User talk:Alienmercy

Welcome!

Hello, Alienmercy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -zappa.jak e (talk) 06:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Governor pictures[edit]

State government photos are not public domain; that's the problem. I've been tagging them as replaceable because it seems like most politicians will release photos under whatever terms necessary to get them on a high-profile site like Wikipedia. Barring that, they make frequent public appearances and could be easily photographed then. —Chowbok ☠ 00:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jimesch.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimesch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joba Chamberlain[edit]

Thanks for restoring Joba Chamberlain. I'm not sure why that happened. --Brewcrewer 18:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, I thought that I erased the section. Forget it. --Brewcrewer 18:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David-Hahn-Nebraska.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:David-Hahn-Nebraska.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Venditte[edit]

I was actually aware, but I thought it was left that as long as the citations were left in, the transition to the different form of inline citations was fine. My apologies if I misunderstood. --fuzzy510 (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Esch for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Esch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Esch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 16:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]