User talk:2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Misuse of Spam whitelisting board[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verify Truth: List Of Music Composers By Name (Edit) [Add Name: Verify Truth][edit]

Editor Won't Allow Post Of Direct Links Of Only Reference To Source Material Due To Blacklist Protocol, Error. 2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 21:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valid Concern[edit]

This Is A Valid Concern And A Reasonable Request. 2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about youtu.be, we don't allow the use of URL shortners. Normal youtube.com links can be used when appropriate. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posting nonsense on my page[edit]

Stop icon Please stop posting on my talk page. I've already explained why that link is blacklisted, and more importantly, Wikipedia is not a vehicle to promote yourself. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 23:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Verify Truth[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Verify Truth = Entry Of Relevant Evidence And Source Materials Mistakenly Barred In Error2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Don't capitalise the first letter of every word, please; it's obnoxious and makes it hard to read what you write. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Verify Truth 3[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Are My Questions And Concerns Being Posted For Review? I Only Ask Because They Are Not Openly Appearing On The Talk Page. 2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. Opening multiple requests will not speed up the process in any way. SQLQuery Me! 19:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Verify Truth 4[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Privately And Confidentially, I Have A Rare Form Of Dyslexia, Which Is One Of The Reason That I Write Like This. Please Review The Conversations And Reciprications Leading To The Application And Sustaining Of This Unreasonable And Unnecessary Block.

Seeking Edit Of [Add Name: Verify Truth] To [List Of Composers By Name] With Only Available Source Documentation As Follows:

  • Valid And Viable Entry Of Cultural And Historical Artifacts Of Value And Significance To The Musical Discussion.

-Example 1 (Seeking Verification) 'The 'New Tune' Album' Performed Live On An Ear-Tuned 5 String Acoustic Guitar By: Verify Truth [Redacted Links]

-Example 2 (Seeking Verification) 'The 'Common Chords' Album' Performed Live On An Ear-Tuned 5 String Acoustic Guitar By: Verify Truth

'The BeetleBug Sonata' [Redacted Links]

    • Thank You For Your Help And Consideration.

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please stop opening new unblock requests while you still have open requests on this page. If you wish to make a comment, you may do so without using the {{unblock}} formatting.

Continuing to do so will not speed this process up in any way. SQLQuery Me! 20:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Verify Truth [Source Documentation][edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Seeking Verification: Only Publicly Available Source Documentation Of Original Work. [Examples 1] youtu. be /BZ94HYBNjCQ youtu. be /5pNIRI_fWDY youtu. be /RrCqGh07b-Q youtu. be /e3NP48pZTME youtu. be /Hbc7Fvcf8EI youtu. be /TE8Cfoes9Ag youtu. be /WIJ1-3Dggw8 youtu. be /IjHlO0z4fK0 youtu. be /0NpdozUe67Q

[Examples 2] [youtu. be /Adq7DRY1wm4]

youtu. be /ZtCXhUOVcjg youtu .be /wt6qbdP2kx4 youtu .be /VmlsGLoc7gA youtu .be /UqgxYKW4Y2o youtu .be /ebEJ-fdOH6M youtu .be /e2s84Eac0Os youtu .be /V6v5T3Vhyjc youtu. be /I-qVrXFtjA4 youtu. be /W6nrcaty7OQ youtu. be /Adq7DRY1wm4

  • Thank You Again For Your Time And Considerations.

2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. 331dot (talk) 20:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Verify Truth [Sincere Request For Detailed Review][edit]

Question for administrator[edit]

<Requesting Reasonable Review Of Source Documentation And Prior Correspondence For Potential Entry Of Cultural Value And Significance To The Musical Discussion>

--2600:8807:C40:1D00:D99C:3B31:22B9:1223 (talk) 20:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have an open unblock request. No need to use the admin-help template. In fact, it's abusive of you to do so. A new admin will be along eventually to review your request. I also see you continue capitalising the first letter of every word, even after you've been told not to. This will count against you in your unblock request. If you are not capable of communicating properly, whatever the reason, I'm afraid WP:CIR would apply. --Yamla (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to fully understand what you write, but the following facts seem clear. You are here to use Wikipedia to publicise something, apparently some music. You don't seem to grasp the fact that doing so is contrary to Wikipedia's policy against promotional editing. You have posted several unblock requests, none of which has given any indication that you understand the reason for the block, and they give every impression that you wish to be unblocked so that you can continue to do the things which led to the block. No administrator is ever going to unblock you in that situation, so such unblock requests achieve nothing apart from wasting people's time which could have been employed more fruitfully on more constructive tasks. You are free to post another unblock request which actually addresses the reason for the block, but if you post more of the kind of thing you have posted so far then your talk page access is likely to be removed to prevent more time-wasting, and very likely the length of the block will be increased too. JBW (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]