User talk:Benny-T5252
Welcome![edit]
Hi Benny-T5252! I noticed your contributions to Open Society Foundations and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, my names Benny, i wanted to use my account to spread some positivity on the site, noting the good gestures and moments of those around the world, i am very new to wiki as a whole, and had no idea we were not allowed more than one account, i figured having two accounts for different topic types would be the best way to go about it, i see now this is an issue and would like this account unblocked if possible? i understand that there was a problem with the proxies i used for the account? general internet security is rather important to myself so i used proxys or VPN's for almost everything i do, again i apologise if this is an issue.
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to "spread some positivity", I'm afraid. You haven't addressed WP:UPE which is a significant issue flagged in your sockpuppet investigation. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Natasha Tsukanova moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Natasha Tsukanova, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Request 2: Hello, while i do understand this is an encyclopedia, i feel my posts so far have had noteworthy merit in addition to being positive sources about aiding foundations that aim to better communities in need, therefore spreading positivity (i apologise if i was too vague in my reasoning of ethos for my account) in regards to the UPE issue, again, being new i'm a little lost as to why people would pay when they could do it themselves? Furthermore, i'm at a loss as to why this would be the case for my account, im unsure what i did or posted that would have lead to this? i feel my edits have been geared toward technological advancements on one account in addition to philanthropy on this account and don't understand why this is not allowed considering in the guild-lines i see it states you are allowed more than one account, and i feel my posts have been noteworthy.
Decline reason:
There are legitimate uses of alternate accounts, but you created this account after your prior account was blocked. Blocks are on the person, not just the account; you may not edit under any account or IP address if any one of your accounts is blocked. Telling the world about good works is a nice thing to do, but this this isn't the place to do it. 331dot (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Benny-T5252 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Request 3: "but you created this account after your prior account was blocked." I have no clue what your referring too, i have two accounts, this one and James-G369 and they were created around the same time for two separate industries, technology and philanthropy(my interests). I feel as though i'm getting passed from person to person without anyone actually responding to my reasoning here, if you read this please look into the claims made and my rebuttal before throwing some guideline at me i have been unaware of, again i am new to the platform and have not made edits to the site prior to these accounts at any stage of my life.
Decline reason:
Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sorry, had that backwards. 331dot (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Natasha Tsukanova for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Tsukanova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Oliver Virk (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha Tsukanova[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Natasha Tsukanova, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)