User talk:ArmOvak

Welcome![edit]

Please note that I will likely respond to new messages here.

Welcome to Wikipedia, ArmOvak! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Yerevan[edit]

Դուն իսկական ախմախին մէկն ես եւ շատ խայտառակ անձ մըն ես, երեք կայքէջ նշած եմ քաղաքի տարածութեան մասին եւ դուն տակաւին նոյն ախմախութեամբ կը շարունակես։ Բոլոր պաշտօնական կայքերը նշած են որ Երեւանի տարածութիւնը 227 քառ․ կմ․ է, նոյնիսկ Հայ Ասպետ հեռուստամրցումի ընթացքին նոյն հարցը տրուած էր եւ պատասխանը նոյնն էր՝ 227 քառ․ կմ․։ Բաւարար է մինչեւ հիմա ցուցաբերած խայտառակ կեցուածքդ։--Kevorkmail (talk) 03:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All sites are written in 227, they are copied from Wikipedia because tkih like you, who wrote that the area which was in Yerevan 10 years ago. She now has a total area of 300 square kilometers. And for some reason you are blocked, and you continue to edit other IP addresses. I will inform the administration. ArmOvak (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads[edit]

Please do not upload images you have found elsewhere on the Internet as your own work- doing so is completely contrary to Wikipedia's policies and is potentially illegal. I have deleted the images you have uploaded. Please be more careful in future. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Kevorkmail[edit]

Why did you re-upload images which were uploaded by User:Kevorkmail and deleted by me? Where did you find them? Wknight94 ^talk 03:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am restoring your images. But Commons:File:Yerevan Armenia.jpg still has images which were in File:Yerevan multi1.JPG. File:Yerevan multi1.JPG was deleted because Kevorkmail has been proven untrustworthy, so you cannot use any of his uploads unless you can find a legitimate source. Wknight94 ^talk 14:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? They obviously aren't all your photos. See this edit for a rundown on the component sources. None of them are known to be yours. A couple of them are known to be someone else's, not yours. And I've already deleted one of them because it was yet another that Kevorkmail uploaded from an unfree web site (ArmeniaPages.com). Because of that one alone, I will be re-deleting the collage soon. Wknight94 ^talk 19:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some pictures are not mine, but those that I have changed, their own. And you can submit a complaint the owners of those photos? ArmOvak (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHUS[edit]

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 05:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zvartnots airport aia.png[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Zvartnots airport aia.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WuhWuzDat 17:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Zvartnots logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zvartnots logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zvartnots logo.png[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Zvartnots logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WuhWuzDat 22:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. WuhWuzDat 05:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Aia logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aia logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yereva. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On discussion page wrote explanations of the editings, but user Kevorkmail continues to create vandalism on page of Yerevan. He has been already repeatedly blocked because of this reason, after an unblocking, he has again started to do editing war стртьи Yerevan. Block him please. ArmOvak (talk) 19:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caucuses sanctions[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Eduardo Iturralde González, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of editing restrictions[edit]

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to inform you that based on your edits, you are hereby placed under the following restrictions:

Revert limitation (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat transgressions.

Enforcement: Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year.

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.

I've placed these sanctions on your account because you've continued to edit war at Yerevan without even bothering to discuss with the user you're edit warring with. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the expense of Yerevan article, I discussed in the talk page. But user Kevorkmail continues to make unreasonable changes and cancel by my changes. ArmOvak (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't edited the talk page in a year! And you had a considerable number of users disagreeing with you even there. When most of the people giving a second opinion on an issue claim you're wrong, it's hard to claim the other side is being "unreasonable." Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After I wrote a page of discussion, the user Kevorkmail had no choice but to continue the war of edits without discussion! Notice his warnings and interlocks. What is the difference that my discussions were a year ago, the problem is the same! Most of the people, who's this? Or am I wrong in what? I'm not right in the fact that the insert-date information on the population and area of Yerevan city, and Kevorkmail undo my edits and inserts the information 10 years ago? ArmOvak (talk) 09:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just because someone reverts you doesn't mean that it's OK to edit war, even if you think you're right. See WP:BRD.

War update starts with the moment when the participant cancels an edit containing the information of todays time, putting his own. ArmOvak (talk) 13:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make you a deal; if you agree to stop edit warring and don't show any behavioral problems for the next three months, I will lift the restriction for you. Or, if another administrator is around and it's too hard to get a hold of me, then you can ask another admin. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I agree, but that my information was left because it fresh info, while the information generated Kevorkmail old. ArmOvak (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If your information was fresh, you should have discussed it. If it's the same information that was the topic of discussion from earlier, then it's not nearly that clear-cut. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Yerevan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yerevan[edit]

Can you explain this edit?--Preacher lad (talk) 14:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zvartnots International Airport (logo).png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zvartnots International Airport (logo).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]