User talk:36.232.207.225

NTDTV

See the "Cultural Outreach" section of the NTDTV page. "China Uncensored" already been mentioned there, all these other mentions are just repeats of information and add nothing new.DPPTPP (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm Azkord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chinese Revolutionary Party without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Discuss on talk page before blanking and redirecting the page. Azkord (talk) 21:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:36.232.207.225 reported by User:DPPTPP (Result: ). Thank you. DPPTPP (talk) 22:49, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Your recent editing history at List of Chinese scientists shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

36.232.207.225 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not 205.173.47.252 , why do I have to bear the crimes committed by 205.173.47.252 , the crime of a sock puppet.From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Possible_IP_abuser_-_DPPTPP, we can know that DPPTPP is 205.173.47.252. Why should I be treated as 205.173.47.252? Just because I am not registered? The evidence I found clearly indicates that 205.173.47.252 is DPPTPP. 36.232.207.225 (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - block has expired. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 11:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If I am not mistaken, the reason I am blocked is because I am treated as 205.173.47.252. 10:18, 13 December 2018 Callanecc (talk | contribs) blocked 36.232.207.225 (talk) with an expiration time of 48 hours (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Block evasion (see User:205.173.47.252 among others))

But in fact, DPPTPP should be 205.173.47.252. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Possible_IP_abuser_-_DPPTPP What is the situation? Can someone explain to me? Callanecc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Bbb23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Ponyo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---