User talk:Alex Kinloch

Welcome!

Hello, Alex Kinloch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Olessi 23:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lionel Edward Sackville-West, 3rd Baron Sackville[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lionel Edward Sackville-West, 3rd Baron Sackville, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. W.marsh 20:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.

Your recent contributions[edit]

Hi! It appears you're filling some gaps in our coverage, which is great, but you need to make sure you have some sources, or people are going to be looking to delete your work. You may want to take a quick look at our policies on verifiability, on what constitutes reliable sources, and editing from an neutral point of view.

I'll be glad to help wherever possible. Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Duke of Monmouth (title) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tory seats[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tory seats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek ^Talk^|Contribs 15:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of descendants of the House of Este[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of descendants of the House of Este, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Nonnotable topic for list. Every European royal from about 1300 is a descendant as are millions of non-royals, and such a descent provides no greater distinction than being descended from the local tanner of Falaise (a descent shared by most of the same people).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Agricolae (talk) 01:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Baljaffray[edit]

I have nominated Baljaffray, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baljaffray. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. magnius (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Alex Kinloch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Granville Gordon, 13th Marquess of Huntly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Fiona FitzGerald, Duchess of Leinster - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Adrian Hope, 4th Marquess of Linlithgow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hans Hamilton, 4th Baron HolmPatrick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fiona FitzGerald, Duchess of Leinster[edit]

The article Fiona FitzGerald, Duchess of Leinster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, and notability is NOTINHERITED.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of British parliamentary constituencies held by the Conservative Party[edit]

The article List of British parliamentary constituencies held by the Conservative Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unacceptable POV fork. Material covered by other lists, article is written with bias, as well as being out of date

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zangar (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hay, 14th Marquess of Tweeddale (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]