Jump to content

User talk:90.252.184.83

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It looks to me as if you are engaging in edit warring without engaging in serious discussion on the talk page. Are you trying to evade a ban? PatGallacher (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Gallagher, what you ought to understand is the fact that you may revert a valid edit with suitable references once after which using the talk page of the Wikipedia article should be necessary, however your vandalism by reverting literal facts is what you seem unable to comprehend. Use the talk page, my choice to reply or not is none of your concern, I will continue to revert your vandalism.
I notice that you did not reply to my allegation of ban evasion. PatGallacher (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
what relevance does that have when your main issue is your vandalism, stay within the limits or admins will be involved

I have now raised a sockpuppet investigation. PatGallacher (talk) 18:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Princess Marie of Romania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.