User talk:Aleventh

Ohlone[edit]

Aleventh, thank you for your time in making corrections to the aforementioned article. I note the corrections were useful and addition used a good style with nice citations.

However, the article is just about to be locked down. Meaning, we are about to disallow new edits to the article. This because we would like to correct many errors, some of which you found. The purpose of the lock down will be two fold. One to make corrections and fix footnote citations. Two, to allow all future additions to be subject to Wikipedia:guidelines. As such, there is a wide range of policy and concecus decisions.

We should all note your additions looked very valuable, but unfortunately they were removed. As such, we invite you to assist us in making additions and correction, as we lockdown the article. If you agree, please use the talkpage for the article. That page is linked here for convenience.

Welcome aboard, Wikipedia. --meatclerk 06:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ohlone Again[edit]

Aleventh,

I am sadden to have to revert (remove) all your changes. In as much as the might be helpful and corret, the article is now locked down'. I invite you again to use the talkpage. --meatclerk 00:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello New User[edit]

Hello, Aleventh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Goldenrowley 04:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ohlone Question[edit]

Hi Aleventh I liked your Ohlone additions to the article. I wonder if you can cite & verify the below parts of the article? They are not in any of my sources. Also I've asked the same thing on the article talk page: Etymology - "Indian Service reports and correspondences": correspondance might be "original research" (if not cited in a public source)? "The tribal term Ohlone during the 1960s was exclusively used in reference to the Mission San Jose/Verona Band of Alameda County Indians" -source for that? Thanks in advance ! Goldenrowley 00:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goldenrowley,

Sorry for the delay, I did not know that you inquired about the sources supporting the statement that "The tribal term Ohlone during the 1960s was exclusively used in reference to the Mission San Jose/Verona Band of Alameda County Indians" If it is not too late the sources include the approved 1928-32 and 1968-1971 BIA enrollment applications. There were three historic and previously federally recognized Costanoan tribes that still spoke their respective languages until the 1930's (Field Notes of John Peabody Harrington; Record Group 75 California, Kelsey Special Indian Agent listed the three historic tribal communities under his (BIA) federal jurisdiction (1905-06 Special Indian Census, 1910, 1913 Maps): The Verona Band of Alameda County, the San Juan Bautista Band and the Monterey Band of Monterey County. Only the Verona Band/Mission San Jose/Muwekma enrollees used the ethnonym Ohlone during the 1st and 3rd BIA enrollment periods. The other two tribes never heard of the term. On the death records of the Muwekma 1900-1925 all of the Muwekma were sent back to Mission San Jose to be buried at the Ohlone Cemetery, Indian Cemetery or Mission San Jose cemetery. On May 24, 1996 the Muwekma obtained a formal determination from the BIA of previous unambiguous Federal recognition as the historic Verona Band of Alameda County and that they were never terminated by any act of Congress.

Aleventh