User talk:Annenaim81
|
Annenaim81, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Annenaim81! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC) |
June 2020[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Ingrid Bergman, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ingrid Bergman, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 05:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ingrid Bergman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. BEAMALEXANDER25, talk 15:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online[edit]
Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright.— Diannaa (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Ingrid Bergman article problems[edit]
Previously you were chastised for copyright violations, copying material from your sources. Your contributions up to June 23 were erased because of this.
I looked at your more recent contributions and found too-close paraphrasing of the Life magazine book Casablanca: The Most Beloved Movie of All Time. You are slightly changing the wording of the book but not enough to avoid copyright violations. See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing.
Another thing I saw was that the book says Bogart thought he himself was medium height and balding, according to his son Stephen. You wrote that "Bogart saw Rick as a balding, self-pitying man", referring to Bogart's character Rick in Casablanca. That is a misinterpretation of the source. Rick was not written as a balding character.
Finally, I noticed that you have been clogging the article up with too many images, and specifying too-large image sizes that are interfering with the text.
For all of these reasons I reverted a huge bunch of your work. Binksternet (talk) 06:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingrid Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingrid Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020[edit]
Your edit to Winona Ryder has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 21[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ingrid Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Montgomery.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
A lengthy welcome[edit]
Hi Annenaim81. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |