User talk:89.115.226.154

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (89.115.226.154) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

89.115.226.154 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What is the reason I have been blocked? I was making very straightforward formatting fixes, following the manual of style. 89.115.226.154 (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


You were blocked because you were banned from editing by the community. And socking from another two IPs already since this block doesn't exactly help your case. Number 57 23:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are the person who disruptively went through and undid all of my fixes to articles on Swiss referendums. Apparently you were so upset that I fixed up a lot of your mistakes that you've decided you must slander me. You've linked to a page that has nothing to do with me, and made unsubstantiated accusations of socking. What was it about me fixing your errors that enraged you so? 89.115.226.154 (talk) 23:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

89.115.226.154 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm asking what the reason for the block is. Is there one? If so, tell me what it is. If not, then lift the block. It is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia - you can see that from looking at the changes I made, which were formatting, grammar and spelling fixes.

Decline reason:

Looks like you've been very naughty. WP:LTA/BKFIP. I suppose you should return to your original account and request an appeal at WP:AN of your CBAN. DlohCierekim (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Talk page access revoked. History has shown that this LTA will continue to post unblock requests feigning ignorance until prevented from doing so.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]