User talk:ABTHEBOSS

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ABTHEBOSS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tolly 4 bolly 03:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Erica Fernandes does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 13:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Television Academy Awards Best Actress Drama moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Indian Television Academy Awards Best Actress Drama, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Tamravidhir (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Imagine TV, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Tamravidhir (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Star Parivaar Awards, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 11:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Parivaar Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Asgar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMCRITICLIST[edit]

We don't have to add every award as per WP:FILMCRITICLIST Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability. Because of the proliferation of film festivals and "award mills", festival awards should be added with discretion, with inclusion subject to consensus. Awards bestowed by web-only entities are not included. --Sid95Q (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection[edit]

Hi Only Admins can protect or remove protection from pages. So if you want to protect a page either request an admin or request here Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Sid95Q (talk) 22:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention[edit]

You need to pay attention to your edits and stop mashing keys. Here you posted a page protection request in an area that was clearly delineated as a "Rolling archive". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please protect this page for few days? ITA Award for Best Serial - Popular ABTHEBOSS (talk) 16:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. Unless I'm missing something, there have only been two instances of disruptive editing in two days. Your claim of there being a "High level of IP vandalism" does not appear accurate whatsoever. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But I think this page should get a move protection. ABTHEBOSS (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1) Please start indenting your posts. Observe how other editors communicate and copy that behavior, please. 2) On what basis would a move protection be justified? So far, you've moved it more than anybody has.

CASSIOPEIA moved page Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular to Draft:Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular
ABTHEBOSS moved page Draft:Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular to Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular
ABTHEBOSS moved page Indian Television Academy Award for Best Show Popular to ITA Award for Best Show Popular
ABTHEBOSS moved page ITA Award for Best Show Popular to ITA Award for Best Serial - Popular

The problematic IP editor hasn't moved the page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correct name of this category is Best Serial - Popular. An user continuously moving this page without log in. So I have to move this page. ABTHEBOSS (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What other accounts have you had at Wikipedia?[edit]

What other accounts have you had at Wikipedia? I strongly advise you to be honest about this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyphoidbomb (talk), ABTHEBOSS is my permanent account name. My all social media account names are ABTHEBOSS. Even my Hindi and Assamese Wikipedia user names are ABTHEBOSS. My original nickname is AB. That's why I only want this username back. I don't want to create another account with another username. Speaking about SID505 I created that account from my cousin's email. I never edited from that account. I didn't had any other accounts before. I joined 2 years ago and only editing from this page. Please unblock me. If you know I'm a regular editor. I edited on Wikipedia because it's makes me happy. Can't imagine my life without Wikipedia these days. Please give me this account back! ABTHEBOSS (talk) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) And you can't deny the fact that I improved so many articles. Especially ITA awards. Because most of award winners out there were incorrect. Then I improved the page. Also created different pages for award categories along with reliable source. So please consider my contributions and please tell Bbb23 (talk) to unblock me... ABTHEBOSS (talk) 07:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a regular editor of Wikipedia. I never used abusive language in any Wikipedia page. I also contributing in few other languages. Wikipedia prefers quality over quantity. So I always careful about editing. I never add any important information without reliable source. I improved so many articles. If I make any mistakes then I will not repeat that mistake again. I still learning what Wikipedia really is. I'm trying to improve my editings. So please unblock me. Because editing became my daily routine. My day is impossible without editing on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is not necessary because I came to know that I have been block due to creating another account. I didn't even knew that editing from another account is illegal. I was not aware of many edit policies and guide lines of Wikipedia. So I apologize for my mistake. I will not repeat this again. Please accept my unblocking request since I am an active editor who improved several articles. Once I get unblock I will make useful contributions again.

Decline reason:

You surely aren't claiming that you needed a policy to know it was inappropriate to pretend to be another person, to provide support for your edits? Surely not. If that is your claim then you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Additionally, you need to address concerns around WP:UPE. Yamla (talk) 10:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Yamla (talk) 10:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC), I never say I edited from that account, I created that for sure. And you think I got paid for edit? Seriously? Who will paid me? I only editing because it gives me satisfaction. They accused me of adding SPA in an article from another account. But I'm the one who has been deleting SPA from actor's articles. I already told that I'm improving. Please watch my other edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABTHEBOSS (talk • contribs) [reply]

So now you are denying editing from the account? You realise the contribution log is public and shows the edits did indeed happen, right? --Yamla (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk) Edits indeed happened but that's not me edited. Please try to understand when I deleting SPA from other articles why I will add them again?

Your violations of WP:SOCK were established and are not in doubt. You are welcome to make another unblock request, but continuing with this claim will result in your unblock request being declined. --Yamla (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC) Please tell me how I could request properly? It will be big help. ABTHEBOSS (talk) 11:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAB explains how you can make a reasonable unblock request. Given that your sockpuppetry was established via technical and behavioural evidence, you'll need to stop claiming it wasn't you and address why you attempted to mislead us. You'll also want to specifically address concerns raised about WP:UPE. Simple denial will not work. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason of block: I was blocked due to violations of WP:SOCK. Explanation: I have been removing Star Parivaar Awards from various articles when I came to know that admins thinks this award is not notable. Then I saw Star Parivar award section in many list articles. Then I thought we can add awards on Wikimedia list articles. After that I submitted those awards through another account (Sid505) which was created a week's ago. It was my cousin's account and it was created by me. I thought I will delete these awards if I get any warning from admins. But they blocked me without giving me a warning. Why I should be unblocked: So after that I realize my mistake and will not continue to cause damage or disruption. I will edit from this account only. I don't have any other accounts. I also emailed Cyphoidbomb and Bbb23 but no response yet. So I request for unblock so I could make more useful contributions. I'm a daily editor. I created and expanded so many articles in past. So please consider all my previous contributions. I may not perfect editor but I learning and trying to improve my edits. Please either unblock me or give me a expiry date for few weeks. Please....

Decline reason:

I agree with the revocation of your ability to access this page. MER-C 12:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not endorse any unblock request until we get the entire story on your various accounts. You created the Sid505 account specifically to evade scrutiny and restore content that you had previously been told numerous times was not to be included. That is blatantly dishonest behaviour and deceit has no business in a community editing project. Now what is your relationship to Shankar 1382? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) Lol! First of all I don't even know who Shankar really is. I mean why you think that person is related to me? I have so much respect for you. You have been helping me a lot. But I am sorry I have no idea about account. ABTHEBOSS (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) And yes you guys told that SPA is not notable so I started to remove SPA from several pages but I saw Star Parivaar Award section in several Wikipedia list articles. So I thought we can add SPA in list articles. So please don't misunderstand me and please do something with my block. And believe it or not I have no connection with that Shankar account.

My original account is ABTHEBOSS and this is the only account I actually have. Even you can see my IG account abtheboss. I creat accounts in every site with AB THE BOSS username only. I created Sid505 for my cousin whose name is Siddharth. And I saw you accused me that I created a fake account but this was not even a fake account. I created this for him because he had no idea how to create an Wikipedia account. I never created a fake account in any other site. Come on man I am not that cheap. These kind of accusations really hurt me. And yes I admit it that I submitted those awards from my cousin's account because I just wanted to know if it's acceptable on list article or not. I know I made mistake. I should have asked an admin about this. So please forgive me and give my account back. I begging both Cyphoidbomb and Bbb23 to unblock me. This Block giving me such terrible feelings. I can't even tell you how I feel. I can't sleep properly until I get unblock.

ABTHEBOSS (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyphoidbomb, please response to this and unblock me. If you want to investigate then please do quickly. I just want to be free from all accusations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABTHEBOSS (talk • contribs) 04:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't work for you, and Wikipedia has no deadline. I won't do anything according to your request, especially when you still haven't learned to sign your posts, and you've subsequently deleted some significant admonishments without explanation or acknowledgment. The bulk of your edits thus far have been problematic for one reason or another, and it's clear that you've not only created another account to evade scrutiny and restore content you never should have added, it's also clear that you logged out to do so,[1][2] and I don't accept your denial of knowledge of Shankar 1382, because Bbb23, a CheckUser, has noted a clear technical connection between you and that user. So either your know them, or you are related to them, or you work for them, or you're using their computer, or something, but I have sufficient reason to think that you are not here to engage in good-faith editing, and you've proven that with your squirrely promotional editing with the Star Parivaar awards. Your explanation of that is pure garbage. You were told what that problems were and you resubmitted that content over and over again despite at least three notices with direct links to the relevant discussions.[3][4][5][6] Your argument about Amitabh Bachchan, is totally fabricated nonsense. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyphoidbomb, when I am talking to you respectfully, then you also talk with respect. Anyways Wikipedia says that users should not take these kind of allegations personally. So I'm not taking anything personaly. You're an admin so you should help other users. I'm not saying you're working for me. First of all I don't know who Shankar really is. My real name is Abinash and I only have one legitimate account. Please tell Bbb23 to contact me or tell me how to get over these allegation.

And I already told you that I thought wikimedia list articles have different rules. Because award list like this (List of accolades received by Kasautii Zindagii Kay) have SPA sections for ages ABTHEBOSS (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now concerned about WP:CIR issues. In these edits they deleted their unblock request, which had responses, so that they could refactor their argument, and I guess leave those preexisting responses lingering in nether space so nobody knew what those notes were in reference to? No idea what they are doing here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not deleting any unblock request. I just shifted to another section. What's wrong with that? I don't think I made any huge mistake to be block for indefinite time. I request to give me a expiry date for few weeks or for maybe 2 months. Also please response to my email.

AB (talk) 05:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"I request to give me a expiry date for few weeks or for maybe 2 months". I don't know how many times we have to tell you this isn't how it works. Apparently, always at least once more. On the basis of WP:IDHT and WP:CIR, I have revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27118 was submitted on Oct 13, 2019 18:15:38. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27130 was submitted on Oct 14, 2019 07:09:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27465 was submitted on Nov 05, 2019 04:07:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ABTHEBOSS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27475 was submitted on Nov 05, 2019 15:27:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of awards and nominations received by Divyanka Tripathi[edit]

Hello, ABTHEBOSS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of awards and nominations received by Divyanka Tripathi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ITA Award for Best Show Popular[edit]

Hello, ABTHEBOSS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ITA Award for Best Show Popular".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 31060[edit]

This user requests unblock on https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/31060. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 33902[edit]

User has requested unblock on https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/33902. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]