User talk:Bigbreastslover18

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bigbreastslover18, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Daphne Rosen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 19:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daphne Rosen[edit]

The article Daphne Rosen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 19:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daphne Rosen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Daphne Rosen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dismas|^(talk) 21:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daphne Rosen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daphne Rosen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Rosen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. brew crewer (yada, yada) 14:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace[edit]

Please note that copying articles to your user page or user talk page is against Wikipedia guidelines; "fake articles" are not permitted. I have removed the text cut and pasted from Daphne Rosen to this page accordingly. However, having a "sandbox" to draft an article before publishing it, or to improve an article that was determined unsuitable for articlespace to the point where it can be restored, is acceptable; accordingly, I have moved the aforementioned content to User:Bigbreastslover18/Daphne Rosen for you to work on improving the article to establish her notability per Wikipedia's standards. Please note that a user sandbox is meant to be temporary; if the "userified" page sits without being worked on, it may be deemed a WP:FAKEARTICLE and deleted. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daphne Rosen.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan 22:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bigbreastslover18[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Bigbreastslover18, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Recreation of page deleted via a deletion discussion as a userpage WP:FAKEARTICLE. Article also already exists as a userspace draft in user's userspace.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]