User talk:Bingobunnybaby

Bingobunnybaby, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Bingobunnybaby! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Trancers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 19:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources provided. Please see transcripts of the interview for further verification. Thanks! Bingobunnybaby (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I provided additional sources. Check transcripts for further verification. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Oxford High School shooting, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 14:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The information was not directly copy and pasted. It was amended for relevance and necessity of information. It was also correctly sourced. The information also listed nothing other than names and ages, which is available in public records for each of the victims. If needed, they can be cited. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Oxford High School shooting, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 05:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t make a test edit. The information is excessive and doesn’t speculative. It also promotes the gun used in a photo, which is unnecessary. I can make edits if I choose to do so. Flip it back if you want, I’m here all day. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also left details for the content removal, which you opted not to read. Please, tell me how the photo of the gun used is constructive? The rest of the article has been restored. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Oxford High School shooting. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, enjoy your gun photo! Would really love to understand how you find it useful information. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indenting TP replies[edit]

Just a friendly notice that talk page replies should be indented. Have a look at Help:Talk pages#Indentation for some examples of how this is accomplished, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bingobunnybaby (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly still not indenting your responses. Love of Corey (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I missed one. Lay off Bingobunnybaby (talk) 04:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make that two, ha. Bingobunnybaby (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were given a link to instructions on indentation. Clearly you did not read it if you responded twice with the same errors. Love of Corey (talk) 05:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you done condescending? The point has been established. Find something more productive to do. Thanks Bingobunnybaby (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford High School shooting[edit]

Your edit to this article was disruptive and lacks consensus. Please gain consensus before making major changes to high visibility articles, especially when you are deleting references to reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 05:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ghost of Hollywood[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Ghost of Hollywood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 23:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Ghost of Hollywood moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Ghost of Hollywood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bingobunnybaby (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bingobunnybaby,

It's best to create and develop articles in Draft space or User space like your Sandbox. Putting articles directly into the main space of the project subjects them to review and possible deletion if they are incomplete or improperly sourced. Although draft articles can be deleted for being promotional, they are a "safer space" to work on articles where they are not subject to the same standards as a main space article. When you believe the article is ready, submit it to Articles for Creation for review by an experienced Wikipedia editor. Their goal is to get the draft article in good enough shape to not be deleted when it is moved into main space.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia policy, please bring them to the Teahouse. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of The Ghost of Hollywood episodes[edit]

Hello, Bingobunnybaby,

Thank you for creating List of The Ghost of Hollywood episodes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs references and categories. References have to satisfy WP:WEB ...Web content includes, but is not limited to, blogs, Internet forums, newsgroups, online magazines, other media, podcasts, webcomics, and web portals... so podcasts need notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Ghost of Hollywood[edit]

Hello, Bingobunnybaby,

Thank you for creating The Ghost of Hollywood.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References given are WP:PRIMARY. References have to satisfy WP:WEB ...Web content includes, but is not limited to, blogs, Internet forums, newsgroups, online magazines, other media, podcasts, webcomics, and web portals... so podcasts need notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ghost of Hollywood[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Ghost of Hollywood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://theghostofhollywood.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]