User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2021-2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Placebo (at funeral) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Placebo (at funeral), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Placebo (at funeral) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I’m Thinking of Ending Things (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I’m Thinking of Ending Things (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#I’m Thinking of Ending Things (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tetum language[edit]

Hi Anthony Appleyard! The technical request Tetum language → Tetum was contested[1] by buidhe (together with Lower Sorbian, which is discussed now), but still you performed the move as it were uncontested(?)[2] –Austronesier (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! –Austronesier (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tigray War[edit]

Why didn't you updated infobox and lead after moving a page? This is a mess. Eurohunter (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

100 000 edit award and time to close AFD[edit]

Hi, I am well on my way to reaching the 100 000 edit award. I was just wondering is there any special things that can happen when you reach this award? Also this article here David Oubel AFD has been open for over 7 days and has a strong consensus, so it needs to be closed. Davidgoodheart (talk) 12:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering after I saw these article here Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week and Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Hall of Fame I am curious to know if there is anything similar like this where people who have earned the 100,000 edit award can have their names listed on. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Davidgoodheart. Reaching 100,000 edits is great. Some editors see it as just a number, while others appreciate the time and work put into getting there. I see that you have over 63,000 edits - good work. When you reach 100,000 feel free to add this userbox {{User 100,000 edits}} to your user page. Also be aware of these Wikipedia:Service awards which acknowledge both number of edits and years editing. These are just for fun because as summed up here Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits#Caveat lector not all edits are equal, but all are appreciated - except for vandalism of course :-) Best regards to you both. MarnetteD|Talk 05:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romans[edit]

Hi Anthony, Please revert this undiscussed move of a significant article. The editor concerned seems to do little but undiscussed moves, & ought to be stopped! Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 05:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry - thanks anyway! Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carex meyeriana[edit]

Could you delete the redirect you created for Carex meyeriana? For some years now the consensus at Wikiproject plants has been that redlinks are better than redirects for encouraging article creation. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 09:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hengki Ardika [edit]

I'm a little puzzled, why did you restore it? DGG ( talk ) 01:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will admit that I never understood history-merges. DGG ( talk ) 17:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial technical request by User:Brandmeister[edit]

Hello, Anthony Appleyard. I've noticed that you renamed Moskovskij Komsomolets to Moskovsky Komsomolets on "technical request" by User:Brandmeister. Unfortunately, it goes against the consensus established on the article's talk page. Take a note that Brandmeister requested a technical move while ignoring Talk:Moskovskij Komsomolets#Requested move 14 July 2018. His reason for the technical move was "WP:RUS, our standard Romanization", which we have already discussed with other users on the talk page.

To @Brandmeister: Please, refrain from pushing WP:RUS in this manner (via technical requests), it's contrary to the consensus on the article's talk page. I hope for your understanding, especially considering that the Moskovskij Komsomolets newspaper is freely available online: https://www.mk.ru/subscription/ (click on "Подписка на PDF версию") → ЧИТАТЬ/READ button on pressa.ru.--Russian Rocky (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that talk page thread when requesting the move, so for me it was uncontroversial. In any case, the current front page logo of MK does not use any English transliteration, while the Moskovsky Komsomolets transliteration is used in reliable sources alongside Moskovskij Komsomolets. So it's questionable whether the newspaper's own transliteration trumps WP:RUS which is de-facto our house style implemented in the majority of Russian names. Brandmeistertalk 20:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ever tried to click on the link above? What you have provided as an argument is MK's anniversary edition celebrating the 100th anniversary of Moskovskij Komsomolets. Here's the current front page (25 January 2021 issue): http://pressa.ru/en/reader/#/magazines/mk-moskovskij-komsomolets/issues/11-2021/pages/1/ You can also check the archive to make sure that the newspaper has used this secondary title for years: http://pressa.ru/en/magazines/mk-moskovskij-komsomolets/archive#/ .
Your reference to "reliable sources" is also invalid, because I've already shown in the previous discussion that Moskovskij Komsomolets is used in reliable sources as well.--Russian Rocky (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I will not argue further, as this is the matter of preference rather than factual error. Let it be that way. Brandmeistertalk 09:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, just be more careful next time. Wikipedia prefers commonly known names for its articles' titles instead of standardized transliterations based on Wikipedia's rules. For example, the Izvestia newspaper is called "Izvestia" (not "Izvestiya") because it's commonly known under this name; they also collaborated with The New York Times under this name. While the Izvestiya: Mathematics journal is called "Izvestiya" (not "Izvestia") because it's the name of its official English edition.--Russian Rocky (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tolkien's languages[edit]

Anthony, are you the person who wrote about Quenya Grammar back in the '90s, and if so, do you still have time and interest in the area? I've been tidying up the whole area of Tolkien's languages, including Elvish (Quenya, Sindarin). I've sorted out quite a bit of the needed reffing, but an expert eye would be a fine thing, if it were available. Just hoping! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Chiswick Chap: I am the same man. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh good. Well, I guess Sindarin is the place that any help would be most immediately appreciated, out of the articles I've mentioned. I feel I have quite a good command of the Tolkien literature, both primary and secondary, with a considerable hole in the linguistics section. But I'm aware you're a busy man. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bank of Amsterdam[edit]

Hello Anthony, could you take a look at the article on the Bank of Amsterdam. Someone deleted a lot of sentences, but I did not know it was a copyright violation. The website owned by Libertyfund told me it was open source. Now I found a better source, the same book but from the Cornell University Library. Look here. [[3]]. Can you help me out?Taksen (talk) 20:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Undermountain" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Undermountain. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 28#Undermountain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jontesta (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Kj cheetham. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, YesWeHack, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kj cheetham (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect in practice this was auto-reviewed when it was moved. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Close formatting and signature[edit]

Hi Anthony, I shifted the close top template and added a sig for your close here, please let me know if this was incorrect. Best, CMD (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Hi. [4]. Consistency does not preclude the actual topic of the article. And of course, changing the topic of a Wikipedia article (instead of creating a new one) requires a solid consensus somewhere. I for one, do not think it is conductive towards the improvement of the enciclopedia. Create a new article about Borrasca Filomena if you wish (you can translate the Spanish-language one: es:Borrasca Filomena or recover the edits by "Buttons0603 ""[5] in the page history. This article is about the snowstorm, chaos, damages, et. al (which can be much expanded if you are wondering) in the city of Madrid, specifically, which as it stands it is a topic in itself and may create heavy WP:UNDUE/WP:BALASP issues if somewhat integrated into a general article.--Asqueladd (talk) 00:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the situation is not yet clear enough, I've just opened a thread in the talk page explaining it [6].--Asqueladd (talk) 01:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bitter Truth (album)[edit]

Good day! Is there a reason why The Bitter Truth (album) was removed from WP:RM instead of being placed in Contested Technical Requests. Please {{ping}} me when you reply. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - Anthony, that is the answer to where the matter is being talked about. The question that I asked you, is why The Bitter Truth (album) was removed from WP:RM here instead of being placed in Contested Technical Requests? --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - I saw that you added it to Talk:The Bitter Truth (album), then removed it. Without knowing, I added the discussion back to that page, so that is where I shall leave it. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move request[edit]

Question regarding moves[edit]

Hello, I requested several moves a few days ago of Azerbaijani place names to their anglicized versions and it was put on hold as there was a discussion going on about one of them in Talk:Şərur#Requested move 10 February 2021. I wanted to ask, if that RM was successful would that allow me to request moves for other similar city names to be anglicized en masse or do I need to open an RM for each of them separately? Thanks in advance. Cheers. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 12:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @CuriousGolden: The Şərur move discussion is not closed yet. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Anthony Appleyard, yes I know. I'm asking for the future if it gets closed successfully (for now, it seems it will), will I still have to request separate RM for each anglicization of city names? — CuriousGolden (T·C) 13:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not Anthony, but you can put multiple RMs in one request, so if this one goes through I'd suggest a multi-page RM. Primefac (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
    Thanks, I'll do that then. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 13:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Primefac: Since the RM was closed successfully, I'm planning on doing multiple RMs together. But do you know which article I should do it in? or should it be any one of the city names I'm changing? Cheers. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 05:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The RM can take place on any of the pages being proposed (ideally the most-watched one?). The bot will take care of placing RM notifications on each of the relevant articles and talk pages. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see several technical requests, and moves in the editor's history. It's common for editors from the countries to think that their towns should be anglicized, but as you say en.WP does not do this for any Latin alphabet language, and that is the status quo on Azerbaijani also since the last RMs in 2014. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CuriousGolden, In ictu oculi, and Primefac: Azeri 'a' sounds like French or Italian 'a', like English "ah!" but short. Azeri 'ə' sounds like English short 'a' in 'hat" (not drawled). On English-reading media where you must plead untypability or unfamiliarity, replacing Azeri ə by ä would look reasonable. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Anthony Appleyard: Replacing non-anglicized Azeri letters with another language's non-anglicized letters is weird. Also, I'm kind of confused about why this is being discussed. I don't plan on anglicizing names of villages in Azerbaijan since they almost never make an appearance in English-media, so they can keep the Ə (the letter is part of extended Latin, like ä which means articles can have it in their titles without a problem). My plan was to move large cities and towns to their anglicized names, especially when their anglicized name has made a significant appearance in English-media sources (like in Sharur page, where I pointed this out), and this would follow WP:ENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 12:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CuriousGolden, In ictu oculi, and Primefac: The infobox says that Şərur has 6964 inhabitants. In European terms that is a small town, not a city. Sorry, it was only a suggestion.Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Anthony Appleyard, I'm having a hard time understanding. It's considered a city/town in South Caucasus, which is not part of Europe. But, how is this relevant to the fact that the city has appeared in its anglicized name much more times in English-language media? A little confused here. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 12:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CuriousGolden, In ictu oculi, and Primefac: The spelling "Sharur" is easier for the public media's Anglophone typists. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CuriousGolden, In ictu oculi, and Primefac: But we in Wikipedia are not restricted to what characters an English typewriter can type. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Anthony Appleyard, I know that. I really feel like we're not understanding each other properly. I'm not moving random articles to anglicized names. I request to move them only if the anglicized version is the WP:COMMONNAME. We use the non-English letters only if there is no established use of the anglicized name per WP:UE. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 13:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CuriousGolden, In ictu oculi, and Primefac: I suspect that Azerbaijan chose to use 'ə' here because it can be fancied to look somewhat like a lowercase 'a'. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A question about a move[edit]

Good day Anthony Appleyard. First of all, thank you for helping to perform so many RMs. I appreciate your contribution a lot. I have a question regarding a request I made. My request was to move it to Delhi Cantt (Delhi Assembly constituency) but seems like it was moved to Delhi Cantonment (Delhi Assembly constituency). Would it be possible to fix this? Thank you.--DreamLinker (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(speedily) Undo controversial "uncontroversial technical request" move?[edit]

Hello Anthony Appleyard, As mentioned on the talk page of Talk:Storming of the United States Capitol, the speedy "uncontroversial technical request" move you recently performed (from 2021 storming of the United States Capitol to "Storming of the United States Capitol") was not an uncontroversial request in the slightest, and it should be moved back quickly (and soon). The speedy move (which was contested and controversial) should be reverted back to "2021 storming of the United States Capitol". Is there any way you can move this back now? Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page was already moved back by Rosguill. Also, I have closed the RM per WP:SNOW. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jack Palmer (Mathematician)[edit]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Jack Palmer (Mathematician). Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CUPIDICAE💕 16:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Min (ship) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Min (ship) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Min (ship) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— BarrelProof (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reference articles in WP[edit]

Hello Dear. Currently i found a user (Aryagolparvar) in Persian WP has created many small articles about places in Iran as village and all are candidate for fast deletion, because of they aren't verified and there is no any trustable reference for them. But reference of all are EN.WP. I checked articles such as Chah-e Shomareh Yek Amalzadeh or Tolombeh-ye Sarhang Bahrmand and found author of all is user:Carlossuarez46 and reference of all is same and it is a link rot excel file. Then i think it is better to Please check all contributed articles by user:Carlossuarez46.

ThanksShahram 16:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

user:Carlossuarez46 With esteem to author/ editor/ creator, but there is no any response from him. I propose all of them to be deleted. Please guide.Shahram 08:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis? There are referenced on the official Iranian census. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding a page[edit]

@Starzoner: since you worry so much about requesting to restore deleted editions, why you don't take advantage and ask that editions of Draft:Frankenstein (upcoming film) be restored? You don't do it because it's a draft that you created. Honestly, it does not bother me that the deleted editions are restored since at the end of the day those deleted editions were duly referenced, what if it bothers me is that Starzoner requests it with the intention of continuing to fuel the existing conflict between the two. He requested that the editions be restored after trying in vain to merge my draft with his because an administrator rejected it due to having parallel histories, as he could not achieve it, he came here with the sole intention of having those editions restored knowing that I would come here later to leave my comments about it. Then you are going to say that you are persecuted when the reality is that nobody persecutes you, I only realize what you do when your username appears in my "watchlist", modifying an article or draft that I have created.
I'll put this as an example, this is another of yours empty drafts that you create with the intention of being the one who appears as the creator, knowing that it already exists Draft:The 4400 (upcoming TV series) created by @Apd9696: just a few minutes before. @Black Kite: here already left you a warning, but that doesn't seem to even matter to you. Instead of continuing to look for conflicts with me, just focus on your articles and if you see that another user already created it before you, stop creating all kinds of conflicts, instead just spend that time on other things. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tigranocerta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artsakh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Igor Ivanov (Schauspieler)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Igor Ivanov (Schauspieler). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Igor Ivanov (Schauspieler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Cocaine Bear[edit]

  • What is the sense then of creating a draft or requesting a merge of histories if anyone can come to create a draft with a little more content and then redirect the existing one? Here you can see how without any problem I deleted the content of my draft and redirected it to this one when I realized that there was already another one created previously. Please note that the history of the original authors should be preserved as long as they comply with Wikipedia's standards. Because as far as I know my draft, despite having less content, had the correct format and was referenced. Greetings. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bruno Rene Vargas: Sorry; I know what it is like, but this sort of dilemma sometimes arises. The world is big, and in it sometimes two people start articles at the same time independently about the same subject soon after the original news comes out. It happens sometimes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But here you can see that the user reconsidered and decided that the best thing was to do what I usually do. He even sent me a thank you for making the copy-paste move. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bruno Rene Vargas: But Wikipedia discourages copy-and-paste and cut-and-paste moves, and says that cut-and-paste moves must be re-history-merged if possible. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I just go by what WP:Parallel histories says and even use the "copied" template. You may be right but you yourself say that it is only discouraged, it is not prohibited. Is there any other place where this can be discussed? Because this cannot be reduced only to the decision of one or two people, even more so considering that I followed the steps present in WP: Parallel histories and even so the corresponding process is not being respected. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still not fixed: Lynne Hobbs[edit]

The article Lynne Hobbs still has some deleted edits. Please do the following (correctly):

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Socialist Party (Ireland) Elected Representatives" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Socialist Party (Ireland) Elected Representatives. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 11#Template:Socialist Party (Ireland) Elected Representatives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agro Nocerino Sarnese[edit]

Hi, Anthony! Would you kindly revert your move of Agro Nocerino Sarnese? There's just been a move request discussion, with the outcome "not moved", so a WP:RM/TR was not appropriate; the rationale given for the move was patently false – if you look at the recent discussion you will see that I listed numerous solid sources that do not employ the hyphen. This is a disruptive editor who has already exhausted the patience of the admins on Italian wp, and is now here to try ours. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move deleted parallel history of Revelación[edit]

The article Revelación currently has some deleted parallel history. You should then do the following:

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done, just because there was a version that existed before the draft was approved, does not mean we need to restore it and make a mess out of both histories. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GeoffreyT2000 and Primefac: I have moved the deleted edits to (undeleted) Revelación (version 2), and the original undeleted edits are still at Revelación. (Likewise their talk pages). I have not history-merged them. Leaving a long deleted edit history sitting under a long visible (undeleted) edit history is liable to accidents. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About portal move from "Arts" to "The arts"[edit]

Hello. I am trying to understand why the Arts portal was moved from Portal:Arts to Portal:The_arts. Having the portal named "Arts" seems more consistent with the other portal names on the Main page. I wanted to find out why the move was made, and I found your edit on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Arts&action=history. Let me know if you have more information regarding this. Thank you! Somerandomuser (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basit Ahmed[edit]

There was a duplicate draft by the same name. Thats why I requested for a merge. Did I placed a wrong CSD tag or made any errors.? Can you please clarify whats the issue here? Kichu🐘 Need any help? 13:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A mess[edit]

Hi Anthony, hope you are well. I spotted Talk:New_chronology_(Fomenko)#Article_move_and_broken_archive_links. Not sure what the best title is either, but I hope you can fix the talks history mess. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod, the talk page archives were moved on 12 March. What's broken? Primefac (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Ok, thanks - this wan't noted at the talk section. Johnbod (talk) 01:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Pet Sematary prequel[edit]

After following this recommendation, I come to you to request that you reconsider whether or not it is necessary to restore deleted editions belonging to a blocked user. And it is not only that, but they also do not contribute anything new to subsequent editions. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 16:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Rene Vargas, while I understand your concerns, you are starting to have issues with "asking the other parent", i.e. admin shopping, and it's starting to get disruptive. Please stop trying to ask any and every admin under the sun to do what you want, and then moving on to another one when you don't get the answer you were expecting. Primefac (talk) 12:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

"In Awe" move[edit]

Hi. You just performed a technical move that I requested, but it didn't quite work out. The point was to move In Awe (disambiguation), a disambiguation page, to In Awe, as that should be the disambiguation page now that there's no primary topic. But now In Awe is still a redirect and In Awe (disambiguation) redirects to that redirect, and the disambiguation page has disappeared. Could you take a look at this? Lennart97 (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...yes, I did, but then I realised it should not be a redirect, but a disambiguation page, so I requested In Awe (disambiguation) to be moved to In Awe:
In Awe (disambiguation) (currently a redirect to In Awe) → In Awe – The album by Midnite no longer has a standalone article (not notable), so there is no primary topic anymore. Lennart97 (talk) 20:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At that point in time, In Awe (disambiguation) was not a redirect but had content that I wanted to be located at In Awe. But that is not what happened. Lennart97 (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help (Government Degree College No. 02 Mardan)[edit]

Hi dear, you have recently edited my draft. I am new a don't know much about Wikipedia. However I have been working on this for two years. Erroneously I copied from my draft and then pasted it sandbox, unfortunately it made a problem. Please help me in publishing my article. Thanks Sultan Abdul sultan (talk) 11:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Cup move[edit]

Hey, Anthony, we both did moves of The Liberty Cup to Liberty Cup pretty close to each other, so we've ended up with a redirect at both locations. The article was last at Liberty Cup, and then it got G6ed to move the redirect back there. I can't undelete anything, so I'll have to lean on you to fix it. Sorry... -2pou (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tanzim al- Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn; Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn; Al-Qaeda in Iraq[edit]

Saw you finished up the move there earlier, I don't have any problems with the changeover but there do appear to be some leftover odds and ends from the miniature mess there.The history currently at Talk:Al-Qaeda in Iraq seems to be incorrect and needs to be swapped with Talk:Tanzim al- Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn, then the history of Tanzim al- Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn and Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn should be swapped, and that should get the pages and their talk pages lined back up, with all the correct entries in the {{split to}}, {{merged from}} templates everywhere so all the attribution lines up. Thanks, 83.136.106.119 (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the prompt action. Thanks, 83.136.106.119 (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fabuloso[edit]

As I understand it you specialize in history splits and merges. So Fabuloso was a redirect and Michaelm created an article there that was moved to draftspace (now at Draft:Fabuloso) without a redirect. In order to avoid deletion via the backdoor since an WP:RFD would be required in this case, and to ensure the correct creator of the draft gets the notices (for imminent g13 if nothing else), and the ability to g7 delete if so desired, the page history needs to be split with the original portion going back to Fabuloso and the post attempted creation at Draft:Fabuloso, thanks. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:  Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @2a03:f80:32:194:71:227:81:1: Fabuloso is a non-notable brand of Spanish cleaner liquid. Most of its edits are redirects. Its latest edit is a redirect to Sech (singer)#Discography. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree, however the draft should be restored, because notability does not apply to draft space, see WP:DMFD, I doubt it will become an article but the creator should get the opportunity to work on it; the redirect to Sech (singer)#Discography should likewise be restored (maybe with only the original edit) because it was created several months ago, hence not eligible for WP:R3. If you want to nom it for WP:RFD I may support but it shouldn't be deleted out-of-process via the backdoor. Also feel free to use {{talkback}} to save time in the future if you want to, I know how to ctrl+f to find the message directed to me. Cheers, 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just to expand a bit. A pre-exisitng redirect to Sech (singer)#Discography existed, that is not csd eligible and should only be deleted through rfd. An editor came along and blanked presumably because they wanted it deleted so they could start an article there, I reversed that. They then started an article anyway (reversed once). That was also a mistake since the topic was different from the redirect, they should have created a draft. Someone else saw there mistake and moved it to draft space. However this created the need to split the history since the first edit to the draft needs to come from the author so they get credit and appropriate notifications, likewise the redirects history, since it's on an unrelated topic should remain distinct from the draft. The way to fix this is to split the history leaving that for the topic of the redirect in one spot, and the topic of the draft in the draft. You did this, but undeletion is still needed to finish the process. Cheers, 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have undeleted Fabuloso Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks you should also restore the draft with it's seperate history since notability doesn't apply to draft space. I also believe revison [7] should be removed from the mainspace history as it doesn't belong there. Thanks for your help, 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks, everything looks just about like it should but [8] still needs to be removed from the history of the redirect, and then everything will be good-to-go. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done: I have deleted the edit [9] (oldid=965298203). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pings[edit]

Appreciate it! 162.208.168.92 (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Histmerge question[edit]

Cephea cephea (a) was recently created (mostly empty). Two days later, we get Cephea Cephea Jelly (b) and Cephea cephea Jellyfish (c) (identical to each other). I have merged (b) to (a) and redirected, and tagged (c) for CSD as a duplicate. Now this leaves Cephea Cephea Jelly as a rather odd-looking redirect in mainspace. Question: does it make sense to merge its history to Cephea cephea and delete it? Or is that too much effort to avoid a dumb redirect? Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Dynasty[edit]

Hi, I believe you are the one who responded to my technical request regarding this redirect... Upon reading the target article at The Affaire in the Swing Age, it turns out that The Dynasty (TV series) is actually the desired title (it's not a film!) Thanks 162.208.168.92 (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, never mind, I don't think it's really necessary, I updated all the links. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 02:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Alsophila dealbata[edit]

Please see User talk:Aseleste#Move of Alsophila dealbata. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lobster hook for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lobster hook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobster hook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coin945 (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moves[edit]

Hi, first off, could you move Bushi (professional wrestler) to "Bushi (wrestler)"? I can't do it myself.

Also, could you take a look at two other possible moves?

  • "Zeus (wrestler)" redirects to Tommy Lister Jr., due to the character he played in No Holds Barred, and resulting career in the WWF as part of cross-promotion. However, there is another wrestler that goes by Zeus, so perhaps he would be a better choice?
  • Mitsuhide Hirasawa, worked for New Japan Pro-Wrestling and is best known as Captain New Japan. One of his former ring names was Hideo Saito, which is currently a disambiguation page. There are two Japanese musicians with the same name, but would the one born in 1902 be the primary topic? APM (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, could you take a look at two other possible moves?
  • (1)  Done.
  • (2) This need for a link is already provided for by a hatlink at the start of page Tommy Lister Jr..
  • (3) Sorry, I know nothing about Japanese wrestling, and I do not know which of these two wrestlers is the better known.

With the second one, I should've clarified myself better. Mitsuhide Hirasawa is the same person as Captain New Japan, so I wasn't asking for that to be moved. It was actually between two different Japanese musicians (Hideo Saito (musician), Hideo Saitō (musician, born 1958)), which was one of Hirasawa's former ring names. I believe that the musician born in 1902 could be a primary topic (instead of a disambiguation page), with the musician born in 1958 moved to "Hideo Saito (musician, born 1958)" to avoid the use of the macron. APM (talk) 04:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary![edit]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Really?[edit]

I spent 4 hours straight on a wiki page, it's not a test page, it was not vandalized, it doesn't hold any misinformation, and if you thought otherwise why didn't you just EDIT IT INSTEAD OF DELETING ALL MY PROGRESS?!! JuniorAdventures

Draft question[edit]

Hi I added some more info to this draft (Draft:Olalekan Jeyifous) that was rejected a while ago by someone else. If you have a moment can you maybe see if it might meet the criteria for article space now ? Since being rejected last year, the artist won several important art awards, exhibited at the MoMA, has lot of press coverage from New York Times etc and has some other permanent or temporary art work build in cities or places like Coachella etc. He does a lot of public art which is usually commissioned by cities or states not fine art in museums, so not sure if that meets the creativity criteria? Thank you for your time and effort! Soupmaker (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Soupmaker[reply]

Help[edit]

Hi, a few days ago you have edited my sandbox. My draft Draft:Government Degree College No.02 Mardan was published in Wikipedia Mainspace, but later due to primary sources, it is again reverted to draft. So now I made the draft fine. Please look up my draft once. Sultan Abdul sultan (talk) 07:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Abdul sultan (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Time to close AFD[edit]

This article here Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan is an AFD that is in it's third relist after 7 days. I think that it's time to close it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Anthony Appleyard: How goes it? That article seems still to be here. For some reason it has not been deleted. Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan. scope_creepTalk 09:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please reconsider your close, as I do not think "delete" is a correct reading of consensus for the main federation. Primefac (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just for reference, the federation for actual wrestling (not WWE stuff) is Pakistan Wrestling Federation. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: I have reverted the deletion and closure. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking the same thing about the decision that was made. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidgoodheart, Primefac, and Lord Bolingbroke: Currently Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan has 2 Keeps and 1 Delete. I am inclined towards deleting, but I have no contact with wrestling or with Pakistan. Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan page says that Pro Wrestling Federation of Pakistan organization has been running 9 years with one or more name changes, so the organization can be described as "established", but how big is it? How many wrestlers? How many other members? How many wrestling matches? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are no reliable sources that discuss the organization I don't know if we can say. That is why I nominated the article for deletion. There isn't a source for the founding date either as a matter of fact. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the reasoning behind your decision. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About histmerging Drafts into articles[edit]

Hi, it is only very recently that I have learnt this is commonplace. I had authored a draft for the article Treat Myself (album), located at Draft:Treat Myself, which was discarded when another user decided to create the article months later. Though this never seems to be the case when the tables are turned. So my question is, can you refund that draft and merge it with the article?--NØ 16:12, 27 April 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Actually I know this is possible, now. Kindly just go ahead and do it. Thanks.--NØ 16:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) With no content copy/pasted from the draft into the article, there are no attribution issues and thus there is nothing to histmerge. Primefac (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permalinks[edit]

Hi Anthony Appleyard. I noticed that when you started discussions today for several contested technical move requests, you included an incorrect permalink (all of the permalinks were to this old revision, which does not include any of the contested titles). I fixed several of the links: [10][11][12]. Do you know what's going on there? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with improving a draft article at Draft:Tucker Budzyn[edit]

Hello, I need assistance with a draft at Draft:Tucker Budzyn, but I have a conflict of interest on the subject, so I may find it difficult. Thanks. 92.237.102.75 (talk) 18:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC) User talk:92.237.102.75[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Battle of Brunanburh[edit]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Battle of Brunanburh. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interview[edit]

Hi, I am a PhD student at University College London (UK), researching the collective production of knowledge. Wikipedia is my main case study. Would you be able/willing to talk to me about your activity on Wikipedia?

I have submitted my project to the Wikipedia research committee for guidance. You can find the full summary here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Sociotechnical_epistemology:_how_do_we_foster_good_practices_in_collective_knowledge-production%3F

There's more on my user page and you can ask me any questions. We can discuss identification, uses of data and so forth before talking as well. If you're interested, you can contact me via my Talk page, or by emailing me at elena.falco.18@ucl.ac.uk

Thanks! ElenaFalco (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Just for clarification – I would only need an hour of your time. ElenaFalco (talk) 08:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit history request[edit]

Hello, I am wondering if you could undo an edit history restoral. Back in September 2019 you added back edit history at Draft:Blade (upcoming film). This was requested by a sock puppet of a blocked editor, who’s draft had been deleted as a result of their block. I feel all edits on the page prior to July 21, 2019 should be removed from the history. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 15:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maor Levi[edit]

Hey! I want to create the page Maor Levi, an Israeli association footballer who plays for Maccabi Haifa from the Israeli Premier League, but unfortunately I can't create this page, because many users create this page in the past and time after time, other users (among them you are) delete this page. I would appreciate it if you could open it, so I can create this article. 23shlomomaman23 (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit history removal request[edit]

Hello there, I was wondering if you could remove some edits of a blocked user from two articles. The user Starzoner made some pages in their userspace and repurposed them into drafts for upcoming/potential projects when they were announced or first reported on, likely to claim creation or ownership of them. I am requesting the edits before this one be removed as they don't constitute standard aid in constructing the article, while this edit and the ones before them are of similar unconstructive use. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page[edit]

Hello, Anthony Appleyard can you delete these pages:

OvalThunder9 (talk) 22:14, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cut glass[edit]

Hi Anthony,

This has for years redirected to a totally different technique, Engraved glass. I have been working up User:Johnbod/Cut glass, and am ready to move to mainspece, but am not sure how to do this with the redirect in place. Could you kindly oblige? No hurry, thanks, Johnbod (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Johnbod (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crayo[edit]

When was the page Crayo created?2601:584:180:3D80:6085:C344:6F64:76A1 (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @2601:584:180:3D80:6085:C344:6F64:76A1: The history of page Crayo has 2 edits, both deleted:-
    • 13:08, 14 June 2011 . . Porturology (talk | contribs | block) 25 bytes (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G10). (TW)) (attack page)
    • 13:05, 14 June 2011 . . Cocopara (talk | contribs | block) 123 bytes (←Created page with 'Crayo, the admin of http://www.marketforums.org is desperately in love with Haruhi Suzumiya, an investor on his very forum.') Tag: very short new article

Norway hyphen plus[edit]

So what is so difficult about using the article talk page, where exactly this question was raised. It is clearly not an uncontroversial move. I recognize your good intentions but it seems that your good will has been misdirected. The outcome will probably end up the same but surely it is a lot easier to do it the right order. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oromia Region[edit]

While mostly named as Oromia Region, why you changed to Oromia region? This denotes the region only inhabited by Oromo people rather than the place name as proper noun usage (as the subject talks about the place in Ethiopia, not to say region that only inhabited by Oromo people.) Discuss to the talk page. The Supermind (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tristichotrochus consors[edit]

Something apparently went wrong when you were history swapping Tristichotrochus consors and Calliostoma consors if you could get around to fixing it at some point when you have time I'd appreciate it. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A. Rupert Hall[edit]

Hello, Anthony Appleyard. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests.
Message added 05:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Punjab Sports University[edit]

Hi Anthony

I hope you're well. Please could I remind you to have a look at the talk page for prior naming discussions before carrying out "uncontroversial" moves at WP:RM/TR? The move from Punjab Sports University to Maharaja Bhupinder Singh Punjab Sports University was specifically rejected by two RM discussions in 2019, so it would certainly need a fresh RM for any change in that status to be effected. I have moved the article back, anyway. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 21:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must say I was also surprised with this move. See talk page, and the page is indef semi. --Muhandes (talk) 08:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontroversial technical request[edit]

Hi. I'd like to request Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Wrestling Title Histories be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Wrestling Title Histories/Promotions as it's in the wrong namespace. I would have posted this to the main request page but I'm not able to edit it. Thanks. 173.162.220.17 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the quick response. Thanks again! 173.162.220.17 (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

I'd like to move Pinoy pop to P-pop, actually Pinoy pop is actually from P-pop back in 2009. This is not a vandalism thank you P-pop is like a K-pop. Thank you Hyunsukie (talk) 01:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hyunsukie, please establish consensus for such a move first. The previous discussion didn't reach that. – NJD-DE (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NJD-DE I'm a P-pop fan too we want to move it beacuse P-pop is comes from Pinoy pop and P-pop was the first name before Pinoy pop, I remembered when I'm in 2010, Many K-poper said Philippines have a P-pop and in mid 2010 people said P-pop is for Filipino only. So Nmb Maximumz who created a P-pop page back in 2009 so please let's move it this is the new discussion thank you. Hyunsukie (talk) 07:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hyunsukie, Njd-de, and Nmb Mazimux: What is all this about? Sorry, but I know nothing about Philippines pop music and I have never been to the Philippines. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Anthony Appleyard. It's not my intention to abuse your talk page for a discussion on moving that page. Only jumped in as I noticed Hyunsukie's edits on other articles that are indistinguishable from those of other socks, and wanted to make sure that article is not just moved w/o a discussion.
    Btw: I am clueless about Philippines and their music as well. Never been there, don't think ever heard Pinoy pop song either. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Male menstruation[edit]

Notice

The article Male menstruation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic doesn't seem to meet WP:SIGCOV and the article is a bit of a mess, with the only source in the article referencing "male menstruation" a single time. It's probably best to blow it up and start over if the article topic is later deemed to have significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsborough disaster[edit]

Might we try unprotecting the Hillsborough disaster article? I've got it watchlisted. Mjroots (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BigID Speedy Deletion[edit]

Hey, I saw that you just deleted BigID. Have you read my comment on the talk page? I do not believe that it should have been deleted according to "G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion". הסיסמא123 (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. Thank you for undeleting BigID. Can you please check if you think that this article should be speedy deleted, and if not, remove the nomination? Thank you. הסיסמא123 (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello Anthony. My understanding is that G11 nominations are not usually withdrawn based on the objection of the article's creator? Therefore could the nomination please remain in place for another admin to consider? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragoman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hittite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tadia Toussaint Deletion[edit]

The Draft Tadia_Toussaint has been deleted because of advertisement and ambiguous promotion. She is a popular artist/ member of the Haitian American community. I am not tied to her and have no intention of advertising on her behalf. Please re-instate the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fembelle (talk • contribs) 17:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

Hey Anthony, thank you for your recent moves of the misspelled pages. There is an extra space now in the page title of Haqnəzər. Can you please remove that? Thanks, KHE'O (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Loria Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcheringa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ClearTax (company) Deletion[edit]

The new company page for ClearTax (company) was deleted after Publishing based on the last deletion notice in 2017. The new page was created by a Paid Author it was mentioned on his talk page and the brand is clearly notable in India and is not written as an advertisement/promotion. Please reinstate the page. Also, I feel G4 won't be applicable since the page contents are not substantially identical to the deleted version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by കാവിന്പുറം (talk • contribs) 06:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fried Egg structure for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fried Egg structure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fried Egg structure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Yagi error[edit]

Hi Anthony Appleyard, my apologies for this, as I'm having a hard time following exactly what happened with these page moves, but I think the actual original article titles were that the current Typhoon Yagi should be at Typhoon Yagi (2006) (currently a redirect), following which the current List of storms named Yagi can be at Typhoon Yagi. That is, I think, the original situation, given the current target of the Typhoon Yagi (disambiguation) redirect. Could you take a look to check my thinking on this? Sorry again, CMD (talk) 10:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cohort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasian Welcome Walk[edit]

Hi! I am a bit confused why you deleted the article? Did you? I was waiting for a consensus so it can be moved to a proper article, but it seems that you have deleted. Why? The article has numerous original sources. Pampi1010 (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was previously moved, but I requested it to be in a draft page so I can edit it. It has been edited thoroughly and I believe it has the capacity to be in a separate article. Thank you. Pampi1010 (talk) 16:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! It seems that I got confused because I can't access the published article the first time I saw the changes. Maybe it was because of the cookies. I don't know. But thank you again for moving the article. Pampi1010 (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you help me? The article seems to be deleted/redirected again, just like that. I don't understand. On one minute, an admin puts in the main space, but on the next minute, it gets redirected again! It's frustrating.Pampi1010 (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Maybe, I could just delete or trim down the Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas#Thomasian Welcome Walk section, so redirecting won't be necessary. 14:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:McDonnell Douglas F-15EX Eagle II[edit]

Draft:McDonnell Douglas F-15EX Eagle II is a cut-paste of Draft:F15EX, which needs to moved there. I'd just swap them, but it probably should be deleted, and I can't do that as a non-admin. BilCat (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BilCat (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Electronic Design (magazine)[edit]

User:DGG moved page Electronic Design (magazine) to Draft:Electronic Design (magazine) without leaving a redirect. It has been an article since 2007-06-22T14:11:06‎. What is the problem? It is older than EDN (magazine). Endeavor Business Media, LLC. is current owner. B2B dead trees are shrinking. The article is very outdated, but the core information seems reliable, perhaps the presentation is boosterish. Most living celebrity articles are much worse. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: OK User:Devprogrammer789 is PAID and COI. Can we revert Electronic Design (magazine) to last edit before User:Devprogrammer789 ? .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: I was cleaning up Draft:Electronic Design (magazine) while you moved it. See User:0mtwb9gd5wx/Electronic Design (magazine) this was my cleanup, any notes about any weaselry, or fuzzy PR merchandising BS still in the article would be welcome, before I add some to Electronic Design (magazine). The revert Electronic Design (magazine) to last edit before User:Devprogrammer789 has almost as much puffery. I just thought it was important to have something there. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion query[edit]

  • Hi Anthony Appleyard, you deleted my draft, I can't find it anywhere. Now the article says, "The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten." I suggest using the lead section from my draft, but it is no longer available. What is the best thing to do? Thanks for your advice/help, Marc MarcAnder79 (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MarcAnder79: Which draft is this? Is it now at Electronic Design (magazine)(version 2)? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interslavic[edit]

Hi Anthony,

Your recent move of Interslavic language per my request left a circular link, and I can't find the page history at either name. Looks like maybe you moved it twice?

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021[edit]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dacor (scuba diving), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Humuhumu nukunuku apua'a for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Humuhumu nukunuku apua'a is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humuhumu nukunuku apua'a until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

dudhhrContribs 08:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Some help needed[edit]

Deleted articles[edit]

Hi, I have decided to contact you about something that I consider to be very important thus being getting access to deleted articles. I really need to get access to some deleted articles. after you get back to me I will let you know about the reasons for this. I will let you know now that this will make my editing job a LOT easier for sure. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your quick response. I will get back to you soon as I can't right now since I am going through much turmoil at the moment. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. The first one that I would like to see would be Orion Williamson. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
04:54, 14 November 2020 User:DragonflySixtyseven deleted page Orion Williamson (Test page)
06:16, 14 October 2005 User:R. fiend deleted page Orion Williamson (nonsense)
The edit history of page Orion Williamson is:-
03:26, 14 November 2020 . . User:Davidgoodheart 13 bytes (Please delete page)
03:24, 14 November 2020 . . User:Davidgoodheart 44 bytes (briefly reviving page just to check it out)
03:23, 14 October 2005 . . User:VSquared 4,221 bytes (nonsense)
01:31, 14 October 2005 . . User:VSquared 108 bytes (copyvio)
01:18, 14 October 2005 . . User:64.136.27.226 4,208 bytes
Hi again, could you please let me this deleted article here "The Great Dinosaur Mystery And The Bible". Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks foe letting me know this. Please let me see this me this deleted article here Pavlos Danelatos. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Σχολή "Ανδρέα Βουτσινά" στη Θεσσαλονίκη. Ελευθεροτυπία (in Greek). 8 September 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2011.

Deleted articles 02[edit]

  • Could I please see the deleted article Wu Ruofu, please include categories. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Davidgoodheart: Its text is "Wu Ruofu, Chinese:吴（吾）若甫，born in May 1962 in Qigihar, Heilongjiang, graduated from the PLA Academy of art, the mainland actor. 1986, shot the first movie "Big Parade". 1994, starred in the urban emotional ethics theme "Fate". In 2001, the city emotional suspense drama starring "moonstruck". In 2003, the police drama starring "Infinite Justice". 2005, appeared in the 773 series of novels based on the novel of the same name of the novel of the same name of the novel of the same name of the novel of the same name as the novel of Yu Yijian. 2007, starring in the Zhang Chenggong novel, "The Curse" adaptation of "Criminal Nature 2". In 2010, led by the Hengdian drama starring Su San. In 2013, starring secret palace ten mystery case "in the first book". 2015 starred in the movie "save my husband". In 2006, and 22 year old Liu Sha married; in early 2010, Wu Ruofu's daughter was born.". It has no Category statements. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Davidgoodheart: There are too many of those pages to list here. For example for Scrapper (transforms to a front-loader excavator), see old edits of page Scrapper (Transformers) (which is currently a redirect), and likewise likely for the other Constructicons and for the Insecticons. Or for information see wikis at https://tfwiki.net/wiki/Main_Page and https://transformers.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, could I please this this deleted article here Sara Wood (military writer) with the categories included. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunnin (Hedley song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gunning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Tanzim al- Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn[edit]

Hello, can you please delete this redirect because It has a problem there is an unnecessary space between al- and Qaeda and I have created another redirect that is written right. Here it is Tanzim al-Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn. So can you delete this redirect Tanzim al- Qaida fi Bilad al-Rafidayn. Thanks Kiro Bassem (talk) 14:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting information[edit]

Hi, if someone messages me on my talkpage and I don't want to respond then do I have to respond to them or not? Also is there a way of blocking someone from messaging me if you feel I need to? Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Davidgoodheart:
    1. "if someone messages me on my talkpage and I don't want to respond then do I have to respond to them or not?" :: not that I know of.
    2. "Also is there a way of blocking someone from messaging me if you feel I need to?" :: by "messaging me", do you mean by a ping template call? Or how?

AfC submission[edit]

Anthony Appleyard, sorry, I think there is a bug with AFC script. It wrongly send this notification to your talk page than its original author. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Over the Top (Smiley song)[edit]

Hi Anthony, I think we managed to move this at the exact same time and now it seems all screwed up and I can't work out what's gone where. Any thoughts on where the actual article has gone? Apologies, --Jack Frost (talk) 10:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello Anthony Appleyard; Requesting deletion of revision history of: [13] and [14] and page protection to my userpage. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Gpkp: I have deleted the 2 edits. The protect-a-file function has these options: (1) allow all users; (2) require autoconfirmed or confirmed access; (3) require extended confirmed access; (4) require template editor access; (5) require administrator access. Which of these options do you want? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much, Anthony Appleyard. I am requesting for: (5) require administrator access. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gpkp:  Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you Anthony Appleyard. But I didn't know that, on even being the account holder I won't be able to edit page on opting the choice: ′require administrator access′. Could you please reduce the protection level to: ′require extended confirmed access′.. ? Sorry for any possible inconvinience. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gpkp:  Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you Anthony Appleyard. Could you please block the user based on vandalistic edits (the ones which I've mentioned in the first post of this thread) ? --Gpkp [u • t • c] 05:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gpkp:  Done Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you Anthony Appleyard. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 10:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marionette (album)[edit]

Hi there. Long time no talk. You restored an article I had marked for speedy due to an earlier afd. Not sure what I was thinking there. My apologies. Onel5969 TT me 02:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before Present/present[edit]

Hi Anthony, This was moved after being presented as an uncontroversial technical request, which it certainly is not. Please restore, then he can do a proper RM if he wants. Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry - there has been to-ing and fro-ing here. It should be at "Before Present" as it always was, while the RM proceeds. Thanks, Anthony! Johnbod (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Punch Bowl Inn, Hurst Green[edit]

  • You recently moved Punch Bowl Inn, Hurst Green to Punch Bowl Inn, Lancashire, claiming the move to be uncontroversial, and without any apparent discussion. It seems to me a bad move, and certainly not uncontroversial. It makes more sense to refer to a pub by its immediate location rather than the entire county. I would also suggest it doesn't need "Inn" in the title, as that wasn't part of its name. Compare The Punch Bowl, York, although I don't see the need for "The" on that one. Could I ask you please to revert your move for now, and start a proper discussion if you think it should be moved. Thanks. --94.196.72.222 (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @94.196.72.222: See the edit comment when I moved it :: 21:01, 6 August 2021‎ Anthony Appleyard moved page Punch Bowl Inn, Hurst Green to Punch Bowl Inn, Lancashire: Requested by User:Crouch, Swale at WP:RM/TR: "The pub is not in Hurst Green but merely near it, county sufficient since there doesn't appear to be any others in Lancashire and could be moved to the base name Punch Bowl Inn if it's the only notable one.". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The pub isn't in Hurst Green so how does it make sense to identify it with that? The move can be reverted per WP:RMUM though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Hi Anthony, I wanted to thank you for the page move, and also wanted to request that you start moving other US Navy ship articles with titles missing the hull code. Would I need to list them RM/TR? Or, they can be found at List of current ships of the United States Navy, can I just leave it with you to go through the list at your own pace? Thanks again - wolf 23:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Thewolfchild: Some may query about adding the hull code when it is not needed to disambiguate. When did the ruling come in about adding the hull code? Wikipedia is not under USA naval commmand. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No ruling that I know of, nor any effort by the US Navy to assert any authority. My understanding is awhile ago (I'd have to hunt around for dates or diffs), some editors felt the hull code wasn't necessary for some ships and removed it, from some articles. I don't think everyone agrees with that however, some feel all the pages should have the hull code included, for various reasons, including the ones listed in the RM you responded to. Thanks again & Cheers - wolf 13:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Thewolfchild: Any moves such as these are likely to be reverted per WP:NCSHIPS#NOTES, though not by me. WT:NCSHIPS is likely the best place to make a case for making hull and pennant numbers mandatory , but I doubt it will ever pass. BilCat (talk) 23:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Or rather in Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is a related discussion, with some links, from about 5½ years ago, on an wtships archive page. fyi - wolf 12:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as some like to keep telling us lately, such notes are not policy, they are based only on local consensus which doesn't seem to count anymore. In this case, it's an old consensus anyway, (one I know I don't agree with) and consensus can change. I'm watching these moves with interest to see how this plays out, whether a bad decision is finally reversed or if it has to be re-litigated. - wolf 02:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm surprised the main antagonist in opposition to using hull numbers hasn't discovered the move by now. But yeah, I'll now be watching this closely also. BilCat (talk) 02:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Thewolfchild and BilCat: And the USA Navy has so many ships that moving all their Wikipedia articles as described here would likely take quite a time. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is no problem, my friend, no problem at all. Many USN ship articles already have the hull code in the title. As for the ones that don't, there is no rush. I'm happy to help in any way that I can. Cheers - wolf 12:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History Merge[edit]

Hi, there can you merge to User:HurricaneParrot/sandbox/Tropical Storm Lupit (2021) from Draft:Tropical Storm Lupit (2021) thank you.HurricaneEdgar 10:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you :)HurricaneEdgar 10:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok i I withdraw my request now HurricaneEdgar 10:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of merging I think that the Category:Incidents of violence against girls and the Category:Incidents of violence against women should be merged into "Category:Incidents of violence against females". I have no idea how to do this, so could you please set it up for me. You can add this for me :Nominator's rationale: both girls and women are females so it makes sense to combine these categories. It will also make it easier to find information about violence against both girls and women as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just wondering where is my request listed? Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move Requests[edit]

Hello, you may recognize me from some technical move requests. Anyway I started a movie discussion at Talk:CTrail#Requested move 26 July 2021 over two weeks ago and it has not been closed. It seems that most users indicate a move, but I did not want to make a technical request since I was the one who made the request, so how should I go about finally achieving a result of this move request? Thank you. JE98 (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, thank you for your contribution to the discussion, but I still have to ask how to handle a legitimate page move on this move request since it has nearly been three weeks, thank you. JE98 (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolved murder?[edit]

Is this case here Svante Grände an unsolved murder or not? I can't find any information to who exactly killed him or if anyone was charged with his murder. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KIMS Hospital, Maidstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KIMS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings[edit]

Hello Anthony Appleyard. I stumbled on a discussion where it seems that a user has created such a mess that it may not even be possible to repair. Since you are, in my opinion, the absolute best at merging histories, you may be their only hope. As a courtesy, I decided not to ping you directly from that discussion, but instead, to message you here (in case you'd rather not fool with it at all. The discussion is at How do I free up my sandbox?--John Cline (talk) 00:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bomb magazine move[edit]

I have undone a move you performed a couple years back, where you had moved Bomb (magazine) to BOMB (magazine), apparently at the request of the publisher. You can see at Talk:Bomb (magazine), the article had been in the place that it was following a discussion with strong consensus, so the request from someone linked to the publisher should have at most been a reason to start a discussion. Additionally, the use of the all-caps BOMB goes against MOS:TMRULES, which calls for us to use the version closest to normal English capitalization standards that is used by independent reliable sources, and "Bomb" is definitely used (example). --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muscovy (disambiguation)[edit]

I think that Muscovy (disambiguation) should redirect to Muscovy, shouldn't it? And probably should not be fully protected anymore. Delasse (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Manathi P Ganesan[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

I was looking at bot edits to Draft pages and came across this page whose edit history only shows a minor bot edit. I couldn't figure out where the rest of the page history was because there is a complete draft here and according to the log, you did a history merge with another page. Should this page have been deleted afterwards? I've run into a couple of these instances before but they are uncommon. I'm not familiar with history merge (I think I've done one) so I'm unsure of the correct procedure. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 17:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dedh Bigha Zameen (film) → Dedh Bigha Zameen[edit]

Sir please move Dedh Bigha Zameen (film) to Dedh Bigha Zameen I have requested on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests but nobody moved it yet. Please move it ASAP. Hyderabadi (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accused of using Wikipedia as a web host.[edit]

If I display my own website within my article, why would you accuse me of using Wikipedia as a website. I see many musical artist's articles on Wikipedia, maybe not in an autobiographical format yet the same type of information is being described. The Wikipedia community seems to look down at autobiographical articles. Yes I'm new to writing literary works and I believe I can learn a lot here in Wikipedia. Didn't think that I could get hyjacked so easily with common names. Anyway would you please supply an answer to my question ❓ Thanks (larryvnash) Larryvnash (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History move of Ocean world[edit]

I see you completed a history move requested at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge from Ocean world to a new article Ocean planet. I don't understand why the history at Ocean world, particularly the talk page content, should be moved from the original article to this new spinoff article? The parent page was not notified of this request as far as I am aware and there really should have been a WP:SPLIT discussion before such a major change, though I realize this is not required. As it stands now, the articles seem like a content fork. I can certainly see the potential for having separate articles, but this will require discussion. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see what the requestor was seeking (still wish it was discussed!). It appears though that there is Talk page content from after 9/2017 that was moved to the split page. It should remain with the parent article. Is this possible to fix? The talk page history should be split off at the same point as the parent article was split off. Thanks, Mdewman6 (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. If you look at the history of the new Ocean planet article, listed there is my page move from Ocean planet to Ocean world. It is confusing that this edit/diff is now located at the page where the move was from. Maybe this is due to a technical limitation, but what I was trying to get at was that it seems like the history split wasn't done to exactly coincide with the version of Ocean world that the requestor wanted split off? Thanks, Mdewman6 (talk) 21:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I guess that is just there because as a result of the move, Ocean planet was the resulting redirect at the time, so it makes sense. I guess my larger point was why couldn't the requestor just create a new article over the redirect at Ocean planet with an edit summary along the lines of "moved content from [permalink|this version] of Ocean world" to provide attribution, along the lines of a traditional split? Perhaps the history split was the proper way, but seems like it creates all sorts of unnecessary confusion now and potentially in the future. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mdewman6: The article was gradually changed over many edits from an article about ocean planets into an article about ocean worlds, leaving no single exact place for a history-split. Users do that sort of thing sometimes. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HMDA[edit]

Hello, Anthony Appleyard! I noticed that my technical request to move HMDA (disambiguation) to HMDA was marked as done but does not seem to have been carried out. Kindly request you take a look. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Baker[edit]

Hi,

thanks for moving the disambiguation pages. I think something went wrong when you moved Dorothy Baker (disambiguation) as Dorothy Baker is now a redirect rather than a list of Dorothy Bakers. Inwind (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Histmerge request[edit]

Hi, please address the request placed on Draft: Deborah Santana regarding History merge. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 06:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naming airports[edit]

Hello you recently moved Hamid Karzai International Airport to Kabul Airport after a technical request. However I've always seen other airport articles use their official names or shortened official names. We never call the New Delhi Airport, New York City Airport or Brasília Airport. Only the official names or shorter names like "Brasília International Airport".

Now the Taliban have renamed Hamid Karzai International Airport to simply Kabul International Airport [15]. Since it doesn't seem to be a practice to use names like "Kabul Airport" even if it may be a common name, I hope you can move the name to Kabul International Airport. Thank you. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

Talk:Balkan Turkish showed up on an Orphaned Talk page list. Ordinarily, these pages are deleted because they are left over from incomplete article deletions or they are page creations from unconfirmed or IP editors but you created this page today as a redirect to Talk:Balkan Gagauz Turkish. However the article page isn't a redirect so I thought I'd just bring it to you to see what should be done. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RM/split at Tical[edit]

Hi. Could you please take a look at Talk:Tical#Requested move 8 September 2021 (unless someone already has)? It's unopposed after seven days, but will require a history split of the most recent versions of the article into a new page. (The talk page I think can be left at the original location; I'll clean up the old disambiguation page and cut/paste the move request to the new talk page afterwards). --Paul_012 (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of article[edit]

Please put a deletion tag on this article Miguel Arcángel Roscigna as there is not much sources or information about this person. Myself and other have expanded it, but weren't able to do much. If it can't be expanded much more then I don't think there is much point in keeping it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Davidgoodheart, you do realise you can do this yourself, right? Primefac (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac I don't know how to do so exactly, that's why I posted this. If I knew how to then I would have done it myself. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Today's a good day to learn then! Place a PROD with {{subst:proposed deletion|concern=concern}}, but if you use Twinkle it'll do that for you. Primefac (talk) 20:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac I have now improved the article Miguel Arcángel Roscigna and have removed my delete vote. The decision to keep it is now unanimous, so you may want to close the AFD now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 14:08, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted page Yiannis Laouris[edit]

Dear Anthony, I just discovered that a page created for me almost 2 decades ago has been recently deleted on your request. I would appreciate your help on how to dispute this and recover that page. I must tell you that I am not a wikipedia expert. The page was created by some students and academics from the US almost 20 years ago. But since then, it was referred in many other pages which now "lost" their link to the person mentioned. 15:41, 24 September 2021‎ User:Yiannislaouris

File permission problem with File:Patent spec of Le Prieur regulator.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Patent spec of Le Prieur regulator.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?[edit]

I had used a clip from a website with footage from superman III movie, but it was removed as it was claimed to be a copyright violation. Is this a copyright violation or not? Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mukhya Upanishads name change request[edit]

Hello. I am wondering if there are any updates on the renaming of the Mukhya Upanishads page. The request move was created on 24 September, 2021. It has been over 7 days since the creation with the consensus of changing the name to Principal Upanishads. If you are not able to close this request, could you please request another user to close this? Thanks! Raps19 (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radio station histmerges[edit]

Hey, I saw you declined a histmerge of KTHX-FM with KWEE due to parallel histories. This is rather unfortunate, as this really needs doing. Is it possible to try and combine them? I need to delete KTHX-FM to move another article to that title (in tandem, KUUB became KTHX-FM), and I do not want to erase history (I'd immediately move KUUB but there are so many edits). The user that did this also was responsible for a second C&P call sign move, WMWA (from WVNV). Our field requires some precision in article naming, and users need to learn that moves this complicated REQUIRE a pagemover. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Sammi Brie: See WP:Parallel histories. The histories of these 2 pages are parallel, and history-merging them would shuffle the parallel editing histories together in one list and make a mess. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    What would you suggest doing in this case? One of these histories has to go, and I'd rather it be the newer one. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sammi Brie: Put a history information note in those pages' talk pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I need the title KTHX-FM for another page. Where should I move it to? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    What I ended up doing was moving that page to KTHX-FM/Old. Let me know if a better title is advisable. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diptych of Federico da Montefeltro and Battista Sforza[edit]

Hi Anthony, Cut n'paste move done here. The move itrself is good. Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 05:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, User:Diannaa|Diannaa has undone the move. Johnbod (talk) 12:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danny Griffin (actor)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Anthony Appleyard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danny Griffin (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei[edit]

Hello. I think the AfD discussion should be closed now because it has been more than 14 days the discussion started. Please close the discussion by making a decision about the article Chikoo Ki Mummy Durr Kei. Shinnosuke15 (talk) 09:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana[edit]

Thank you so much Sir for removing the disambiguation and moving the article permanently to Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. I thank you with all my heart. Cheers :)--117.193.133.188 (talk) 12:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two pages[edit]

Can you take a look at Draft:Crazy Love (2022 TV Series) and Crazy Love (2022 TV Series)? It seems that the user started the article in the draft namespace and then used copy and paste to move it to the article namespace and then continued developing the article there. It would be nice to have the two of them merged, but there was a single edit by another editor to the draft after that (the article was declined at AfC). --Stefan2 (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rv RM/TR from JCPOA[edit]

Hi. The user is a sock and has requested several RM TRs, would you consider moving the articles Karachi Airport and Lahore Airport back to the original location, and put a note for a normal RM process for further moves? Also the Republic World (you were already pinged) Thanks! — DaxServer (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Republic Bharat — DaxServer (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clarify (as to what the original titles are):
— DaxServer (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious history merge[edit]

These 4 revisions should have stayed with the original redirect... Now the page history makes no sense (there is an RfD, and a big revert, but nothing before...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bowser[edit]

Hi Anthony. I noticed you created a new RM at Talk:Bowser_(character)#Requested_move_19_October_2021. I created the technical move yesterday after I closed Talk:Bowser_(character)#Requested_move_10_October_2021, so I don't think we should have a new RM. I thought the consensus to move was pretty obvious. Would you be able to move the article please? Vpab15 (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Vpab15: User:力 and User:Necrothesp seem to disagree. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strange, since User:力 supported the move. Necrothesp opposed the move but didn't object to the close as far as I can see. In any case, I thought if someone objected to a close a move review is created rather than openining a new move request. Vpab15 (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I wasn't disputing whether there was consensus to move (I think there was, but as a !voter I didn't want to comment on that), I was noting that the closing statement was sufficient. There was absolutely no reason whatsoever for an immediate second RM discussion. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance fixing CP move[edit]

Sabarno Moitra first created Sikka (1989 film) at 0455 on 20 OCT; that creation was subsequently moved to draft at Draft:Sikka (1989 film). At 1028 they then did a cut-and-paste move back to mainspace. Hence to preserve attribution per WP:CWW a histmerge is needed of the edits prior to that time (the last few edits there including mine can stay deleted). The draft has since been accidentally deleted due to the confusing circumstances, but the history is still there so this shouldn't be too hard. Strictly speaking there should probably be a redirect pointing from the draft to the mainspace article per WP:RDRAFT as there would be had the move been done the proper way, but given how briefly the page was at the title it's probably not that important if we have one. Thanks for your help. Regards, 2A0A:C802:4:1:0:0:0:30 (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, Sabarno Moitra was the only editor of the draft to add content (there were two other editors who added AFC templates but made no content changes that were copied), so with only one editor there are no attribution issues. Primefac (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Just an aside, there is a current AFD for this article and a previous one at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikka (film). Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw that. Actually the entire thing was a bit confusing, since in mainspace it's a pretty clear g4 until Bbarmadillo starts adding refs; the previously deleted diffs are viewable to those without a current +sysop at mirrors as is just about everything not deleted within an hour. On the other hand the draft is not g4 eligible unless there is evidence I'm not aware of that shows it was created in a bad-faith attempt to evade the deletion policy (see this discussion), though admittedly the creator's pattern of editing is not exactly promising. Not a big deal really, no harm in reassessing notability at afd rather than drv, and a histmerge requires the eventual deletion of the draftspace predecessor, though premature removal does slightly inhibit a deferred determination of whether histmerge is practical, just all a tad bit odd.
Getting back to topic, my previous understanding was that while not strictly required, single author histmerges were considered best practice, and a failure to execute them properly could even cause considerable consternation. Doubtless consensus has changed to some degree, so if one of the page watchers would kindly point me to the discussions that establish the most recent consensus on when histmerges in these situations are desirable I'd be appreciative. That way the next time someone yells at me for not having one done I'll at least have some links handy. Regards, 2A0A:C802:4:1:0:0:0:30 (talk) 03:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOATT states that if the re-user is the sole contributor of the text at the other page, attribution is not necessary; that's what I've been going on pretty much since I got the bit. Primefac (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, perhaps the issue is more just a philosophical disagreement then. With some coming down on the side of we should preserve contributors editing histories / we've always done it this way and others coming down on the side of if somethings not broken it doesn't need to be fixed. At some point in the future I may moot this issue at the appropriate forum, but at present I'm in the midst of one of my recurring bouts of malaise and probably won't be editing much or at all for a bit. Regards, 2A0A:C802:4:1:0:0:0:30 (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smokey Joe's Cafe[edit]

Anthony, this musical revue article was recently moved by someone (who obviously doesn't know anything about common titles of musicals) which should not have been moved in the first place. All the long-running Broadway articles are at their correct places, all but this one now. So I'm asking if you can move Smokey Joe's Cafe: The Songs of Leiber and Stoller back to Smokey Joe's Cafe (it's common title), please. Smokey Joe's Cafe is the primary title, while The Songs of Leiber and Stoller form the sub-title. Many musical shows have sub-titles which are in no way part of the direct primary title. Thanks. Best, --Discographer (talk) 09:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About a category[edit]

Sir, the Category:Star Utsav original programming doesn't contain any 'original programming'. All are reruns of the shows aired on different channels. So, the category should be deleted. I have removed some shows from the category and opened a discussion about the category. But none is participating in the discussion. So I request you to delete the category. Thank you. Shinnosuke15 10:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: sir, I've removed all the lines from the articles of the category. You can delete this category now. Shinnosuke15 17:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mako Komuro[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you marked the histmerge of Mako Komuro as done, but did you actually do it? The majority of the revision history still resides at Mako Kuroda (due to an incorrect move), and I couldn't see a link to those from the Mako Komuro article. Regards, decltype (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhoom: 4[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dhoom: 4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Wasell(T) 11:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of earls in the reign of Richard III of England[edit]

There is a draft under this title and there is an older deleted draft under the same title. Can you check if the new draft is related to the old draft or not and if there's any content which would benefit from history merging? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The short answer is yes, the draft that was deleted (via WP:G13) was later recreated by the same user. I'm not sure resurrecting the history would do any good, though, given that there were a huge number of page moves and secondary G6 deletions as it was moved back and forth between the draft and article spaces. Additionally, the creator of the now-deleted draft is/was the only content editor to either version. Primefac (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. It's just confusing if the redirect revisions are restored. Even if the other revisions are useful, there's a possibility that the article ends up deleted again under WP:G13 in half a year. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boo![edit]

Happy Halloween!
Hello Anthony Appleyard:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt about reviewing and indexing[edit]

hi @Anthony Appleyard and thank you for helping me merge history of the page I created. I am new to Wikipedia hence I'm only getting the hang of it now. I am a bit lost about the review process and how it shall get indexed. I realize now that when i made the article again, it actually became a duplicate which did not go through review process. So i added the AfC tag again. Will the page get reviewed now? Will that ensure the page getting indexed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notashfaq (talk • contribs) 04:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

move[edit]

Hi, sorry to disturb you. Can I just ask, for my own learning and for future reference, how you determined that this move was correct? Thank you! Dr. Vogel (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @DrVogel: The airport's website called it "Kushinagar International Airport". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah ok, cool. I thought this revolved more around what people actually call the subject, rather than what the subject calls itself. But this is helpful to know. Thanks very much. Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Zee TV[edit]

Zee TV is an Indian television channel, which country follows British English. So I request you to move List of programs broadcast by Zee TV to List of programmes broadcast by Zee TV. I made a request move in the article's talk page. But I think it didn't get approved for unknown reasons. I hope you will understand and move it, or explain me why the move request didn't get approved. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 16:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard:, Thanks. Shinnosuke15, 00:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danny Griffin (actor)[edit]

Hello, Anthony Appleyard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danny Griffin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History unmerge request[edit]

Hello, would you be able to remove the edit history of Draft:Blade (upcoming film) before July 21, 2019? They are of a older draft version that was deleted in 2017 (by you actually) due to abandonment per G13. It is no longer the same version of the deleted draft and the histories should not be included together. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 04:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giardino all'italiana[edit]

Hi Anthony, Please move this to Italian garden, which redirects there. No reason not to use English. Many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aa nort troopers 02.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aa nort troopers 02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Enchantment[edit]

You know that request to merge history was not factual, right? I didn't copy and paste anything. Hell, I didn't know that the draft even existed. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 11:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TrueCRaysball: The history-merge request was made at 04:59, 15 November 2021‎ by User:Robert McClenon. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, but it still doesn't make it a valid histmerge; there might have been a copy/paste from the draft but it was not initially copy/pasted, making it a merge and not a copy/paste pagemove. Robert McClenon might have made a reasonable request to histmerge, but you should have declined it. Primefac (talk) 09:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Primefac or User:Anthony Appleyard - Are there a detailed set of instructions for exactly when I should and should not request history merge? Robert McClenon (talk) 09:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Sadly enough, at the moment (as far as I am aware) all we have is a one-sentence explanation at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Repairing_cut-and-paste_moves_of_a_page and the (very brief) guide at the HISTMERGE page. If I get an opportunity in the coming weeks I might write a guide page for it. It basically boils down to two questions:
    1. Was content copied from one page to a brand-new one without attribution?
    2. Did the old page have more than one contributor of content?
    If both of these is "yes" then a histmerge should likely be performed. If (i.e. in this instance) the content was copied over something else (#1 is "no"), then attribution is required but histmerge is not. If there is only one content editor (e.g. when a draft creator copies their draft into the article space) then a histmerge is not required. There are nuances and further examples to give for each of these points, hence my interest in writing a guide page for it, but those will cover 99% of cases. That being said, just like revdel or oversight requests, I would rather decline a histmerge request than have something get overlooked, but that doesn't necessarily mean we just slap a histmerge on anything and let the admins decline things unnecessarily. Primefac (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpaka Vimanam (2021 film) → Pushpaka Vimanam[edit]

Hello sir. Please move Pushpaka Vimanam (2021 film) to Pushpaka Vimanam because there is no other film of this name. So there is no need of this disambiguation. Somebody moved it for no reason. Thanks. Hyderabadi (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Us (verson 2)/Them[edit]

Hey, Anthony,

This page popped up on an orphaned talk subpage. I'm not sure what it is for but you moved the page to this title so I hope you can tell me or maybe you'll decide to delete it. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Appleyard moved page Talk:Us/Them to Talk:Us (verson 2)/Them without leaving a redirect: get away from incoming

Just revert the move, also w/o redirect. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Chaplin Jr.[edit]

Hi Anthony,

I tried to move Charles Chaplin III to Charles Chaplin Jr., but it looks like you did the move just before me and something went wrong. Can you fix it? Polyamorph (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I think I've managed to fix it. sorry for the trouble! Polyamorph (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algonquin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slavery in Thailand[edit]

Regarding Special:Diff/1056035260, I was concerned that the oldest version of the page Special:Permalink/1039194440 contained the user's personal information before the article was started in their sandbox, and belongs in Userspace and not the article history. Is there some way to address this? --Paul_012 (talk) 10:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Paul 012:  Done. And it looks like that someone else did the main history-merge on page Slavery in Thailand before I came to it. 14:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Crayon Shin-chan[edit]

Can the article be considered as good article? If yes, please improve the class. If it is needed to be gone through nomination process, please inform me how to nominate this article. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 16:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Kumar[edit]

Hi,

Can you explain your move of Akshay Kumar to King of Versatility? I think this move is uncalled for and would recommend to delete the redirect that was created, which is baseless and unsourced. Could you delete it? Shahid • Talk2me 18:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bangarraju (film) → Bangarraju[edit]

Hello. Please move Bangarraju (film) to Bangarraju. Reason: Unnecessary disambiguation. Thanks. :) Hyderabadi (talk) 07:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move revert request[edit]

Hi Anthony,

I just wanted to ask why you opened a discussion here rather than reverting the undiscussed move? I would also note that there is already a move discussion ongoing on that page; the move that I was requesting be reverted occurred during that RM. BilledMammal (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unfortunately, there was already an ongoing discussion, that the bold move that I was requesting be reverted occurred in the middle off. Plus, I thought that the general way to handle such controversy was to revert the move, and leave the onus on the person wanting to make the move to get consensus for it? BilledMammal (talk) 12:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BilledMammal: I have reverted as asked. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for doing that. I thought a bold move in the middle of an RM to a title no one had proposed was out of process, and I'm glad to see it be corrected. Levivich 15:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you Anthony, and apologies for this mess I seem to have thrown you in. BilledMammal (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • How kind of you to notify me that you had a problem with my action before reverting it. Oh wait, you reverted the move without even attempting to discuss it with me. What's your reason for not asking me first if you thought I did something wrong? There was a sturdy consensus that "crash" was unworkable. I did "close" the discussion (to that point) because there was a clear consensus against both "crash" and "incident," but I invited editors to continue discussing because it was not yet clear what the final and best title might be. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. Please revert your move now and wait for consensus to emerge around a better title (if any). I received numerous thanks for the move and not a single complaint. The page title was stable for more than a day before your action. Jehochman Talk 16:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    No, there was absolutely not a "sturdy consensus" that crash was unworkable. In fact, quite the opposite when I closed the previous discussion while citing two other high profile articles with "car crash" in the title. In fact, searching for articles of this type in Wikipedia with "rampage" in its title comes up with nothing. So let's make sure we are being intellectually clear on this. You also moved the page in the middle of a discussion, which I would consider poor faith. I support the move back to "car crash" as we settle things on the talk page. The move back to "car crash" was a proper revert. - Fuzheado | Talk 16:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, please do not. There was never a consensus for a move, and there was already an open move request when this move was made (here), and the edit summary of the move is not one of "a clear consensus" but of somebody offering their own justification for the move, and in the talk page justification offered his own novel reasoning for rampage, which as far as I can tell is the very first time anybody even mentioned rampage on the talk page. We have a process in place for controversial moves, and this one was such a move, and it did not follow that process. We have an RM ongoing, and if Jehochman feels rampage is the correct title he can make the argument there. nableezy - 16:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care what the title is and am not making a case other than to observe that very few editors like "crash" and many dislike "incident." The editors feel that these terms are not an accurate representation of what happened. How Nableezy feels is just anecdata. Go read the discussion, assess where the consensus is at present, and move the page to what seems like an appropriate title based on the sum of the comments. This is a high traffic page for a current event. Timeliness is important. Wikipedia should not continue to misrepresent what happened because we are tied up in red tape. Jehochman Talk 16:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you "don't care what the title is" then you should not have moved it. Period. Your evaluation of consensus is also very off. What is clear is "rampage" is not a word we use often (or at all) in article titles, so you unilaterally made the situation worse. Please don't do these types of things. - Fuzheado | Talk 16:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should be less polemic. Please look at Category:Vehicular rampage in the United States‎. "Rampage" appears to be the generic word Wikipedia uses to describe mass casualties from an automobile ramming. You can also look up the dictionary definition, which does not require intent. A rampage can also be due to recklessness, panic, etc. But as I said, I don't care what title we settle on, and a whole lot of editors dislike "crash". I think your reading of consensus is worse than mine. I'd really like to hear why Anthony didn't just ask me if he had concerns. That point is being buried by everyone else chiming in to my attempt to ask him a serious question. Jehochman Talk 16:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence you provide is not helpful to your case - none of the titles in that category have the word "rampage" in them. The only thing that is convincing is that the category should be renamed to be "Vehicular attacks in the United States." What is the most concerning is that you did not honor best practices, so now we have a confused move discussion on that talk page where the discussion of "car crash" and "incident" and "rampage" are all co-mingled, and it is a mess. - Fuzheado | Talk 16:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's pretty ridiculous that you made a bold, totally undiscussed move in the middle of an RM, but you expect others to discuss it with you first before reverting it. Levivich 16:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There very much was never a consensus for rampage, making all that hand waving "anecdata". Your comment on the talk page is the very first instance anybody ever offered that as a suggested title. To claim a consensus for it is asinine. Yes, you made the situation worse by unilaterally choosing a name nobody ever supported in the middle of an open move discussion. And then you demand your unilateral move be upheld and a consensus needed to overturn it. nableezy - 16:45, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm most interested in Anthony's reply. What they rest of you say on his behalf is interesting but not definitive. Please let the editor speak for himself. Jehochman Talk 16:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Any admin worth a salt would take several users who have explicitly objected to an out of process admin action they have made and reflect that maybe they should not be doing out of process admin actions anymore instead of dismissing them all as interesting but not definitive and saying they are only interested in what one other particular admin has to say. And yes, given the page was move protected at the time of your move, that was an admin action. nableezy - 17:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, ad hominem attacks feel like victory. Where o' where is Anthony? Why don't you give him a chance to reply? Jehochman Talk 17:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see an ad hominem attack there. I based nothing in my criticism here on your person, but on your words and actions. Reconsider those actions maybe? nableezy - 17:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was asked to revert 2021 Waukesha Christmas parade car crash to the status quo ante, and as stated above, after some discussion I did so. For what a rampage correctly is, see wikt:rampage. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I see that. Any reason you didn't notify me about the discussion so that I could maybe explain my actions? You just took the other editor's word for it without hearing what I had to say. Was it a very urgent situation that you didn't have time to ask me? Jehochman Talk 17:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Did you read my explanations here [16][17]? Are you aware that I'm also an administrator? As a general rule its a good idea to discuss when you find yourself in disagreement with another administrator over an action that could be viewed as an administrative action. It's true that I did some interpolating to soften the word choice from "attack" to "rampage". If that's diagreeable you could tell me why and if you were right, I would probably agree with you. I don't feel strongly. Also, see the discussion section posted by Levivich. Jehochman Talk 18:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anyway, the page move discussion was closed and resolved to the satisfaction of most editors. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and my concerns are resolved or moot. Happy holidays, Jehochman Talk 21:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • For what it's worth, I requested several times that the user requesting the revert discuss this with you Jehochman. Happy holidays to you Polyamorph (talk) 10:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ke Apon Ke Por[edit]

I thought a list would be appropriate for the cast section in the following article, so I converted the cast section from wikitable to wikilist. But Avish773 keeps reverting that. I tried to start a discussion on the talk page, but he/she doesn't respond. I don't want to get involved in an edit war. What should I do now? Shinnosuke15, 06:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gantchhora.jpg[edit]

I think this file is not free and shouldn't stay in wikimedia commons. Can you move this to Wikipedia non-free files? I'll add the non-free rationale. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 14:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Shinnosuke15: I have not heard of a "Wikipedia non-free files" area. If that image is against the copyright rules, I can delete it, after suitable discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision Deletion Request[edit]

Hello there, I hope you are doing well. I would like to request the deletion of the first five edits (including the page move) of Draft:Untitled Spider-Man: No Way Home sequel as it was originally made as a "claiming space" by the initial editor and those edits have nothing to do with the Spidey film. Thanks. Trailblazer101 (talk) 08:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I noticed another instance of this user's "claiming" with the first five edits at Draft:Ironheart (TV series), which I am requesting to be removed as they mainly don't relate to this, and the revision before the page move just said New film" which doesn't help as it was incorrect and part of the "claiming", so the first six edits in the history can be removed. Thank you, in advance, again for all of your hard work. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Falconer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falconer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saath Nibhaana Saathiya.png[edit]

This file is non free. Please delete this. Shinnosuke15, 06:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled[edit]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hey there,

since you are the perhaps most experienced page mover I've seen around, I thought I would ask you this question. There was a discussion here, that established consensus to swap Parksosauridae and Thescelosauridae, and then redirect Parksosauridae to Thescelosauridae. The thing is, the consensus-establishing discussion is now on the redirect talk and I’m a bit unhappy with that. I re-checked WP:RMCI, WP:TPG, and some other guidelines on how to handle things like this but I couldn’t find any answers. Is it possible to move or duplicate the discussion and mark this with moved templates? And if not, do you have any alternative suggestions? Colonestarrice (talk) 11:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And good to know that there is a template for such things. Colonestarrice (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saw sam sai[edit]

Thanks for taking care of the several requests for history split I made over the past few weeks. However, Draft:Saw sam sai seems to have slipped through? The history split doesn't appear to have been completed. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance fixing CP move[edit]

Looks like Leuciscus turskyi was c&p moved to Telestes turskyi by Divingpetrel back in 2011. See [18] and [19]. If you could do a histmerge I'd appreciate it, thanks. Regards, 188.232.146.110 (talk) 19:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Disambig query[edit]

Hi Anthony - hope you are well. Incase you missed the notification, I mentioned you in this post at ANI. If you have a moment, I'd be grateful if you could comment. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inactivity[edit]

You appear to have been inactive since December 12. So, for now, we will miss you! :( GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this. Hoping you're well and just busy with the holidays. Vaticidalprophet 10:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gladys Knight & the Pips[edit]

Hi Anthony. Can you move Template:The Pips back to Template:Gladys Knight & the Pips please, as somebody moved this and should not have. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 13:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022[edit]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Merchandise giveaway nomination[edit]

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi Anthony Appleyard! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2350 BC Middle East Anomaly for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2350 BC Middle East Anomaly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2350 BC Middle East Anomaly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Doug Weller talk 16:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yo[edit]

You still online? —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Equus lambei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello. I want to ask you how to prevent IPs from editing my user talk page? Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 15:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit was not simple "editing" or "vandalizing", but was posted to inform about the changes made. I think the talk-pages are meant for that. 2402:3A80:6C7:8855:2194:A05F:8E7A:5E5C (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

List of New Year's television specials[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

I don't really understand much about history merges but something is off with this article you worked on. It shows up in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as empty articles but there is no tag on the page that can be removed! Looking at the page log, it looks as if the page was tagged CSD A1 before the merge but somehow, the page is still tagged for deletion without there being an actual tag on the page.

Can you see how to fix this? Without a change, it looks like it will just be in this CSD category indefinitely. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It also appears to be in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as importance or significance not asserted. Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Liz: The page is now in that category now. If a page is taken out of a category, sometimes it takes time for the whole of Wikipedia to register the change, due to delays caused by buffering etc. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation. I actually was coming to your talk page to ask about this specific page on a completely different matter and then saw I already asked you a question about it! I look at so many pages every day, the new pages push the older pages out of my short-term memory.
Okay, today's question was I was looking at deleting a sockpuppets (Resosuvinoin) created pages and this page appeared as a page creation. And the page log shows that they created it this week. But, there are edits from 2014 on the page? Huh? When you history merge two pages, I would think both page creation dates (and any deletions) would show in a page log but, I guess they don't? Or was the 2014 page deleted and you restored it but the restoration doesn't show in the page log? I'm confused but that isn't unprecedented in technical matters. Any way, there are other editors who've contributed to the page so it isn't eligible for CSD G5 but it did leave me with some questions. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Request Needs Administrator[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

I submitted a technical request for a draft to be moved into the main space for a page that's currently a redirect. Thought it would be good if others could also be able to add on to article while its under construction. I would highly appreciate if you could do the move. Thanks in advance. - DovahDuck (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I apologize for forgetting to mention which was mine. I appreciate the move however! - DovahDuck (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman–Turkish Caliphate[edit]

Hi, Please restore to old Ottoman Caliphate after disruptive moves by now-blocked editor. I can't. Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks as always - Happy New Year too! Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valve exerciser[edit]

Notice

The article Valve exerciser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Was not able to find WP:SIGCOV of this topic such that it would meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Request Needs Administrator (Again)[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

I submitted another technical request for a draft (Draft:Gasoline (The Weeknd song)) to be moved into the main space for a page that's currently a redirect. The song's music video will come out early tomorrow morning (at my time) so a move to the main space will allow others to edit and add even more information to the article. Thanks in advance once again. - DovahDuck (talk) 03:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Local church body" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Local church body and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Local church body until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amiens Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Hi, Anthony Please review this article, Thanks https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susovan 2409:4060:2002:B61E:0:0:29B0:F8A0 (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: Please note the IP user is a suspected sock of globally banned user User:Blogs19 who have tried to create the same self-promotional article earlier as Susovan Sonu Roy / Draft:Susovan Sonu Roy / Susovan Sonu Roy (Actor). 2402:3A80:6F7:58C2:B15F:4BB8:A996:D544 (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet Another Technical Request Needs Administrator[edit]

Hello, Anthony,

I submitted another technical request for a draft (Draft:Out of Time (The Weeknd song)) to be moved into the main space for a page that's currently a redirect. The song is currently set to be a single and has charted within the top 40 of various territories so a move to the main space will allow others to edit and add even more information to the article. Thanks in advance once again. - DovahDuck (talk) 06:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody already did the move but once again I would like to thank you for the previous moves you've done. - DovahDuck (talk) 06:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hist-merged[edit]

Hello Anthony, could you merge the history of the article The Vanishings at Caddo Lake and the Draft:Vanishings since the user, instead of expanding the draft, directly created a parallel page. Bruno Vargas Eñe'ẽ avec moi 22:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I'm not seeing a copy/paste pagemove, so my opinion is that a histmerge is not necessary here. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Before It Explodes(song)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Before It Explodes(song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Before It Explodes(song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for your recent move :-). —Gennaro Prota•Talk 22:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"History of cats" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect History of cats and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 29#History of cats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C. D. Loga[edit]

Hi, Anthony. I reported a histmerge-type problem here, but was summarily turned away. I don’t know my way around the bureaucratic weeds of this area too well; could you perhaps deal with the issue for me, or at least let me know where I can pursue it? Thank you ever so much. — Biruitorul Talk 18:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technical request for move of caproic acid[edit]

I see you completed a technical request for moving caproic acid back to hexanoic acid at the request of user Pabsoluterince. I obviously didn't notice the request to contest it (hard for one to do that, since requests for watchlisted pages don't appear until the requests have been completed...), but this should have been sent to RM given that it had just been moved from hexanoic acid less than 2 years ago, so the page name is not uncontroversial per WP:RM#CM (hence the history of the redirect preventing them from moving it themselves). I started a discussion with this user at their talk page outlining why it should not have been moved and can either move it back myself (I'm a page mover) or will take it to RM, unless you suggest another course of action. Cheers, Mdewman6 (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for any trouble I have caused. 😐 Pabsoluterince (talk) 08:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note that we have resolved this at User_talk:Pabsoluterince#move_of_caproic_acid and I have swaped the pages back. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed move[edit]

Please visit Talk:Alkali metals#rename without discussion? to see a concern that your rename of that article is contrary to a previous discussion. DMacks (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Inexorable (film)" and "Incroyable mais vrai"[edit]

Hello Anthony, I would like to know if you can restore two articles that were deleted a long time ago. These are two French films whose information I want to expand. The movies articles are Inexorable (film) and Incroyable mais vrai. You can restore them as drafts so that I can expand them from there before requesting to be moved to an article. Bruno Vargas Eñe'ẽ avec moi 18:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Vector" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Vector and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#The Vector until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. casualdejekyll 01:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

I started a discussion for several pages to be moved:

But I wasn't looking to start one but simply intended for it to be a technical request. If it's not too much trouble could you close the discussion and perform the move? The topic is a primary one. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 03:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Anthony, of course, but given that there is almost unanimous opposition to your proposal I think it would be extremely improper to file an RM/TR indicating that it is "uncontroversial". Primefac (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

JackSucksAtLife[edit]

In 2019, you deleted a page about a popular youtuber named JackSucksAtLife. Your reason for deleting the article was absurd. As a refresher, your reason was not significant. All I want to know is why. At the time of deletion, Jack had 1 mil+ subscribers on youtube. Now, he has over two million subscribers. It think he was bloody significant in 2019 and more now. AsherDoodle1115 (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AsherDoodle1115, regardless of whether the initial A7 was appropriate or not, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JackSucksAtLife and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Massey Welsh pretty definitively put the nail in the "notability" coffin. If you really think Jack is a notable individual (and has overcome the issues found in both AFDs), I would encourage you to use the Article wizard to create a draft page, which will be reviewed by experienced editors after submission. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Your 13.2.2020 edits[edit]

Dear Anthony, the edits you made to the Pink and White Terraces page on Feb 13, 2020 were a welcome public clarification, i.e. as to where research lay at that time. The page currently ends in 2018 and is thus obsolete. I suggest your editorial hand is again required to bring the page up to date for the 2018-2022 period. For example, since 2018 another dozen research papers (including refereed) have been published by our team alone on this active topic. Regards, Rex BunnCounterrev11 (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Zip (file format)[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Zip (file format), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blue Riband► 03:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"GHOST (vessel)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect GHOST (vessel) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 27#GHOST (vessel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Welt(medicine)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Welt(medicine) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Welt(medicine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daystar Academy[edit]

Notice

The article Daystar Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement[edit]

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Kishtwari language[edit]

Hello sir , some editors are writting that kishtwari is dialect of kashmiri on kishtwari page, but i have studied that siddheshwar Varma has identified kishtwari as a western pahari language and has argued that kishtwari is not a dialect of kashmiri. So whenever I try to edit , some editors like 511kev imranqazi delete my edits our forefathers have also said us that kishtwari is a pahari language. Please sir help me 117.98.110.58 (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And sir can you provide article of s verma about kishtwari, I have read about it on a book of my friend's grandfather and he's out of the town. Jarnail zoravar singh ki jai (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at User_talk:Jarnail_zoravar_singh_ki_jai#Kishtwari. – Uanfala (talk) 20:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary![edit]

Have a Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Hey there Anthony Appleyard, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 11:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC) On behalf of the Birthday Committee[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary![edit]

Wishing Anthony Appleyard a very Appleyard happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! --Isro! chatter 18:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brockhampton, Bringsty ? Comment[edit]

@Crouch, Swale: Hi, could we look at this one again please. It was changed from Brockhampton, Herefordshire by request to Brockhampton, Bringsty to distinguish it from Brockhampton-by-Ross. In the request it was implied that the "-by-Ross" part was not part of the official name, and I can only find it as such on Anglican sites, so the "-by-Ross" bit should also be removed from there? If so, I think we need to look at both the Brockhamptons again. "Brockhampton, Bringsty" is only relevant to 'Bringsty' in that it is in a particular ward (Bromyard Bringsty), and the Brockhampton Group Parish Council disagrees with the 'Bringsty' bit. I've come across the same anomaly with my latest: Linton (Bringsty). BTW, 'Brockhampton, Bringsty' is not a village, only a civil parish, comprising the Brockhampton Estate, Park, and disparate properties. Here's a couple of suggestions that make it obvious that the bracketed stuff is not part of the official name:

I don't think the anomaly can stand, so I appreciate input. Acabashi (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Crouch, Swale: Thanks for getting back. I think the BHO 'Brockhampton by Ross' is just BHO using their own handy form of disambig. Unfortunately 'Bringsty' is not really an administrative entity or place today... it's either 'Bringsty Common' or part of a ward name. Naming conventions have (necessary?) complex guideline on this... confusing for readers looking at a range of similar articles. They do seem to suggest either Name, District, or Name, compass point-shire. As Herefordshire has no districts, I think your Brockhampton, south Herefordshire, and Brockhampton, east Herefordshire is neat and could do the trick, or we could try Brockhampton (near Bromyard) and Brockhampton (near Ross-on-Wye). What do you think... I'm easy either way ? We might do the same thing with the two Lintons. Acabashi (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Acabashi: I think lean towards the "near" option as the Ross one isn't very southerly and is quite eastern/central and the Bromyard one is a bit northerly but I'd be fine either way. With the Bromyard one the ward now seems to be Bromyard Bringsty and while UKPLACE does suggest wards ward boundaries change frequently, aren't known by many people and don't generally correspond to natural boundaries. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Crouch, Swale: I'll change them to the "near option". Taking the discussion wider and deeper could throw what is a not a particularly contentious thing into the weeds. If there is any comeback through further discussion, they can always be changed again if necessary. Many thanks for your advice. Acabashi (talk) 08:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers[edit]

Hi Anthony, I'm here to ask you a favor, if you can please merge the Draft:Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers and Mr. Morale & the Big Steppers histories because I consider it unfair that my work has simply been displaced instead of simply expanded. From already thank you very much, greetings. Bruno Vargas Eñe'ẽ avec moi 18:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno, you've been told this time and time again, a histmerge is not a tool to give "first dibs" credit to someone. Now, I will state that it's kind of shitty that you had a perfectly valid draft/article, and it just happened that it got moved to the Draft space instead of the proper article title, but that doesn't mean you can't copy your prose from your draft into the existing article - it's still your work, whether or not you actually created the page or just added to it. Primefac (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Nomination of United States Navy SEALs in popular culture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States Navy SEALs in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Navy SEALs in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Italian Renaissance sculpture [edit]

Hi Anthony, this has been a redirect (to the wrong article). I have a draft at User:Johnbod/IRS but am having trouble moving it in over the redirect. Wwwtty was supposed to be a temp stage, & has the redirect's history. Can you sort this? Many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SBB style[edit]

Template:SBB style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"North Cape (Norway))" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect North Cape (Norway)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 7#North Cape (Norway)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holosonics[edit]

Notice

The article Holosonics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria under WP:COMPANY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alan Islas (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Michael Blake Kruse[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Michael Blake Kruse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Blake Kruse. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Thomas Fleetwood (1661–1717))" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thomas Fleetwood (1661–1717)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Thomas Fleetwood (1661–1717)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moonbase Alpha (disambiguation)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Moonbase Alpha (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anthony_Appleyard/2021-2022&oldid=1136724644"