User talk:Annie.shepherd

This user is a student editor in Gonzaga_University/COML_509:_Social_Media_Engagement_and_Analysis_(Fall_2022_A_Session) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Annie.shepherd, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation[edit]

In this article, the introduction gives a great overview of what the digital divide if. However, it does include some information that could be cut down, including the global movements to resolve the matter. The structure of the article does not flow. It goes from discussing the history to the pandemic and describing the various types and causes of the divide after that. The article should give all the context before highlighting recent events of digital divide. In terms of images, the images are all graphs that are difficult to read and lack context.Overall, the sources of the article are relevant and recent. The article is not concise and could be shortened a bit. My overall feedback is that the article needs to be restructured and include transitions to ensure it flows properly. There are also a few points in the article marked "clarification needed." Annie.shepherd (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Annie.shepherd: Congratulations and well done - Digital divide has been a problematic article for some time and your edits have really improved it. The article had become a bit of a dumping ground for unsourced or poorly sourced material from different editors and it certainly was inconcise and didn't flow well. I hope you'll stick around and continue to volunteer here! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]