 18:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Caroline Spencer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 16:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 17:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandria Forrester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephanie Forrester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance to be a productive member of the community[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 14:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bold12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why! I add Taylor's return I help this page!

Decline reason:

Once bitten, twice shy. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.