User talk:Bar78
One issue stubbornly pursued[edit]
Hello! You are obviously a one-issue user only interested in getting your way without providing sources in regard to one single article on English Wikipedia. Your persistent edits are arbitrary and inappropriate. If you continue adding and deleting what you want, with no regard or respect for the way things are supposed to be done here, according to rules we are all supposed to follow, I'm afraid you're likey to find yourself blocked soon. Start providing reliable sources or stop editing there! Cordially, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- PLEASE. Tell me the different between Camilla and Sophie & Catherine. And show me a source. I will stop adding than. --Bar78 (talk) 20:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- That is not my responsibility. If you want Camilla in there, you must show a reliable source that she is a princess. We have tried to communicate with you in good faith to show you how things are done and not done, for example by trying to get you to look at policy like Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (example 5), but your lack of interest in learning is too apparent now. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's quite a serious offense against Wikipedia policy to keep adding unsourced conjecture to articles dealing with living persons. Keep it up, and you'll find yourself blocked. Fair warning, again. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:16, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK - i finally found my source. The Question was asked AND answerd on the page of the parliament of the United Kingdom: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmhansrd/vo050404/text/50404w42.htm
- Well done! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- OK - i finally found my source. The Question was asked AND answerd on the page of the parliament of the United Kingdom: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmhansrd/vo050404/text/50404w42.htm
- It's quite a serious offense against Wikipedia policy to keep adding unsourced conjecture to articles dealing with living persons. Keep it up, and you'll find yourself blocked. Fair warning, again. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:16, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- That is not my responsibility. If you want Camilla in there, you must show a reliable source that she is a princess. We have tried to communicate with you in good faith to show you how things are done and not done, for example by trying to get you to look at policy like Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (example 5), but your lack of interest in learning is too apparent now. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The article 2019 French Open – Women's Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:TOOSOON for this many blank tables; the obvious redirect target 2019 French Open doesn't even exist yet.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
2019 French Open – Women's Singles moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, 2019 French Open – Women's Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 19:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2019 French Open – Women's Singles[edit]
Hello, Bar78. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 French Open – Women's Singles".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Germcrow (talk) 11:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)