User talk:Appsoft4

Nomination of OpenOrienteering Mapper for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OpenOrienteering Mapper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenOrienteering Mapper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Music1201 ^talk 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at XTrackCAD. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally do not close AfD's without reason and especially if you are the creator of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrissymad: Acually the closing was mine because it was erroneously categorized as a template so I thought it was a discussion for TfD. Sorry ^{[Username Needed]} 10:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Username Needed it was also them. See here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Poberezny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EAA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrii Pilshchykov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obscure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrii Pilshchykov[edit]

Albert Einstein: 30 pictures. The Beatles: 26, and that's including counting the first photo as four and others as two. Pilshchykov: 47! Ridiculous overkill. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every photo linked add a direct context to the personality article written about.

> Ridiculous overkill.

Comparing the Beatles to the prominent Ukrainian fighter pilot fallen during war is unacceptable. Appsoft4 (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles are far better known than one fighter pilot virtually unknown outside of Ukraine. If you do not desist from your hero worshipping, measures will be taken to ban you from editing this article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Appsoft4! Your additions to Skencil have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Diannaa!

Your additions to Skencil have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license.

All the content of the Skencil site, I've used to contribute in the article, is licensed under GNU LGPL, see:

Please, revert your edits and back all my contributions to the article, you have removed. Appsoft4 (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the GNU LGPL is not a compatible license. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 12:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the GNU LGPL is not a compatible license

There is no such statement claimed anywhere.

Even on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COMPLIC there is only noted that GPL-only (without "or later" clause) are not compatible with Wikipedia, but there are no any restrictions on include LGPL (with "or later" clause) into CC-BY-SA (not vice versa), so its not claimed as incompatible.

Also, I've asked Creative Commons team (via their contact form) on the compatibility of including LGPL into CC-BY-SA:

Hi, I have the next question on license compatibility: Could GNU LGPL (Library GPL) v2 or later be included into CC-BY-SA 4.0 International?
As I know, and according to Creative Commons site, GNU GPL could not be included into CC-BY-SA, only CC-BY-SA could be included into GNU GPL, not vice versa. But there is no info on how to combine content under GNU LGPL (Library GPL) v2 or later with content under CC-BY-SA 4.0. As I see, GNU LGPL could be included into CC-BY-SA 4.0 as well, as in even closed source licensed product. Would be grateful for your answer.
— (me)

Here is an answer I've got from Creative Commons team via email on 6 November 2023:

Creative Commons is a very small team so we can't always provide the level of support that may be requested and we don't provide legal advice, sorry.
The license compatibility you are asking about has not been evaluated.
You can propose it here: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/ShareAlike_compatibility_process_and_criteria
Hope this helps!
— Connor, <info@creativecommons.org>

So, I not see any violation there, even more LGPL never claimed as incompatible with CC-BY-SA. Appsoft4 (talk) 10:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to say that the GNU LGPL alone is not a compatible license. The content must also be released under a compatible CC-by license. — Diannaa (talk) 11:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no such info anywhere non on Wikipedia, non on Creative Commons.

There should be clear statement on legal status of LGPL text in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COMPLIC, because LGPL and GPL are way different, and LGPL allows to be linked into any other source without re-licensing the source, even inside CC-BY-SA. Appsoft4 (talk) 13:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the content in the chart labelled "License Compatibility with Wikipedia" where it says "Compatible: GFDL and CC BY or CC BY-SA (not including CC-BY-SA 1.0)"; not compatible: "any GNU-only license (including GFDL)" — Diannaa (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]