User talk:Basdeninard

February 2024[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Digital nomad. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't threaten me with silly emoticons. You are selectively reverting contributions based on zero evidence. By the way, first you said that there is no SEO benefit to websites being linked, now you are suggesting there is a benefit if they are blacklisted? In any case, I don't care, because none of those websites belong to me, so go right ahead. Until then, I will continue to contribute to Wikipedia whether you like it or not. Basdeninard (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Basdeninard (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]