User talk:Blueshockerx02

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Hi Blueshockerx02! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

02:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Blueshockerx02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! Blueshockerx02 (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, what is it fam? Blueshockerx02 (talk) 04:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A WikiProject is a group of editors who formed together to better organize articles (such as ones related to ice hockey). Here you can see important article related information (such as articles up for deletion) and tips on hockey related sources (see "Sources of information"). There are also "Task Forces" whose goal is to focus on improving a specific team (you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Vancouver Canucks task force). As well, if you have a question relating to hockey it may be best to ask on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey where informed editors can assist you. It is basically a group of editors who enjoy hockey

. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC) I need help with my user page Blueshockerx02 (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Dinah Jane[edit]

Your addition to Dinah Jane has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skindred associated acts[edit]

What songs have they collaborated on ? Touring together is NOT associated, if it were then almost everyone would be associated. Have you reviewed the guideline on associated acts ? If not, please do, here: Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Lol they have collaborated look it up[reply]

Look, if you're going to play here YOU need to follow some guidelines, like this one, WP:PROVEIT. I don't need to look up nothing, you're the one making the claims/changes. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Violette1st (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More references are needed, a wiki does not count.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Violette1st and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Violette1st, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The One and Only Boothsift 23:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Violette1st (March 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Violette1st and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Violette1st, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fieryflames (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]