User talk:Alex Charles Kent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion of Project Sanctuary[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Project Sanctuary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TNX-Man 16:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of EmoTrance[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, EmoTrance, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EmoTrance. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MastCell Talk 20:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of EmoTrance, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/emotrance.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Project Sanctuary, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Sanctuary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silvia Hartmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search brings up some hits for a novel she wrote in real time on the internet, but the coverage there is so light that this looks to be a case of WP:BIO1E. There are claims that she helped develop something that another person created, but there isn't much out there that lists her as a big pioneer of this field. Granted this is fringe science and is unlikely to get the big mainstream attention, but we need more than that to show that her contributions are notable enough to keep on that front.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silvia Hartmann for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silvia Hartmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvia Hartmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]