User talk:Alsayid

This user may have left Wikipedia. Alsayid has not edited Wikipedia since 23 April 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Marisa Miller Birthdate[edit]

Hi Alsayid! Kurt000 here, thanks for telling me that IMBD states that she was born in 1978, however i found that on Sports illustrated website it states that Marisa's age is 25; this would mean she was born in 1980 and not 1978. Also on the askmen website it states that Marisa was born in 1980. Thanks --Kurt000 13:23, 15 February 2006 (GMT)

Hello again, I am asking you to help confirm Marisa's birth date as 1978 rather than 1980, as you seem to have more knowledge than me. Apparently her Perfect 10 Issue was published in 1998 making her 18 and thus legal, could you please help resolve this matter. Kurt000 17:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/2006_swimsuit/models/marisa_miller.html http://www.askmen.com/women/models_200/242_marisa_miller.html

Image:Perfect 10 Marisa Miller.jpg[edit]

Please do not remove fair-use-disputed tags without providing a detailed fair-use rationale. You did this to Image:Perfect 10 Marisa Miller.jpg and this is considered vandalism. Thanks. --Yamla 04:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yamla. I can assure you there was no vandalism on my part. I read the template which asked that a rationale be given. I provided this, which you shouldn't have deleted. I'm willing to assume you didn't see it and this was just an honest oversight. :-) --Alsayid 05:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I wasn't trying to imply that you did commit vandalism though I obviously did not word my note very well. I checked the image and see that you have added a more detailed rationale and this suits me fine. I thank you for doing so and for not getting all ticked off at me when you had good reason to do so. Have a great day! --Yamla 14:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marisa Miller SI 05.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Marisa Miller SI 05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu Badali 20:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Badali 20:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ashley Degenford X Show.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Ashley Degenford X Show.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anita Blond[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anita Blond, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No reliable sources. No Assertion of WP:Notability. Fails WP:PORNBIO.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. David in DC (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashley Degenford[edit]

The article Ashley Degenford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real claim to notability, no sign of sgnificant independent 3d party coverage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]