User talk:Bartash

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome. Thanks, SqueakBox 20:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat

Hello, Bartash. I replied to your request for feedback.
Best regards, Tkotc (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

re Irish Writers' Union

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

emma freud[edit]

Hello there, i noticed you removed the referenced entry about emma freud's name and rhyming slang on account of it being 'not encyclopaedic' im unsure what you mean by this (in the context of wiki rules) and have never seen anyone else suggest something similar; regardless there is precedent with other names also being described as such on wiki (pete tong etc). I have put back the entry, please consider this a courtesy notice to that affect. If you disagree with the inclusion i'd be happy to have someone senior to both of us arbitrate.Zaq12wsx (talk) 16:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lowell High School[edit]

The Verifiability policy requires material to be accompanied by a citation of a reliable source, and in each article in which that material appears. Merely mentioning material in one article does not constitute a citation in another, since that's circular sourcing. Sources have to be those independent of Wikipedia. If you can find a source for Carol Channing's attendance, and others like her, then you can improve Wikipedia by adding it to both Channing's article and by restoring Channing's name to the alumni list in the Lowell article, with the same accompanying citation.

As a show of good faith, I've looked for a citation for Carol Channing's attendance at Lowell. I've added that citation (along with her graduation year) to her article, and restored her name to the alumni table in the Lowell article. But the same has to be done for rest before they can be restored there. Nightscream (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My appreciation for your efforts to improve the article for Lowell High School (San Francisco). My sincerest sympathies for being forced to deal with Nightscream, who disruptively removes easily sourceable content rather than simply tagging or adding sources, as specified by policy. Let me know if you need any further help with this article or in dealing with other such editors. Alansohn (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words on my talk page. I will be taking out the entry for Stafford Repp for now, as it is backed exclusively by sources from imdb, a user-updateable site that is not appropriate for use as a Wikipedia reference. I do see the scholarship listed on the Lowell alumni site, and I will continue my search for an appropriate reliable and verifiable source for Repp. Thanks again. Alansohn (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the removal of Adrian Lamo, Bartash. I don't know how that happened. Thanks for restoring it, and for your genuine efforts to improve the article. Nightscream (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bartash. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bartash. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bartash. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]