User talk:Alluburam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of members of the 17th Lok Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anthiyur P. Selvaraj moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Anthiyur P. Selvaraj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tehsils in Punjab moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tehsils in Punjab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. The article also requires comprehensive cleanup, to correct grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes, and to format / lay out the last section appropriately. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tehsils in Punjab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.punjabdata.com/Tehsils-of-Punjab.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Alluburam! Your additions to Draft:Tehsils in Punjab have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Alluburam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alluburam, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2023 Indian Rajya Sabha elections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Indian Rajya Sabha elections for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Indian Rajya Sabha elections is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Indian Rajya Sabha elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script[edit]

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Shwait Malik, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add Indic script like you did here. Check the policy above. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles. Do not add Indic scripts like Punjabi, Hindi, Bangla, Marathi, Tamil, etc in Indian articles as you did here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refrain from adding Indic Script in the lead and infoboxes of India-related articles. You will get reported next time. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abohar Muncipal Coorporation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Abohar Muncipal Coorporation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is incomplete I will make changes later but now I am not able to open this page Alluburam (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/punjab/abohar-mc-told-to-de-seal-sbi-office-220644 Alluburam (talk) 06:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Your Adding Of Party Affiliation[edit]

Already Party Affiliation Is Clearly Mentioned In Lok Sabha And Rajya Sabha Pages Then What Is The Need Of Adding Them Again

Can You Explain? Dev Adhi (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here I have added only major parties not all parties Alluburam (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How Can You And Party Affiliations In A List Article

List Article Is For Listing MP Names Not For Party Affiliations


For Party Affiliation It Was Present In Membership By Party Section In Both Rajya Sabha And Lok Sabha

Don't Add Party Affiliation Dev Adhi (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Information icon Hi Alluburam! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Abohar Municipal Corporation that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rukanpura[edit]

Hello Alluburam,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rukanpura for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need more time to improve this article Alluburam (talk) 13:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abohar Municipal Corporation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Abohar Municipal Corporation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Punjab Legislative Assembly, you may be blocked from editing. Do not include Indic Scripts in Infoboxes and Leads of Indian articles. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page 2021 Assam Legislative Assembly election, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Hi there, I was just wondering why you had remove what seemed to be an exit poll that was sourced? It would be helpful if you had used an edit summary. Thanks! Jtrrs0 (talk) 10:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alluburam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion Poll from 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election[edit]

can you explain why you remove the edit on 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election#Opinion_Poll -Jubair Sayeed Linas (talk) 11:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You recently removed sourced material without any reason here and here. -- Manasbose (talk | edits) 11:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is removing content without giving proper explanation. Kongugirl (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SC and OBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Firozpur (Lok Sabha constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1977 general election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Punjab Legislative assembly elections[edit]

Hey @Alluburam: please don't engage in edit warring. Your edit has a lot of random capitalisations and wrong grammar. Also you are drastically changing the article without consensus even after warnings from @SangrurUser:, this can result in you getting blocked. Hence please refrain from doing so. I request you to have a meaningful discussion on the article's talk page. Lone Warrior 007 (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Alluburam reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee into 2021 Delhi Sikh Gurudwaraa Committee Election Results. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2021 Delhi Sikh Gurudwaraa Committee Election Results. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to 2012 Punjab Legislative Assembly election has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.Diannaa (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Delhi Sikh Gurudwaraa Committee Election Results, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Delhi Sikh Gurudwaraa Committee Election Results until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article is informatics and effect politics of Delhi and Punjab Alluburam (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edits[edit]

Hello. Can you tell me why you have reverted my edits here: 2021 elections in India diff=1021589222 and Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee diff=1021589692. If you can follow the link that I have removed, you would see that it is a redirect to the same page of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee. Also, there is no mention or any section on the article describing a 2021 election. -- DaxServer (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noe that page "2021 dsgmc elections" is merged with this page. I don't know who idiot did this, but that page was different. Alluburam (talk) 00:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you see the history of the redirect ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2021_Delhi_Sikh_Gurudwaraa_Committee_Election_Results&action=history ), you can see that there is no content, there was never any content. Please remove the link from both the pages. If you are familiar with any elections to the committee, please add it and only then add a link to it. Hope it helps! -- DaxServer (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, I haven't followed another earlier move. It seems that there is a consensus to merge (AfD link) the article into the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee. I believe you have to add content to this page. Once you had added the election related content, you can add the committee article to 2021 elections in India's "See also" section. Until then, there is no relation. I'll remove both the links. -- DaxServer (talk) 10:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahitya Akademi Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

What is the reason for your this [1] revert? Nitesh003 (talk) 10:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Nitesh003 (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi Alluburam. I've noticed that you have a tendency to not leave any edit summaries for the edits you make. In some cases, perhaps the reason the edit was made is quite obvious, but in others (particularly when you revert an edit made by another editor), not leaving an edit summary often leads to confusion and problems between editors. It's really not too difficult to explain why you feel an edit needed to be made and you don't have to write a long edit summary to do so; often, all you need to do is leave a WP:WIKILINK to the relevant policy or guideline page which supports the edit you want to make. Although not leaving an edit summary is generally a minor thing in and of itself, it is something that a Wikipedia administrator might look at if they feel there are also other problems being caused by an editor that need to be addressed. In other words, not leaving an edit summary is probably not going to lead to administrator action if for the most part all of your edits are easily to understand; however, if there are other problems with your edits, then not leaving an edit summary might be seen as an indication by an administrator that some action needs to be taken. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project involving lots of editors from around the world and one of the ways we communicate with each other is through edit summaries; so, it's considered to be good practice to do so even for the most WP:MINOR edits. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alluburam. Thank you. Dev Adhi (talk) 17:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am using my this account from starting someone else have created account with my name Alluburam (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alluburam, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- DaxServer (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Allubram 2 is not my account this is made by someone else. do your action on him/her Thank you Alluburam (talk) 02:25, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an SPI clerk. I'm not sure whether you receive pings, so I'm also notifying you here: Could you please respond to my question at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alluburam? Thanks. Blablubbs|talk 12:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Alluburam. If User:Alluburam 2 is not your account, then you won't mind if we block it from Wikipedia? I have to observe that this comment by you seems to be an admission that the second account is yours. If you tell us what really happened, then the complaint might be closed with no action against you. EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes, that account belongs to someone else. Even I request you to block him or ask him/her to change theor name. Thanks. Alluburam (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alluburam. On Jul 10 you continued to revert at this article after being twice reported at WP:AN3 and once blocked about this specific article. The next time you make any revert on an article about Indian elections you are risking a block, unless you have obtained a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite partial block from 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election for the persistent addition of unsourced content. What is going on, Alluburam? You're making unsourced changes that are at odds with the official documentation at punjab.gov.in/districts-of-punjab, you offer no explanation. You don't engage anyone in discussion, instead, all you do is edit war. This is not an acceptable manner in which to conduct oneself. Communication is required. Any further such conduct will be met with sanctions of increasing severity. Thank you.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 02:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then Go to Hell 😜🤣🤣 Alluburam (talk) 03:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That nonsense response reveals to me that you're just not compatible with a collaborative project, so I now sitewide blocked you. If you wish to discuss that in a mature way, let me know. El_C 04:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
do you know he have deleyed many columns from result by constituency table what was the reason for that
I have made this page working very hard. That was me who added all the things like maps of districts result by region district etc even i have made columns for the parties to tell the people about dynasty politics paryy changers
know people like nahtrav came and started deleting things slowly. they are not only changing the name of constituencies but many things more
Now i came to know this is just a wastage of time on wikipedia. No need to unblock me
Congrates to Nahtrav who qre made to delete things but not add
Now i will never contribute to wikipedia. Congrates to your new users now they aree free to delete things
Thanks Alluburam (talk) 04:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alluburam, as I mention above, this is about your unexplained, unsourced changes to constituency names (diff), which your comment above does not address, and, which as far as I was able to see, were never explained. El_C 08:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
natrav have changed many things not only constituencies names so i had reverted the changes Alluburam (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't align, because the diff I provide above shows you made an edit specifically just for that — which is still unexplained, even now. El_C 13:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Alluburam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abohar Muncipal Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthiyur P. Selvaraj[edit]

Hello, Alluburam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthiyur P. Selvaraj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]