Jump to content

User talk:60.240.77.211

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Falcon 9[edit]

I'm not sure what you hangup on the Kestrel is, but if you go to the SpaceX web page, you will clearly see that the Falcon 9 uses a Merlin engine on its second state. Why do you keep making this change when the manufacturer's own site doesn't agree with you? --StuffOfInterest 21:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the same point: do you understand that -- regardless of what is true -- the Wikipedia article should only include material from "reliable sources"? What is the reliable source that supports the (rather obvious) notion that Kestrel is the better engine for the Falcon 9 second stage? (sdsds - talk) 09:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, please present your source showing that Kestrel is the second stage being used. I've provided my link, from the manufacturers own website. Time to put yours on the table or back away. --StuffOfInterest 11:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Academia, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gimme danger (talk) 15:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there

I left a note at Talk:Phenylmagnesium_bromide; perhaps you could take a look? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]