User talk:All Is One/Archive 2

King Vishal

Main article: King Vishal

Hi All Is One. I declined the speedy-delete for this article, but I have no knowledge of the subject's notability (though there is now a clear assertion of importance there). Feel free to take it to AfD if you think it appropriate. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your clarification. ~ All Is One ~ (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Abrams & Bettes: Beyond the Forecast

Main article: Abrams & Bettes: Beyond the Forecast

Why the unencyclopedic tag? What content might be considered unencyclopedic? Raymie Humbert (local radar | current conditions) 05:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello! I was concerned with youtube as the only reference. If you feel that it is appropriate, then go ahead and take the tag down. Take care. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 13:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

After further research, I will remove the tag. A Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard search for "youtube" reveals quite a few debates on this subject; however, since you (the creator of the article) are an established user, I see it as trustworthy. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Mimi's Cafe

Main article: Mimi's Cafe

You recently changed the location of the article on this chain (and all of the spellings in the article) to "Mimis", instead of "Mimi's". A quick look at the company's website indicates that this is not correct. While the apostrophe is missing from the logo, every instance of the word on the company's website has the apostrophe. Please revert your changes; I can take care of the redirect issue, but I'd rather have you revert your changes. Thank you. Horologium (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

It appears that you are correct; go ahead and change the redirect and I will correct the other articles. There seems to be some confusion with the company consistently spelling the name. Maybe they are trying to save money when producing the signs. All Is One (talk) 23:04, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I went ahead and moved the article and fixed the spelling. There shouldn't be problems with redirects; either you got them all, or there were none to begin with. Horologium (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your clarification on this article. I moved the name to "Mimis" back in January to play it safe. I was not 100 percent sure of the proper spelling of the name when I created the article with "Mimi's" in November since the company uses so many different spellings. I'll fix all of the redirects sometime. Take care! All Is One (talk) 01:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Completed improvements associated with the Mimi's Cafe article! All Is One (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hummelstown, Pennsylvania

Main article: Hummelstown, Pennsylvania

Thank you for your contributions to the Hummelstown page. Ever been there? The Rypcord. 04:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello! When you asked that question I had to think for a minute... but yes my wife and I drove through there on the way to Hershey a couple of years ago. I saw your note on the talk page at WikiProject Pennsylvania and wanted to contribute to the article. Have you ever been there? ~ All is One ~ (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I live in Hummelstown; which is the main reason I want to try and get the page to be 'top-of-the-line'. The Rypcord. 15:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Cool! I will add the article to my watchlist and improve it when I see something it needs. There is a really nice article on Swatara Creek; I came across it the other day when researching Pennsylvania streams. Maybe that article will also be of some interest to you. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

The biggest problem for the Hummelstown page right now is sources and such. Any sources you know of and could add in (I'm not very good at this) would be especially helpful. Thanks! The Rypcord. 09:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I will work on the references. So far, I just fixed the punctuation and spacing around the current references. Also, I placed cleanup and copyedit tags on the article to garner some attention from other editors and bots. Hopefully that will help get the article moving forward. Have you considered being adopted by an advanced editor? That may be a great way to learn Wikipedia at a deeper level, while expanding and improving your hometown article at the same time. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Whats 'adopted' mean? The Rypcord. 14:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

More information can be found at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. I have never participated, so I am not sure of the details. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I posted a list of useful links for Hummelstown in the Hummelstown discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hummelstown,_Pennsylvania . Perhaps these could help us reference/cite things in the article. The Rypcord. 20:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I just saw all of the websites that you posted on Talk:Hummelstown. Some of these look really promising; I am excited to get to work! It would be nice if we could get some book references as well. Thank you for making our job easier. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know any books off the top of my head. But perhaps a library search could yield some book titles that we could index/list. The Rypcord. 23:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I added a couple references. The "History" section ref. details the architectural demand for Hummelstown brownstone. You live in a really interesting place! ~ All is One ~ (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for making the Hummelstown page alot better. The Rypcord. 14:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I really enjoyed working with you on this, and will keep looking for references to add where appropriate. The red links are notable, especially the Indian Echo Caverns; a stub should be created as soon as possible. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

What could be put in the stub that wouldn't make it sound like a commercial ad? The Rypcord. 03:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Take a look at some examples at: List of caves in the United States. These articles appear to take a somewhat objective approach. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 12:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

St. Joseph High School

Main article: St. Joseph High School (Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania)

I apologize for not seeing your explanation as to your reversion (dated). However, dated information is not to be deleted from articles. Any referenced information is relevant information, and for this reason, sources are to be cited along with their publication date and retrieval date. Wikificationist (talk) 18:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Aside from the information being somewhat dated, I am also concerned with the reference's reliability. There are no authors listed. See: the reference. I am not opposed to statistics on the article; however, up-to-date data would be more helpful to readers. Also, if you can find a better reference, please provide one. I will not revert your edit, which reinserted the material, because it is a good faith edit. I do feel that this information may be a bit sensitive though, since it claims that there are all white students as of four years ago. This is the main reason why I initially undid your first edit as dated. I would just suggest that we handle the information with sensitivity, because the demographics may have changed since 2005. Most importantly, we wouldn't want to convey, even accidentally, that this is an all-white school. To summarize my requests: Up-to-date statistics entered into the info. box with a reliable reference; no demographics unless there is a reason to do so. The demographics would need to be comprehensive – at least as far back as the records go – and listed on a table. ~ All is One ~ (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. I suppose my shot at a demographic picture does imply that it is an all-white school. I missed that but it is indeed clear. I did not want to list the percentages, seeming silly to list a series of demographic categories all followed by 0%. Perhaps a table would be better. Also, all sources seem to point to this demographic profile, and lower numbers of students, leading me to believe that the source I cited initially is the most current one available. Other sources also are author-less, seeming to be review sites such as the one currently cited. Wikificationist (talk) 04:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

New Age

Main article: New Age

• Re your message (which i only discovered today): Hey there Terry! It is really nice to collaborate with you on New Age. I see that you are a member of WikiProject Astrology; could you add the New Age article to the project? I thought that might be helpful since there is no WikiProject New Age; although there probably should be. Take care! ~ All is One ~ (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't know how to add the WikiProject Astrology to New Age, but it may not be appropriate. All the other sites with the WikiProject Astrology status have as their primary focus astrology, which is not the case with New Age. I don't know what your level of knowledge of astrology is, but you may be amused to know that nearly every attribute associated with the New Age is a Pisces archetype. I am not the only astrologer that has noticed that the New Age movement has nearly 100% old Pisces age ideals. Pisces also rules deceit and delusion! 08:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hummelstown, Pennsylvania

Main article: Hummelstown, Pennsylvania

Any ideas on how to improve the page? Possibly more pictures? More in-depth sections? The Rypcord. 17:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

You could ask for some help and explore Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities for further ideas. I suggest expanding the "History" section. All is One (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

New Age addition

Main article: New Age

Hello!

I see you have been very active in making New Age article a great article. Would you mind looking at some of the articles written by a person in India. NOTE: SPAM LINK REMOVED HERE PER WIKIPEDIA FILTER. Specially his writing on simple living and incorporating them in the article?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.29.47 (talk) 09:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliments and offer, but editing on your behalf would place me in a position of a conflict of interest. I decline the request per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. All is One (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate that. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.21.95 (talk) 10:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)