User talk:Aftaminas

December 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Liberal Initiative (Portugal). Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 03:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Liberal Initiative, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: "with its policy base described as combining economic liberalism with more progressive stances on cultural issues." is present on the page. You have been edit warring on the page since 2019, you should stop and take it to the talk page to discuss with other editors. Vacant0 (talk) 14:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very deeply concerned[edit]

Toca em relva bro TheRealDiogoFaro (talk) 15:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, corno Aftaminas (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mod estrangeiro "especial"[edit]

Vai ver o que aquele corno anda a fazer na página da IL. Vocês têm de deixar de ser mansos e permitir que a comunada adicione fontes bastante questionáveis para deturpar a imagem da IL. A estrangeirada come aquilo como se fosse verdade. O gajo está a destruir a página da IL, completamente passado dos cornos.2001:8A0:6A16:8301:5E9:CBFF:1927:7FF5 (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Liberal Initiative, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]