User talk:Anoyet

August 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ravindra Jadeja have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:05, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bhonsle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. FrontierMountie ^talk 12:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jadeja, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jadeja was changed by Anoyet (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85829 on 2016-08-27T15:51:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martial race has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Martial race was changed by Anoyet (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860413 on 2016-08-30T13:03:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Yaduvanshi Rajputs. Sitush (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And despite the warning I gave you at 17:25 above you have again removed sourced content from Yaduvanshi Rajputs without giving a rationale. This simply has to stop: if you consider a source to be unreliable then you will have to explain why on the article talk page. As it is, you need to self-revert your latest removal otherwise the chances of your being blocked from editing here are very high, bearing in mind all of the other warnings given by other people. - Sitush (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent unsourced and unexplained edits to Yaduvanshi Rajputs. You have never edited a talkpage, and only once used an edit summary. That's not how Wikipedia is supposed to work. When you return from the block, please respond to advice and warnings you're given on this page, and please use the article talkpage. Edit summaries explaining your edits are also important. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 18:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Rajput[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rajput, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yadav has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yadav was changed by Anoyet (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946274 on 2016-10-16T05:54:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. You have still never edited a talkpage and only once used an edit summary, just as I said when I blocked you in September 2016. What you do here is mostly remove big chunks of content without explanation, which makes your editing a negative to the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 17:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]