User talk:Bertaut/Archive 2011

Invitation to participate

As an editor previously involved in the SAQ mediation, you should note that there is a related Request for Arbitration [1], at which you may wish to participate. Smatprt (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Titus authorship page

Hi, Bertaut. Your new page is being discussed at Talk:Shakespeare authorship question. This follows from a thread at the Administrator's Incidents board: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Possible_violation_of_Shakespeare_authorship_question_NPOV_forking. Paul B (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Shakespeare

Hi,

Just wanted to say - brilliant work on Titus Andronicus and the other Shakespeare articles you've worked on. I know some of them may be too detailed for Wiki's mandate, but I've found them fascinating. I really struggle to find such detailed discussions of individual plays on the web. (Would that Love's Labour's Lost had been so well treated!) I do hope you'll do more in future, and that - should they be subsequently pared down - you could preserve them on the 'net nonetheless. Cheers, Daydream believer2 (talk) 11:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Very much appreciated that you would take the time to say that. Yeah, I'm more than aware that they're too detailed/too long; what I post is usually a third draft, you should see the size of the first!! As for Love's Labour's, well, I'm doing the plays in chronological order as per the Oxford Complete Works, which means Richard III is up next. So it'll be a while before I get to Love's I'm afraid! But maybe some day. Who knows!! And thanks again for you kind words. Seriously, I do appreciate it. Bertaut (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)