User talk:Ben Lunsford

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Ben Lunsford, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeWrestler (talk • contribs) 15:33, July 22, 2005

Crotalus atrox pic[edit]

Hi Ben, I saw the new image that you added to the Crotalus atrox article, but I'm not sure it's of the correct species. Have you noticed those paravertabral stripes down its neck? That's more typical of the the C. durissus complex (which includes C. simus). However, considering the light coloration, this one looks to me more like an example of C. basiliscus (of which I can show you some more examples later). If it is actually an albino, it's not a true albino because it still has come scale/skin pigment and its eyes aren't red. --Jwinius (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are right... it looks like I misidentified this rattlesnake after I took its picture! You were right with your first suggestion, it is a Crotalus durissus after all, and the subspecies is C. d. unicolor. Here is another pic of the very same snake that I found on Flickr where it is labeled as an Aruba Island rattlesnake. I will re-upload the same pic with the new name. Thank you! Ben Lunsford (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images at United States[edit]

Regarding this, I very much agree with you that the current drab image needs replacement (telephone wires? really?). I plan on getting out to find a church somewhat similar to the one currently used in the article to replace it (they like the look of the simple building with the expected steeple, most likely not in a city). Care to take on the challenge too?

Though based on this edit summary, it seems we're breaking it down to sects of Protestantism and if that's the case—if I'm not mistaken—Catholics are more numerous than any other sects in the US (based on this and this); based on that, I'd say the church should be Catholic, no? This also needs replacement (desperately). If you have a place near you that is similar (the point being that there are a number of different American-style eateries placed together), that would be awesome. Plus if you're in CA, we won't add to that eastern bias (I'm in NY) ;-). I can think of one place locally that could work, but I'd rather replace the CA image with another CA image. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 05:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Aav.jpg[edit]

File:Aav.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Aav.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Aav.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ben Lunsford. You have new messages at Talk:List of National League pennant winners.
Message added — KV5 • Talk • 15:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I feel that your edits are horribly inappropriate, and have replied at the talk page. As the original deleter, you should be the one to initiate discussion, per WP:BRD, rather than reverting to your preferred version, which did not pass the featured content review, and saying that other editors should discuss. — KV5 • Talk • 15:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article is about pennant winners. I'm being bold and editing it to reflect that... sorry if you felt this is inappropriate, but this is what the article is about after all. Ben Lunsford (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know what the article is about. I wrote it, after all. I've responded with my concerns at the talk page. — KV5 • Talk • 16:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just remember, after you write something on Wikipedia, you no longer have any more rights to control the direction of the content than any other editor. See Wikipedia:Article_ownership. Ben Lunsford (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to tell me about article ownership. It's not like I don't understand the concept. I never said I controlled the content, and to say so is misleading. All I said is that I wrote the article, which is true. — KV5 • Talk • 16:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Ben Lunsford (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Lovers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lovers.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E-410 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect E-410. Since you had some involvement with the E-410 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 19:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Woody Hayes.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Woody Hayes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Eu amo gatinhos!

Mzeimih3 (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ben Lunsford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]