User talk:71.125.62.208

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.125.62.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is too large and too long, also as I attempted to point out in the SPI I didn’t know about sockpuppetry, I tried to defend myself at SPI but its semi protected and I couldn’t even defend myself before being blocked. Also this is a train station for the LIRR in Hicksville, NY which connects two branches so there will be collateral for blocking, this range also includes the ShopRite of Plainview Centre. 71.125.62.208 (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Pretty small range that's blocked here, and you haven't addressed the block evasion. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.125.62.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its hard to respond to the evidence that was there and I can’t copy/paste, but the evidence is at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5 and the semi protected edit request from 12/18. That’s basically my unblock argument and sadly I don’t have time to copy/paste it (because again it’s a train station that I can’t linger at, also while typing this request I almost got hit by a train.) 71.125.62.208 (talk) 20:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are clearly Andrew5, and the rangeblock is not excessive given the substantial amount of block evasion over a considerable length of time. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.125.62.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuse me, who are you to tell me that I am andrew5? Can you see whoever is typing this right now? No? Didn’t think so. Millions of people utilize Hicksville station, the busiest station on Long Island east of Jamaica, as two important LIRR lines split here. And to tell me that I am clearly andrew5 is astoundingly ridiculously stupid. Have evidence or just don’t comment.71.125.62.208 (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.125.62.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mypoint is that you cannot tell who is editing, a large range is blocked for an extreme length of time and they involve public IPs, so the range should be unblocked.71.125.62.208 (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Obvious block evasion by an IP editor who has been repeatedly blocked, even if you're not the person tagged above. Despite what you may think, we're not obligated to repeatedly respond to your unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.125.62.208 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Really? I’m trying to contest my block and you revoke TPA? Yes there was socking but you blocked a huge range including a train terminal!! 71.125.62.208 (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Perhaps you should have more consideration for internet users in the train terminal by not evading your block and socking. TPA removed again. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2024[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.