User talk:Akiraneesama

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Akiraneesama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Cold calling. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 09:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial Engineering Body of Knowledge[edit]

Hi. I moved the article to Draft:Industrial Engineering Body of Knowledge, please feel free to work on it. Also, kindly read the Wikipedia:Your first article. Once you think the article is ready, then move to article space; or ask any experienced editor for help. If you have any questions or doubts, please feel free to ask me. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 09:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (December 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akiraneesama! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues at Draft:Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge[edit]

I have removed the material which is too close a paraphrase of the SEBoK materials. While the Guide is a wiki and states that its material is free to use in some circumstances, the license they use, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, is not compatible with WIkipedia's which allows commercial reuse. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge has been accepted[edit]

Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

StarryGrandma (talk) 17:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for your new article on Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Industrial Engineering Body of Knowledge[edit]

Hello, Akiraneesama. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Industrial Engineering Body of Knowledge.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unconventional title[edit]

Why did you move the article Government Procurement Reform Act to Government Procurement Reform Act (RA 9184)? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HueMan1: Sorry, I thought it might be easier to find or something.Akiraneesama (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HJ Mitchell. I noticed that you recently removed content from Construction without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the sectors. I planning on revising the entire sectors based on a reference book I had but I didn't have the time. I'm not rsally familoar in using the sandbox. The book separated environmental construction from industrial. Akiraneesama (talk) 10:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Construction management shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 19:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MrOllie. I'm trying to transclude a specific portion of the construction management page. Can you tell me why you don't like this? I don't think it affects the information in the page. Akiraneesama (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Building articles out of transcluded chunks of other articles should generally be avoided, outside of limited circumstances. Articles designed in that way are nearly impossible for new users to edit, and they will rapidly break things by innocently moving or removing include tags when editing the transcluded article. It will also not be apparent to them where to make changes when they attempt to edit the article which is transcluding content from elsewhere. All in all it is a bad idea. MrOllie (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for explainjng. I'm sorry about the trouble. Akiraneesama (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Breakdown of Construction Industry.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Breakdown of Construction Industry.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]