User talk:Arnoutf/Archives/2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 12 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Germaine de Randamie page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Schoontje
I've run across an article written by my friend, SusunW, which uses the word "Schoontje" as a first name for one of the parents. The references both use the name but, to me, it doesn't seem like a name. Is it maybe a nickname? A word of endearment? Any help is appreciated. Buster Seven Talk 20:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- BTW...It's almost the anniversary of this. Buster Seven Talk 20:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You've reverted my edit with the explanation: "As long as these are candidates and not proven we should not list them. (TW)"
But at least the sexual misconduct allegations are very likely alternative facts: None(*) of the links point to articles created after election day, but the wiki-article has been maintained till now. Why hasn't there emerged new information after election day? Is Mr. Trump irrelevant or sacrosanct now? I think, neither is the case. So why did the media bring up the story shortly before and then drop it abruptly at election day? --RosaLuxemburgOnFreedom (talk) 06:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
(*) Only one of the linked articles was published after Nov.8 (it was published on Nov. 9, so it was created before Nov. 9, too)
- The alternative facts article explicitly discusses fake news by US ruling government, supported by leading federal government officials claiming truth if these "facts". Not all unfounded accusation are alternative facts, otherwise the list would be endless. Arnoutf (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
Question is: is it art? ;) Thanks for an interesting debate. Despite our disagreements, the article is definitely more accurate and precise than when we started out yesterday. — Quasar G. 12:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |
Doctor and schooling
Dear Arnoutf,
Thank you very much for your reply on the TALK page of Doctor (title). Ia gee that the comprehensive examination should be of such quality that it is decisive. My experience is that in (many) cases the title is granted as appreciation for "the amount of work". I am afraid that don't work and those doctors should refrain from publicizing and taking part in the public conversation. My point is that a longer schooling might be helpful because the candidate who is not apt to it leaves (if not the (very) ambitious teaching environment fleece him.
Regards,
Jan Clifford
O.K. 145.129.136.48 (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
09:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.129.136.48 (talk)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Template
You ask why an empty sectionis needed; this question makes no sense or why would such templates then exist? The templates poitns out to content that needs to be provided - unless it is not done it can stay as a hint to that. --Joobo (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- You are speculating. I did actually read the documentation of the template. Also - there is no consensus the section needs to be there, so the least you can do to support its presence is to provide actual contents. Arnoutf (talk) 20:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WPNetherlands Improvement
Template:WPNetherlands Improvement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey Arnoutf,
It was totally a failure on my part to forget to add the two main terms (cultured & in vitro) to the Nomenclature section, thank you for doing this! :)
I also agree with you summary for this edit, as only mentioning the origins of 1 of 6 terms is putting undue attention to that specific name. A little context: Of all the lesser terms, clean meat used to be its own article, which was later merged. The Clean meat content was condensed and placed at the bottom of the page.
I think the information you removed is worth having in the article, but I'm not sure where best to place it. Should a clean meat section once again be added, to include only those two sentences? Or perhaps reinstated to the Nomenclature section, alongside the origins of the other terms? (A problem with that solution is that a couple of the terms are quite thinly sourced - vat-grown in particular.) Or perhaps something else, that I haven't thought of! What do you think? Greg (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- My main problem was that clean meat was the only one with so much information, but if about 3-4 of the other terms would also receive fair information, leaving vat-grown out would not be a major issue. The balance should be sufficiently there in my view. Cheers. Arnoutf (talk) 06:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Arnoutf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
.jpg)
|
Happy Holidays |
| Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC) |
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Zwarte Piet. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Are you kidding? You removed the page protection template. Do be careful. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)