User talk:60.242.186.241

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Emily Scott has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ritchie Neville, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 22:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emily Scott, you will be blocked from editing. Don't remove cited material without a reasonable explanation. Falcon8765 (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, 60.242.186.241. You have new messages at Alansohn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, 60.242.186.241, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages you bitch ing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Falcon8765 (talk) 00:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I understand your concerns, but the material in question is cited from a reliable source so it's tricky. Your best bet is to go to the article's talk page and state your reason why you think it should be removed/why you think the information isn't factual; if editors agree with you and a consensus is reached, the content will be reverted :). -Falcon8765 (talk) 00:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]