User talk:Amzingrl

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Amzingrl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proof of license on File:Pauline Nordin CEO of Fighter Diet.jpg needed[edit]

Greetings! I see you've uploaded File:Pauline Nordin CEO of Fighter Diet.jpg and claimed it's under a free license. How can we verify that? If we can't go to the photographer's website and see the license, we'll need him to email Wikipedia to verify. Directions are at WP:VRT.

Second, could you re-upload the image without the website watermark? That will need to be edited out of the picture. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pauline Nordin CEO of Fighter Diet.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pauline Nordin CEO of Fighter Diet.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pauline Nordin CEO of Fighter Diet.jpg[edit]

I've deleted the image as you have File:Pauline Nordin of Fighter Diet - 2013.jpg on commons, for which I have just replied in OTRS. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Amzingrl/Pauline Nordin has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 18:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin[edit]

Hello Amzingrl. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Pauline Nordin".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pauline Nordin}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Amzingrl. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.
Message added 07:04, 24 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I'm going to cut/paste my answer here, just to ensure that you get it:

The article has some pretty promotional tones in it and it'd essentially need a complete re-write to fit the neutral tones we require on Wikipedia. I'm not against the idea of you trying to make a new version of it at AfC (although a search doesn't really bring up much of anything to assert notability per WP:GNG), but the version previously deleted would be considered to be unacceptable in its current format. Also, I actually do see where you asked for help here at the Teahouse and were given fairly good reasons for why the article did not pass notability guidelines. They also advised you that you needed to re-write the article because it was fairly promotional in tone. I also saw that you re-asked the same question and while you might not have seen the answers to your question, it also makes me wonder if you were just re-asking in the hopes of getting a different answer. I am going to assume WP:GOODFAITH, but any experienced editor will tell you the same that the Teahouse editors did. To rehash what they were saying, most of the sources were unusable for various reasons. This source is pretty much a blog entry (WP:SPS) and we cannot use that to show notability. Unfortunately the majority of the sources are blogs that would not hold up under scrutiny at WP:RS/N or at WP:AfD. The ones about her competition stats really didn't assert notability since she didn't actually win the overall competitions. Notability is really only extended when someone wins a competition and even then, not all competitions count towards notability because there are so many of them in any given area. (The IFBB is notable, but this is just something in general I'm adding.) Others were considered to be WP:PRIMARY, as they were the woman's own website or own YouTube channel. Offhand, this one seems to be the only one that we would consider to be usable per our WP:RS guidelines. The thing to remember is that not all sources are reliable and we are very strict sometimes in what we consider to be usable. Just because a written article exists does not mean that it would be usable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:04, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the more in depth info. I saw the basic reasoning for the article but it didn't explain what exactly I needed. We had a group of people looking for this info and I have to say it wasn't easy to make sense of anything we found, a lot of the links here ran us back to the same pages or nothing in relation to trying to understand the restrictions. What is AfC? We had reask the question because of the none response, as I tweeted Wiki directly and they said for us to post the question in teahouse where i never received any notices. It became very confusing I noticed some other women in the fitness industry placing below her that uses that website for reference are you saying she actually has to win first place? What are the stipulations on the notability and any suggestions on rewording the page because I didn't intend for it to sound like a promotion I did research other bodybuilders pages to use their as a guideline, can you explain in more detail on that and what is it about the page that sounds promotion wise or is it just the references, which I can redo. I would like to ask for an to un-delete the page so I can rework it or at least have a copy that I can get so I can restart the new page you suggested so I can use it as a reference of what I need to recite or leave out - that way I can do more research. This is my first try so if it's okay to try another round and if it doesn't work then it doesn't work but would like to keep learning as I progress.

Thanks for your info and hope to talk with you more soon!Amzingrl (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]