User talk:BigGabriel555

Hello, BigGabriel555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards 13:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Imagen:Parque Colon.JPG[edit]

A tag has been placed on Imagen:Parque Colon.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 15:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Fleonel.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fleonel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Leonel Fernández[edit]

I am noticing you are a bit confused; we have a freely licensed photo of the President already, we cannot accept the one you are wishing to use. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 21:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leonel Fernández article[edit]

I noticed you have been working on the Leonel Fernández article. In case you don't know, let me point out that Wikipedia doesn't allow nonfree photographs of living people to be used to identify those people. Only free images are acceptable for that purpose. This is why the nonfree photographs you added were removed. Please do not add additional nonfree images to the article. If you have questions about this, please feel free to ask me; you can reply immediately below this comment and I will notice it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 21:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Columbus Park.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Columbus Park.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Columbus Park.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Columbus Park.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is your reason for removing the photo i placed in?[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=159834685&oldid=159708964 UnclePaco 06:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is the first warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=160314999 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 17:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160525921&oldid=160502343 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 23:59, 26 September 2007

This is the third warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160806698&oldid=160740291 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 07:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Dominican Republic here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=prev&oldid=160866369 , you will be blocked from editing. UnclePaco 05:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Dominican Republic on Wikipedia as you did with this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160806698&oldid=160740291. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. UnclePaco 06:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Dominican Republic on}} Wikipedia Wikipedia{{#if:| as you did with this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominican_Republic&diff=160525921&oldid=160502343 . Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Stop your silly edits in the Dominican Republic article[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dukered 05:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Please revert wat you have done. I was only trying to improve the article, and I think it was better. You deleted supported edits I made. Dukered 02:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dominican Republic. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Flor Silvestre 20:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

You're making serious mistakes in your persistent chain of edits in the Dominican Republic article:

1. When you put back your own version without checking my edits thoroughly, you're keeping the grammar errors I've corrected. Grammar is a pivotal aspect here on WP.

2. There's a photograph of Juan Pablo Duarte which happens to be redundant here. There's an article about him with that photo, an the DR entry already has a photo with the three Founding Fathers.

3. In the Economy section, there's no need for two photos of Santo Domingo. In the first photo you keep writing "Economic and vertical growth of Santo Domingo" as a footnote. Does that image really illustrate that?

4. The image of the statue of Duarte can go perfectly to his article. It does nothing in the Music section.

5. I put a photograph of Juan Marichal in the sports section, and more information, which improved the section. You deleted it. Why?

And so on. I'm open to consensus, but please, behave according to Wikipedia's policy on civility, or I'll have you reported for disrupting conduct. Dukered 02:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im very sorry from BigGabreil555[edit]

please who ever blocked me i am very sorry for what i have done i deserved to get blocked i just didnt want the article of the dominican republic to be changed because i dint believe it was better but know i know i should compromise with the other users becuase im not the only one on wikipedia i have found some mistakes on the dominican republic and i would like to fix them so please give me one more chance so if i screw up you could do anything you want you could stop me from editing ever again i just want to see the dominican republics page be the best it can be so please i ask to unblock me thank you

please help[edit]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 72.189.201.229 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Mr.Z-man 20:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise?[edit]

Calling me retarded wasn't very nice when you were using another username. Also why do you keep deleting photos without any reason? such as [1] ?? UnclePaco 14:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR Warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Your edits in the Dominican Republic article do not add anything valuable to it. You only keep the typographical errors and you lack editing style. You can improve by having a good, extensive look around, seeing other pages about countries, for example. Flor Silvestre 14:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal[edit]

May I ask why you removed Image:Jfpg1.jpg from the article on the Dominican Republic? Tabercil 22:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. TigerShark 23:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DR page[edit]

Why would you remove the palace of DR? that's pretty important. [2] 02:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

i understand what i did wrong please unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigGabriel555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please i understand what i have done wrong and i can contribute to wikipedia please all i want is a chance please just one more chance i just came back a week ago from the Dominican Republic becuase of a death in the family but i really got good pictures of cultural places on the island and also got a better picture of the presidential palace so please give me a chance to put them in they are really good and if you dont like them take them off please give me a chance i wont do anything wrong it will be perfect so please anyone unblock me

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigGabriel555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

becuase im just ttrying to make the dominican Republics page the best it can be

Decline reason:

How interesting. You are using the exact same wording as your indef blocked sockpuppet. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 22:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigGabriel555 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please irishguy unblock me i just want to make the dominican republics page shine i just want to show people that the Dominican republic is not a bad country just please give me one more chance ill tell you what i want to do you know that map on the page i just want to change it to a better mp its the same map but its not blurry like the one there is know please irish guy if you dont like it change it just give me a chance i want to make the Dominican republic page a good one i will cooperate with the other people on wikipedia please i just want one more chance thats all i ask

Decline reason:

You do not appear to understand what you did wrong, and at any rate, it does not appear likely that you are able to contribute usefully to this encyclopedia. — Sandstein 14:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop removing denied unblock requests and creating a new one. You are abusing the unblock template. You have been denied twice. Please just wait out your block. IrishGuy ^talk 18:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo removal[edit]

Please stop removing the photograph of the ceiling of Catedral Santa María La Menor. You seem to have done that at least twice, without any specified justification. If you have a reason, please let us know. TBird68 22:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Note that "User:TBird68", above, is my alternate account, used here by accident.] In your latest removal of the photo in question, BigGabriel555, you give a reason for the removal: "i took it off becuase people are sending me messages saying that it does not look good on the page thats the reason so please stop putting it back". I hope you understand that this is not a very satisfying response. It would be a lot better to get this information directly from the "people" than through your interpretation. The needed information, actually, is what is it that needs to be done to improve the photo or its placement? Is it too big, too small? Is it in the wrong location in the article? Too dark or light? I hope you don't disapprove of the subject matter, an interior view of the vaulted ceiling of the cathedral, as this is of some historical, architectural, and artistic importance. Tim Ross (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BigGabriel555, as I have not had a response from you regarding the ceiling photo of the Catedral Santa María La Menor since I wrote the above request for discussion, I am assuming you are no longer concerned, and I will replace it in the article. If you continue to object to it, I would be grateful if you would respond to me on this talk page, explaining how to change it to make it less objectionable in your view. Tim Ross·^talk 10:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I regret that I have found that you have, once more, removed this photo, BigGabriel555, without any explanation or attempt to develop a photo more to your liking. Please contact me at my talk page, or here, before you delete it again, and perhaps we can work together to make this a better article. Tim Ross·^talk 17:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings, Santo Domingo editing[edit]

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Tim Ross·^talk 22:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Santo Domingo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Tim Ross·^talk 22:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BigGabriel555, if you have a reason for continuing to remove the photograph of the ceiling of Catedral Santa María La Menor that we can work on together so that it becomes more to your liking, I will be happy to work with you. If your only reason to remove it, though, continues to be "does not look right on the page" or "does not look good on the page", and if you offer no advice on ways to improve it, I will ask for higher level dispute resolution. I am replacing the photo, and request that you leave it in place unless you wish to provide helpful advice. Tim Ross·^talk 22:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic, Caste System[edit]

Why did you remove the tag that the section needs to improve its references? The section only cites one source, and not a very detailed source. It needs more references to cite and better references at that. Please do not simply remove a tag like that without saying why. As well, you marked it as a minor edit and that does not qualify as one. Please explain.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 02:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The two references this section has now are the same two references it had when you asked the other editors to "fix" the section because it wasn't very good. This makes no sense. Why have you changed your mind? Both those sources state the exact same things and neither of them particularly relate to the Dominican Republic or talk about how the Caste System affected the Dominican Republic in its early years. The section still looks very shabby in my opinion.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 00:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic, Health Statisitics[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dominican Republic. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 01:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of LeonelFernandezReyna[edit]

A tag has been placed on LeonelFernandezReyna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brunoy Anastasiya Seryozhenko (talk) 20:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" Edits[edit]

When you're adding entire new sections and paragraphs of text, it shouldn't be marked as a "minor" edit. Please familiarize yourself with Help:Minor edit to aid in knowing when to mark edits as minor. Hope this helps in your future editing.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 16:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US-Dominican Occupation/Intervention[edit]

Please read this discussion before changing the name of this section.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 19:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your recent edits to Dominican Republic[edit]

You should seriously be careful when removing sourced material as you did here, I will only leave a notice and encourage you to replace the content if you can find a reference to support it, however other admins may not take it this slightly, especially with your past edit patterns, and they would most likely issue only one warning before blocking, remember that even 'assume good faith' has its limits. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The D.R. is upper middle income not lower[edit]

alright stop taking it out your reference is from 2006 i have one thats from 2007 alright so stop changing it — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGabriel555 (talk • contribs)

You were changing it without adding the source you're referring to. If you have a source, cite it. Otherwise it just looks like you're changing fully sourced material and replacing it with unsourced. As well, stop marking all your edits as "minor." Many of them are clearly not minor changes.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 23:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No citation in Geography?[edit]

You said that you were reverting my changes because there were not cites. Just ask for them but do not say that you are going to revert because of that; I could put all the cites that you might need because I am a Dominican geographer and not a high school student, and I have travelled for all the country. But I saw that you didn't put any cite, so we are even. And I signed all my comments. --Pepemar2 (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Geography of the Dominican Republic, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. ff m 22:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Economy[edit]

Why are you undoing recent good-faith edits by SamEV? He hasn't removed any content, merely shuffled it around and copy-edited it. What do you feel was wrong with his edits?--Rosicrucian ^Talk 02:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC[edit]

I have started an RfC regarding your recent edits, and would appreciate a response. Thank you.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 22:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC is now approved as it has two users supporting it. Please post your response to it. Thank you.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 03:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Domincan Republic[edit]

Your placement of that paragraph makes no sense. You seem to continue doing just to prove a point. Would you like to say what it is? SamEV (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dominican Republic 3RR[edit]

I'm going to restore Pepemar's edit. Please be aware of the three revert rule. You already know about it, of course, but I just want to remind you that you've reverted 4 times already in the last 24 hours. You've refused to edit that section, opting for completely reverting Pepemar's work and mine, and in the past you've reverted Rosicrucian, who also endorsed Pepemar's edit. SamEV (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're batch-reverting good faith, and even constructive, positive edits. You're refusing to discuss this on the talkpage, and just reverting. This is hard to work with.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 01:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR report[edit]

I'm informing you that I made a [3RR report about your violations at Dominican Republic. You're free to comment about it. SamEV (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:D.r's map.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:D.r's map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 05:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muchness (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following images you uploaded are also missing source information: Image:National palace.jpg, Image:National palace2.jpg, Image:Juan Pablo Duarte.jpg, Image:Leonel fernandez.JPG. Please can you also update the licensing tags for these images? The {{PD-old}} tag should only be used when the author of the photo died 100 or more years ago. --Muchness (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem with Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG[edit]

Hello. It appears that Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG is a copyright photograph; it is labeled "© Otto Piron" and was taken from the copyright website http://el-bohio.com/conde/conde8.html. As a copyright violation, the image appears to qualify for deletion per Wikipedia's speedy deletion criteria: "The image was copied from a website or other source that does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and the uploader does not assert (other than through image tags) that it is public domain, freely licensed, fair use, or used with permission."

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Padres de la patria dom.JPG]].

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Muchness (talk) 02:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you uploaded this image again without accurate source and licensing info. Can you please ensure that your image uploads note the image source and are tagged with an accurate license tag, as outlined at WP:IUP? Thank you. --Muchness (talk) 15:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Work on D.R.[edit]

I intend to. SamEV (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:National Palace of the D.R..jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:National Palace of the D.R..jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tigres Del Licey Logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tigres Del Licey Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leonel Fernandez Reyna.jpg[edit]

Hello, I noticed you uploaded the image Image:Leonel Fernandez Reyna.jpg again despite it being deleted twice previously. Unfortunately this is a copyright image that illustrates a subject for which a free image might reasonably be found or created that adequately provides the same information. As such, the image fails Wikipedia's first non-free content criteria, and is not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. --Muchness (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palacio photo[edit]

That's not a free image; it belongs to someone else, who has a copyright on it. Wikipedia prefers that free images be used so that there won't be any problems when other sites copy Wikipedia's articles. Sorry. SamEV (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dominican Republic. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Freshbakedpie (talk) 20:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving D.R. article[edit]

No problem. Just give me a couple of days, though. SamEV (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know your suggestions on the article's talk page. I'll be editing this evening. SamEV (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gabriel. I think you should tell me what specifically "sucks" about the page. Which section needs the most attention, in your opinion? SamEV (talk) 18:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Santo Domingo Panorama1.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Santo Domingo Panorama1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 23:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Santo Domingo1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Santo Domingo1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 12:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Santo Domingo image3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Santo Domingo image3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 12:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Parque Colon1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Parque Colon1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 00:34, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]